Abstract
The paper deals with the philosophy of science and technology from a new perspective. The analysis connects closely to the novel approach to scientific research called practical realism of the late Estonian philosopher of science and chemistry Rein Vihalemm. From his perspective, science is not only theoretical but even more clearly a practical activity. This kind of practice-based approach puts chemistry rather than physics into the position of the most typical science as chemistry has a dual character resting on both constructive-hypothetico-deductive (ϕ-science) and classifying-historico-descriptive (non-ϕ-science) types of cognition. Chemists deal with finding out the laws of nature just like the physicists do. However, in addition to this chemistry deals with substances or stuff that is rather an activity typical to natural history. The analysis of the dual character of chemistry brings forward the need to analyse philosophically also the reasons why physics has held the position of the model science so far. The problem unfolds in the context of practical realism. However, some earlier observations concerning the dual character of chemistry influenced us as well, i.e. by Friedrich Paneth, Michael Polanyi and Edward Caldin. More recently, Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and Jonathan Simon have given their own explanation of why and how chemistry has a dual character. From their perspective, chemistry is a perfect technical science as it aims at applications, literally at producing something new. Bensaude-Vincent and Simon call their approach operational realism. The latter, however, does not differ from practical realism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bensaude-Vincent, B., Simon, J.: Chemistry—The Impure Science. Imperial College Press, London (2008)
Caldin, E.: The structure of chemistry in relation to the philosophy of science. Hyle 8(2), 103–121 (2002)
Cartwright, N.: How the Laws of Physics Lie. Clarendon, Oxford (1983)
Hacking, I.: Representing and Intervening; Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Lõhkivi, E., Vihalemm, R.: Guest editorial. Philosophy of science and practical realism. Stud. Philos. Est. 5(2), 1–6 (2012)
Marx, K.: Theses on Feuerbach. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm. Accessed 17 Mar 2019 (1845)
Mets, A.: A philosophical critique of the distinction of representational and pragmatic measurements on the example of the periodic system of chemical elements. Found. Sci. 24, 73–93 (2019)
Mumford, L.: The Myth of the Machine. The Pentagon of Power. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York (1970)
Müürsepp, P.: Chemistry as an independent science. Stud. Philos. (IV) 40, 131–138 (2004)
Müürsepp, P.: The changing role of scientific experiment. Stud. Philos. Est. 5(2), 152–166 (2012)
Müürsepp, P.: Chemistry as a practical science (Edward Caldin revisited). Found. Chem. 18(3), 213–223 (2016)
Näpinen, L., Müürsepp, P.: The concept of chaos in contemporary science: on Jean Bricmont’s critique of Ilya Prigogine’s ideas. Found. Sci. 7, 465–479 (2002)
Niiniluoto, I.: Truthlikeness. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1987)
Niiniluoto, I.: The emergence of scientific specialties: six models. Poznań Stud. Philos. Sci. Humanit. 44, 211–223 (1995)
Paneth, F.: The epistemological status of the chemical concept of element. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 13, 1–14 (1962) (pp. 144–160)
Pihlstrõm, S.: How (not) to write the history of pragmatist philosophy of science? Perspect. Sci. 16(1), 26–69 (2008)
Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Routledge, London (2005)
Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue With Nature. Flamingo (1984)
Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and New Laws of Nature. Free Press, New York (1997)
Rouse, J.: Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Cornell, University Press, Ithaca (1987)
Ruthenberg, K.: Friedrich Adolf Paneth (1887–1958). HYLE Int. J. Philos. Chem. 3, 103–106 (1997)
Sharp, K., Matschinsky, F.: Translation of Ludwig Boltzmann’s Paper “On the Relationship between the second fundamental theorem of the mechanical theory of heat and probability calculations regarding the conditions for thermal equilibrium” Sitzungberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissen Classe. Abt. II, LXXVI 1877, pp. 373–435 (Wien. Ber. 1877, 76:373–435). Reprinted in Wiss. Abhandlungen, Vol. II, reprint 42, pp. 164–223, Barth, Leipzig, 1909. Entropy 17, 1971–2009 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/e17041971. http://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy. Accessed 11 Mar 2019
Stepin, V.: Theoretical Knowledge. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Vihalemm, R.: Can chemistry be handled as its own type of science? Ars mutandi: Issues in Philosophy and History of Chemistry, Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, pp. 83–88 (1999)
Vihalemm, R.: Chemistry as an interesting subject for the philosophy of science. Estonian studies in the history and philosophy of science. In: Vihalemm, R. (ed.) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 219, pp. 185–200. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)
Vihalemm, R.: Are laws of nature and scientific theories peculiar in chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev’s discovery. Found. Chem. 5(1), 7–22 (2003a)
Vihalemm, R.: Is chemistry a physical science, a physics-like science or its own type of science? Volume of abstracts. In: 12th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 348–349. Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo (2003b)
Vihalemm, R.: The problem of the unity of science and chemistry. In: Sobczynska, D., Zeidler, P., Zielonacka-Lis, E. (eds.) Chemistry in the Philosophical Melting Pot, pp. 39–58. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt-am-Main (2004)
Vihalemm, R.: Chemistry and a theoretical model of science: on the occasion of a recent debate with the Christies. Found. Chem. 7(2), 171–182 (2005)
Vihalemm, R.: Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science. Found. Sci. 12(3), 223–234 (2007a)
Vihalemm, R.: A. Whitehead’s metaphysical ontology and I. Prigogine’s scientific ontology: from a point of view of a theoretical conception of science. Problemos 71, 78–90 (2007b)
Vihalemm, R.: The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems. Found. Chem. 13(2), 97–107 (2011a)
Vihalemm, R.: Towards a practical realist philosophy of science. Balt. J. Eur. Stud. 1(1), 46–60 (2011b)
Vihalemm, R.: Practical realism: against standard scientific realism and antirealism. Stud. Philos. Est. 5(2), 7–22 (2012)
Vihalemm, R.: What is a scientific concept? Some considerations concerning chemistry in practical realist philosophy of science. In: Llored, J.-P. (ed.) The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies and Concepts, pp. 364–384. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2013)
Vihalemm, R.: Philosophy of chemistry against standard scientific realism and anti-realism. Philos. Sci. 19(1), 99–113 (2015)
Vihalemm, R.: Science, φ-science, and the dual character of chemistry. In: Scerri, E., Fisher, G. (eds.) Essays in the Philosophy of Chemistry, pp. 352–380. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müürsepp, P., Nurysheva, G., Ramazanova, A. et al. Chemistry as the basic science. Found Chem 23, 69–83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09357-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09357-5