Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the gall fly, Urophora stylata, on the pasture weed, Cirsium vulgare, in New Zealand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gall fly, Urophora stylata F. (Diptera: Tephritidae), was released in New Zealand in 1998 as a biocontrol agent against the thistle weed, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore. A survey of 20 randomly selected pasture populations of C. vulgare was conducted to assess the impact of the gall fly on seed production. Attack by the biocontrol agent reduced the number of seeds per seedhead by 47%, individual seed weight by 21%, and seed germination rate by 30%. Where the biocontrol agent was present, population seed reduction ranged from 11 to 61%. The impact of the gall fly significantly increased from southern to more northern latitudes of C. vulgare populations in New Zealand. This study represents the first post-release assessment of this biocontrol agent and indicates that U. stylata can have a significant impact on the seed production of C. vulgare, especially in northern New Zealand where seedhead attack is greatest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blossey B (2016) Measuring and evaluating ecological outcomes of biological control introductions. In: van Driesche RG, Simberloff D, Blossey B, Causton C, Hoddle M, Wagner DL, Marks CO, Heinz KM, Warner KD (eds) Integrating biological control into conservation practice. Wiley, New York, pp 161–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdôt G, Cripps MG (2018) Biological weed control in temperate grasslands. In: Marshall A, Collins R (eds) Improving grassland and pasture management in temperate agriculture. Burleigh Dodds, Cambridge, pp 283–324

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdôt GW, Kelly D (1986) Density and cover estimates of some non-palatable herbaceous pasture weeds. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand plant protection society, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 251–256

  • Cullen J, Sheppard AW (2012) Carduus nutans L.–nodding thistle. In: Julien M, McFadyen R, Cullen J (eds) Biological control of weeds in Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 118–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs MP, Cavers P (2000) Effects of wetting and drying on seed germination and seedling emergence of bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. Can J Bot 78:1545–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F, Randall JM (1994) Biology of bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore. Rev Weed Sci 6:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SV, Gourlay AH, Hill R (2016) Biological control of ragwort in the New Zealand dairy sector: an ex-post economic analysis. N Z J Agric Res 59:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenteman R, Kelly D, Fowler SV, Bourdôt G (2008) Which species of thistle biocontrol agent trichosirocalus are present in New Zealand? In: Julien M, Sforza R, Bon MC, Evans HC, Hatcher PE, Hinz HL, Rector BG (eds) Proceedings of the XII international symposium on biological control of weeds, CABI, La Grande Motte, France, pp 145–149

  • Groenteman R, Kelly D, Fowler SV, Bourdôt GW (2011) Abundance, phenology and impact of biocontrol agents on nodding thistle (Carduus nutans) in Canterbury 35 years into a biocontrol programme. N Z J Agric Res 54:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P (1980) Effects of Urophora affinis Frfld. and U. quadrifasciata (Meig.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Centaurea diffusa Lam. and C. maculosa Lam. (Compositae). Z für Angew Entomol 90:190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P (1997) Monitoring and impact of weed biological control agents. In: Andow DA, Ragsdale DW, Nyvall RF (eds) Ecological interactions and biological control. Westview Press, New York, pp 215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Shorthouse JS (1996) Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control. Can Entomol 128:1021–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Wilkinson A (1984) Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten., bull thistle (Compositae). In: Kelleher J, Hulme M (eds) Biological programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London, pp 147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley MJ (1983) Effect of Scotch thistles on sheep growth rates. In: Proceedings of the NZ weed and pest control conference, vol 36, pp 86–88

  • Hayes L (2001) Gall flies are go! Weed biocontrol newsletter, issue 18. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes L (2007) The biocontrol of weeds book: a New Zealand guide. ISBN 0-478-09306-3. Manaaki whenua press, Lincoln. https://www.Landcareresearch.Co.Nz/publications/books/biocontrol-of-weeds-book. Accessed 11 Nov 2019

  • Hayes L (2015) The biological control of weeds book: a New Zealand guide. ISBN 0-478-09306-3. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/books/biocontrol-of-weeds-book. Accessed 11 Nov 2019

  • Hayes L, Fowler SV, Paynter Q, Groenteman R, Peterson P, Dodd S, Bellgard S (2013) Biocontrol of weeds: achievements to date and future outlook. In: Dymond JR (ed) Ecosystem services in New Zealand—conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, pp 375–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz HL, Winston RL, Schwarzländer M (2020) A global review of target impact and direct nontarget effects of classical weed biological control. Curr Opin Insect Sci 38:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D, Popay AI (1985) Pasture production lost to unsprayed thistles at two sites. In: Proceedings of the NZ weed and pest control conference, vol 38, pp 115–118

  • Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ (1993) Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. J Ecol 81:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis H (1986) Competition of Urophora stylata F. and Terellia serratulae L. (Dipt, Tephritidae) in the flowerheads of Cirsium vulgare. In: Mangel M, Carey JR, Plant RE (eds) Pest control: operations and systems analysis in fruit fly management. NATO ASI series (series G: ecological sciences), vol 11. Springer, Berlin, pp 191–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michaux B (1989) Reproductive and vegetative biology of Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. (Compositae: Cynareae). N Z J Bot 27:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin L, Reid AM, Sims-Chilton NM, Buckley YM, Dhileepan K, Hastwell GT, Nordblom TL, Raghu S (2009) Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents. Biol Control 51:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paynter Q, Fowler SV, Groenteman R (2018) Making weed biological control predictable, safer and more effective: Perspectives from New Zealand. BioControl 63:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popay I, Champion P, James T (2010) An illustrated guide to common weeds of New Zealand, vol 3. New Zealand Plant Protection Society, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern M (1968) The natural history of spear thistle-heads. Field Stud 2:669–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern M, Cameron R (1989) Density and survival of Urophora stylata (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Cirsium vulgare (Compositae) in relation to flower head and gall size. In: Delfosse E (ed) Proceedings of the VII international symposium on biological control of weeds, Rome, Italy, 1st Sper Patol Veg (MAF), pp 203–210

  • Sagliocco J-L, Kwong RM, Morley T (2012) Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore – spear thistle. In: Julien M, McFadyen R, Cullen J (eds) Biological control of weeds in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2015) SAS version 9.4. Cary, NC, USA. https://www.sas.com. Accessed 11 Nov 2019

  • Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Winston RL, Day MD (2018) Biological control of weeds: an analysis of introductions, rates of establishment and estimates of success, worldwide. BioControl 63:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story JM, Smith L, Corn JG, White LJ (2008) Influence of seed head–attacking biological control agents on spotted knapweed reproductive potential in western Montana over a 30-year period. Environ Entomol 37:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suckling DM (2013) Benefits from biological control of weeds in New Zealand range from negligible to massive: a retrospective analysis. Biol Control 66:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson GM (1922) The naturalisation of animals and plants in New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge library collection—zoology

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Carruthers RI, Center T, Hoddle MS, Hough-Goldstein J, Morin L, Smith L, Wagner DL, Blossey B, Brancatini V, Casagrande R, Causton CE, Coetzee JA, Cuda J, Ding J, Fowler SV, Frank JH, Fuester R, Goolsby J, Grodowitz M, Heard TA, Hill MP, Hoffmann JH, Huber J, Julien M, Kairo MTK, Kenis M, Mason P, Medal J, Messing R, Miller R, Moore A, Neuenschwander P, Newman R, Norambuena H, Palmer WA, Pemberton R, Perez Panduro A, Pratt PD, Rayamajhi M, Salom S, Sands D, Schooler S, Schwarzländer M, Sheppard A, Shaw R, Tipping PW, van Klinken RD (2010) Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems. Biol Control 54:S2–S33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CJ, Sykes WR, Garnock-Jones PJ (1988) Flora of New Zealand naturalised pteridophytes, gymnosperms, dicotyledons, vol 4. DSIR, Botany Division, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston R, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Day M, Cock M, Julien M (2014) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds, 5th edn. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HG (1991) Biological control of spear thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Asteraceae), in South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 37:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer H, Harris P (1984) Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Fröl.) (Col, Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. J Appl Entomol 97:36–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Chris Hunt (AgResearch) for assistance with the random selection of survey locations. We thank Sarah O’Connell, Laura Gray, Alison Whiteford, and Maria Shanks (beef + lamb New Zealand farm extension managers) for contacting farmers to survey the selected thistle populations. We thank Jennifer Agaldo for assistance with seedhead dissections and Benjamin Kaltenbach for assistance with the seed germination tests. We thank Dan Dash (Lincoln University) for assistance with the C. vulgare monitoring site. We thank Shona Lamoureaux for assistance creating the map of New Zealand. This study was funded by the AgResearch Strategic Science Investment Fund through the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation, and Employment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Cripps.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals other than those detailed for the insects.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants named in the study.

Additional information

Handling Editor: S. Raghu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cripps, M., Navukula, J., Casonato, S. et al. Impact of the gall fly, Urophora stylata, on the pasture weed, Cirsium vulgare, in New Zealand. BioControl 65, 501–513 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-020-10007-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-020-10007-0

Keywords

Navigation