Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farm-scale carbon and nitrogen fluxes in pastoral dairy production systems using different nitrogen fertilizer regimes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rate (kg ha−1 year−1) in pastoral dairy systems affects the flow of N through the soil, plant and animal pools of the system. With better understanding of the magnitude of these pools and their fluxes, dairy systems could be managed to improve N use efficiency, therefore reducing losses to the environment. A study with three levels of N fertilizer, 0 (N0), 150 (N150) and 300 (N300) kg N ha−1 year−1, was conducted in the Canterbury region of New Zealand from 1 June 2017 till 31 May 2018. Farm measurements, e.g. pasture and milk production, were used to calibrate three different farm-scale models, DairyNZ’s Whole Farm Model, DairyMod, and Overseer®. The models were used to extrapolate periodic farm measurements to predictions of carbon (C) and N pools and fluxes on an annual basis. Pasture and milk production per hectare increased from N0 to N300 by 70 and 58%, respectively. There was a concomitant increase in farm-gate N surplus (input–output) of 43%, resulting in predicted increases in N leaching and greenhouse gas emissions of 72 and 67%, respectively. By increasing N fertilizer from 0 to 300 kg N ha−1 year−1, 53% more feed N flowed through the dairy herd with surplus N deposited as urinary N increasing by 49%. Plant uptake and soil immobilization increased by 58 and 343%, respectively, but not enough to avoid substantial increases in leaching and emission losses. Carbon flux through the soil system increased through increased litter and faecal deposition, but with very little C sequestration because of accelerated microbial respiration rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht WA (1938) Variable levels of biological activity in sanborn field after fifty years of treatment. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 3:77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beukes PC, Palliser CC, Macdonald KA, Lancaster JAS, Levy G, Thorrold BS, Wastney ME (2008) Evaluation of a whole-farm model for pasture-based dairy systems. J Dairy Sci 91:2353–2360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beukes PC, Romera AJ, Gregorini P, Clark DA, Chapman DF (2011) Using a whole farm model linked to the APSIM suite to predict production, profit and N leaching for next generation dairy systems in the Canterbury region of New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 19th international congress on modelling and simulation, Perth, Australia, 12–16 December 2011. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2011. Accessed 17 Aug 2019

  • Beukes PC, Scarsbrook MR, Gregorini P, Romera AJ, Clark DA, Catto W (2012) The relationship between milk production and farm-gate nitrogen surplus for the Waikato region, New Zealand. J Environ Manag 93:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KC, Smith NP, McLay CDA, Fraser PM, McPherson RJ, Harrison DF, Harbottle P (1992) Lysimeters without edge-flow: an improved design and sampling procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1625–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JM (2013) Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Ann Appl Biol 162:145–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman D, Parsons AJ (2017) Doing more for the environment with lower inputs in pasture-based livestock systems: does this always lead to lower outputs? In: O’Leary GJ, Armstrong RD, Hafner L (eds) Doing more with less. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australian society of agronomy conference, 24–28 September 2017, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia. http://www.agronomyaustraliaproceedings.org/. Accessed 17 Aug 2019

  • Clark DA (1997) How much nitrogen is enough? In: Proceedings of the Ruakura farmers’ conference vol 49, pp 92–99

  • DairyNZ (2017) Facts and figures for New Zealand dairy farmers, 2nd edn. https://www.dairynz.co.nz/publications/dairy-industry/facts-and-figures. Accessed 17 Aug 2019

  • de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM, Ledgard SF, Shepherd M (2010) A system’s perspective on the effectiveness of measures to mitigate the environmental impacts of nitrogen losses from pastoral dairy farming. In: Edwards GR, Bryant RH (eds) Meeting the challenges for pasture-based dairying. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian dairy science symposium, 31 August–2 September 2010, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 14–28

  • de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM, Alfaro A, Gourley CJP, Oenema O, Powell JM (2017) Nitrogen performance indicators for dairy production systems. Soil Res 55:479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di HJ, Cameron KC (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field TRO, Ball PR (1981) Nitrogen balance in an intensively utilised dairy farm system. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 43:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis SC, Scholefield D, Pain B (1995) Nitrogen cycling in grazing systems. In: Bacon PE (ed) Nitrogen fertilisation in the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 381–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson IR, Chapman DF, Snow VO, Eckard RJ, Parsons AJ, Lambert MG, Cullen BR (2008) DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture simulation models for Australia and New Zealand. Aust J Exp Agric 48:621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SA, Mulvaney RL, Ellsworth TR, Boast CW (2007) The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 36:1821–1832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard SF, Penno JW, Sprosen MS (1997) Nitrogen balances and losses on intensive dairy farms. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 59:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard SF, Penno JW, Sprosen MS (1999) Nitrogen inputs and losses from clover/grass pastures grazed by dairy cows, as affected by nitrogen fertiliser application. J Agric Sci 132:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livestock Improvement Corporation Limited, DairyNZ Limited (2017) New Zealand dairy statistics 2016–17. www.lic.co.nz or www.dairynz.co.nz. Accessed 17 Aug 2019

  • Mulvaney RL, Khan SA, Ellsworth TR (2009) Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. J Environ Qual 38:2295–2314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL, Stevenson BA, Ross C, Fraser S (2014) Changes in pH, bicarbonate-extractable-P, carbon and nitrogen in soils under pasture over 7 to 27 years. NZ J Agric Res 57:216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Thornley JHM, Newton PCD, Rasmussen S, Rowarth JS (2013) Soil carbon dynamics: the effects of nitrogen input, intake demand and off-take by animals. Sci Total Environ 465:205–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Thornley JHM, Rasmussen S, Rowarth JS (2016) Some clarification of the impacts of grassland intensification on food production, nitrogen release, greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration: using the example of New Zealand. CAB reviews 11, no. 054. http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews © CAB International 2016. Online ISSN 1749-8848

  • Pinxterhuis JB, Edwards JP (2018) Comparing nitrogen management on dairy farms: Canterbury case studies. J NZ Grassl 80:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell AE, Cambardella CA, Laird DA, Jaynes DB, Meek DW (2009) Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soil carbon balances in Midwestern U.S. agricultural systems. Ecol Appl 19:1102–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Parfitt RL, Fraser S, Littler RA, Baisden WT, Ross C (2014) Soil order and grazing management effects on changes in soil C and N in New Zealand pastures. Agr Ecosyst Environ 184:67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soussana J-F, Lemaire G (2014) Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin SA, Condron LM, Gerard E, Dignam BEA, Black A, O’Callaghan M (2017) Long-term P fertilisation of pasture soil did not increase soil organic matter stocks but increased microbial biomass and activity. Biol Fertil Soils 53:511–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DM, Ledgard SF, de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM, Carey PL, McDowell RW, Johns KL (2003) OVERSEER®: moving towards on-farm resource accounting. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 65:191–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead DC (1995) Grassland nitrogen. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Vivanco JM, Manter DK (2016) Nitrogen fertilizer rate affects root exudation, the rhizosphere microbiome and nitrogen-use-efficiency of maize. Appl Soil Ecol 107:324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Challenge—Our Land and Water: Innovative Agricultural Microbiomes Project Number A24085. We are grateful to Charissa Thomas and the farm staff for conducting the trial at ADRDS and to Trevor Hendy for conducting the lysimeter study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre C. Beukes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beukes, P.C., Gregorini, P., Cameron, K. et al. Farm-scale carbon and nitrogen fluxes in pastoral dairy production systems using different nitrogen fertilizer regimes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 117, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10052-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10052-2

Keywords

Navigation