Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preparing for a changing future in recreational fisheries: 100 research questions for global consideration emerging from a horizon scan

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recreational fisheries hold immense ecological, social, and economic value. The management of these fisheries is increasingly important as we move forward in the Anthropocene. Recreational fisheries managers face several challenges as fisheries often involve diverse social and ecological systems comprised of complex feedback and stakeholder motivations and needs. Here, we used a horizon scanning exercise to yield 100 research questions related to recreational fisheries science and management in the Anthropocene. Initial research questions (n = 205) were collected from recreational fisheries experts (i.e., stakeholders, managers, researchers) from various sectors (i.e., industry, government, NGOs) and geographic locations (14 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA). These questions were subsequently categorized, thematized, and refined by our authorship team, eventually yielding what we considered to be the top 100 research questions of relevance to management of recreational fisheries. The key themes include: human dimensions; bioeconomics; resource monitoring and data acquisition; governance; management—regulatory actions; management—stock and habitat enhancement; catch-and-release; impacts of recreational fisheries on populations, communities and ecosystems; threats and sustainability; and angler outreach, education and engagement. It is our intention that this comprehensive and forward-looking list will create a framework to guide future research within this field, and contribute to evidence-based recreational fisheries management and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott JK, Lloyd-Smith P, Willard D, Adamowicz W (2018) Status-quo management of marine recreational fisheries undermines angler welfare. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(36):8948–8953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allen MS, Pine WE III (2000) Detecting fish population responses to a minimum length limit: effects of variable recruitment and duration of evaluation. North Am J Fish Manag 20(3):672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LG (1983) The demand curve for recreational fishing with an application to stock enhancement activities. Land Econ 59(3):279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R (2006) Overcoming human obstacles to conservation of recreational fishery resources, with emphasis on central Europe. Environ Conserv 33(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ (2009) Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance, conservation issues and management challenges. In: Dickson JH, Adams B (eds) Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: science and practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 39–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Mehner T (2005) Determinants of management preferences of recreational anglers in Germany: habitat management versus fish stocking. Limnologica 35(1–2):2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Lyman J, Policansky D, Schwab A, Suski C, Sutton SG, Thorstad EB (2007) Understanding the complexity of catch-and-release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev Fish Sci 15(1–2):75–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Schwab A, Riepe C, Teel T (2012) A primer on anti-angling philosophy and its relevance for recreational fisheries in urbanized societies. Fisheries 37(4):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Potts W (2013) Towards resilient recreational fisheries on a global scale through improved understanding of fish and fisher behaviour. Fish Manag Ecol 20(2–3):91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Beardmore B, Riepe C, Meyerhoff J, Pagel T (2014) Species-specific preferences of German recreational anglers for freshwater fishing experiences, with emphasis on the intrinsic utilities of fish stocking and wild fishes. J Fish Biol 85(6):1843–1867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Tillner R, Bork M (2015) Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialised countries. Fish Manag Ecol 22(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Lorenzen K, Johnson BM, Cooke SJ, Cowx IG (2016) Management of freshwater fisheries: addressing habitat, people and fishes. In: Craig J (ed) Freshwater fisheries ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 557–579

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Alós J, Beardmore B, Daedlow K, Dorow M, Fujitani M, Hühn D, Haider W, Hunt LM, Johnson BM, Johnston F (2017) Understanding and managing freshwater recreational fisheries as complex adaptive social-ecological systems. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 25(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus R, Abbott JK, Fenichel EP, Carpenter SR, Hunt LM, Alós J, Klefoth T, Cooke SJ, Hilborn R, Jensen OP, Wilberg MJ (2019) Opinion: governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(12):5209–5213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett A, Abrantes KG, Baker R, Diedrich AS, Farr M, Kuilboer A, Mahony T, McLeod I, Moscardo G, Prideaux M, Stoeckl N (2016) Sportfisheries, conservation and sustainable livelihoods: a multidisciplinary guide to developing best practice. Fish Fish 17(3):696–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard TD Jr, Cox SP, Carpenter SR (2003) Impacts of daily bag limit reductions on angler effort in Wisconsin walleye lakes. North Am J Fish Manag 23(4):1283–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardmore B, Dorow M, Haider W, Arlinghaus R (2011) The elasticity of fishing effort response and harvest outcomes to altered regulatory policies in eel (Anguilla anguilla) recreational angling. Fish Res 110(1):136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownscombe JW, Hyder K, Potts W, Wilson K, Pope KL, Danylchuk AJ, Cooke SJ, Clarke A, Arlinghaus R, Post JR (2018) The future of recreational fisheries: advances in science, monitoring, management, and practice. Fish Res 211:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DW, Crosson S, Liese C (2015) Nowcasting intraseasonal recreational fishing harvest with internet search volume. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins LG Jr, Catalano MJ, Allen MS, Pine WE III, Walters CJ (2007) Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management. Fish Fish 8(3):196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman FC, Figueira WF, Ueland JS, Crowder LB (2004) The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science 305(5692):1958–1960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Cowx IG (2004) The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bioscience 54(9):857–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Cowx IG (2006) Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biol Cons 128(1):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Schramm HL (2007) Catch-and-release science and its application to conservation and management of recreational fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 14(2):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Suski CD (2005) Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources? Biodivers Conserv 14(5):1195–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Danylchuk AJ, Kaiser MJ, Rudd MA (2010) Is there a need for a ‘100 questions exercise to enhance fisheries and aquatic conservation, policy, management and research? Lessons from a global 100 questions exercise on conservation of biodiversity. J Fish Biol 76(9):2261–2286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Arlinghaus R, Danylchuk AJ (2013) Voluntary institutions and behaviours as alternatives to formal regulations in recreational fisheries management. Fish Fish 14(4):439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Arthington AH, Bonar SA, Bower SD, Bunnell DB, Entsua-Mensah RE, Funge-Smith S, Koehn JD, Lester NP, Lorenzen K (2016) Assessment of inland fisheries: a vision for the future. In: Freshwater, fish, and the future: proceedings of the global cross-sectoral conference, American Fisheries Society Press, Bethesda, pp 45–62

  • Cooke SJ, Twardek WM, Reid AJ, Lennox RJ, Danylchuk SC, Brownscombe JW, Bower SD, Arlinghaus R, Hyder K, Danylchuk AJ (2019) Searching for responsible and sustainable recreational fisheries in the Anthropocene. J Fish Biol 94:845–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowx IG, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ (2010) Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. J Fish Biol 76(9):2194–2215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daedlow K, Beckmann V, Arlinghaus R (2011) Assessing an adaptive cycle in a social system under external pressure to change: the importance of intergroup relations in recreational fisheries governance. Ecol Soc 16(2):3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art3/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danylchuk AJ, Danylchuk SC, Kosiarski A, Cooke SJ, Huskey B (2018) Keepemwet Fishing—an emerging social brand for disseminating best practices for catch-and-release in recreational fisheries. Fish Res 205:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauwalter DC, Fesenmyer KA, Bjork R, Leasure DR, Wenger SJ (2017) Satellite and airborne remote sensing applications for freshwater fisheries. Fisheries 42(10):526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedual M, Sague Pla O, Arlinghaus R, Clarke A, Ferter K, Geertz Hansen P, Gerdeaux D, Hames F, Kennelly SJ, Kleiven AR, Meraner A (2013) Communication between scientists, fishery managers and recreational fishers: lessons learned from a comparative analysis of international case studies. Fish Manag Ecol 20(2–3):234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Palme CA, Nguyen VM, Gutowsky LF, Cooke SJ (2016) Do fishing education programs effectively transfer ‘catch-and-release’best practices to youth anglers yielding measurable improvements in fish condition and survival? Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 417:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson MR, O’Connor CM, Thompson LA, Gingerich AJ, Danylchuk SE, Duplain RR, Cooke SJ (2011) Contrasting global game fish and non-game fish species. Fisheries 36(8):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorow M, Arlinghaus R (2012) The relationship between personal commitment to angling and the opinions and attitudes of German anglers towards the conservation and management of the European eel Anguilla anguilla. North Am J Fish Manag 32(3):466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmer LK, Kelly LA, Rivest S, Steell SC, Twardek WM, Danylchuk AJ, Arlinghaus R, Bennett JR, Cooke SJ (2017) Angling into the future: ten commandments for recreational fisheries science, management, and stewardship in a good Anthropocene. Environ Manag 60(2):165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1994) Mangrove forest management guidelines, vol 117. Forest Resources Development Branch and United States. Forest Service. Tropical Forestry Program

  • FAO (2012) Recreational fisheries—UN FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 13. Rome 176

  • Fedler AJ, Ditton RB (1994) Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries 19(4):6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel EP, Abbott JK (2014a) Heterogeneity and the fragility of the first best: putting the “micro” in bioeconomic models of recreational resources. Resour Energy Econ 36(2):351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel EP, Abbott JK (2014b) Natural capital: from metaphor to measurement. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 1(1/2):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel EP, Abbott JK, Huang B (2013) Modelling angler behaviour as a part of the management system: synthesizing a multi-disciplinary literature. Fish Fish 14(2):137–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira WF, Coleman FC (2010) Comparing landings of United States recreational fishery sectors. Bull Mar Sci 86(3):499–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Forseth T, Barlaup BT, Finstad B, Fiske P, Gjøsæter H, Falkegård M, Hindar A, Mo TA, Rikardsen AH, Thorstad EB, Vøllestad LA (2017) The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway. ICES J Mar Sci 74(6):1496–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire KMF, Sumaila UR (2019) Economic potential of the Brazilian marine recreational fishery. Bol Inst Pesca 45(1):e412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granek EF, Madin EM, Brown MA, Figueira W, Cameron DS, Hogan Z, Kristianson G, de Villiers P, Williams JE, Post J, Zahn S (2008) Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: global case studies. Conserv Biol 22(5):1125–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guckian ML, Danylchuk AJ, Cooke SJ, Markowitz EM (2018) Peer pressure on the riverbank: assessing catch-and-release anglers’ willingness to sanction others’(bad) behavior. J Environ Manag 219:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinn DC, Allen MS, Johnston FD, Brown P, Todd CR, Arlinghaus R (2015) Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots. Fish Fish 16(2):259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall-Arber M, Pomeroy C, Conway F (2009) Figuring out the human dimensions of fisheries: illuminating models. Mar Coast Fish Dyn Manag Ecosyst Sci 1(1):300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R (2007) Managing fisheries is managing people: What has been learned? Fish Fish 8(4):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland SM, Ditton RB (1992) Fishing trip satisfaction: a typology of anglers. North Am J Fish Manag 12(1):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer J, McConnell K (2014) Harvest allocation without property rights. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 1(1/2):209–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt LM, Sutton SG, Arlinghaus R (2013) Illustrating the critical role of human dimensions research for understanding and managing recreational fisheries within a social-ecological system framework. Fish Manag Ecol 20(2–3):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyder K, Armstrong M, Ferter K, Strehlow HV (2014) Recreational sea fishing–the high value forgotten catch. ICES Insight 51:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde TF, Wilberg MJ, Loewensteiner DA, Secor DH, Miller TJ (2011) The increasing importance of marine recreational fishing in the US: challenges for management. Fish Res 108(2–3):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FD, Arlinghaus R, Dieckmann U (2010) Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(9):1507–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FD, Allen MS, Beardmore B, Riepe C, Pagel T, Hühn D, Arlinghaus R (2018) How ecological processes shape the outcomes of stock enhancement and harvest regulations in recreational fisheries. Ecol Appl 28(8):2033–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr LA, Connelly WJ, Martino EJ, Peer AC, Woodland RJ, Secor DH (2009) Climate change in the US Atlantic affecting recreational fisheries. Rev Fish Sci 17(2):267–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf RC, Driver BL, Bassett JR (1973) Motivations for fishing. In: Transactions of the 38th North American wildlife and natural resources conference, vol 38, pp 191–204

  • Kooiman J, Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Mahon R, Pullin R (2008) Interactive governance and governability: an introduction. J Transdiscipl Environ Stud 7(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger CC, Decker DJ (1999) The process of fisheries management. Inland fisheries management in North America, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 31–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PA (1988) The future of fisheries management-managing the fisherman. Fisheries 13(1):3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard RB, Martell SJ, Walters CJ, Essington TE, Kitchell JF (2005) Should ecosystem management involve active control of species abundances? Ecol Soc 10(2):1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art1/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester NP, Marshall TR, Armstrong K, Dunlop WI, Ritchie B (2003) A broad-scale approach to management of Ontario’s recreational fisheries. North Am J Fish Manag 23(4):1312–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin WC, Arlinghaus R, Mehner T (2006) Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: insights for management and conservation. Rev Fish Sci 14(4):305–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Stokes L, Topping T, Stunz G (2017) Estimation of a total from a population of unknown size and application to estimating recreational red snapper catch in Texas. J Surv Stat Methodol 5(3):350–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas M, Baras E (2001) Migration of freshwater fishes. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim SL, Childs AR, Butler EC, Winkler AC, Parkinson MC, Farthing MW, Zweig T, McCord M, Drobniewska N, Potts WM (2018) Working with, not against recreational anglers: evaluating a pro-environmental behavioural strategy for improving catch-and-release behaviour. Fish Res 206:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell KE, Sutinen JG (1979) Bioeconomic models of marine recreational fishing. J Environ Econ Manag 6(2):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller GH, Engelken JH (1972) What fishermen look for in a fishing experience. J Wildl Manag 36:1253–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olds AD, Vargas-Fonseca E, Connolly RM, Gilby BL, Huijbers CM, Hyndes GA, Layman CA, Whitfield AK, Schlacher TA (2018) The ecology of fish in the surf zones of ocean beaches: a global review. Fish Fish 19(1):78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paukert CP, Lynch AJ, Beard TD, Chen Y, Cooke SJ, Cooperman MS, Cowx IG, Ibengwe L, Infante DM, Myers BJ, Nguyễn HP (2017) Designing a global assessment of climate change on inland fishes and fisheries: knowns and needs. Rev Fish Biol Fish 27(2):393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira DL, Hansen MJ (2003) A perspective on challenges to recreational fisheries management: summary of the symposium on active management of recreational fisheries. North Am J Fish Manag 23(4):1276–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilling GM, Apostolaki P, Failler P, Floros C, Large PA, Morales-Nin B, Reglero P, Stergiou KI, Tsikliras AC (2009) Assessment and management of data-poor fisheries. Adv Fish Sci 50:280–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, Auburn J, Baulcombe D, Bell M, Bentley J, Bickersteth S, Brown K, Burke J, Campbell H (2010) The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain 8(4):219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radomski PJ, Grant GC, Jacobson PC, Cook MF (2001) Visions for recreational fishing regulations. Fisheries 26(5):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel RS, Colby PJ (1991) A statistically valid model of the morphoedaphic index. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48(10):1937–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick TC, Lockwood R (2013) Integrating paleobiology, archeology, and history to inform biological conservation. Conserv Biol 27(1):45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roni P, Hanson K, Beechie T (2008) Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North Am J Fish Manag 28(3):856–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragaglia V, Correia RA, Coco S, Arlinghaus R (2019) Data mining on YouTube reveals fisher group-specific harvesting patterns and social engagement in recreational anglers and spearfishers. ICES J Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman DS, Gallagher AJ, Wester J, Macdonald CC, Thaler AD, Cooke SJ, Hammerschlag N (2014) Trophy fishing for species threatened with extinction: a way forward building on a history of conservation. Mar Policy 50:318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman DS, Macdonald C, Ganz HY, Hammerschlag N (2017) Fishing practices and representations of shark conservation issues among users of a land-based shark angling online forum. Fish Res 196:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth PR, Tom B, Brickland J, Campbell CD, Chamberlain DE, Cooke AI, Dulvy NK, Dusic NR, Fitton M (2006) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 43(4):617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2(3):238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufts BL, Holden J, DeMille M (2015) Benefits arising from sustainable use of North America’s fishery resources: economic and conservation impacts of recreational angling. Int J Environ Stud 72(5):850–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venturelli PA, Hyder K, Skov C (2017) Angler apps as a source of recreational fisheries data: opportunities, challenges and proposed standards. Fish Fish 18(3):578–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JP, Dassow CJ, Jones SE, Ross AJ, Solomon CT (2018) Coarse woody habitat does not predict largemouth bass young of year mortality during the open-water season. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76(6):998–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Fisheries Section of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry for their input while refining this manuscript. Cooke is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Genome BC. Brownscombe is supported by a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship and Bonefish and Tarpon Trust. Potts is supported by the South African National Research Foundation through their Rated Researcher Grant Program. Arlinghaus received funding through the European Union (European Maritime and Fisheries Fund) and the State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) (Grant MV-I.18-LM-004, B 730117000069), and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grants 01LC1826E and 033W046A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Peter E. Holder, Amanda L. Jeanson, Jacob W. Brownscombe & Steven J. Cooke

  2. Laboratory for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway

    Robert J. Lennox

  3. Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B4H 4R2, Canada

    Jacob W. Brownscombe

  4. Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany

    Robert Arlinghaus

  5. Division of Integrativer Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philippstrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany

    Robert Arlinghaus

  6. Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Andy J. Danylchuk

  7. Natural Resources and Sustainable Development, Department of Earth Science, Uppsala University, Cramérgatan 3, 62157, Visby, Sweden

    Shannon D. Bower

  8. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK

    Kieran Hyder

  9. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 103-421 James St. South, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 2V6, Canada

    Len M. Hunt

  10. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06460, USA

    Eli P. Fenichel

  11. Department of Biology, Ball State University, 121 Cooper Building, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA

    Paul A. Venturelli

  12. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Postboks 5685, Torgarden, 7485, Trondheim, Norway

    Eva B. Thorstad

  13. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program, Nature Coast Biological Station, University of Florida, 552 First Street, Cedar Key, FL, 32625, USA

    Micheal S. Allen

  14. Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown, 6139, South Africa

    Warren M. Potts

  15. Keep Fish Wet, 11 Kingman Road, Amherst, MA, 01002, USA

    Sascha Clark-Danylchuk

  16. Fisheries Conservation Foundation, 302 E. Green Street #2102, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Julie E. Claussen

  17. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Jeremy M. Lyle & Sean R. Tracey

  18. Yamanashi Prefectural Fisheries Technology Center, Yamanashi 7, Kai, 400-0121, Japan

    Jun-ichi Tsuboi

  19. Environment and Natural Resources Department, World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA

    Randall Brummett

  20. Laboratório de Ecologia Pesqueira, Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca e Aquicultura, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Cidade Universitária Prof. José Aloísio de Campos, Rua Mal. Rondon S/N, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, CEP 49100-000, Brazil

    Kátia M. F. Freire

  21. Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Sean R. Tracey

  22. DTU AQUA, Section of Inland Fisheries and Ecology, Technical University of Denmark, Vejlsøvej 39, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark

    Christian Skov

Authors
  1. Peter E. Holder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda L. Jeanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert J. Lennox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacob W. Brownscombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert Arlinghaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andy J. Danylchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shannon D. Bower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kieran Hyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Len M. Hunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Eli P. Fenichel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paul A. Venturelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Eva B. Thorstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Micheal S. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Warren M. Potts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Sascha Clark-Danylchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Julie E. Claussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jeremy M. Lyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jun-ichi Tsuboi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Randall Brummett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Kátia M. F. Freire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Sean R. Tracey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Christian Skov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Steven J. Cooke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter E. Holder.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holder, P.E., Jeanson, A.L., Lennox, R.J. et al. Preparing for a changing future in recreational fisheries: 100 research questions for global consideration emerging from a horizon scan. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 30, 137–151 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09595-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09595-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation