Abstract
The key to control carbon emissions is to clarify the cause of carbon emissions and their transfer process. This paper focuses on the relationship and its internal mechanism of population urbanization, trade openness and carbon emissions using the threshold model and the moderated mediating model, which is based on the panel data of China during 2003–2016. The results show that the higher the level of population urbanization is; the more carbon emissions are. There is a significant threshold effect on trade openness. That is, when the threshold value of urban population density is 24,211 people per square kilometer, the relationship between trade openness and carbon emissions is “inverted U”. The population urbanization can also affect carbon emissions through trade openness indirectly, and its moderated mediating effect is significant. The moderated variables can be divided into four categories: scale effect, structure effect, technological progress effect, and social effect. Different moderated variables have different effects on carbon emission path, but they show an effective tendency of controlling emissions on the whole. By quantifying the conditional indirect effect, this paper analyzes the internal channel of population urbanization, trade openness, and carbon emissions. Then, according to the characteristics of different moderated effects, the effective emission control policy in China will be formulated in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afridi MA, Kehelwalatenna S, Naseem I, Tahir M (2019) Per capita income, trade openness, urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: an empirical study on the SAARC region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:29978–29990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06154-2
Alam S, Fatima A, Butt MS (2007) Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. J Asian Econ 18:825–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2007.07.005
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment. Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877
Chen H, Jia B, Lau SSY (2008) Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat Int 32(1):28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.005
Chen M, Liu W, Lu D, Chen H, Ye C (2018) Progress of China's new-type urbanization construction since 2014: a preliminary assessment. Cities 78:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.012
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118421
Edenhofer O (2015) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change (Vol. 3). Cambridge University press, London
Elliott RJ, Sun P, Zhu T (2017) The direct and indirect effect of urbanization on energy intensity: a province-level study for China. Energy 123:677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.143
Ernstson H, Van der Leeuw SE, Redman CL, Meffert DJ, Davis G, Alfsen C, Elmqvist T (2010) Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39(8):531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
Ewing R, Rong F (2008) The impact of urban form on US residential energy use. Hous Policy Debate 19(1):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624
Fudge C, Rowe J (2001) Ecological modernisation as a framework for sustainable development: a case study in Sweden. Environ Plan A 33(9):1527–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33153
Guan X, Wei H, Lu S, Dai Q, Su H (2018) Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat Int 71:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.009
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
Hatzipanayotou P, Lahiri S, Michael MS (2002) Can cross–border pollution reduce pollution? Can J Econ 35(4):805–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.00155
Ho SY, Iyke BN (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from central and eastern European countries. Rev Econ 70(1):41–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2018-0001
Hussain M, Imitiyaz I (2018) Urbanization concepts, dimensions and factors. Int J Recent Sci Res 9(1):23513–23523. https://doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2018.0901.1483
Ji X, Chen B (2017) Assessing the energy-saving effect of urbanization in China based on stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model. J Clean Prod 163:S306–S314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.002
Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.025
Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA (2020) Exploring the effect of the renewable energy transition on CO2 emissions of Latin American & Caribbean countries. Int J Sustain Energy 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1731511
Kurniawan R, Managi S (2018) Coal consumption, urbanization, and trade openness linkage in Indonesia. Energy Policy 121:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.023
Levinson A, Taylor MS (2008) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int Econ Rev 49(1):223–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x
Liddle B (2004) Demographic dynamics and per capita environmental impact: using panel regressions and household decompositions to examine population and transport. Popul Environ 26(1):23–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039951.37276.f3
Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Zhan D, Li J (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.110
Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.156
Liu Y, Yan B, Zhou Y (2016) Urbanization, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emissions in China: a panel cointegration and causality analysis. J Geogr Sci 26(2):131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1259-2
Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28(3):317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1534878
Madlener R, Sunak Y (2011) Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: what can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management. Sustain Cities Soc 1(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2019) National Economic and Social Development Statistics Bulletin 2018 http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201902/t20190228_1651265.html
Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S, Dhakal S (2012) Impacts of urbanization on national transport and road energy use: evidence from low, middle and high income countries. Energy Policy 46:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.059
Salim RA, Rafiq S, Shafiei S (2017) Urbanization, energy consumption, and pollutant emission in Asian developing economies: an empirical analysis (no.718). ADBI working paper series http://hdl.handle.net/10419/163205.Accessed April 2017
Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Sbia R, Afza T (2015) The effect of urbanization, affluence and trade openness on energy consumption: a time series analysis in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.044
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020
Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Zhang Q (2018) China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Sci Data 5:170201. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.201
Sugiawan Y, Kurniawan R, Managi S (2019) Are carbon dioxide emission reductions compatible with sustainable well-being. Appl Energy 242:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.113
Sun H, Attuquaye Clottey S, Geng Y, Fang K, Clifford Kofi Amissah J (2019) Trade openness and carbon emissions: evidence from belt and road countries. Sustainability 11(9):2682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092682
UNEP (2019) The emissions gap report 2019. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J, Han R, Zhu X, Lu G (2016) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.105
Xu SC, He ZX, Long RY, Shen WX, Ji SB, Chen QB (2016) Impacts of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions: regional differences in China based on panel estimation. Reg Environ Chang 16(3):777–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0795-0
Yao X, Kou D, Shao S, Li X, Wang W, Zhang C (2018) Can urbanization process and carbon emission abatement be harmonious? New evidence from China. Environ Impact Asses 71:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.005
Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou F (2019) The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15162–15173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04912-w
Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Carvajal-Lara C, Urgiles-Sanchez R (2018) Is there an inverted U-shaped curve? Empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve in Singapore. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 25(1–2):145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1245625
Zhang L (2008) Conceptualizing China's urbanization under reforms. Habitat Int 32(4):452–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.001
Zhang N, Yu K, Chen Z (2017) How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis. Energy Policy 107:678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.072
Zhang Y, Yi W, Li B (2015) The impact of urbanization on carbon emission: empirical evidence in Beijing. Energy Procedia 75:2963–2968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.601
Funding
Thanks to the major project of the National Social Science Fund (approval NO.15ZDC034) and National Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Research Planning Fund Project (approval NO.18YJA790031) to support this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Data curation, Y.H.; Formal analysis, X.Q.; Funding acquisition, Y.H.; Investigation, X.Q. and P.K.; Methodology, X.Q.; Software, X.Q.; Writing—original draft, X.Q.; Writing—Review & Editing, X.Q.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, X., Han, Y. & Kou, P. Population urbanization, trade openness and carbon emissions: an empirical analysis based on China. Air Qual Atmos Health 13, 519–528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00808-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00808-8