A case-control study of herd- and cow-level risk factors associated with an outbreak of Mycoplasma mastitis in Nemuro, Japan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104946Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Risk factors of Mycoplasma mastitis were evaluated by case-control studies.

  • Conscious teat wiping before milking was negatively associated with Mycoplasma mastitis.

  • Introduction of cattle was a herd level risk factor.

  • Cows with a high milk yield were more susceptible against Mycoplasma mastitis.

  • Previous acute mastitis without isolation of causal pathogens was a risk factor.

Abstract

The objective of this case-control study was to determine the herd- and cow-level risk factors associated with an outbreak of Mycoplasma bovine mastitis in the winter of 2014–2015 in Nemuro, Hokkaido, Japan. Two questionnaire surveys were sent to all 40 Mycoplasma-infected farms in the area and 73 non-infected farms for the farm-level analysis. Infected cows were matched to twice the number of non-infected cows in the same herds by parity and days after calving. Movement records, dairy herd test records, and clinical records of infected cows and matched non-infected cows were collected for the cow-level analysis. Risk factors for Mycoplasma infection were explored by multivariable analyses at both levels. In the herd-level analysis, tie stall housing for milking cows (odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.60, p =  0.004), consciously wiping of teat openings before milking (OR = 0.15, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.76, p =  0.030), and use of paper towels to wipe teats (OR = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.92, p =  0.045) were identified as preventive factors, whereas introduction of cattle (OR = 3.43, 95 % CI: 1.14–10.86, p =  0.030) was identified as a risk factor. In the cow-level analysis, a history of presence in livestock markets (OR = 10.80, 95 % CI: 1.12–104.38, p =  0.040), higher milk yield 2 months prior to Mycoplasma infection (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.02–1.18, p =  0.014), and previous diagnosis of acute mastitis without isolation of the causal pathogen (OR = 3.14, 95 % CI: 0.86–11.41, p =  0.082) were identified as risk factors. These results highlight the importance of proper milking hygiene control and quarantine of introduced cattle to prevent Mycoplasma infection.

Introduction

Bovine mastitis caused by Mycoplasma spp. is a highly contagious disease and a major problem in the global dairy industry (Nicholas et al., 2016). The economic impact of Mycoplasma mastitis is high because the disease is considered untreatable with antibiotics, and thus, culling of infected cows is commonly recommended for within-farm control. Several Mycoplasma species have been linked to bovine mastitis, with Mycoplasma bovis being the most important (González and Wilson, 2003). In addition to mastitis, Mycoplasma spp. also cause a variety of other diseases, including pneumonia, otitis media, and arthritis (Maunsell et al., 2011).

The primary route of Mycoplasma infection is udder-to-udder spread by milking equipment, hands, or teat dipping (Maunsell and Donovan, 2009). Calves can be infected by ingestion of contaminated colostrum or waste milk and through aerosols (Foster et al., 2009; Maunsell et al., 2011). Intra-uterine or intra-mammary transmission of Mycoplasma from a dam to a calf has also been reported (Pfutzner and Schimmel, 1985; Fox et al., 2008). Contaminated semen is also a route of Mycoplasma infection (Haapala et al., 2018). Several risk factors for Mycoplasma mastitis have been reported as well. Commonly identified risk factors include large herd size and introduction of cattle (González and Wilson, 2003). Potential reasons larger herds have a higher risk of contracting mastitis are that they tend to have more introduced cattle and a higher chance of a rare infection event (Fox et al., 2003). In addition, a higher frequency of Mycoplasma infection in winter has been reported (Maunsell and Donovan, 2009).

Hokkaido is the largest dairy production area in Japan, producing more than half of the cow milk in the country (Ministry of Agriculture‚ Forestry and Fisheries, 2018). Hokkaido is the northernmost prefecture in Japan and typically covered in deep snow in winter. Mycoplasma mastitis is a major dairy issue in Japan, with an estimated herd-level prevalence of 3.8 % in the Tokachi area of Hokkaido (Ministry of Agriculture‚ Forestry and Fisheries, 2018; The Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Nemuro, 2018). An increase in the occurrence of Mycoplasma mastitis cases was noted from 2014 to 2015 in the Nemuro area (the eastern part of Hokkaido) by the Nemuro Mycoplasma Mastitis Control Committee (NMMCC), which consists of local agricultural cooperatives, the Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Nemuro (FACN), the Hokkaido Dairy Milk Recording and Testing Association, veterinarians in the Hokkaido Higashi agriculture mutual aid association (AMAA) and Nemuro Prefectural Livestock Hygiene Service Center, agriculture extension officers in the prefectural agriculture extension office, and the prefectural livestock research institute. Three to six times per year, the committee conducts PCR-based bulk tank milk screening tests (Higuchi et al., 2011) for Mycoplasma spp. for all of the member dairy farms of the agricultural cooperatives. Although possible risk factors have been reported in the literature, little is known regarding the relative importance of these factors in Japan.

In the present case-control study, we conducted separate analyses of both cow- and herd-level risk factors for Mycoplasma mastitis by (1) comparing infected and non-infected farms, and (2) investigating the records of cattle movement, milk testing, and clinical services regarding infected and non-infected cows at the infected farms.

Section snippets

Study design

Case-control analyses at the farm and cow levels for bovine Mycoplasma mastitis were conducted using a structured questionnaire and investigation of the records of cattle movement, milk testing, and clinical services, following a participatory appraisal of potential risk factors for Mycoplasma mastitis by NMMCC members in March 2015. Four hypotheses regarding factors associated with Mycoplasma mastitis were discussed at the appraisal: (1) poor hygiene management facilitates infection of the

Response rates and data availability

In the herd-level analysis, all 40 infected farms (which belonged to the FACN during the study period) and 73 non-infected farms were selected. In the first questionnaire survey, 37 of the 40 infected farms (92.5 %) and 70 of the 73 non-infected farms (95.9 %) responded and agreed to participate in the study. In the second questionnaire survey, which was conducted for the participants of the first survey, 25 of the 37 infected farms (67.6 %) and 47 of the 70 non-infected farms (67.1 %)

Discussion

In this study, risk factors for Mycoplasma mastitis were investigated at the farm and cow levels, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to have examined an outbreak of Mycoplasma mastitis at both levels simultaneously. The multi-level study utilized a variety of data sets: movement records, dairy herd test records, and clinical records, in addition to two questionnaire surveys.

As shown in Fig. 3A, at the herd level, introduction of cows poses the risk of introducing

Conclusions

This study identified herd- and cow-level risk factors associated with an outbreak of Mycoplasma mastitis in Japan. The results of the herd-level risk factor analysis highlighted the importance of proper milking hygiene management in preventing Mycoplasma mastitis, such as consciously wiping of teat openings before milking and use of paper towels. The introduction of cattle, particularly from livestock markets, could introduce Mycoplasma-infected cows onto farms. Tie-stall barns for milking

Funding

The study was conducted with research budgets allocated to Y.F., H.H. and K.M. from Rakuno Gakuen University.

Author contributions

H.I., H.H., H.O., and K.M. conceived and designed the study. Y.F., H.I., and K.M. conducted the surveys and collected the data. Y.F., H.I., and K.M. analyzed and interpreted the data. H.H. and H.O. contributed to data interpretation. Y.F. and K.M. drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors much appreciate the participating farmers for their contributions. We thank the Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Nemuro, Japan Agricultural Cooperatives in the study area, and the Hokkaido Higashi Agriculture Mutual Aid Association for the joint study design, ethical clearances, conduct of the studies, and help in collecting and processing of the data. We also thank Professor Mark Stevenson of the University of Melbourne for discussions regarding data analysis.

References (36)

  • L.K. Fox et al.

    Clinical Mycoplasma bovis mastitis in prepubertal heifers on 2 dairy herds

    Can. Vet. J.

    (2008)
  • R.N. Gonzalez et al.

    Mastitis due to Mycoplasma in the state of New York during the period 1972-1990

    Cornell Vet.

    (1992)
  • G. Grolemund et al.

    Dates and times made easy withlubridate

    J. Stat. Softw.

    (2011)
  • J. Hester

    glue: Interpreted String Literals

    (2019)
  • H. Higuchi et al.

    A simplified PCR assay for fast and easy mycoplasma mastitis screening in dairy cattle

    J. Vet. Sci.

    (2011)
  • R. Iannone

    DiagrammeR: Graph/Network Visualization

    (2019)
  • Japan Meteorological Agency

    Search for Historical Climate Data

    (2020)
  • D.E. Jasper et al.

    Prevalence of mycoplasmal bovine mastitis in California

    Am. J. Vet. Res.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Economic losses associated with mastitis due to bovine leukemia virus infection

      2023, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cows on the farms studied are therefore less likely to undergo heat stress during the summer, thus reducing the likelihood of seasonal subclinical mastitis. Several farm-level factors, such as farm dairy hygiene (Fujimoto et al., 2020; Miyama et al., 2020), and individual animal-level factors, such as sensitivity to mastitis (Martin et al., 2018), are known to affect the occurrence of mastitis. However, our study employed a frailty model to adequately control for such clustering effects (Hanagal, 2011), in showing the pure effect of BLV infection on subclinical mastitis.

    • Modeling e-Livestock Indonesia

      2021, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      In 2003, Japan enforces The Beef Traceability Law or the full name is “The Law for Special Measures Concerning the Management and Relay of Information for Individual Identification of Cattle” (NLBC 2018; The Beef Traceability Law 2003; Mathews 2008). Based on the law, each cattle must be identified and registered in a system called the Individual Cattle Identification Register (The Beef Traceability Law 2003; Fujimoto et al., 2020). The system is managed by a government agency called National Livestock Breeding Center (NLBC) (NLBC 2018).

    • Mycoplasma bovis infection in dairy herds—Risk factors and effect of control measures

      2021, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Purchased animals were the third most important risk factor in univariable analysis. This factor was not significant in our multivariable analysis as in the results from other studies (Murai and Higuchi, 2019; Fujimoto et al., 2020). The prevalence of M. bovis among Finnish cattle is low, roughly 1% of the herds were infected in 2016, and new M. bovis infections on dairy farms are efficiently detected through routine testing of mastitis cases with PCR detecting M. bovis.

    • Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and the russia-ukraine crisis on the agricultural sector

      2023, Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine Crisis on the Agricultural Sector
    View full text