Elsevier

Crop Protection

Volume 133, July 2020, 105141
Crop Protection

Palatability of common cover crops to voles (Microtus)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105141Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Voles preferred clovers, hairy vetch, and alfalfa as forage, and avoided canola.

  • Voles consistently chose or avoided highly and minimally preferred species.

  • Voles were variable in choosing moderately preferred species.

  • Voles consumed more of unpreferred plant species when forage diversity was low.

  • Vole individuality contributed to probability of plants being selected as forage.

Abstract

Use of cover crops in intensive row-crop agriculture has dramatically increased over the last decade. Cover crops provide vegetative cover and forage that may support more diverse and abundant rodent communities than those found in conventional row-crop agroecosystems. However, increasing vole populations can lead to depredation of the soybean (Glycine max) commodity crop. We tested for selection of 13 commonly planted cover crops and 4-5 additional benchmark species by meadow (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and prairie (M. ochrogaster) voles using cafeteria-style feeding trials conducted in semi-natural outdoor enclosures. Red clover (Trifolium pratense), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) were commonly preferred among vole species, and canola (Brassica napus) was avoided. Meadow and prairie voles consistently chose or avoided highly and minimally preferred species, respectively, but were more variable in choosing moderately preferred species. Consumption scores were negatively associated with the number of plants offered in a trial, and the relationship was stronger for males than females. The interaction of protein and fiber content of plants, and vole identity included as a random effect, were also important in predicting score probability for both vole species. Identifying minimally preferred plants and factors that influence selection may allow farmers to manage cover-cropped soybean fields to discourage immigration of small mammals into fields, thus reducing negative consequences that might otherwise limit future adoption of a valuable soil conservation practice.

Introduction

Use of cover crops in conventional row-crop agriculture has increased greatly over the last decade (White, 2014). In corn-soybean rotations of the Midwestern U.S., producers plant cover crops after harvesting the commodity crop in fall and terminate in spring before the next commodity crop germinates. Cover crops are used to improve soil health by retaining topsoil, providing essential nutrients, and maintaining soil moisture (Fageria, 2007).

In addition to improving soil health, cover crops provide forage and vegetative structure in fields that, under conventional tillage practices, contain only bare soil or crop stubble from late fall to early spring. Improved overhead cover likely increases diversity of the small mammal community in row-crop fields (Berl et al., 2018; Getz et al., 2007; Jug et al., 2008) and could enable population growth of herbivorous small mammals that can incorporate the cover crops into their diets. Although increased biodiversity can benefit farm management (Altieri, 1999), some species, such as voles (Microtus), may depredate the commodity crop when their populations grow too large (Wiman et al., 2009; Witmer et al., 2007). When appropriate cover and food are available, voles reproduce year-round, and populations can quickly grow to large numbers (Cole and Batzli, 1978; Getz et al., 2007; Goswami et al., 2011).

Vole depredation of crops in row-crop fields has been reported previously (Witmer et al., 2007), and complaints of vole damage to soybeans (Glycine max) in cover-cropped fields are numerous (Fisher et al., 2014; Prieur, 2019; Joe Rorick, [Conservation Cropping Systems Initiative, West Lafayette, IN] personal communication, [August 2017]). However, we are unaware of research designed to evaluate which cover crops used in corn-soybean rotations may, by virtue of their relative palatability, encourage vole use of fields and increase risk of damage to soybeans. Our objective was to rate commonly used overwinter cover crops, including grasses, clovers, brassicas, and others, for selection by meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) and prairie (M. ochrogaster) voles. The geographic ranges of these two vole species encompass the bulk of the Midwestern U.S., where row-crop agriculture dominated by soybean and corn (Zea mays) is prevalent. Identifying cover crops that are avoided by voles provides producers with options for planting cover crops of lower value to voles, which may discourage immigration and recruitment in fields and thus reduce potential for feeding damage by voles to young soybean plants. Alternatively, producers can anticipate damage in fields planted with highly preferred cover crops and act preemptively to minimize damage in these fields by using farming strategies such as spot tillage or manipulation of nearby grassland habitat (Prieur, 2019).

We expected clovers (Trifolium) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) to be preferred, as they ranked high in previous vole diet studies comparing plants from permanent vole habitats (DeJaco and Batzli, 2013; Lindroth and Batzli, 1984). We anticipated that vetches, specifically hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) and cicer milk vetch (Astragalus cicer), would be avoided, as Vicia was suggested by Sullivan (2006) to be the most likely group of cover crops avoided by voles, and A. cicer was reported to deter voles from entering fields (Lisa Holscher, [Conservation Cropping Systems Initiative, West Lafayette, Indiana], personal communication, [August 2017]).

In addition to establishing relative preference by voles, we evaluated factors hypothesized to influence selection and avoidance of plant species. These objectives were operationally motivated; plant species that consistently are avoided by voles are less likely to yield variable results when used by producers compared to plant species for which avoidance varies with factors such as vole sex or availability of alternative foods. Swihart (1990) found that woodchucks (Marmota monax), a generalist herbivore, more consistently selected and avoided highly and minimally preferred species of orchard ground cover, respectively. In contrast, moderately preferred species were selected with more variation among feeding trials. Hence, we predicted a similar unimodal relationship between relative preference and variation in selection of cover crops for our vole species.

Meadow and prairie voles are generalist herbivores (Reich, 1981; Stalling, 1990) that can adjust diets to account for changes in plant availability (Haken and Batzli, 1996). Thus, we hypothesized that voles would become increasingly willing to consume a plant as available plant diversity and quality of forage declined (Haken and Batzli, 1996), resulting in greater relative preference. To control for possible effects of plant diversity, we also tested whether voles consumed less when presented with an equally diverse offering of plants rated as avoided versus preferred based on prior trials. We expected voles to consume less of unpreferred forage, as some minimally selected plants may be consistently avoided (Swihart, 1990).

Section snippets

Study site

We captured voles and performed captive feeding trials at the Purdue University Wildlife Area (PWA) located 11 km west of West Lafayette, Indiana. PWA encompasses 1.17 km2 of restored tallgrass prairie, savanna, and wetland habitat and is surrounded by row-crop agriculture. We captured five female and five male meadow voles and two male prairie voles within restored prairie at the site and at a nearby Purdue property. Low population levels during the study prevented us from capturing sufficient

Relative preference

No plant species was wholly avoided, as both meadow and prairie voles sampled all plant species at least once. However, canola (Brassica napus) ranked lower than most plant types for both vole species and was chosen less than expected by meadow voles in trials 1, 2, and 4 (Table 1). Meadow voles also ate turnip (B. rapa) less than expected in trials 1 and 3.

Of the 17 plant species presented to both vole species, red clover (T. pratense), alfalfa, and hairy vetch were consistently selected more

Discussion

We found pronounced differences in selection of commonly used cover crop species. Elimination of the most preferred plant species in successive trials allows us to present an estimated ranking of relative palatability for the species tested to aid producers in selection of cover crops to use in fields with historic vole issues (Fig. 3). However, we suggest consideration of all results presented before applying the rankings, as the order is subjective and based on the cumulative results of all

Conclusion

Common cover crop species range in attractiveness to meadow and prairie voles, and palatability depends on availability of other forage. Red clover, alfalfa, and hairy vetch were commonly preferred, and canola was avoided. Highly and minimally preferred species were selected or avoided, respectively, more consistently than moderately preferred species. Farmers can plant minimally preferred cover crops to deter voles, however, our findings suggest that the effectiveness of this strategy may

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service [grant number 68-3A75-18-127], the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture [Hatch project 1014271], the Iowa Academy of Science [grant number 40001934], and the Purdue University Department of Forestry and Natural Resources.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Abby-Gayle A. Prieur: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Robert K. Swihart: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors, Abby-Gayle Prieur and Rob Swihart, declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Technical support was provided by D. J. Hixon, C. Harms, and L. Estrada. Seeds were donated by CISCO Seeds, Ceres Solutions, and Kester's Wild Game Food Nurseries. L. Holscher and J. D. Rorick offered valued advice on project development. We thank E. A. Flaherty S. Zezula, and two anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript.

References (67)

  • J.L. Berl et al.

    Spatial variation in density of white-footed mice along edges in fragmented habitat

    Am. Midl. Nat.

    (2018)
  • N.C. Bonnot et al.

    Who's afraid of the big bad wolf? Variation in the stress response among personalities and populations in a large wild herbivore

    Oecologia

    (2018)
  • A.M. Brehm et al.

    Land‐use change and the ecological consequences of personality in small mammals

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2019)
  • G.E. Brink et al.

    Cool- and warm-season forage legume potential for the Southeastern USA

    Trop. Grassl.

    (1988)
  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • R.H.B. Christensen

    Package ‘ordinal’: regression models for ordinal data

  • F.R. Cole et al.

    Nutrition and population dynamics of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in central Illinois

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (1979)
  • F.R. Cole et al.

    Influence of supplemental feeding on a vole population

    J. Mammal.

    (1978)
  • Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) and Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE)

    Annual Report 2015-2016: Cover Crop Survey. 42pp

    (2016)
  • M.D. Dearing et al.

    The influence of plant secondary metabolites on the nutritional ecology of herbivorous terrestrial vertebrates

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.

    (2005)
  • C.E. DeJaco et al.

    Palatability of plants to small mammals in nonnative grasslands of east-central Illinois

    J. Mammal.

    (2013)
  • P.J. Desborough et al.

    Cultivar and growth stage effects on the nutritive value of soybean hay

    Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod.

    (1988)
  • N.A. Dochtermann et al.

    The contribution of additive genetic variation to personality variation: heritability of personality

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2015)
  • H.W. Dougall

    The chemical composition of some species and varieties of Trifolium

    East Afr. Agric. For. J.

    (1962)
  • J.A. Duke et al.

    Handbook of Proximate Analysis Tables of Higher Plants

    (1986)
  • K.L. Edmisten et al.

    Winter annual small grain forage potential. II. Quantification of nutritive characteristics of four small grain species at six growth stages

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plan.

    (1998)
  • A. Elgersma et al.

    Herbage dry-matter production and forage quality of three legumes and four non-leguminous forbs grown in single-species stands

    Grass Forage Sci.

    (2013)
  • A. Espinoza-Canales et al.

    Forage quality of Canola (Brassica napus L.) at early and late bloom under rainfed conditions in Zacatecas, Mexico

    Rev. Mexic. Cienc. Pecuarias

    (2017)
  • N.K. Fageria

    Green manuring in crop production

    J. Plant Nutr.

    (2007)
  • B. Fisher et al.
    (2014)
  • M. Francisco et al.

    Genotypic and environmental effects on agronomic and nutritional value of Brassica rapa

    Agron. J.

    (2011)
  • R.L. Gerhardt et al.

    Digestion kinetics and composition of normal and brown midrib sorghum morphological components

    Crop Sci.

    (1994)
  • L.L. Getz et al.

    Twenty-five years of population fluctuations of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in three habitats in east-central Illinois

    J. Mammal.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text