Abstract
Exact computation of the gravitational field and gravitational gradient tensor for a general mass body is a core routine to model the density structure of the Earth. In this study, we report on the existence of closed-form solutions of the gravitational potential, gravitational field and gravitational gradient tensor for a general polyhedral mass body with a polynomial density function of arbitrary non-negative integer orders that can simultaneously vary in both horizontal and vertical directions. Our closed-form solutions of the gravitational potential and the gravitational field are singularity-free, which implies that the observation sites can have arbitrary geometric relationships with polyhedral mass source bodies. However, weak logarithmic singularities exist on the edges of polyhedra for the gravitational gradient tensor. A simple prismatic mass body with polynomial density contrast varying in the vertical direction and a complicated dodecahedral mass body with quartic-order density contrasts were tested to verify the accuracy of the newly derived closed-form solutions. For the gravitational potential, gravitational fields and gradient tensors, our closed-form solutions are in excellent agreement with previously published analytical solutions and Gaussian numerical quadrature solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aydemir A, Ates A, Bilim F, Buyuksarac A, Bektas O (2014) Evaluation of gravity and aeromagnetic anomalies for the deep structure and possibility of hydrocarbon potential of the region surrounding Lake Van, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Surv Geophys 35(2):431–448
Bangerth W, Hartmann R, Kanschat G (2007) deal.II—a general-purpose object-oriented finite element library. ACM Trans Math Softw 33(4):24-es
Barnett CT (1976) Theoretical modeling of the magnetic and gravitational fields of an arbitrarily shaped three dimensional body. Geophysics 41(6):1353–1364
Blakely RJ (1996) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bruinsma SL, Foerste C, Abrikosov O, Lemoine JM, Marty JC, Mulet S, Rio MH, Bonvalot S (2014) ESA’s satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data. Geophys Res Lett 41(21):7508–7514
Chen L, Liu L (2019) Fast and accurate forward modelling of gravity field using prismatic grids. Geophys J Int 216(2):1062–1071
Chen CJ, Ren Z, Pan K, Tang J, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Sun Y, Li Y (2018) Exact solutions of the vertical gravitational anomaly for a polyhedral prism with vertical polynomial density contrast of arbitrary orders. Geophys J Int 214(3):2115–2132
Chen C, Chen Y, Bian S (2019a) Evaluation of the spherical harmonic coefficients for the external potential of a polyhedral body with linearly varying density. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 131(2):8
Chen C, Ouyang Y, Bian S (2019b) Spherical harmonic expansions for the gravitational field of a polyhedral body with polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 40(2):197–246
Conway JT (2015) Analytical solution from vector potentials for the gravitational field of a general polyhedron. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 121(1):17–38
Dai S, Zhao D, Wang S, Xiong B, Zhang Q, Li K, Chen L, Chen Q (2019) Three-dimensional numerical modeling of gravity and magnetic anomaly in a mixed space-wavenumber domain. Geophysics 84(4):G41–G54
Davis PJ, Rabinowitz P (1984) Methods of numerical integration, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
D’Urso MG (2012) New expressions of the gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. In: Sneeuw N, Novák P, Crespi M, Sansò F (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy. Springer, Berlin, pp 251–256
D’Urso MG (2013) On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. J Geod 87(3):239–252
D’Urso MG (2014a) Analytical computation of gravity effects for polyhedral bodies. J Geod 88(1):13–29
D’Urso MG (2014b) Gravity effects of polyhedral bodies with linearly varying density. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 120(4):349–372
D’Urso MG (2016) A remark on the computation of the gravitational potential of masses with linearly varying density. In: Sneeuw N, Novák P, Crespi M, Sansò F (eds) VIII Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy. Springer, Cham, pp 205–212
D’Urso MG, Trotta S (2015) Comparative assessment of linear and bilinear prism-based strategies for terrain correction computations. J Geod 89(3):199–215
D’Urso MG, Trotta S (2017) Gravity anomaly of polyhedral bodies having a polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 38(4):781–832
Farquharson C, Mosher C (2009) Three-dimensional modelling of gravity data using finite differences. J Appl Geophys 68(3):417–422
Fukushima T (2017) Precise and fast computation of the gravitational field of a general finite body and its application to the gravitational study of asteroid Eros. Astron J 154(4):145–159
Fukushima T (2018) Recursive computation of gravitational field of a right rectangular parallelepiped with density varying vertically by following an arbitrary degree polynomial. Geophys J Int 215(2):864–879
Garcia-Abdeslem J (2005) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism with density varying with depth following a cubic polynomial. Geophysics 70(6):J39–J42
Garcia-Abdeslem J (2017) Nonlinear inversion of isostatic residual gravity data from Montage Basin, northern Gulf of California. Geophysics 82(3):G45–G55
Gharti HN, Tromp J, Zampini S (2018) Spectral-infinite-element simulations of gravity anomalies. Geophys J Int 215(2):1098–1117
Goodacre AK (1973) Some comments on the calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism. Geophys Prospect 21(1):66–69
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products, 7th edn. Academic Press, New York
Hamayun Prutkin I, Tenzer R (2009) The optimum expression for the gravitational potential of polyhedral bodies having a linearly varying density distribution. J Geod 83(12):1163–1170
Hansen RO (1999) An analytical expression for the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly varying density. Geophysics 64(1):75–77
Hautmann S, Camacho AG, Gottsmann J, Odbert HM, Syers RT (2013) The shallow structure beneath Montserrat (West Indies) from new Bouguer gravity data. Geophys Res Lett 40(19):5113–5118
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2006) Physical geodesy. Springer, Berlin
Holstein H (2002) Gravimagnetic similarity in anomaly formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics 67(4):1126–1133
Holstein H (2003) Gravimagnetic anomaly formulas for polyhedra of spatially linear media. Geophysics 68(1):157–167
Holstein H, Ketteridge B (1996) Gravimetric analysis of uniform polyhedra. Geophysics 61(2):357–364
Holstein H, Schürholz P, Starr AJ, Chakraborty M (1999) Comparison of gravimetric formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics 64(5):1438–1446
Jahandari H, Farquharson CG (2013) Forward modeling of gravity data using finite-volume and finite-element methods on unstructured grids. Geophysics 78(3):G69–G80
Jarvenpaa S, Taskinen M, Yla-Oijala P (2003) Singularity extraction technique for integral equation methods with higher order basis functions on plane triangles and tetrahedra. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(8):1149–1165
Jarvenpaa S, Taskinen M, Yla-Oijala P (2006) Singularity subtraction technique for high-order polynomial vector basis functions on planar triangles. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 54(1):42–49
Jiang L, Zhang J, Feng Z (2017) A versatile solution for the gravity anomaly of 3D prism-meshed bodies with depth-dependent density contrast. Geophysics 82(4):G77–G86
Jiang L, Liu J, Zhang J, Feng Z (2018) Analytic expressions for the gravity gradient tensor of 3D prisms with depth-dependent density. Surv Geophys 39(3):337–363
Karcol R (2018) The gravitational potential and its derivatives of a right rectangular prism with depth-dependent density following an n-th degree polynomial. Stud Geophys Geod 62(3):427–449
Kirk BS, Peterson JW, Stogner RH, Carey GF (2006) libMesh: a C++ Library for parallel adaptive mesh refinement/coarsening simulations. Eng Comput 22(3–4):237–254
Li X, Chouteau M (1998) Three-dimensional gravity modeling in all space. Surv Geophys 19(4):339–368
Liu J, Zhang J, Jiang L, Lin Q, Wan L (2019) Polynomial-based density inversion of gravity anomalies for concealed iron-deposit exploration in North China. Geophysics 84(5):B325–B334
Long J, Farquharson CG (2019) Three-dimensional forward modelling of gravity data using mesh-free methods with radial basis functions and unstructured nodes. Geophys J Int 217(3):1577–1601
Martin-Atienza B, Garcia-Abdeslem J (1999) 2-D gravity modeling with analytically defined geometry and quadratic polynomial density functions. Geophysics 64(6):1730–1734
Martinez C, Li Y, Krahenbuhl R, Braga MA (2013) 3D inversion of airborne gravity gradiometry data in mineral exploration: a case study in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Brazil. Geophysics 78(1):B1–B11
Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics 31:362–371
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geod 74(7–8):552–560
Okabe M (1979) Analytical expressions for gravity anomalies due to homogeneous polyhedral bodies and translations into magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 44(4):730–741
Panet I, Pajot-Métivier G, Grefflefftz M, Métivier L, Diament M, Mandea M (2014) Mapping the mass distribution of Earth’s mantle using satellite-derived gravity gradients. Nat Geosci 7(2):131–135
Paul MK (1974) The gravity effect of a homogeneous polyhedron for three-dimensional interpretation. Pure Appl Geophys 112(3):553–561
Pedersen LB, Bastani M, Kamm J (2015) Gravity gradient and magnetic terrain effects for airborne applications—a practical fast Fourier transform technique. Geophysics 80(2):J19–J26
Pohanka V (1988) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophys Prospect 36(7):733–751
Pohanka V (1998) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly increasing density. Geophys Prospect 46(4):391–404
Ren Z, Chen C, Pan K, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Tang J (2017) Gravity anomalies of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surv Geophys 38(2):479–502
Ren Z, Zhong Y, Chen C, Tang J, Kalscheuer T, Maurer H, Li Y (2018a) Gravity gradient tensor of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with up to third-order polynomial horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surv Geophys 39(5):901–935
Ren Z, Zhong Y, Chen C, Tang J, Pan K (2018b) Gravity anomalies of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with horizontal and vertical mass contrasts up to cubic order. Geophysics 83(1):G1–G13
Reudink R, Klees R, Francis O, Kusche J, Schlesinger R, Shabanloui A, Sneeuw N, Timmen L (2014) High tilt susceptibility of the Scintrex CG-5 relative gravimeters. J Geod 88(6):617–622
Shin YH, Choi KS, Xu H (2006) Three-dimensional forward and inverse models for gravity fields based on the fast Fourier transform. Comput Geosci 32(6):727–738
Smith DA (2000) The gravitational attraction of any polygonally shaped vertical prism with inclined top and bottom faces. J Geod 74(5):414–420
Sulaiman A, Elawadi E, Mogren S (2018) Gravity interpretation to image the geologic structures of the coastal zone in al Qunfudhah area, southwest Saudi Arabia. Geophys J Int 214(3):1623–1632
Tai CT (1994) Dyadic Green functions in electromagnetic theory. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ
Tihon D, Craeye C (2018) All-analytical evaluation of the singular integrals involved in the method of moments. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 66(4):1925–1936
Tsoulis D (2012) Analytical computation of the full gravity tensor of a homogeneous arbitrarily shaped polyhedral source using line integrals. Geophysics 77(2):F1–F11
Tsoulis D, Petrovi S (2001) On the singularities of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophysics 66(2):535–539
Tsoulis D, Wziontek H, Petrović S (2003) A bilinear approximation of the surface relief in terrain correction computations. J Geod 77(5):338–344
Tsoulis D, Jamet O, Verdun J, Gonindard N (2009) Recursive algorithms for the computation of the potential harmonic coefficients of a constant density polyhedron. J Geod 83(10):925–942
Van Camp M, de Viron O, Watlet A, Meurers B, Francis O, Caudron C (2017) Geophysics from terrestrial time-variable gravity measurements. Rev Geophys 55(4):938–992
Wan L, Zhang J (2019) Analytical solutions of gravity vector and gravity gradient tensor caused by a 2D polygonal body with a 2D polynomial density contrast. Surv Geophys 40(5):B325–B334
Welford JK, Peace AL, Geng M, Dehler SA, Dickie K (2018) Crustal structure of Baffin Bay from constrained three-dimensional gravity inversion and deformable plate tectonic models. Geophys J Int 214(2):1281–1300
Werner RA (2017) The solid angle hidden in polyhedron gravitation formulations. J Geod 91(3):307–328
Wilton D, Rao S, Glisson A, Schaubert D, Al-Bundak O, Butler C (1984) Potential integrals for uniform and linear source distributions on polygonal and polyhedral domains. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 32(3):276–281
Wu L (2018a) Comparison of 3-D Fourier forward algorithms for gravity modelling of prismatic bodies with polynomial density distribution. Geophys J Int 215(3):1865–1886
Wu L (2018b) Efficient modeling of gravity fields caused by sources with arbitrary geometry and arbitrary density distribution. Surv Geophys 39(3):401–434
Wu L (2019) Fourier-domain modeling of gravity effects caused by polyhedral bodies. J Geod 93(5):635–653
Wu L, Chen L (2016) Fourier forward modeling of vector and tensor gravity fields due to prismatic bodies with variable density contrast. Geophysics 81(1):G13–G26
Ye Z, Tenzer R, Sneeuw N, Liu L, Wild-Pfeiffer F (2016) Generalized model for a Moho inversion from gravity and vertical gravity-gradient data. Geophys J Int 207(1):111–128
Yla-Oijala P, Taskinen M (2003) Calculation of CFIE impedance matrix elements with RWG and n x RWG functions. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 51(8):1837–1846
Zhang J, Jiang L (2017) Analytical expressions for the gravitational vector field of a 3-D rectangular prism with density varying as an arbitrary-order polynomial function. Geophys J Int 210(2):1176–1190
Zhao G, Chen B, Chen L, Liu J, Ren Z (2018) High-accuracy 3D Fourier forward modeling of gravity field based on the Gauss-FFT technique. J Appl Geophys 150:294–303
Zhou X (2009) 3D vector gravity potential and line integrals for the gravity anomaly of a rectangular prism with 3D variable density contrast. Geophysics 74(6):I43–I53
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41830107, 41922027), a joint China–Sweden mobility project funded by NSFC through project number 4171101400 and by the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) through Project No. CH2017-7233, the China Scholarship Council Foundation (201806370223), the National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (2019JJ20032) and the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (2020CX012). Our sincere thanks are given to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments which significantly improved the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Closed-Form Solution for Volume Integral \(I_v(0,0,0,w)\)
Appendix: Closed-Form Solution for Volume Integral \(I_v(0,0,0,w)\)
Following our previous work (Chen et al. 2018, equation 24 therein), the closed-form and singularity-free solution for volume integral \(I_v(0,0,0,w)\,(w=-1,1,3,\ldots ,\infty )\) can be expressed as:
transforming the volume integral \(I_v(0,0,0,w)\) into N surface integrals \(I_s(0,0,0,w)\), which can be calculated by:
where \(\tau _{ij}=|{\mathbf {r}}-{\mathbf {o}}_i|\) is the distance from point \({\mathbf {r}}\) to point \({\mathbf {o}}_i\). \(\beta ({\mathbf {o}}_i)\) is the solid angle which can be calculated by the following formula:
where \(\hat{\varvec{\rho }}_{ij}^{\perp }\) is the unit vector from point \({\mathbf {o}}_i\) to point \({\mathbf {r}}_{ij}^{\perp }\) (the projection point of point \({\mathbf {o}}_i\) onto edge \(C_{ij}\)). Note that \(\hat{\varvec{\rho }}_{ij}^{\perp }\) is either parallel or antiparallel to \({{\hat{{\mathbf {m}}}}}_{ij}\). The line integral in Eq. (44) is recursively computed by:
The initial line integral of the second term on the right-hand side of Eq. (46) is:
and the closed-form solution for the line integral L(0, w) in the first term on the right-hand side is (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik 2007, equation (2.260)):
with the initial integral being:
Note that the above closed-form expressions for \(I_v(0,0,0,w)\) (\(w=-1,1,3,\ldots ,\infty\)), which are based on the solutions for \(I_s(0,0,0,w)\) and L(0, w), are singularity-free. This means that the scalar components \(\phi (p,q,t)\) in Eq. (37) and vector components \({\mathbf {g}}(p,q,t)\) in Eq. (38) can be calculated without singularities.
To calculate the gravitational gradient tensor, the tensor components \({\mathbf {T}}(p,q,t)\) in Eq. (39), including the surface integral \(h_i I_s(0,0,0,-3)\), have to be evaluated. For \(h_i I_s(0,0,0,-3)\), the closed-form solutions in Eqs. (44) and (46) can be applied, but with the following initial integrals:
and
Weak logarithmic singularities exist in computation of line integral \(L(0,-1)\) in Eq. (51) when the observation site locates on the edge of the polyhedral body.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, Z., Chen, C., Zhong, Y. et al. Recursive Analytical Formulae of Gravitational Fields and Gradient Tensors for Polyhedral Bodies with Polynomial Density Contrasts of Arbitrary Non-negative Integer Orders. Surv Geophys 41, 695–722 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09587-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09587-4