Skip to main content
Log in

Is There an Optimal Recovery Step Landing Zone Against Slip-Induced Backward Falls During Walking?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery stepping in response to forward slips has the potential to not only rebuild the base of support to prevent backward falling, but also provide extra limb support to prevent downward falling. Hence, recovery stepping is often necessary for fall prevention following an unexpected slip. However, less is known about whether recovery foot placement could affect the likelihood of recovery following a slip. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an optimal recovery landing zone within which older adults have a higher likelihood of recovery. 195 participants experienced a novel, unannounced forward slip while walking on a 7-m walkway. The center of mass (COM) stability (computed from its position and velocity), vertical limb support (computed from change in hip kinematics), and recovery limb joint moments (computed from joint kinematics and ground reaction force) in the sagittal plane were analyzed. The results showed that a longer distance between recovery foot landing position and the projected COM position at recovery foot touchdown (relative recovery step placement) was conducive to stability improvement but adverse to limb support enhancement, and vice versa for a shorter distance. Relative recovery step placement could predict the recovery likelihood with an accuracy of 67.3%, and the recovery rate was greater than 50% when the distance between recovery foot and COM is less than 0.3 × foot length. This study also found more posterior stepping could be attributed to insufficient ankle plantar flexor and hip flexor moments in the pre-swing phase, while more anterior stepping was induced by insufficient hip and knee extensor moments in the following swing phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beschorner, K., and R. Cham. Impact of joint torques on heel acceleration at heel contact, a contributor to slips and falls. Ergonomics 51:1799–1813, 2008.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatt, T., and Y. C. Pai. Immediate and latent interlimb transfer of gait stability adaptation following repeated exposure to slips. J. Mot. Behav. 40:380–390, 2008.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatt, T., J. D. Wening, and Y. C. Pai. Influence of gait speed on stability: recovery from anterior slips and compensatory stepping. Gait Posture 21:146–156, 2005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt, T., J. D. Wening, and Y. C. Pai. Adaptive control of gait stability in reducing slip-related backward loss of balance. Exp. Brain Res. 170:61–73, 2006.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, V. C. K., A. d’Avella, and E. Bizzi. Adjustments of motor pattern for load compensation via modulated activations of muscle synergies during natural behaviors. J. Neurophysiol. 101:1235–1257, 2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R. C., L. M. Prebeau-Menezes, M. T. Butcher, and J. E. A. Bertram. Step length and required friction in walking. Gait Posture 27:547–551, 2008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Leva, P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J. Biomech. 29:1223–1230, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delp, S. L., F. C. Anderson, A. S. Arnold, P. Loan, A. Habib, C. T. John, E. Guendelman, and D. G. Thelen. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic Simulations of movement. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:1940–1950, 2007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Espy, D. D., F. Yang, T. Bhatt, and Y. C. Pai. Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture 32:378–382, 2010.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaffney, B. M., M. D. Harris, B. S. Davidson, J. E. Stevens-Lapsley, C. L. Christiansen, and K. B. Shelburne. Multi-joint compensatory effects of unilateral total knee arthroplasty during high-demand tasks. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:2529–2541, 2016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghoussayni, S., C. Stevens, S. Durham, and D. Ewins. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait Posture 20:266–272, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabiner, M. D., M. L. Bareither, S. Gatts, J. Marone, and K. L. Troy. Task-specific training reduces trip-related fall risk in women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44:2410–2414, 2012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grabiner, M. D., T. J. Koh, T. M. Lundin, and D. W. Jahnigen. Kinematics of recovery from a stumble. J. Gerontol. 48:M97–M102, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hof, A. L. The ground reaction vector in walking passes always (almost) through the same point. J. Biomech. 46:631–632, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsiao-Wecksler, E. T., and S. N. Robinovitch. The effect of step length on young and elderly women’s ability to recover balance. Clin. Biomech. 22:574–580, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, G. W., C. W. Luchies, A. P. Stylianou, J. M. Schiffman, and D. G. Thelen. Effects of step length on stepping responses used to arrest a forward fall. Gait Posture 22:219–224, 2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lacquaniti, F., R. Grasso, and M. Zago. Motor patterns in walking. News Physiol. Sci. 14:168–174, 1999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X., S. Reschechtko, S. J. Wang, and Y. C. Pai. The recovery response to a novel unannounced laboratory-induced slip: THE “first trial effect” in older adults. Clin. Biomech. 48:9–14, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacLean, J. G. B., and S. K. Reddy. The contralateral slip—an avoidable complication and indication for prophylactic, pinning in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 88:1497–1501, 2006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mak, M. K. Y., F. Yang, and Y. C. Pai. Limb collapse, rather than instability, causes failure in sit-to-stand performance among patients with Parkinson disease. Phys. Ther. 91:381–391, 2011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maki, B. E., and W. E. McIlroy. The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the “change-in-support” strategy. Phys. Ther. 77:488–507, 1997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maki, B. E., W. E. McIlroy, and G. R. Fernie. Change-in-support reactions for balance recovery. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 22:20–26, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mansfield, A., E. L. Inness, J. S. Wong, J. E. Fraser, and W. E. McIlroy. Is Impaired control of reactive stepping related to falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27:526–533, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martelli, D., F. Aprigliano, P. Tropea, G. Pasquini, S. Micera, and V. Monaco. Stability against backward balance loss: age-related modifications following slip-like perturbations of multiple amplitudes. Gait Posture 53:207–214, 2017.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maus, H. M., S. W. Lipfert, M. Gross, J. Rummel, and A. Seyfarth. Upright human gait did not provide a major mechanical challenge for our ancestors. Nat. Commun. 1(1):1–6, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neptune, R. R., S. A. Kautz, and F. E. Zajac. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J. Biomech. 34:1387–1398, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pai, Y. C. Movement termination and stability in standing. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 31:19–25, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pai, Y.-C., and J. L. Patton. Center of mass velocity-position predictions for balance control. J. Biomech. 30:347–354, 1997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pai, Y. C., F. Yang, T. Bhatt, and E. Wang. Learning from laboratory-induced falling: long-term motor retention among older adults. Age 36:1367–1376, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pai, Y. C., F. Yang, J. D. Wening, and M. J. Pavol. Mechanisms of limb collapse following a slip among young and older adults. J. Biomech. 39:2194–2204, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pavol, M. J., T. M. Owings, K. T. Foley, and M. D. Grabiner. Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 56:M428–M437, 2001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pavol, M. J., and Y. C. Pai. Deficient limb support is a major contributor to age differences in falling. J. Biomech. 40:1318–1325, 2007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Piazza, S. J., and S. L. Delp. The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait. J. Biomech. 29:723–733, 1996.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Prilutsky, B. I., R. J. Gregor, and M. M. Ryan. Coordination of two-joint rectus femoris and hamstrings during the swing phase of human walking and running. Exp. Brain Res. 120:479–486, 1998.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, S., X. Liu, A. Lee, and Y.-C. Pai. Can recovery foot placement affect older adults’ slip-fall severity? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(8):1941–1948, 2017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, S. J., X. Liu, and Y. C. Pai. Limb collapse or instability? Assessment on cause of falls. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 47:767–777, 2019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Winter, D. A. CNS strategies in human gait: implication for FES control. Automedica 11:163–174, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Winter, D. A. Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys. Ther. 72:45–53, 1992; (discussion 54–46).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamaguchi, T., and K. Masani. Contribution of center of mass–center of pressure angle tangent to the required coefficient of friction in the sagittal plane during straight walking. Biotribology 5:16–22, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, F., F. C. Anderson, and Y. C. Pai. Predicted threshold against backward balance loss in gait. J. Biomech. 40:804–811, 2007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, F., F. C. Anderson, and Y. C. Pai. Predicted threshold against backward balance loss following a slip in gait. J. Biomech. 41:1823–1831, 2008.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang, F., T. Bhatt, and Y. C. Pai. Role of stability and limb support in recovery against a fall following a novel slip induced in different daily activities. J. Biomech. 42:1903–1908, 2009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang, F., D. Espy, and Y. C. Pai. Feasible stability region in the frontal plane during human gait. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37:2606–2614, 2009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang, F., and Y. C. Pai. Automatic recognition of falls in gait-slip training: Harness load cell based criteria. J. Biomech. 44:2243–2249, 2011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, B., D. Gabriel, L. Noble, and K. N. An. Estimate of the optimum cutoff frequency for the Butterworth low-pass digital filter. J. Appl. Biomech. 15:318–329, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH R01-AG050672-02 (to Tanvi Bhatt) and NIH R01-AG044364 (to Tanvi Bhatt & Yi-Chung Pai). We thank Ms. Alison Schenone for helpful edits.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanvi Bhatt.

Additional information

Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Pai, YC. & Bhatt, T. Is There an Optimal Recovery Step Landing Zone Against Slip-Induced Backward Falls During Walking?. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 1768–1778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02482-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02482-4

Keywords

Navigation