Abstract
Recovery stepping in response to forward slips has the potential to not only rebuild the base of support to prevent backward falling, but also provide extra limb support to prevent downward falling. Hence, recovery stepping is often necessary for fall prevention following an unexpected slip. However, less is known about whether recovery foot placement could affect the likelihood of recovery following a slip. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an optimal recovery landing zone within which older adults have a higher likelihood of recovery. 195 participants experienced a novel, unannounced forward slip while walking on a 7-m walkway. The center of mass (COM) stability (computed from its position and velocity), vertical limb support (computed from change in hip kinematics), and recovery limb joint moments (computed from joint kinematics and ground reaction force) in the sagittal plane were analyzed. The results showed that a longer distance between recovery foot landing position and the projected COM position at recovery foot touchdown (relative recovery step placement) was conducive to stability improvement but adverse to limb support enhancement, and vice versa for a shorter distance. Relative recovery step placement could predict the recovery likelihood with an accuracy of 67.3%, and the recovery rate was greater than 50% when the distance between recovery foot and COM is less than 0.3 × foot length. This study also found more posterior stepping could be attributed to insufficient ankle plantar flexor and hip flexor moments in the pre-swing phase, while more anterior stepping was induced by insufficient hip and knee extensor moments in the following swing phase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beschorner, K., and R. Cham. Impact of joint torques on heel acceleration at heel contact, a contributor to slips and falls. Ergonomics 51:1799–1813, 2008.
Bhatt, T., and Y. C. Pai. Immediate and latent interlimb transfer of gait stability adaptation following repeated exposure to slips. J. Mot. Behav. 40:380–390, 2008.
Bhatt, T., J. D. Wening, and Y. C. Pai. Influence of gait speed on stability: recovery from anterior slips and compensatory stepping. Gait Posture 21:146–156, 2005.
Bhatt, T., J. D. Wening, and Y. C. Pai. Adaptive control of gait stability in reducing slip-related backward loss of balance. Exp. Brain Res. 170:61–73, 2006.
Cheung, V. C. K., A. d’Avella, and E. Bizzi. Adjustments of motor pattern for load compensation via modulated activations of muscle synergies during natural behaviors. J. Neurophysiol. 101:1235–1257, 2009.
Cooper, R. C., L. M. Prebeau-Menezes, M. T. Butcher, and J. E. A. Bertram. Step length and required friction in walking. Gait Posture 27:547–551, 2008.
de Leva, P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J. Biomech. 29:1223–1230, 1996.
Delp, S. L., F. C. Anderson, A. S. Arnold, P. Loan, A. Habib, C. T. John, E. Guendelman, and D. G. Thelen. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic Simulations of movement. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:1940–1950, 2007.
Espy, D. D., F. Yang, T. Bhatt, and Y. C. Pai. Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture 32:378–382, 2010.
Gaffney, B. M., M. D. Harris, B. S. Davidson, J. E. Stevens-Lapsley, C. L. Christiansen, and K. B. Shelburne. Multi-joint compensatory effects of unilateral total knee arthroplasty during high-demand tasks. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:2529–2541, 2016.
Ghoussayni, S., C. Stevens, S. Durham, and D. Ewins. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait Posture 20:266–272, 2004.
Grabiner, M. D., M. L. Bareither, S. Gatts, J. Marone, and K. L. Troy. Task-specific training reduces trip-related fall risk in women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44:2410–2414, 2012.
Grabiner, M. D., T. J. Koh, T. M. Lundin, and D. W. Jahnigen. Kinematics of recovery from a stumble. J. Gerontol. 48:M97–M102, 1993.
Hof, A. L. The ground reaction vector in walking passes always (almost) through the same point. J. Biomech. 46:631–632, 2013.
Hsiao-Wecksler, E. T., and S. N. Robinovitch. The effect of step length on young and elderly women’s ability to recover balance. Clin. Biomech. 22:574–580, 2007.
King, G. W., C. W. Luchies, A. P. Stylianou, J. M. Schiffman, and D. G. Thelen. Effects of step length on stepping responses used to arrest a forward fall. Gait Posture 22:219–224, 2005.
Lacquaniti, F., R. Grasso, and M. Zago. Motor patterns in walking. News Physiol. Sci. 14:168–174, 1999.
Liu, X., S. Reschechtko, S. J. Wang, and Y. C. Pai. The recovery response to a novel unannounced laboratory-induced slip: THE “first trial effect” in older adults. Clin. Biomech. 48:9–14, 2017.
MacLean, J. G. B., and S. K. Reddy. The contralateral slip—an avoidable complication and indication for prophylactic, pinning in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 88:1497–1501, 2006.
Mak, M. K. Y., F. Yang, and Y. C. Pai. Limb collapse, rather than instability, causes failure in sit-to-stand performance among patients with Parkinson disease. Phys. Ther. 91:381–391, 2011.
Maki, B. E., and W. E. McIlroy. The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the “change-in-support” strategy. Phys. Ther. 77:488–507, 1997.
Maki, B. E., W. E. McIlroy, and G. R. Fernie. Change-in-support reactions for balance recovery. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 22:20–26, 2003.
Mansfield, A., E. L. Inness, J. S. Wong, J. E. Fraser, and W. E. McIlroy. Is Impaired control of reactive stepping related to falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27:526–533, 2013.
Martelli, D., F. Aprigliano, P. Tropea, G. Pasquini, S. Micera, and V. Monaco. Stability against backward balance loss: age-related modifications following slip-like perturbations of multiple amplitudes. Gait Posture 53:207–214, 2017.
Maus, H. M., S. W. Lipfert, M. Gross, J. Rummel, and A. Seyfarth. Upright human gait did not provide a major mechanical challenge for our ancestors. Nat. Commun. 1(1):1–6, 2010.
Neptune, R. R., S. A. Kautz, and F. E. Zajac. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J. Biomech. 34:1387–1398, 2001.
Pai, Y. C. Movement termination and stability in standing. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 31:19–25, 2003.
Pai, Y.-C., and J. L. Patton. Center of mass velocity-position predictions for balance control. J. Biomech. 30:347–354, 1997.
Pai, Y. C., F. Yang, T. Bhatt, and E. Wang. Learning from laboratory-induced falling: long-term motor retention among older adults. Age 36:1367–1376, 2014.
Pai, Y. C., F. Yang, J. D. Wening, and M. J. Pavol. Mechanisms of limb collapse following a slip among young and older adults. J. Biomech. 39:2194–2204, 2006.
Pavol, M. J., T. M. Owings, K. T. Foley, and M. D. Grabiner. Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 56:M428–M437, 2001.
Pavol, M. J., and Y. C. Pai. Deficient limb support is a major contributor to age differences in falling. J. Biomech. 40:1318–1325, 2007.
Piazza, S. J., and S. L. Delp. The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait. J. Biomech. 29:723–733, 1996.
Prilutsky, B. I., R. J. Gregor, and M. M. Ryan. Coordination of two-joint rectus femoris and hamstrings during the swing phase of human walking and running. Exp. Brain Res. 120:479–486, 1998.
Wang, S., X. Liu, A. Lee, and Y.-C. Pai. Can recovery foot placement affect older adults’ slip-fall severity? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(8):1941–1948, 2017.
Wang, S. J., X. Liu, and Y. C. Pai. Limb collapse or instability? Assessment on cause of falls. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 47:767–777, 2019.
Winter, D. A. CNS strategies in human gait: implication for FES control. Automedica 11:163–174, 1989.
Winter, D. A. Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys. Ther. 72:45–53, 1992; (discussion 54–46).
Yamaguchi, T., and K. Masani. Contribution of center of mass–center of pressure angle tangent to the required coefficient of friction in the sagittal plane during straight walking. Biotribology 5:16–22, 2016.
Yang, F., F. C. Anderson, and Y. C. Pai. Predicted threshold against backward balance loss in gait. J. Biomech. 40:804–811, 2007.
Yang, F., F. C. Anderson, and Y. C. Pai. Predicted threshold against backward balance loss following a slip in gait. J. Biomech. 41:1823–1831, 2008.
Yang, F., T. Bhatt, and Y. C. Pai. Role of stability and limb support in recovery against a fall following a novel slip induced in different daily activities. J. Biomech. 42:1903–1908, 2009.
Yang, F., D. Espy, and Y. C. Pai. Feasible stability region in the frontal plane during human gait. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37:2606–2614, 2009.
Yang, F., and Y. C. Pai. Automatic recognition of falls in gait-slip training: Harness load cell based criteria. J. Biomech. 44:2243–2249, 2011.
Yu, B., D. Gabriel, L. Noble, and K. N. An. Estimate of the optimum cutoff frequency for the Butterworth low-pass digital filter. J. Appl. Biomech. 15:318–329, 1999.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH R01-AG050672-02 (to Tanvi Bhatt) and NIH R01-AG044364 (to Tanvi Bhatt & Yi-Chung Pai). We thank Ms. Alison Schenone for helpful edits.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Pai, YC. & Bhatt, T. Is There an Optimal Recovery Step Landing Zone Against Slip-Induced Backward Falls During Walking?. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 1768–1778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02482-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02482-4