Skip to main content
Log in

Key informants’ perspectives on the challenges of municipal solid waste management in Iran: a mixed method study

  • REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of the municipal solid waste (MSW) management system seems necessary to promote urban services. The present study is aimed to identify and prioritize the problems and deficiencies of MSW management in Iran. This study has used a mixed-methods (Scoping review and Delphi technique) approach to achieve its goals. The results obtained by the scoping review showed that the average rate of Iran’s MSW generation in the last decade (2009–2019) was 0.745 kg/capita/day. The average of MSW composition was estimated to include: organic material (68.42%), paper and cardboard (7.31%), plastic (9.80%), pet (0.99%), metal (1.59%), rubber (1.09%), textile (3.02%), glass (2.33%), wood (0.97%), and others (4.48%). Also a scoping review of the current status of Iran’s MSW management showed that at present, Iran’s MSW management has both some strengths (such as collecting more than 90% of the total generated MSW) and lot of weaknesses such as lack of a systematic program for MSW reduction, weakness in source separation, low processing and recycling, unsanitary disposal of MSW, etc. According to the results of the Delphi technique, Iran’s main MSW management problems are: disregarding the investment for culturalization in the field of SWM and low effectiveness of the existing educational methods, disregarding the principles of integrated solid waste management hierarchy, imbalance in cost-efficiency in MSW systems, the existence of major deficits and weaknesses in recruitment and selection of staffs and the existence of additional non-expert human resources, lack of incongruity between the non-standard solid waste disposal crimes and their penalties, lack of executive guarantees for the proper implementation of the existing regulations, poor performance of the responsible organizations in the field of public education, as well as lack of effective cooperation among the responsible bodies in this field. Overall, consideration and elimination of priority problems and reinforcement the strengths of Iran’s MSW management system can be effective in improving the performance of this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verma R, Borongan G, Memon M (2016) Municipal solid waste management in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, current practices and future recommendation. Procedia Environ Sci 35:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benis KZ, Safaiyan A, Farajzadeh D, Nadji FK, Shakerkhatibi M, Harati H, Safari G, Sarbazan M (2019) Municipal solid waste characterization and household waste behaviors in a megacity in the northwest of Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4863–4872

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh P, Ghosh SK (2019) Cost analysis of municipal solid waste management using waste compacting stations: a case study. In: Waste management and resource efficiency. Springer, India, pp 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7290-1_94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Deus R, Bezerra B, Battistelle R (2019) Solid waste indicators and their implications for management practice. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(2):1129–1144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rathore P, Sarmah S (2019) Modeling transfer station locations considering source separation of solid waste in urban centers: a case study of Bilaspur city, India. J Clean Prod 211:44–60

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ma J, Hipel KW (2016) Exploring social dimensions of municipal solid waste management around the globe—a systematic literature review. Waste Manag 56:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Negi H, Agrawal R, Verma A, Goel R (2019) Municipal solid waste to bioenergy: current status, opportunities, and challenges in Indian Context. In: New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64191-5.00014-6

  8. Valizadeh S, Hakimian H (2019) Evaluation of waste management options using rapid impact assessment matrix and Iranian Leopold matrix in Birjand. Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(7):3337–3354

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammadi M, Jämsä-Jounela S-L, Harjunkoski I (2019) Optimal planning of municipal solid waste management systems in an integrated supply chain network. Comput Chem Eng 123:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abdallah M, Shanableh A, Arab M, Shabib A, Adghim M, El-Sherbiny R (2019) Waste to energy potential in middle income countries of MENA region based on multi-scenario analysis for Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt. J Environ Manag 232:58–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zarea MA, Moazed H, Ahmadmoazzam M, Malekghasemi S, Jaafarzadeh N (2019) Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191(3):131

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aleluia J, Ferrão P (2016) Characterization of urban waste management practices in developing Asian countries: a new analytical framework based on waste characteristics and urban dimension. Waste Manag 58:415–429

    Google Scholar 

  13. OECD Data (2019), Municipal waste (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/waste/municipal-waste.htm. Accessed 8 July 2019

  14. Caniato M (2017) Assessment and design of local regulation in solid waste management in low-and middle-income countries. In: The political economy of local regulation. Springer, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58828-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2017) Guidance on municipal waste data collection. https://ec.europa.eu/.../Municipal+Waste.../bd38a449-7d30-44b6-a39f-8a20a9e67af2. Accessed 8 July 2019

  16. Human’s Environmental Laws, Regulation Griteria and Standards (2012) Chapter four: laws, regulations, and guidelines related to water and soil pollution (Rule Number: 2). Tehran: Hak (Persian)

  17. Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33(1):220–232

    Google Scholar 

  18. Soltani A, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2017) The impacts of decision uncertainty on municipal solid waste management. J Environ Manag 197:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yukalang N, Clarke B, Ross K (2018) Solid waste management solutions for a rapidly urbanizing area in Thailand: recommendations based on stakeholder input. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(7):1302

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malinauskaite J, Jouhara H, Czajczyńska D, Stanchev P, Katsou E, Rostkowski P, Thorne RJ, Colón J, Ponsá S, Al-Mansour F (2017) Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe. Energy 141:2013–2044

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management, introduction. 15. World Bank, Washington, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  23. Agamuthu P, Masaru T (2014) Municipal solid waste management in Asia and the Pacific Islands: challenges and strategic solutions. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bundhoo ZM (2018) Solid waste management in least developed countries: current status and challenges faced. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1867–1877

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mohee R, Mauthoor S, Bundhoo ZM, Somaroo G, Soobhany N, Gunasee S (2015) Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: a review. Waste Manag 43:539–549

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daskal S, Ayalon O, Shechter M (2018) The state of municipal solid waste management in Israel. Waste Manag Res 36(6):527–534

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vij D (2012) Urbanization and solid waste management in India: present practices and future challenges. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 37:437–447

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cetrulo TB, Marques RC, Cetrulo NM, Pinto FS, Moreira RM, Mendizábal-Cortés AD, Malheiros TF (2018) Effectiveness of solid waste policies in developing countries: a case study in Brazil. J Clean Prod 205:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al Lahou A, Alsabbagh M (2019) Assessment of municipal solid waste management in the state of Kuwait. Int J Environ Sci Dev 10 (2)

  30. Moshari M (2016) Investigating solid waste management in the legal system of Iran. Legal Res Q 19(806):329–355 (Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abdoli M, Rezaei M, Hasanian H (2016) Integrated solid waste management in megacities. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 2(3):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abduli MA, Tavakolli H, Azari A (2013) Alternatives for solid waste management in Isfahan, Iran: a case study. Waste Manag Res 31(5):532–537

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rezaei M, Ghobadian B, Samadi SH, Karimi S (2018) Electric power generation from municipal solid waste: a techno-economical assessment under different scenarios in Iran. Energy 152:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yazdani M, Monavari S, Omrani G, Shariat M, Hosseini S (2015) Landfill site suitability assessment by means of geographic information system analysis. Solid Earth 6(3):945–956

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nikkhah A, Khojastehpour M, Abbaspour-Fard MH (2019) Valorization of municipal solid wastes through biogas production in Iran. Energy Equip Syst 7(1):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dehghani MH, Mosavi MF, Ale-Sheikh AA, Heidarinejad Z, Yousefi M (2018) Experimental data of designing an optimal system for storage, collection and transfer of household waste in the GIS environment: a case study of Tehran, district 22, Iran. Data Brief 19:1605–1613

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rupani PF, Maleki Delarestaghi R, Asadi H, Rezania S, Park J, Abbaspour M, Shao W (2019) Current scenario of the Tehran municipal solid waste handling rules towards green technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(6):979

    Google Scholar 

  38. Erfani SMH, Danesh S, Karrabi SM, Shad R, Nemati S (2018) Using applied operations research and geographical information systems to evaluate effective factors in storage service of municipal solid waste management systems. Waste Manag 79:346–355

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rich N, Bharti A (2015) Assessment of different types of in-vessel composters and its effect on stabilization of MSW compost. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 2(03):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rafiee A, Delgado-Saborit JM, Sly PD, Amiri H, Hoseini M (2019) Lifestyle and occupational factors affecting exposure to BTEX in municipal solid waste composting facility workers. Sci Total Environ 656:540–546

    Google Scholar 

  41. Behrooznia L, Sharifi M, Alimardani R, Mousavi-Avval SH (2018) Sustainability analysis of landfilling and composting-landfilling for municipal solid waste management in the north of Iran. J Clean Prod 203:1028–1038

    Google Scholar 

  42. Farahbakhsh A, Forghani MA (2019) Sustainable location and route planning with GIS for waste sorting centers, case study: Kerman, Iran. Waste Manag Res 37(3):287–300

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rafiee A, Gordi E, Lu W, Miyata Y, Shabani H, Mortezazadeh S, Hoseini M (2018) The impact of various festivals and events on recycling potential of municipal solid waste in Tehran, Iran. J Clean Prod 183:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  44. Farzadkia M, Jorfi S, Akbari H, Ghasemi M (2012) Evaluation of dry solid waste recycling from municipal solid waste: case of Mashhad city, Iran. Waste Manag Res 30(1):106–112

    Google Scholar 

  45. Feyzi S, Khanmohammadi M, Abedinzadeh N, Aalipour M (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis FANP based on GIS for siting municipal solid waste incineration power plant in the north of Iran. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101513

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ebadi Torkayesh A, Fathipoir F, Saidi-Mehrabd M (2019) Entropy-based multi-criteria analysis of thermochemical conversions for energy recovery from municipal solid waste using fuzzy VIKOR and ELECTRE III: case of Azerbaijan region, Iran. J Energy Manag Technol 3(1):17–29

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Hosseinzadeh M (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):111–118

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yazdani M, Monavari S, Omrani G, Shariat M, Hosseini S (2017) A comparative evaluation of municipal solid waste landfill sites in northern Iran. Appl Ecol Environ Res 15(4):91–110

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gholamalifard M, Phillips J, Ghazizade MJ (2017) Evaluation of unmitigated options for municipal waste disposal site in Tehran, Iran using an integrated assessment approach. J Environ Plann Manag 60(5):792–820

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mostafaeipour A, Mostafaeipour N (2009) Renewable energy issues and electricity production in Middle East compared with Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1641–1645

    Google Scholar 

  51. latitude and longitude. Iran latitude and longitude. https://latitudelongitude.org/ir/. Accessed 10 July 2019

  52. Latitude Countries, Latitude and longitude of Iran. https://latitude.to/map/ir/iran. Accessed 10 July 2019

  53. Modarres R, Sarhadi A (2011) Statistically-based regionalization of rainfall climates of Iran. Glob Planet Change 75(1–2):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  54. Moghim S (2018) Impact of climate variation on hydrometeorology in Iran. Glob Planet Change 170:93–105

    Google Scholar 

  55. Statistical center of Iran. Population and Housing Censuses. https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses. Accessed 8 July 2019

  56. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res 1(2):112–133

    Google Scholar 

  57. Molina-Azorín JF, López-Gamero MD (2016) Mixed methods studies in environmental management research: prevalence, purposes and designs. Bus Strategy Environ 25(2):134–148

    Google Scholar 

  58. Clark VLP (2019) Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: identifying why, what, when and how. Contemp Educ Psychol 57:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  59. Taguchi N (2018) Description and explanation of pragmatic development: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System 75:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  60. Omrani GA, Karbasi AA, Arjomandi R, Habibipour AA (2010) Compilation of optimal strategies of urban waste management system by using SWOT and QSPM; case study of city of Sari. Int J Urban Rural Manag 8(26):1–21 (Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Bayat R, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Afrasyabi H, Berrada A (2017) Prognostication of energy use and environmental impacts for recycle system of municipal solid waste management. J Clean Prod 154:602–613

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji S, Alimardani R (2016) Feasibility and study to estimate the minimum cost and emission of environmental pollutants from disposal of municipal solid waste with composting method by using operations research techniques in Tehran. Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Iran (Persian)

  63. Karak T, Bhagat R, Bhattacharyya P (2012) Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: the world scenario. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42(15):1509–1630

    Google Scholar 

  64. Geist MR (2010) Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: a comparison of two studies. Evaluat Progr Plan 33(2):147–154

    Google Scholar 

  65. Humphrey-Murto S, de Wit M (2019) The Delphi method—more research please. J Clin Epidemiol 106:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hasson F, Keeney S (2011) Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78(9):1695–1704

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hutchins MJ, Richter JS, Henry ML, Sutherland JW (2019) Development of indicators for the social dimension of sustainability in a US business context. J Clean Prod 212:687–697

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gliem JA, Gliem RR (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Midwest Research, pp 82–88

  69. Dalkey NC (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, pp 1–79

    Google Scholar 

  70. Smalley SW, Retallick MS (2011) Purposes, activities, and documentation of early field experience in agricultural teacher education: a national Delphi study. J Agric Educ 52(3):100–109

    Google Scholar 

  71. Roberts TG, Dyer JE (2004) Characteristics of effective agriculture teachers. J Agric Educ 45:82–95

    Google Scholar 

  72. Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The delphi method. Addison-Wesley Reading, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  74. Madadian E, Amiri L, Abdoli MA (2013) Application of analytic hierarchy process and multicriteria decision analysis on waste management: a case study in Iran. Environ Progress Sustain Energy 32(3):810–817

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kalantarifard A, Yang GS (2011) Energy potential from municipal solid waste in Tanjung Langsat landfill, Johor, Malaysia. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(12):8560–8568

    Google Scholar 

  76. Khan D, Kumar A, Samadder S (2016) Impact of socioeconomic status on municipal solid waste generation rate. Waste Manag 49:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rajaeifar MA, Ghanavati H, Dashti BB, Heijungs R, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M (2017) Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: a comparative review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:414–439

    Google Scholar 

  78. Majlessi M, Zamanzadeh M, Alavi N, Amanidaz N, Bakhshoodeh R (2019) Generation rates and current management of municipal, construction and demolition wastes in Tehran. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21(1):191–200

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hassanvand M, Nabizadeh R, Heidari M (2008) Municipal solid waste analysis in Iran. Iran J Health Environ 1(1):9–18 (Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management, vol 15. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  81. WASTE ATLAST, Country Data. (2019). https://www.atlas.d-waste.com/. Accessed 27 June 2019

  82. Mian MM, Zeng X, AaNB N, Al-Hamadani SM (2017) Municipal solid waste management in China: a comparative analysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19(3):1127–1135

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ghinea C, Drăgoi EN, Comăniţă E-D, Gavrilescu M, Câmpean T, Curteanu S, Gavrilescu M (2016) Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis. J Environ Manag 182:80–93

    Google Scholar 

  84. Moghadam MA, Mokhtarani N, Mokhtarani B (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Rasht City, Iran. Waste Manag 29(1):485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Dhokhikah Y, Trihadiningrum Y (2012) Solid waste management in Asian developing countries: challenges and opportunities. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 2(7):329–335

    Google Scholar 

  86. Khoramnejadian S, Zavareh JJ, Khoramnejadian S (2011) Bio-based plastic a way for reduce municipal solid waste. Procedia Eng 21:489–495

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dehghanifard E, Dehghani MH (2018) Evaluation and analysis of municipal solid wastes in Tehran, Iran. MethodsX 5:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  88. Babazadeh T, Nadrian H, Mosaferi M, Allahverdipour H (2018) Identifying challenges and barriers to participating in the source separation of waste program in Tabriz, Northwest of Iran: a qualitative study from the citizens’ perspective. Resources 7(3):53

    Google Scholar 

  89. Jamshidi A, Taghizadeh F, Ata D (2011) Sustainable municipal solid waste management (case study: Sarab County, Iran). Ann Environ Sci 5(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  90. Samadi M, Kashitarash Esfahani Z, Naddafi K (2013) Comparison the efficacy of fenton and “nzvi+ h2o2” processes in municipal solid waste landfill leachate treatment (case study: Hamadan landfill leachate). Int J Environ Res 7(1):187–194

    Google Scholar 

  91. Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F (2002) Handbook of solid waste management, 2nd Edn. In: 2 (ed) Introduction-Issues in solid waste management—Lack of Quality Data. McGraw-Hill Education, United States, p 1.6

  92. Fernando RLS (2019) Solid waste management of local governments in the Western Province of Sri Lanka: an implementation analysis. Waste Manag 84:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  93. Van Ewijk S, Stegemann J (2016) Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. J Clean Prod 132:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ferdowsi A, Ferdosi M, Mehrani MJ (2018) Municipal solid waste management in Gachsaran county, Iran – landfill site selection. J Civil Eng Waste Resour Manag 171(3):82–88. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmoodi S, Pazira E, Van Genuchten MT (2015) Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(10):7754–7765

    Google Scholar 

  96. Weng Y-C, Fujiwara T, Houng HJ, Sun C-H, Li W-Y, Kuo Y-W (2015) Management of landfill reclamation with regard to biodiversity preservation, global warming mitigation and landfill mining: experiences from the Asia-Pacific region. J Clean Prod 104:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kumar S, Gaikwad S, Shekdar A, Kshirsagar P, Singh R (2004) Estimation method for national methane emission from solid waste landfills. Atmos Environ 38(21):3481–3487

    Google Scholar 

  98. Chen Y-C, Lo S-L (2016) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions for several municipal solid waste management strategies. J Clean Prod 113:606–612

    Google Scholar 

  99. Mintz KK, Henn L, Park J, Kurman J (2019) What predicts household waste management behaviors? Culture and type of behavior as moderators. Resour Conserv Recycl 145:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  100. Singh A (2019) Managing the uncertainty problems of municipal solid waste disposal. J Environ Manag 240:259–265

    Google Scholar 

  101. Yakubu Y, Zhou J (2019) Novel approach to quantify municipal solid waste management hierarchy based on analytical hierarchy process. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(4):1897–1908

    Google Scholar 

  102. Phonphoton N, Pharino C (2019) A system dynamics modeling to evaluate flooding impacts on municipal solid waste management services. Waste Manag 87:525–536

    Google Scholar 

  103. Marino AL, Chaves GdLD, dos Santos Junior JL (2018) Do Brazilian municipalities have the technical capacity to implement solid waste management at the local level? J Clean Prod 188:378–386

    Google Scholar 

  104. Human's Environmental Laws, Regulation Griteria and Standards (2012) Chapter four: laws, regulations, and guidelines related to water and soil pollution (Rule Number: 28). Tehran: Hak (Persian)

  105. Esmaeilizadeh S, Taghipour H (2019) Investigating the education level and specialty of managers and experts in Waste Management Organizations of Iranian cities. J Res Environ Health 5(1):265–277. https://doi.org/10.22038/jreh.2019.38895.1286(Persian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Babaei AA, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Teymouri P, Ahmadi K, Rafiee M (2015) Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 102:94–100

    Google Scholar 

  107. Zurbrugg C (2002) Urban solid waste management in low-income countries of Asia how to cope with the garbage crisis. The Urban Solid Waste Management Durban, South Africa, pp 1–13

  108. De Feo G, De Gisi S (2010) Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: a sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge. Waste Manag 30(6):958–976

    Google Scholar 

  109. Eom K, Kim HS, Sherman DK, Ishii K (2016) Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychol Sci 27(10):1331–1339

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors would like to acknowledge the members of the panelist group, all government agencies (such as municipalities, waste management organizations, health vice-chancellor, environment departments, universities of medical sciences), and thank them for their time, effort and guidance towards the successful completion of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Taghipour.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esmaeilizadeh, S., Shaghaghi, A. & Taghipour, H. Key informants’ perspectives on the challenges of municipal solid waste management in Iran: a mixed method study. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 1284–1298 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01005-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01005-6

Keywords

Navigation