Skip to main content
Log in

Thermally-Induced Wedging–Ratcheting Failure Mechanism in Rock Slopes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A thermally induced wedging–ratcheting mechanism for slope stability is investigated using a large-scale physical model and using a three-dimensional version of the numerical Distinct Element Method (3DEC). The studied mechanism consists of a discrete block that is separated from the rock mass by a tension crack filled with a wedge block or rock fragments. Irreversible block sliding is assumed to develop down a gently dipping sliding plane in response to climatic thermal fluctuations and consequent contraction and expansion of the sliding and wedge block materials. A concrete block assembly representing the rock mass is placed in a specially designed climate controlled room. An integrated measurement system tracks the block displacement and temperature evolution over time. Results of the numerical 3DEC model and an existing analytical solution are compared with the experimental results and the sensitivity of the numerical and analytical solutions to the input thermo-mechanical parameters is explored. To test the applicability of our physical and numerical models to the field scale, we compare our numerical simulations with monitored displacements of a slender block that was mapped in the East slope of Mount Masada, as up until recently the governing mechanism for this block displacement has been assumed to be seismically driven. By application of our numerical approach to the physical dimensions of the block in the field we find that, in fact, thermal loading alone can explain the mapped accumulated displacement that has surpassed by now 200 mm. We believe this new, thermally-induced, failure mechanism may play a significant role in slope stability problems due to the cumulative and repetitive nature of the displacement, particularly in rock slopes in fractured rock masses that are exposed to high temperature oscillations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakun-Mazor D, Hatzor YH, Glaser SD, Carlos Santamarina J (2013) Thermally vs. seismically induced block displacements in Masada rock slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:196–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begin ZEB (2005) Destructive earthquakes in the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea: their recurrence intervals and the probability of their occurrence. Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA (1988) Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part I. A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Hart RD (1992) Numerical modelling of discontinua. Engineering computations 9(2):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENCARDIO RITE. (2015). products. https://www.encardio.com/products/geotechnical/displacement/crack-meter-displacement.php

  • Feldheim A (2017) Experimental study of thermally induced wedging–ratcheting mechanism in rock slopes. Master Thesis, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva. P 58

  • Gischig VS, Moore JR, Evans KF, Amann F, Loew S (2011a) Thermomechanical forcing of deep rock slope deformation: 1. Conceptual study of a simplified slope. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 116:F04010

    Google Scholar 

  • Gischig VS, Moore JR, Evans KF, Amann F, Loew S (2011b) Thermomechanical forcing of deep rock slope deformation: 2. The Randa rock slope instability. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 116:F04011

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif V, Sassa K, Fukuoka H (2006) Failure mechanism in an extremely slow rock slide at Bitchu-Matsuyama castle site (Japan). Landslides 3(1):22–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif V, Simkova I, Vlcko J (2014) Physical Model of the Mechanism for Thermal Wedging Failure in Rocks. In: Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment. Springer, New York, pp 45–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunzburger Y, Merrien-Soukatchoff V, Guglielmi Y (2005) Influence of daily surface temperature fluctuations on rock slope stability: case study of the Rochers de Valabres slope (France). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(3):331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart R, Cundall P, Lemos J (1988) Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part II. Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 2:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzor YH (2003) Keyblock stability in seismically active rock slopes - Snake Path cliff, Masada. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(8):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzor YH, Arzi AA, Zaslavsky Y, Shapira A (2004) Dynamic stability analysis of jointed rock slopes using the DDA method: King Herod's Palace, Masada, Israel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(5):813–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzor YH, Talesnick M, Tsesarsky M (2002) Continuous and discontinuous stability analysis of the bell-shaped caverns at Bet Guvrin, Israel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(7):867–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel Meteorological Service. (2017). Israel Meteorological Service Data Base.

  • Itasca Consulting Group I (2013) 3DEC—three-dimensional distinct element code (Version 5.0), user's guide. Itasca, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing L (2003) A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(3):283–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mufundirwa A, Fujii Y, Kodama N, Kodama J (2011) Analysis of natural rock slope deformations under temperature variation: a case from a cool temperate region in Japan. Cold Reg Sci Technol 65(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasten C (2013) Geomaterials subjected to repetitive loading: implications on energy systems. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. P 149

  • Pasten C, García M, Cortes D (2015a) Physical and numerical modelling of the thermally induced wedging mechanism. Geotech Lett 5(3):186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasten C, García M, Santamarina C (2015b) Thermo-mechanical ratcheting in jointed rock masses. Géotechn Lett 5:86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohsenow WM, Hartnett JP, Cho YI (1998) Handbook of heat transfer3. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira A, Hofstetter R, Abdallah A-QF, Dabbeek J, Hays W (2007) Earthquake hazard assessments for building codes. Institutions 3:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi G-H (1993) Block system modeling by discontinuous deformation analysis11. Computational Mechanics, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • SIM STRUMENTI. (2009). Products. https://www.simstrumenti.com/en/products.html.

  • Taboada A, Ginouvez H, Renouf M, Azemard P (2017) Landsliding generated by thermomechanical interactions between rock columns and wedging blocks: study case from the Larzac Plateau (Southern France). In EPJ Web of Conferences, (14012). EDP Sciences.

  • Vargas JE, Velloso R, Chávez L, Gusmão L, Amaral C (2013) On the effect of thermally induced stresses in failures of some rock slopes in Rio de Janeiro. Braz Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(1):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicko J, Greif V, Grof V, Jezny M, Petro L, Brcek M (2009) Rock displacement and thermal expansion study at historic heritage sites in Slovakia. Environ Geol 58(8):1727–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson A, Moore D, Stewart T (2004) Temperature influence on rock slope movements at Checkerboard Creek. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Landslides, (6). London:Taylor & Francis Group, Rio de Janeiro

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Israel Science Foundation through contract no. ISF—1442/13. Prof. Noam Weisbrod from Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, is thanked for allowing us to use the Climatic Controlled Room in his lab and for assistance with the setup of the physical model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagan Bakun-Mazor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

We derive here the maximum sliding force required to reach limit equilibrium along the sliding surface (Fmax). Consider the free body diagrams for the sliding and wedge blocks as shown in Fig. 18 in Appendix 1.

Fig. 18
figure 18

a Free body diagrams of the sliding and the wedge blocks, b force polygon on the wedge block

The driving forces acting on the sliding and the wedge blocks are:

$$W_{1} \sin \eta _{1} + W_{2} \sin \eta _{1} + F_{{\max }}$$
(6)

The resisting friction forces parallel to the sliding plane are f1 and f2. In order to find f2, consider the force polygon in Fig. 18 in Appendix 1 showing the weight of the wedge W2 and the reactions along the wedge faces R and T:

$$\frac{{W_{2} }}{{\sin (90 - \eta _{2} )}} = \frac{T}{{\sin (90 - \eta _{1} )}} \Rightarrow T = W_{2} \frac{{\cos \eta _{1} }}{{\cos \eta _{2} }}$$
(7)

The friction force due to the reaction T, is:

$$f_{{\text{T}}} = T\tan \phi = W_{2} \frac{{\cos \eta _{1} }}{{\cos \eta _{2} }}\tan \phi$$
(8)

The component of fT parallel to the sliding plain, is:

$$f_{2} = f_{{\text{T}}} \cos \eta _{2} = W_{2} \cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi$$
(9)

Therefore, the total resisting frictional forces parallel to the sliding plane are:

$$f_{1} + f_{2} = W_{1} \cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi + W_{2} \cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi$$
(10)

From limit equilibrium parallel to the sliding plane, we obtain the magnitude of Fmax:

$$F_{{\max }} = W_{1} \cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi + W_{2} \cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi - W_{1} \sin \eta _{1} - W_{2} \sin \eta _{1}$$
(11)

Inserting the blocks weights:

$$W_{1} = L_{{\text{b}}} H_{{\text{b}}} \gamma ;\,\,W_{2} = \frac{{L_{{{\text{w}}1}} + L_{{{\text{w}}2}} }}{2}H_{{\text{W}}} \gamma$$

We get:

$$F_{{\max }} = (L_{{\text{b}}} H_{{\text{b}}} \gamma )\left( {\cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi - \sin \eta _{1} } \right) + \frac{{L_{{{\text{w}}1}} + L_{{{\text{w}}2}} }}{2}H_{{\text{W}}} \gamma \left[ {\cos \eta _{1} \tan \phi - \sin \eta _{1} } \right]$$
(12)
$$F_{\max } = \gamma \left( {\cos \eta_{1} \tan \phi - \sin \eta_{1} } \right)\left[ {L_{{\text{b}}} H_{{\text{b}}} + \frac{{L_{{{\text{w}}1}} + L_{{{\text{w}}2}} }}{2}H_{{\text{w}}} } \right]$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakun-Mazor, D., Keissar, Y., Feldheim, A. et al. Thermally-Induced Wedging–Ratcheting Failure Mechanism in Rock Slopes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 2521–2538 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02075-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02075-6

Keywords

Navigation