Comparative pharmacokinetics of salbutamol inhaled from a pressurized metered dose inhaler either alone or connected to a newly enhanced spacer design

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105304Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Coordination between actuation of a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and inhalation is a critical manoeuvre that many patients fail to perform correctly. pMDIs connected to spacers do not require hand-lung coordination. This study evaluated the relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol post-inhalation from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following verbal inhaler technique counselling (VC) or connected to a newly improved Able Spacer® (AS).

Methods

In a two-period, randomized crossover study, 16 healthy adults inhaled 2 × 100 µg salbutamol puffs (1 min gap) from Ventolin using VC or AS. Immediately after each puff inhalation, each subject gargled with 20 mL water for oropharyngeal deposition (OD) determination. Urine samples were collected 0.5 h (pre-) and 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 h post-inhalation. Urine was then pooled 2–24 h post-inhalation. The relative lung bioavailability (0–0.5 h urinary salbutamol excretion – USAL0.5) and systemic bioavailability (0–24 h urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite – USALMET24) were determined. A one week washout separated VC and AS use.

Results

The mean (SD) USAL0.5 of VC and AS was 5.36 (4.48) and 12.80 (10.83) µg, respectively. The mean (SD) OD was 11.35 (3.37) and 0.48 (0.30) µg, respectively. VC and AS were significantly different in USAL0.5 and OD (p<0.001). USALMET24 was comparable (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with VC, AS doubled the inhaled salbutamol lung dose and minimised its precipitation in the oral cavity. The results suggest this inhalation aid can add therapeutic and safety benefits particularly in patients with continued pMDI technique issues despite repeated VC.

Introduction

The inhaled products’ market has expanded enormously over time. Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers of various design and pharmaceutical formulation have been introduced [1]. However, the pMDI remains a fundamental inhaler for patients with obstructive lung conditions [2]. Many patients, however, do not get the maximal therapeutic benefit from their inhaled medicines because they fail to use their pMDIs correctly [3], [4], [5]. Up to 93% of patients have a hand-lung coordination issue which is expressed as an inability to press the canister at or instantly after the start of a slow inhalation through their pressurized inhaler [6]. This poor pMDI technique reduces lung deposition and maximises unwanted oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled medicines [2].

Verbal inhaler technique counselling (VC) improves patients’ pMDI use [7, 8]. Despite repeated VC, many patients continue to misuse their pMDIs [9, 10]. Accordingly, these patients are usually prescribed spacer devices, also known as valved holding chambers (VHCs), to use with their pMDIs to overcome coordination and improper inhalation flow problems [3]. These add-on chambers slow the speed of the emitted aerosol particles giving more time for the patient to inhale the puff slowly and deeply. Additionally, spacers allow more evaporation of the aerosol propellant reducing the size of the drug particles and thus their impaction in the mouth and throat [11], [12], [13]. Available spacers differ in size, shape and engineering design. It has been reported that aerosol emission and particle size distribution vary between different spacers, and within a particular spacer when used with different active pharmaceutical ingredients and formulations [14], [15], [16]. Able Spacer® (AS) (Clement Clarke International Limited, UK) is a small-size VHC that has recently been improved with the use of a special transparent polymer that incorporates silver ion anti-microbial technology to protect from contamination and inhibit microbial growth. The Spacer valve has been improved to operate at the low inhalation rates typical of the tidal flows of younger patients, combined with a visible valve movement that allows healthcare professionals to observe and confirm correct pMDI actuation and inhalation.

Various pharmacokinetic and gamma scintigraphy methods have been developed to determine the amount of a drug delivered to the lungs post-inhalation [17]. A urinary pharmacokinetic approach has shown that unchanged salbutamol excreted in urine within the first 30 min following dose inhalation (USAL0.5) represents the therapeutically effective lung dose (or relative lung bioavailability). Whilst, the cumulative renally-excreted salbutamol and its sulphate ester metabolite 0 to 24 h post dose inhalation (USALMET24) identifies the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the body (the systemic exposure through both pulmonary and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) gates) [18]. This urinary salbutamol excretion pharmacokinetic approach has been applied to assess different pMDI inhalation methods [19, 20], VHCs [21, 22] and inhaler devices [23], [24], [25]. The current study evaluated and compared the relative lung (USAL0.5) and systemic (USALMET24) bioavailability of salbutamol inhaled by healthy adults from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following VC or connected to AS. The oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol was also determined immediately post VC and AS inhalation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This was an investigational, two-period, two-sequence, randomized crossover pharmacokinetic study to assess two pMDI inhalation approaches on the relative lung and systemic bioavailability as well as the oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled salbutamol in healthy, adult male subjects. These approaches were using the pMDI either alone following VC or connected to AS. Ventolin® Evohaler® (100 μg salbutamol/puff, GlaxoSmithKline) was used as the pMDI. A one week washout separated the VC and AS

Results

Sixteen healthy male subjects with mean (SD) age, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) of 29.4 (9.7) years, 1.80 (0.1) m, 81.4 (15.2) kg and 25.4 (3.7) kg/m2, respectively, took part in the study. All participants had normal medical, physical and laboratory examinations at study completion, and no-one reported any adverse effects. The mean (SD) PIFs through pMDI following VC and AS training were 45.6 (9.8) and 47.5 (8.8) L/min, respectively, with no significant difference (Wilcoxon Z

Discussion

Lung deposition of orally inhaled medicines is critical to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome. The amount of drug that reaches the distal areas of the lungs, where the sites of pharmacologic action are, depends on the prescribed inhaler device, aerosol emission and particle size characteristics and, equally important, the patient's mastery in inhaler technique and inhalation [27]. It has been reported that up to 30% of inhaled salbutamol is delivered to the lungs [17]. The remaining

Conclusion

Poor pMDI technique is common among patients with respiratory conditions. This has negative consequences on the therapeutic outcomes of the pMDI therapy. VC is vital and has improved the lung dose from Ventolin Evohaler. However, adding AS to Ventolin Evohaler has doubled the pulmonary salbutamol bioavailability and almost diminished drug precipitation in the oral cavity. In addition to its recent anti-microbial growth technology and inhalation valve design improvements, AS can provide extra

Funding

This academically initiated, designed and conducted research study was un-conditionally supported by Clement Clarke International Limited, UK.

Declaration of Competing Interest

W.G.A. is an Academic Researcher in the inhaled respiratory medicine and inhaler devices areas. He has received unconditional travel grants from Clement Clarke International Limited to present his research work at ATS, BTS, ERS and ISAM conferences.

G.A.O. has no conflict of interest to declare.

M.S. is the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at Clement Clarke International Limited, UK.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to all the subjects that took part in this study, and to the medical and technical staff for their assistance. The Authors would also like to thank Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Jordan and Clement Clarke International Limited, UK for their supportive roles.

References (32)

  • M. Dolovich et al.

    Clinical evaluation of a simple demand inhalation MDI aerosol delivery device

    Chest

    (1983)
  • S.P. Newman et al.

    Lung deposition of fenoterol and flunisolide delivered using a novel device for inhaled medicines: comparison of RESPIMAT with conventional metered-dose inhalers with and without spacer devices

    Chest

    (1998)
  • S.W. Stein et al.

    The history of therapeutic aerosols: a chronological review

    J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv.

    (2017)
  • N. Roche et al.

    The evolution of pressurized metered-dose inhalers from early to modern devices

    J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv.

    (2016)
  • D.B. Price et al.

    Inhaler errors in the critikal study: type, frequency, and association with asthma outcomes

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract.

    (2017)
  • M.F. Griffith et al.

    Poor metered-dose inhaler technique is associated with overuse of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (4)

    • A 3D printed human upper respiratory tract model for particulate deposition profiling

      2021, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Whilst the in vitro extrathoracic region data was compared with the in vivo oropharyngeal deposition data, the total in vitro deposition in trachea, bronchus and alveoli was compared with the in vivo urinary recovery of unchanged salbutamol 0–0.5 h (USAL0.5) post-salbutamol inhalation. Ammari et al., 2020 defined USAL0.5 as the relative lung bioavailability of inhaled salbutamol. The relative lung bioavailability represents the total amount of salbutamol deposited in the lungs, specifically the trachea, bronchus and alveoli.

    Study Registration: The study was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Reference: ISRCTN88332465)

    View full text