Abstract
Purpose
In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), spinal deformity can be seen in the thoracic or in the lumbar area. Although differences according to curve location are well described on standard radiographs, dynamic consequences of such difference remain unclear. Our objective was to explore the differences in dynamic spinal balance according to curve location in AIS patients using gait analysis
Methods
We prospectively included 22 females with AIS planned for surgical correction (16.3 years old, 81% Risser ≥ 4). Patients were divided into two matched cohorts, according to major curve location [right thoracic (Lenke 1) or left lumbar (Lenke 5)]. Gait analysis was performed the day before surgery. Global balance was analyzed as the primary outcome. Local curves parameters (dynamic Cobb angles) were defined as the secondary outcome.
Results
In coronal plane, Lenke 5 patients had a left trunk shift, whereas trunk was shifted to the right in Lenke 1 patients (− 20.7 vs 6.3, p = 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the main difference between the two groups was T12 position that remained over the pelvis during gait in Lenke 5 patients, whereas it was anterior to the pelvis in Lenke 1 patients. In the transversal plane, Lenke 5 and Lenke 1 patients presented the same gait abnormalities, with a global trunk rotation to the left (− 4.8 vs − 7.6, p = 0,165).
Conclusion
This is the first study to provide the results of a direct comparison between Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 patients during gait. Curve location influenced coronal and sagittal balance, but abnormalities of transversal trunk motion were the same, wherever the curve was located.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1985) Thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curve evolution and prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198511000-00001
Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1987) Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. Orthopedics 10:909–915
Stokes IA (1989) Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 7:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100070511
Cholewicki J, Crisco JJ, Oxland TR et al (1996) Effects of posture and structure on three-dimensional coupled rotations in the lumbar spine. A biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2421–2428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611010-00003
Tredwell SJ, Sawatzky BJ, Hughes BL (1999) Rotations of a helix as a model for correction of the scoliotic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199906150-00009
Lenke LG (2005) Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 54:537–542
Pesenti S, Jouve JL, Morin C et al (2015) Evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a multicenter study at 20 years’ follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004
Gage JR (1983) Gait analysis for decision-making in cerebral palsy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 43:147–163
Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A et al (2016) The John Insall Award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4259-0
Ranavolo A, Don R, Draicchio F et al (2013) Modelling the spine as a deformable body: feasibility of reconstruction using an optoelectronic system. Appl Ergon 44:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.004
Lenke LG, Engsberg JR, Ross SA et al (2001) Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E330–E337
Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A et al (2004) Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 13:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x
Patel A, Pivec R, Shah NV et al (2018) Motion analysis in the axial plane after realignment surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 66:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.015
Yang JH, Suh SW, Sung PS, Park WH (2013) Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:2407–2413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y
Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C (2009) Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J 18:512–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7
Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N et al (2019) Spinal correction surgery improves asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracic major curve. Eur Spine J 28:619–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5741-7
Blondel B, Pomero V, Moal B et al (2012) Sagittal spine posture assessment: feasibility of a protocol based on intersegmental moments. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.001
Blondel B, Viehweger E, Moal B et al (2015) Postural spinal balance defined by net intersegmental moments: results of a biomechanical approach and experimental errors measurement. World J Orthop 6:983–990. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.983
Pesenti S, Prost S, Blondel B et al (2019) Correlations linking static quantitative gait analysis parameters to radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.024
Pesenti S, Prost S, Pomero V et al (2019) Characterization of trunk motion in adolescents with right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 28:2025–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06067-1
Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N et al (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1869–1874. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b912
Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N et al (2017) Position of the major curve influences asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 51:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004
Thorstensson A, Nilsson J, Carlson H, Zomlefer MR (1984) Trunk movements in human locomotion. Acta Physiol Scand 121:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1984.tb10452.x
Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SH et al (2010) Kinematic aspects of trunk motion and gender effect in normal adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-9
Assaiante C, Mallau S, Jouve J-L et al (2012) Do adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) neglect proprioceptive information in sensory integration of postural control? PLoS ONE 7:e40646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040646
Mallau S, Bollini G, Jouve J-L, Assaiante C (2007) Locomotor skills and balance strategies in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E14–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251069.58498.eb
Funding
No funding was received by any of the author for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pesenti, S., Pomero, V., Prost, S. et al. Curve location influences spinal balance in coronal and sagittal planes but not transversal trunk motion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective observational study. Eur Spine J 29, 1972–1980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3