Boudinage and two-stage folding of oblique single layers under coaxial plane strain: Layer rotation around the axis of no change (Y)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Oblique single layers exposed to high plane strain show two-phase folding.

  • Fold asymmetry decreases and wavelength increases with layer inclination.

  • Boudinage of single oblique layers is symmetric if finite plane strain is high.

  • Both folded and boudinaged oblique layers show striking thickening.

Abstract

Scaled analogue modelling using non-linear viscous plasticine as rock analogue has been carried out to investigate the influence of varying layer obliquity on the geometry of single-layer folds and boudins under bulk coaxial plane strain. Two deformation series with different viscosity ratio between layer and matrix (m = 18 and 82) were carried out. The initial angle between shortening axis and competent layer (θZ(i)) was gradually changed from 0° to 90° by multiples of 11.25°. Shortening at θZ(i) < 30° was accommodated by layer thickening and two-stage folding. Low-wavelength F1-folds were refolded by large-wavelength homoaxial F2-folds, both with similar degree of tightness. With increasing layer obliquity, the number of folds and the degree of F2-fold asymmetry decrease, and F1- and F2-folds approximate in size. Although bulk shortening was high (eZ = −70%), the rotated long limbs of asymmetric folds are free from boudinage. Boudins, however, developed by combined necking and tensile fracturing at θZ(i) > 60°. Because of the high finite strain and related layer rotation, these boudins are not asymmetric (as expected) but symmetric. Folds and boudins like those produced in the present study occur in salt rocks and in crystalline basement deformed at deeper structural levels.

Introduction

Buckle folds and boudins are common deformation structures in rheologically stratified rocks, which develop on different spatial and temporal scales at various structural levels and in various geotectonic settings. The basic driving mechanism for buckle folding and boudinage is the difference in effective viscosity - and thus in strain rate - between the competent layer and the incompetent matrix (Ramberg, 1955, 1959). If bulk strain is coaxial, there is a difference between folding and boudinage concerning the attitude of the layer with respect to the principal strain axes. At very low fold limb dip (<15–20°, Chapple, 1968), the layer is oriented subparallel to the principal shortening axis (Z) and the strain rate in the layer should be approximately equal to the strain rate imposed at the boundaries. As the limbs rotate due to buckling of the layer, less shortening occurs inside the layer, compared to the matrix. Increasing fold amplitude is associated with a decrease of the layer-parallel deviatoric stress that is proportional to a decrease in effective viscosity of the layer resulting in structural softening (Schmalholz, 2006).

Structural softening is also related to the formation of pinch-and-swell structures (Schmalholz and Mancktelow, 2016), although the layer does not significantly rotate if bulk strain is coaxial and the initial angle (θZ(i)) between the principal shortening direction (Z) and the layer is 90°. The driving mechanism for boudinage is the transfer of stress from the matrix to the layer. If the competent layer is brittle, tensile-fracture boudinage develops by successive ‘mid-point’ fracturing of the layer segments, until the layer is reduced to boudins, all of which are shorter than some critical length, i.e. the length for which the strength of the layer is higher than the tensile stress at the mid-point (Ramberg, 1955; Lloyd et al., 1982; Bai et al., 2000). The formation of drawn boudins is related to viscous necking. With increasing layer-parallel stretch, pinches or cusps are growing along the layer/matrix interface, with their tips pointing into the competent layer (e.g. Ramberg, 1955; Goscombe et al., 2004; Schmalholz et al., 2008; Schmalholz and Mancktelow, 2016; Schmalholz and Duretz, 2017). Numerical simulations for initial random geometrical perturbations show that pinches and individual boudins do not need to develop simultaneously (Schmalholz and Maeder, 2012). Although the deformation geometry of a competent layer is entirely different for layer-parallel shortening and extension, the initial stages of both folding and necking can be mathematically described using the same theory (e.g. Fletcher, 1974; Smith, 1977; Peters et al., 2016).

Given a rheologically stratified rock is deformed by dislocation (power-law) creep, the geometry of folds and/or boudins produced in the deformed layer(s) depends on various parameters (Hudleston and Treagus, 2010, and references therein): (1) thickness of layer(s), (2) shape and distribution of initial perturbations along the layer(s); (3) viscosity ratio between layer(s) and matrix; (4) stress exponent of the matrix and – more important – of the layer(s); (5) single or multilayer; (6) anisotropic viscosity of matrix and/or layer; (7) magnitude of bulk finite strain; (8) bulk strain rate; (9) bonding between matrix and layer(s); (10) bulk finite strain geometry (flattening, plane strain, constriction); (11) orientation of layer(s) with respect to the principal strain axes. Only few of these parameters can be accurately determined from naturally deformed rocks.

The situation is relatively simple for cases where a single competent layer is oriented perpendicular to one of the principal strain axes (X > Y > Z) under bulk coaxial plane strain (Fig. 1). Single fold and single boudin axes will develop in the field of shortening and in the field of elongation, respectively. A large number of experimental and numerical models were produced under such conditions, where the layer is oriented either perpendicular to the long axis, X, or perpendicular to the short axis, Z, of the finite strain ellipsoid. This holds for classical plane-strain folds, with the fold axis parallel to the intermediate Y-axis (e.g. Biot, 1961; Biot et al., 1961; Ramberg, 1961; Hudleston, 1973; Cobbold, 1975; Abbassi and Mancketelow, 1992; Mancktelow, 1999; Schmalholz, 2006), and for plane-strain boudins, with the boudin axis (or neck line) parallel to the Y-axis (e.g. Ramberg, 1955; Neurath and Smith, 1982; Price and Cosgrove, 1990; Kidan and Cosgrove, 1996; Schöpfer and Zulauf, 2002; Zulauf et al., 2003; Treagus and Lan, 2000, 2004; Schmalholz et al., 2008; Abe and Urai, 2012; Marques et al., 2012; Samanta and Deb, 2014; Samanta et al., 2017; Dabrowski and Grasemann, 2019). The shape of boudins varies significantly and can be used to estimate the viscosity ratio among the boudin, inter-boudin and matrix material.

Apart from bulk coaxial plane strain, nearly all the theory and modelling of folds and boudins are based on a layer (or layers) oriented perpendicular to one of the principal strain axes. Physical experiments with oblique layers are difficult because the ends of the layer(s) tend to slide along the boundaries and parts of the layer can be pulled out of the sample. Moreover, oblique loading of the ends introduces additional perturbation components because the planar boundary is no longer parallel to the axial plane of the developing folds (Schmalholz and Mancktelow, 2016).

If the layering is oblique to all three far-field principal strain rates, the directions of maximum shortening rate in the competent layer vary continuously with time and the base strain rate on which a buckling or necking instability would be superimposed is therefore also changing (Flinn, 1962). A schematic drawing of coaxial plane strain of a competent layer in incompetent matrix, with various layer orientation but parallel to the Y-axis, is shown in Fig. 2.

Price (1967) has shown that asymmetric folds are possible under plane strain if the competent layer is inclined to the Z-axis (see also Frehner and Schmalholz, 2006). The rigid layer rotates slower than the surrounding matrix causing an asymmetry to develop. Cobbold et al. (1971) carried out experiments using multilayers consisting of non-linear, lubricated plasticine, which had been deformed coaxially with the shortening direction at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° to the layering. In cases where the layering was oblique to the shortening direction, asymmetric folds developed. Watkinson (1976) deformed a regular multilayer of non-linear modelling clay, set in a softer uniform matrix. The shortening direction wat set at 10° to the layering. Also in this case, asymmetric folds developed. It has further been shown by Treagus (1973) that the same dominant wavelength of a cylindrical waveform, as described by the Biot-Ramberg equation, would arise for Newtonian materials under plane strain with the layer oblique to the principal shortening axis (Z), but parallel to the Y-axis. To first order, the initial low-amplitude buckles are symmetric (Treagus, 1973), but become asymmetric during progressive folding. The same results have been obtained by Reches and Johnson (1976), but for elastic materials. Anthony and Wickham (1978) used finite-element modelling to simulate asymmetric folding of a competent, linear-viscous layer inclined up to 20° to the Z-axis under coaxial plane strain.

At higher degree of inclination between the competent layer and the Z-axis (θZ(i) > 45°) asymmetric boudinage is expected (Fig. 2). Also in this case, the asymmetry results from the fact that the rigid layer rotates slower than the surrounding matrix. Abe and Urai (2012) showed how boudins may rotate in pure shear deformation. According to their simulation results, the sense of rotation correlates with the shape of the blocks: rhombic blocks with a positive angle between block and surface and layer normal direction rotate clockwise, rhombic blocks with negative angles rotate anticlockwise and trapezoidal blocks with a different sign of angles for both ends do not rotate significantly. Numerical simulation of oblique boudinage was also carried out by Komoróczi (2014). By varying the cohesion of the competent layer, pinch-and-swell structures, drawn and torn boudins were simulated.

Oblique boudinage, however, may also occur in other settings. Mandal and Khan (1991) used theory and experiments to demonstrate that competent layer-segments, separated by oblique fractures in a ductile matrix undergo rotation under layer-normal shortening. Mandal et al. (2000) produced oblique boudins in brittle multilayers inside a linear-viscous matrix under layer-normal shortening. Oblique boudins have also been obtained by numerical modelling focusing on non-coaxial deformation and rotation of boudins in shear zones (Passchier and Druguet, 2002; Dabrowski and Grasemann, 2014). The same holds for physical analogue modelling of asymmetric boudinage carried out by Hanmer (1986) and Goldstein (1988). Asymmetric boudins, however, may also occur under coaxial conditions as has been shown by numerical modelling (Abe and Urai, 2012).

The published results focusing on deformation of oblique layers listed above are concerned either on boudiange or on folding. Experiments and numerical modelling, which consider both oblique layers on the one hand and folding and boudinage on the other hand, are still lacking. In the present paper, the results of a systematic study of the impact of layer obliquity on the deformation geometry in coaxial bulk plane strain are presented. Our studies focus on a single layer, which rotates around the intermediate Y-axis of the strain ellipsoid meaning that the layer shows initially a different inclination with respect to the principal strain axes X and Z, respectively.

Section snippets

Analogue material, sample preparation and deformation conditions

To investigate the influence of layer obliquity on the deformation geometry, we carried out two deformation series under bulk plane strain, each with different viscosity ratio between layer and matrix. The rock analogues used for the experiments consist of plasticine and modified plasticine, which behave as strain-rate softening materials (effective viscosity decreases with increasing strain rate). The rheological parameters of some of the plasticine types used in the experiments have been

Deformation series 1 with high viscosity ratio between layer and matrix

The deformed competent layers of the individual models with high viscosity ratio between layer and matrix (m = 82) are shown in Fig. 4. Views subparallel to the layer and subparallel to the intermediate axis (Y) are depicted in the left column. Views subperpendicular to the layer, with the Y-axis in the vertical direction, are shown in the right column. Details of folds are shown in Fig. 5.

If θZ(i) was set at 45°, the layer was neither folded nor boudinaged. For this reason, the layer is not

Layer thickening

All experiments of the present study have been carried out using the same initial thickness of the single competent layer. Almost all layers underwent thickening during deformation. As the thickness of the competent layer controls the geometry of folds and boudins, the degree of layer thickening will be discussed at first. In cases of folding at θZ(i) < 45°, thickening of the competent layer should have occurred before the onset of F1 folding. The highest degree of layer thickening (ca. 75%)

Conclusions

The results of the coaxial plane-strain experiments presented above may help to understand the processes of folding and of boudinage in nature if the layer is inclined at different angles to the principal shortening axis. The following conclusions can be drawn:

  • Under bulk coaxial plane strain, the initial angle between a competent layer and the principal shortening axis (θZ(i)) is an important parameter for finite layer thickness and the type and geometry of folds and boudins.

  • Compared with a

CRediT authorship contribution statement

J. Zulauf: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. G. Zulauf: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. E. Hattingen: Methodology, Validation, Software, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help of Mark Peinl when using his software Smoooth. Thanks also to Pascal Ahlfeldt for his contributions during the rheological studies of plasticine. We also greatly appreciate the fruitful reviews by F.O. Marques and an anonymous referee. The studies were supported by a grant of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, grant Zu 73/31).

References (85)

  • M.R. Abbassi et al.

    Single layer buckle folding in non-linear materials – I. Experimental study of fold development from an isolated initial perturbation

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1992)
  • S. Abe et al.

    Discrete element modeling of boudinage: insights on rock rheology, matrix flow, and evolution of geometry

    J. Geophys Res. Solid Earth

    (2012)
  • J.M. Anthony et al.

    Finite-element simulation of asymmetric folding

    Tectonophysics

    (1978)
  • T. Bai et al.

    Explanation for fracture spacing in layered materials

    Nature

    (2000)
  • M.A. Biot

    Theory of folding of stratified viscoelastic media and its implications in tectonics and orogenesis

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.

    (1961)
  • M.A. Biot et al.

    Experimental verification of the theory of folding of stratified viscoelastic media

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.

    (1961)
  • J.P. Burg et al.

    Tension fractures and boudinage oblique to the maximum extension direction: an analogy with Lüders’ bands

    Tectonophysics

    (1982)
  • N.L. Carter et al.

    Flow properties of continental lithosphere

    Tectonophysics

    (1987)
  • W.M. Chapple

    A mathermatical theory of finite-amplitude rock-folding

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.

    (1968)
  • P.R. Cobbold

    Fold propagation in single embedded layers

    Tectonophysics

    (1975)
  • P.R. Cobbold et al.

    Development of internal structures in deformed anisotropic rocks

    Tectonophysics

    (1971)
  • M. Dabrowski et al.

    Domino boudinage under layer-parallel simple shear

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2014)
  • M. Dabrowski et al.

    Numerical modelling of boudinage under pure shear: implications for estimating viscosity ratios and finite strain from natural examples

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2019)
  • G.E. Dieter

    Mechanical metallurgy

  • E. Druguet et al.

    Coeval brittle and ductile structures associated with extreme deformation partitioning in a multilayer sequence

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2009)
  • M. Enama Mengong et al.

    Coeval folding and boudinage under bulk plain strain, with the axis of no change perpendicular to the layering

    Int. J. Earth Sci.

    (2006)
  • M. Enama Mengong et al.

    The impact of strain rate on folding and boudinage under plane strain: results from analogue modelling

    Geotect. Res.

    (2007)
  • R.C. Fletcher

    Wavelength selection in the folding of a single layer with power-law rheology

    Am. J. Sci.

    (1974)
  • D. Flinn

    On folding during three-dimensional progressive deformation

    J. Geol. Soc. Lond.

    (1962)
  • H. Fossen

    Structural Geology

    (2016)
  • M. Frehner et al.

    Numerical simulations of parasitic folding in multilayers

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2006)
  • G.C. Gleason et al.

    A flow law for dislocation creep in quartz aggregates determined with molten salt cell

    Tectonophysics

    (1995)
  • A.G. Goldstein

    Factors affecting the kinematic interpretation of asymmetric boudinage in shear zones

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1988)
  • B.D. Goscombe et al.

    Boudinage classification: end-member boudin types and modified boudin structures

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2004)
  • S. Hanmer

    Asymmetric pull-aprts and foliation fish as kinematic indicators

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1986)
  • M.K. Hubbert

    Theory of scale models as applied to the study of geologic structures

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1937)
  • P.J. Hudleston

    An analysis of 'single layer' folds developed experimentally in viscous media

    Tectonophysics

    (1973)
  • P.J. Hudleston et al.

    Information from folds: a review

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Johnson et al.

    Folding of Visous Layers

    (1994)
  • T.W. Kidan et al.

    The deformation of multilayers by layer-normal compression; an experimental investigation

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1996)
  • S.M. Kirby

    Rheology of the lithosphere

    Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.

    (1983)
  • A. Komoróczi

    Numerical Simulation of Combined Brittle-Ductile Deformation Processes

    (2014)
  • D.L. Kohlstedt

    Properties of rocks and minerals - constitutive equations, rheological behavior, and viscosity of rocks

  • A.K. Kronenberg et al.

    Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1984)
  • J. Linckens et al.

    Subgrain development in experimentally deformed rock salt

  • J. Linckens et al.

    Experimental deformation of coarse-grained rock salt to high strain

    J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth

    (2016)
  • G.E. Lloyd et al.

    A stress-transfer model for the development of extension fracture boudinage

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1982)
  • N.S. Mancktelow

    Finite-element modeling of single layer folding in elasto-viscous materials: the effect of the initial perturbation geometry

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1999)
  • N.S. Mancktelow et al.

    The control of precursor brittle fracture and fluid-rock interaction on the development of single and paired ductile shear zones

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2005)
  • N. Mandal et al.

    Rotation, offset and separation of oblique-fracture (rhombic) boudins: theory and experiments under layer-normal compression

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (1991)
  • N. Mandal et al.

    Boudinage in multilayered rocks under layer-normal compression

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2000)
  • F.O. Marques et al.

    Boudinage in nature and experiment

    Tectonophysics

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text