Elsevier

Journal of Controlled Release

Volume 322, 10 June 2020, Pages 217-226
Journal of Controlled Release

Different kinetics for the hepatic uptake of lipid nanoparticles between the apolipoprotein E/low density lipoprotein receptor and the N-acetyl-d-galactosamine/asialoglycoprotein receptor pathway

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are one of the more promising technologies for efficiently delivering nucleic acids in vivo. Hepatocytes are the primary target cells of LNPs that are delivered via the apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) pathway, an endogenous targeting pathway. This robust targeting mechanism results in the specific and efficient delivery of nucleic acids to hepatocytes. Trivalent N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc) is known to be a high-affinity exogenous ligand against the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), which is highly expressed on hepatocytes. In this study, we report that the kinetics of the hepatic uptake process between the two types of targeting pathways are different. Rapid blood clearance, accumulation to the space of Disse and a subsequent slow cellular uptake was observed in the case of the endogenous ApoE-LDLR pathway. On the other hand, both blood clearance and cellular uptake were more gradual in the case of the exogenous GalNAc-ASGPR pathway. Interactions between ApoE-bound LNPs and hepatic heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) were involved in the rapid blood clearance and accumulation to the space of Disse in the case of the endogenous pathway. The findings presented here contribute to a more precise understanding of the mechanism of hepatic uptake and to the rational design of hepatocyte-targeting nanoparticles.

Introduction

The accumulation of nucleic acids in target tissues or cells is severely limited due to the following characteristics of these molecules: high molecular weight, negative charges and hydrophilicity [1,2]. Therefore, appropriate systems for delivering nucleic acids are essential for their efficient delivery and therapeutic applications. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are one of the most promising technologies for the delivery of nucleic acids, and, as of this writing, a huge number of different LNPs have been designed [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. Many efforts, including rational design or high throughput screening of potent cationic lipids, have dramatically improved the efficiency of nucleic acid delivery. This resulted in the approval of the first LNP-based short interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy for the treatment of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis in 2018 [10].

The liver is the primary target of LNPs containing nucleic acids because thousands of human diseases are estimated to be caused by genetic disorders originating in hepatocytes [11]. The following unique structural features in liver tissue enable size-controlled LNPs (diameters of 100 nm or less) to reach hepatocytes: 1) the presence of fenestrae which are pores with diameters of 100–150 nm in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), and, 2) a lack of basement membranes between LSECs and hepatocytes [[12], [13], [14]]. In addition, the presence of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-mediated endogenous uptake pathway in hepatocytes is a major contributor to the success of LNP-based therapy of liver-associated diseases, including fibrosis [15], hypercholesterolemia [16] and hepatitis [17,18]. It is known that LNPs interact with serum proteins, exchanging components and acquiring a protein-coated interface (i.e. protein corona) upon their intravenous injection [[19], [20], [21]]. It is particularly interesting that ApoE was found to be generally adsorbed on LNPs, leading to an enhanced uptake of such particles by hepatocytes [22,23]. ApoE is typically located on chylomicrons, very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs) and high density lipoproteins, and facilitates the clearance of VLDLs and chylomicron remnants in hepatocytes [24,25]. It is known that ApoE is an endogenous ligand for the LDLR family and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) [26]. The lipid-binding site in the NH2-terminal domain of ApoE strongly interacts with LNPs through tryptophan residues [27]. The interaction results in a conformational change in ApoE. This results in a high affinity to its receptors, namely, the LDLR family and HSPGs, through an arginine-rich receptor-binding domain [28,29].

In another strategy for targeting hepatocytes, galactose or N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc) are used as ligands for the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) which is expressed on hepatocytes at high levels [30]. GalNAc is known to have an approximately 50-fold higher affinity for ASGPR compared to galactose [31]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the clustering of GalNAc greatly enhances its affinity (dissociation constant of up to single-digit nM) through the simultaneous occupation of several GalNAc-binding sites of ASGPR [32,33]. Because ASGPR is expressed at high levels (~500,000 ASGPRs per individual hepatocyte), is specific for hepatocytes and the recycling time of the ASGPR is rapid (approximately 15 min), clustered GalNAc has been utilized for delivering nucleic acids to hepatocytes as an exogenous ligand [22,34,35].

Although many previous reports have demonstrated that both targeting mechanisms can be useful, little is known regarding the kinetics of the hepatic uptake process between the two types of targeting pathways. In the present study, we prepared 4 types of LNPs with different surface modifications in an attempt to modify the hepatocyte-targeting pathway. Rapid blood clearance, accumulation in the space of Disse and a subsequent slow cellular uptake was observed in the case of the endogenous ApoE-LDLR pathway. On the other hand, both blood clearance and cellular uptake progressed gradually in the case of the exogenous GalNAc-ASGPR pathway. Interactions between ApoE-bound LNPs and hepatic HSPGs were found to be involved in the rapid blood clearance and accumulation to the space of Disse in the endogenous pathway. These findings contribute to a more precise understanding of the mechanism of the hepatic uptake process and to the rational design of hepatocyte-targeting nanoparticles.

Section snippets

Materials

pH-sensitive cationic lipids, YSK05, and GalNAc3-PEG2k-DSG were synthesized as described previously [22,36,37]. Cholesterol (chol) was purchased from SIGMA Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). 1,2-Dimirystoyl-rac-glycero, methoxyethyleneglycol 2000 ether (mPEG2k -DMG) and 1,2-disrearoyl-rac-glycero, methoxyethyleneglycol 2000 ether (mPEG2k-DSG) were obtained from NOF Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). 1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine perchlorate (DiD) and Ribogreen were purchased from

LNPs that are taken up by the different cellular uptake pathways show different blood half-lives

For a model of LNP that accumulates to the liver via the ApoE/LDLR pathway, an LNP composed of a pH-sensitive cationic lipid, YSK05, cholesterol and mPEG2k-DMG with a molar ratio of 70/30/3 was used (Fig. 1a). Because the YSK05 has an apparent pKa of 6.4, these LNPs are electrostatically near neutral in the blood stream at pH 7.4 [17]. Cholesterol and mPEG2k-DMG was used for stability and size control, respectively. The mPEG2k-DMG, which contains two myristic acid (C14:0)-derived scaffolds, can

Discussion

In the present study, we discovered that the hepatic uptake process of LNPs between ApoE/LDLR and GalNAc/ASGPR pathway have different kinetics. ApoE-mediated binding to hepatic HSPG resulted in a rapid blood clearance followed by cellular uptake after residing in the space of Disse for 10 to 20 min in the former pathway (Fig. 6). This was clearly different from the gradual progress in both blood clearance and cellular uptake that was observed in the latter pathway (Fig. 6).

The blood clearance

Conclusions

In summary, the findings presented herein show that the hepatic uptake process for LNPs between the ApoE/LDLR and GalNAc/ASGPR pathways show different kinetics. ApoE-mediated binding to hepatic HSPG resulted in a rapid blood clearance followed by cellular uptake after the particles resided for 10 to 20 min in the space of Disse in the former pathway, which is clearly different from the gradual progress of both blood clearance and cellular uptake in the latter pathway. Interactions between the

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors who have taken part in this study declare that they have nothing to disclose regarding funding or conflicts of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in parts by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Japan Grant Numbers JP15K20831 and JP17H05052. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Milton S. Feather for his helpful advice in preparing the English manuscript.

References (62)

  • K.H. Weisgraber et al.

    The receptor-binding domain of human apolipoprotein E. Monoclonal antibody inhibition of binding

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • K.H. Weisgraber et al.

    Human apolipoprotein E. determination of the heparin binding sites of apolipoprotein E3

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • A.A. D’Souza et al.

    Asialoglycoprotein receptor mediated hepatocyte targeting - strategies and applications

    J. Control. Release

    (2015)
  • J.U. Baenziger et al.

    Human hepatic lectin. Physiochemical properties and specificity

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1980)
  • D.T. Connolly et al.

    Binding and endocytosis of cluster glycosides by rabbit hepatocytes. Evidence for a short-circuit pathway that does not lead to degradation

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1982)
  • C.I. Wooddell et al.

    Hepatocyte-targeted RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

    Mol. Ther.

    (2013)
  • Y. Sato et al.

    A pH-sensitive cationic lipid facilitates the delivery of liposomal siRNA and gene silencing activity in vitro and in vivo

    J. Control. Release

    (2012)
  • K. Hashiba et al.

    pH-labile PEGylation of siRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticle improves active targeting and gene silencing activity in hepatocytes

    J. Control. Release

    (2017)
  • B.L. Mui et al.

    Influence of polyethylene glycol lipid desorption rates on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of siRNA lipid nanoparticles

    Mol Ther Nucleic Acids

    (2013)
  • S. Chen et al.

    Influence of particle size on the in vivo potency of lipid nanoparticle formulations of siRNA

    J. Control. Release

    (2016)
  • Y. Sato et al.

    Elucidation of the physicochemical properties and potency of siRNA-loaded small-sized lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery

    J. Control. Release

    (2016)
  • A. Grefhorst et al.

    Plasma PCSK9 preferentially reduces liver LDL receptors in mice

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2008)
  • M.J. Wells et al.

    In vivo clearance of ternary complexes of vitronectin-thrombin-antithrombin is mediated by hepatic heparan sulfate proteoglycans

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • M. Narita et al.

    Two receptor systems are involved in the plasma clearance of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in vivo

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • Z.S. Ji et al.

    Intravenous heparinase inhibits remnant lipoprotein clearance from the plasma and uptake by the liver: in vivo role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1995)
  • Y. Sato et al.

    Highly specific delivery of siRNA to hepatocytes circumvents endothelial cell-mediated lipid nanoparticle-associated toxicity leading to the safe and efficacious decrease in the hepatitis B virus

    J. Control. Release

    (2017)
  • T.L. Innerarity et al.

    Binding of arginine-rich (E) apoprotein after recombination with phospholipid vesicles to the low density lipoprotein receptors of fibroblasts

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1979)
  • E.M. Foley et al.

    Hepatic heparan sulfate proteoglycans and endocytic clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

    Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.

    (2010)
  • T. Roskams et al.

    Heparan sulfate proteoglycan expression in normal human liver

    Hepatology

    (1995)
  • S. Rietwyk et al.

    Next-generation lipids in RNA interference therapeutics

    ACS Nano

    (2017)
  • E. Blanco et al.

    Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Extrahepatic targeting of lipid nanoparticles in vivo with intracellular targeting for future nanomedicines

      2022, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, LNPs composed of ionizable lipids are typically adsorbed to ApoE in the blood stream and are taken up by hepatocytes that express high levels of LDLRs [28,29]. Hepatocytes also express the heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) with approximately 2-fold higher sulfate units per disaccharide, facilitating the rapid capture of ApoE-bound LNPs and transferring them to LDLRs followed by endocytosis [30,31]. A recent study reported that the binding of ApoE to LNPs induced the rearrangement of the distribution of ionizable lipids from the interface to the core [32].

    • On the size-regulation of RNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles synthesized by microfluidic device

      2022, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pH-sensitive cationic lipids are electrostatically near neutral at physiological pH and adopt cationic properties at an acidic pH. This property allows the enhanced encapsulation of highly negatively charged RNAs in the LNPs through electrostatic interactions in an acidic buffer, thereby avoiding non-specific interactions with serum components after intravenous administration. This, in turn, facilitates rapid hepatic uptake and enhances the cytosolic delivery of RNAs through electrostatic interactions followed by fusion with endosomal membranes [7–9]. The development of potent pH-sensitive cationic lipids has been a major breakthrough in the field of LNP-based RNA delivery [10–12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work

    View full text