Elsevier

Polymer

Volume 193, 10 April 2020, 122350
Polymer

Scaling laws of Mullins effect in nitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122350Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Mullins effect of rubber nanocomposites involves the microscopic deformation of the matrix.

  • The recovery hysteresis is temperature and velocity dependent.

  • The softening energy loss is accumulative.

Abstract

Rubber nanocomposites experiencing cyclic deformation undoubtedly exhibit Mullins effect whose underlining mechanisms are not yet clear. Herein this effect in nitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites is systematically investigated for revealing the influences of pre-strain interval, loading and unloading velocities, temperature, filler type and content, as well as crosslinking agent. The results show that the recovery hysteresis energy and accumulative softening energy of the nanocomposites can be superposed onto master curves as a function of microscopic strain of the rubber phase, revealing that both involving the viscoelastic deformation of the rubber phase. Especially the recovery hysteresis highly depending on temperature and loading and unloading velocities is connected to the viscoelasticity of nonideally crosslinked rubber network in the nanocomposites. On the other hand, the accumulative softening energy loss comes from recovery retardation of rubber chains and is somewhat sensitive to the filler, temperature and crosslinking agent. The investigation would be instructive to clarify the physical origin of Mullins effect to produce low dissipation rubber nanocomposites.

Introduction

Rubber nanocomposites are widely used in industry [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. They exhibit Mullins effect featured by stress softening and recovery hysteresis during cyclic deformations. Following the pioneering work of Mullins in 1965 [6,7], this effect is extensively investigated whereas its mechanism is far from being clarified [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. Viewpoints of breakup of filler network [[15], [16], [17], [18]] or strain induced crystallization [[19], [20], [21], [22]] are proposed but they are not applicable to the same effect appeared in non-crystalizing gum and low-filling nanocomposites [23,24]. The processes of chain desorption [25,26], slippery [[27], [28], [29]] or bond breakage [30] could possibly explain the hysteresis and stress softening but fails for the viscoelastic recovery of the stretched nanocomposites [14,23,[31], [32], [33]]. The models are hard to reasonably explain this effect over a wide range of conditions [[34], [35], [36], [37], [38]].

In a previous work [23] we divide the energy loss accompanying the Mullins effect into recovery hysteresis and softening energies (Erh and Es) and find that Erh involves in microscopic strain of rubber phase while Es is associated with both the rubber and filler phases. However, this conclusion is in conflict with that for the nonlinear Payne effect where the decays of both storage and loss moduli beyond the linear viscoelastic region are related to the nonlinear event of the matrix [[39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]]. Because the viscoelasticity of the matrix is dependent upon the testing condition, herein influence factors including pre-strains, tensile velocity, temperature, filler type and crosslinking agents on the Mullins effect are systematically investigated. By considering the accumulation characteristic of Es, we show that the softening also involves in the local deformation of viscoelastic, nonideally crosslinked rubber matrix. The results are illuminating for understanding the Mullins effect based on rubber viscoelasticity.

Section snippets

Materials

Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR; trademark 4155 acrylonitrile content 41 wt% and density 0.97 g cm−3) was obtained from Duokang, China. Carbon black (CB; trademark N330, primary particle size ~30 nm and density 1.86 g cm−3) was obtained from Longxin Chem. Stock, China. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic fumed silica products (A200 and R974) were purchased from Evonik Degussa Co., Akron, OH, USA. Antioxidant 6PPD [N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine], zinc oxide and stearic acid were

Influence of prestrain interval

The Mullins effect is sensitive to prestrain interval (εinter) [[49], [50], [51]] for sulfur-vulcanized gum and its CB nanocomposites. This effect was investigated under cyclic deformations at a crosshead velocity 50 mm min−1 with three predetermined prestrain intervals (εinter = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5; see Fig. S1 for σ-ε curves of sulfur-vulcanized gum and its CB nanocomposite with ϕ = 0.24). Following Li et al. [23], the energy losses associated with recovery hysteresis and softening (Erh and Es)

Conclusions

By creating master curves of hysteresis energy and accumulated softening energy of the nanocomposites with the reference of the vulcanized NBR gum, it is evidenced that the Mullins effect of the nanocomposites is dominated by the microscopic deformation of the nonideally crosslinked rubber phase. Due to the viscoelastic nature of the rubber phase, the hysteresis energy accompanying the Mullins effect is dependent on velocity of the cyclic deformation of the nanocomposites and the accumulated

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhiyun Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Investigation. Fuxiang Wen: Investigation, Resources. Munir Hussain: Investigation, Resources. Yihu Song: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Qiang Zheng: Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1908221, 51873190, and 51790503).

References (67)

  • S. Li et al.

    Nonlinear and linear viscoelastic behaviors of thermoplastic vulcanizates containing rubber nanoparticle agglomerates

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • Z. Miao et al.

    Temperature dependent network properties of amorphous PCT during tensile stretching

    Polymer

    (2020)
  • S. Sun et al.

    Probing the structural evolution in deformed isoprene rubber by in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and atomic force microscopy

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Energy dissipation accompanying Mullins effect of nitrile butadiene rubber/carbon black nanocomposites

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • X.Z. He et al.

    Mechanical properties of carbon black filled hydrogenated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber for packer compounds

    Polym. Test.

    (2016)
  • E. Coquelle et al.

    Mullins effect in elastomers filled with particles aligned by a magnetic field

    Int. J. Solid Struct.

    (2006)
  • S. Govindjee et al.

    A micro-mechanically based continuum damage model for carbon black-filled rubbers incorporating Mullins effect

    J. Mech. Phys. Solid.

    (1991)
  • N. Suzuki et al.

    Effects of rubber/filler interactions on deformation behavior of silica filled SBR systems

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • S. Cantournet et al.

    Mullins effect and cyclic stress softening of filled elastomers by internal sliding and friction thermodynamics model

    Int. J. Solid Struct.

    (2009)
  • S.L. Wang et al.

    Modeling thermal recovery of the Mullins effect

    Mech. Mater.

    (2018)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Integrating transient and sacrificial bonds into biobased elastomers toward mechanical property enhancement and macroscopically responsive property

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • Y. Wei et al.

    Non-rubber components tuning mechanical properties of natural rubber from vulcanization kinetics

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • A. McGlasson et al.

    The effects of staged mixing on the dispersion of reinforcing fillers in elastomer compounds

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • X. Fan et al.

    Insight into the weak strain overshoot of carbon black filled natural rubber

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • H. Xu et al.

    Linear and nonlinear rheological behaviors of silica filled nitrile butadiene rubber

    Polymer

    (2018)
  • R. Yang et al.

    Payne effect of silica-filled styrene-butadiene rubber

    Polymer

    (2017)
  • Y. Xu et al.

    Influence of ionic liquids on rheological behaviors of polyisoprene rubber/silica compounds

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Payne effect of carbon black filled natural rubber compounds and their carbon black gels

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • S. Nie et al.

    Aging of natural rubber studied via Fourier-transform rheology and double quantum NMR to correlate local chain dynamics with macroscopic mechanical response

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • J. Diani et al.

    A damage directional constitutive model for Mullins effect with permanent set and induced anisotropy

    Eur. J. Mech. Solid.

    (2006)
  • J. Domurath et al.

    Modelling of stress and strain amplification effects in filled polymer melts

    J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.

    (2012)
  • R.K. Luo et al.

    Rubber-unloading-behaviour evaluation using product-orientated specimen based on a resilience test

    Polym. Test.

    (2014)
  • Y. Tomita et al.

    Computational evaluation of strain-rate-dependent deformation behavior of rubber and carbon-black-filled rubber under monotonic and cyclic straining

    Int. J. Mech. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (26)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text