Plants are better engineers: the complexity of plant organ morphogenesis
Introduction
Unlike animals, which typically complete organogenesis during embryogenesis, plants continuously and reproducibly create new organs (i.e. leaves, sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels/fruit) throughout their lifecycles. We are starting to be able to engineer the organoid, a mass of cells or tissue grown artificially that resembles an organ, from human and animal cells [1]. Prompted by Richard Feynman’s famous pronouncement, ‘What I cannot create, I do not understand’, we consider the challenges inherent in engineering plant organs.
For classical engineering:
- (1)
the design is based on well-understood principles and all components are well defined;
- (2)
the system is designed with precise, nearly fault-free components;
- (3)
the system operates in the linear range, so that its behavior is predictable [2].
In comparison, development violates all these tenets:
- (1)
it is unclear to what extent general principles exist or each organ is a special case. And regulatory components often have multiple overlapping and intersecting functions;
- (2)
the cellular and molecular components behave variably, and large faults in these components are tolerated to produce robust organs;
- (3)
the regulatory networks often act in the non-linear range and small stochastic changes in key regulators can push the system to different outcomes.
In complexity theory, emergence is the generation of de novo properties in a system that are not found within its component parts. Organs undergo emergence, arriving at a reproducible size, shape, and function that is not present or easily predictable from their cellular and molecular parts. Just think if we could incorporate this ability in our engineering—engineering emergence [2]. In this review, we emphasize quantitative and dynamic research including computational analysis and modeling which allows us to penetrate deeper into complexity and gives us insight into how organ emergence occurs.
Section snippets
The potential for general principles to exist in organ morphogenesis
“If you can’t explain something simply, you don’t understand it well.” - Albert Einstein
It remains unclear to what extent there are general principles in morphogenesis, which if present are hidden by the complexity of the systems. Here we propose that a biophysical feedback loop between mechanical stress and organ growth can be considered a general principle in plant morphogenesis [3, 4, 5]. This biophysical feedback loop was first elucidated in the Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis)
Reproducibility at larger scales emerges from variability at smaller scales
“To do a great right do a little wrong.” - William Shakespeare
Fundamentally the size and shape of an organ depend on the number, size, and shape of its constituent cells. Spatially, the anisotropy of cell growth and the orientation of the cell division plane contribute to the organ growth orientation. Temporally, the growth rate of the cells controls the organ growth rate. However, all of these cellular aspects are variable [18, 19, 20, 21] (Figure 2).
The plant promotes variability in cell
Operating in the non-linear regime, close to thresholds and critical points
“It may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena.” - Henri Poincare
Formation of patterns of specialized cell types within organs requires symmetry breaking [32], where two identical cells make different decisions to become distinct cell types. Symmetry breaking can occur because biological systems often operate in the non-linear regime where they are close to thresholds and critical points. Small changes in the concentration of key
Concluding remarks
To reach a more holistic understanding of plant morphogenesis, we need to embrace complexity: 1. Pay attention to the distributions of outcomes and the dynamics of the problem instead of just average differences between samples; 2. Pay attention to variable phenotypes as the genes promoting robustness tend to genetically interact with lots of other genes, making them the hubs of genetic networks [48]; 3. Integrate computational modeling with experiments. Computational modeling can be used for
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Mingyuan Zhu: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Adrienne HK Roeder: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing.
Acknowledgements
We apologize to all whose works we could not cite due to length restrictions. We thank Arezki Boudaoud, Joseph Cammarata, Frances Clark, Olivier Hamant, Kate Harline, Josh Strable, Batthula Vijaya Lakshmi Vadde, and the reviewers for critical reading. Work in the Roeder lab is supported by NSFIOS-1553030 and Cornell University, Weill Institute startup funding.
References (48)
- et al.
Physical forces regulate plant development and morphogenesis
Curr Biol
(2014) - et al.
A mechanical feedback restricts sepal growth and shape in Arabidopsis
Curr Biol
(2016) - et al.
The self-organization of plant microtubules inside the cell volume yields their cortical localization, stable alignment, and sensitivity to external cues
PLoS Comput Biol
(2018) - et al.
Spatiotemporal variation of leaf epidermal cell growth: a quantitative analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and triple cyclinD3 mutant plants
Ann Bot
(2012) - et al.
Clones of cells switch from reduction to enhancement of size variability in Arabidopsis sepals
Development
(2017) - et al.
Transcriptomic effects of the cell cycle regulator LGO in Arabidopsis sepals
Front Plant Sci
(2016) - et al.
Concise review: current status of three-dimensional organoids as preclinical models
Stem Cells
(2018) Emergent engineering: reframing the grand challenge for the 21st century
Worlds Hidden in Plain Sight
(2019)- et al.
Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis
Science
(2008) Mechanism for plant cellular morphogenesis
Science
(1962)
A plausible model of phyllotaxis
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
An auxin-driven polarized transport model for phyllotaxis
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules
Science
Subcellular and supracellular mechanical stress prescribes cytoskeleton behavior in Arabidopsis cotyledon pavement cells
eLife
Mechanical constraints imposed by 3D cellular geometry and arrangement modulate growth patterns in the Arabidopsis embryo
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Why plants make puzzle cells, and how their shape emerges
eLife
Morphomechanical innovation drives explosive seed dispersal
Cell
A tension-adhesion feedback loop in plant epidermis
eLife
Cellular basis of growth in plants: geometry matters
Curr Opin Plant Biol
The role of mechanical forces in plant morphogenesis
Annu Rev Plant Biol
Heterogeneity and robustness in plant morphogenesis: from cells to organs
Annu Rev Plant Biol
Variability and constancy in cellular growth of Arabidopsis sepals
Plant Physiol
Surface growth at the reproductive shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana pin-formed 1 and wild type
J Exp Bot
Alteration of oriented deposition of cellulose microfibrils by mutation of a katanin-like microtubule-severing protein
Plant Cell
Cited by (7)
A multiscale analysis of early flower development in Arabidopsis provides an integrated view of molecular regulation and growth control
2021, Developmental CellCitation Excerpt :An important first step toward addressing these problems is to integrate the existing information on gene expression and to quantitatively correlate regulatory inputs, for example, in the form of gene expression patterns, with the final output, i.e., shape changes during development (Coen et al., 2004; Whitewoods and Coen, 2017). This should then provide a solid basis for more mechanistic studies, involving also the regulation of biochemical interactions and biophysical aspects (Abad et al., 2017; Diaz de la Loza and Thompson, 2017; Pasakarnis et al., 2016; Thompson, 1917; Zhu and Roeder, 2020). We address this question in the floral meristem (FM) of the model plant Arabidopsis, which generates four whorls of floral organs and is one of the best-characterized morphogenetic systems available (Blázquez et al., 2006; Bowman et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2018).
Productive method for commercial propagation through direct embryogenesis and organogenesis in Ledebouria revoluta—an underutilized medicinal plant with cardioprotective properties
2020, Industrial Crops and ProductsCitation Excerpt :About 53–58 weeks after field transfer, a total of 92.5 % matured plants (161 out of 174 plants) had flowered normally (Fig. 5C, F). “Plants are better engineers than us” as they repeatedly produce new organs, whereas we humans are still far away from being capable to engineer morphogenesis in planta (Zhu and Roeder, 2020). The in vitro plant regeneration path would be either embryogenic or organogenic!
Arabidopsis sepals: A model system for the emergent process of morphogenesis
2021, Quantitative Plant BiologyThe root meristem is shaped by brassinosteroid control of cell geometry
2021, Nature PlantsAsymmetry of plant cell divisions under salt stress
2021, SymmetryPlant multiscale networks: charting plant connectivity by multi-level analysis and imaging techniques
2021, Science China Life Sciences