Skip to main content
Log in

Supplementing decompression with instrumented fusion for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis—a critical appraisal of available randomized controlled trials

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common indications for surgery in the USA. The addition of instrumented fusion to decompression for the treatment of LSS has become common, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have produced percieved conflicting results with unclear clinical implications. This review seeks clarity through an analysis of available RCTs. We performed a search of the PubMed database for RCTs that directly addressed decompression vs. decompression and fusion for the surgical treatment of LSS. RCTs were screened and reviewed to compare content such as patient selection, pathology, radiographic criteria, and operative technique. Five RCTs resulted from our search and were included in our analysis. Two studies yielded class I data while three yielded class III data due to study design related issues. Heterogeneity between these studies is emphasized with regard to patient selection, LSS definition, spondylolisthesis, instability, and surgical technique. Efforts to decipher which patients will truly benefit from instrumented fusion for the surgical treatment of LSS are still ongoing. Surgeon judgment will remain a crucial component for surgical decision making until future trials provide clarity. Instrumented fusion should be tailored to the individual patient rather than incorporated as a routine practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleås F, Nordal HJ, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1178–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bridwell K, Sedgewick T, O'Brien M, Lenke L, Baldus C (1993) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:461–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabraja M, Mohamed E, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S (2012) The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21:256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT (1997) 1997 Volvo award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila pa 1976) 22:2807–2812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1131–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Genevay S, Atlas SJ (2010) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg-Ser A 86:1497–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, Coumans J-VCE, Harrington JF, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz JS, Sonntag VKH, Barker FG, Benzel EC (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374:1424–1434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glassman SD, Polly DW, Dimar JR, Carreon LY (2012) The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:769–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J (1993) Significance of simultaneous fusion and surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthopade 22:243–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Albert TJ, Radcliff KE (2014) National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1584–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Landi A, Gregori F, Marotta N, Donnarumma P, Delfini R (2015) Hidden spondylolisthesis: unrecognized cause of low back pain? Prospective study about the use of dynamic projections in standing and recumbent position for the individuation of lumbar instability. Neuroradiology 57:583–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lattig F, Fekete TF, Grob D, Kleinstück FS, Jeszenszky D, Mannion AF (2012) Lumbar facet joint effusion in MRI: a sign of instability in degenerative spondylolisthesis? Eur Spine J 21:276–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D, Betz RR, Baldus C, Schoenecker PL (1992) Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimäki T, Rönty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Hurri H, Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group (2007) Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mobbs R, Phan K (2017) Minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 7:e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Hansson T, Holm S (1990) Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the porcine cauda equina. J Spinal Disord 3:25–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Otani K, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Igarashi T, Nikaido T, Watanabe K, Konno S (2013) Lumbar spinal stenosis has a negative impact on quality of life compared with other comorbidities: an epidemiological cross-sectional study of 1862 community-dwelling individuals. ScientificWorldJournal 2013:590652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson AM (2016) Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: how to reconcile conflicting evidence. J Spine Surg 2:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter RW, Ward D (1992) Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, Hong J, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2009) Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 9:623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schinnerer KA, Katz LD, Grauer JN (2008) MR findings of exaggerated fluid in facet joints predicts instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:468–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Vaccaro AR, Hsu WK, Patel AA, Savage JW (2015) Rationale for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E1161–E1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaffer WO, Spratt KF, Weinstein J, Lehmann TR, Goel V (1990) 1990 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The consistency and accuracy of roentgenograms for measuring sagittal translation in the lumbar vertebral motion segment An experimental model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:741–750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Slätis P, Malmivaara A, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Herno A, Kankare J, Seitsalo S, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Hurri H (2011) Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 20:1174–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, Investigators S (2008) V Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:794–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yadhati A, Kurra S, Tallarico RA, Lavelle WF (2017) Lumbar vertebral body and pars fractures following laminectomy. J Surg Case Rep 2017:rjx007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Leschke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not required/applicable

Informed consent

Not required/applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leschke, J.M., Chen, C.C. Supplementing decompression with instrumented fusion for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis—a critical appraisal of available randomized controlled trials. Neurosurg Rev 44, 643–648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01270-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01270-x

Keywords

Navigation