New electrolytic enrichment system for tritium determination in water research institute in Bratislava and IT’S first results of tritium activity in precipitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106177Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The process of electrolytic enrichment of water samples was described.

  • New and old electrolytic enrichment system were compared.

  • The seasonal variations of tritium activities in precipitation are observed.

Abstract

The method of tritium activity measurements by electrolytic enrichment in combination with liquid scintillation counting is well known for many years. In the Water Research Institute in Bratislava was this system employed since the 60-ties of the 20th century. In 2018 the laboratory of radiochemistry of Water Research Institute obtained a new electrolytic enrichment system with higher enrichment factor (varying from 9 to 22, depending on the total ampere-hours used). The enrichment factor of the previous system was about 6. Complementary to the new system, also the new LCS counter Quantulus GCT 6220 was added. This spectrometer has active background suppression function (Guard Compensation Technology - GCT) and for the tritium measurement the background counts decreased from cca. 9 cpm (for Tricarb 2900 TR) to approximately 1 cpm. To demonstrate the capabilities of this system, we present results of the tritium concentration in precipitations during the period from May 2016 to May 2019. The seasonal variations of tritium activities in precipitation are observed, with maximum values in spring season and minimum in winter. Additionally, selected tritium activities from the extensive monitoring of river waters in Slovakia are presented.

Introduction

Tritium has a great significance in isotope hydrology in addition to the stable isotopes 2H and 18O. Tritium is a pure beta emitter (Emax = 18.6 keV) with the half-life of 12.32 years (Lucas and Unterweger, 2000). Its concentration is described in terms of tritium units (TU), where 1 TU = 1 atom of tritium per 1018 atoms of hydrogen = 0.11919 ± 0.00021 Bq.kg−1 of water (Groning and Rozanski, 2003).

Natural tritium is produced in the upper layers of the atmosphere by the reaction of neutrons produced by the cosmic rays and the nitrogen atoms. After formation, 3H is oxidized to water (HTO) and removed from the troposphere to the ground via precipitation. The latitudinal dependence of the natural production rate and the transport of the tritium from the stratosphere to the troposphere at the high latitudes should lead to non-uniform distribution of tritium in precipitation. Usually, it is assumed that tritium content is in the range between 10 and 20 TU in the northern hemisphere and less than 10 TU in the intertropical belt and the southern hemisphere, except Antarctica (Von Buttlar and Libby, 1955).

Tritium is also produced in nuclear reactors, entering the environment by periodical releases from the nuclear power plants. But the major source of tritium pollution was the hydrogen bomb testing in 1960′s. The amount of tritium released to the atmosphere by thermonuclear tests was enormous, exceeding the natural production by the two to three orders of magnitude over many years. From 1952 to 1962, approximately 600 kg of tritium was released to the environment (Rozanski et al., 1991). For comparison, the natural background mass of tritium in the atmosphere from cosmic ray spallation is estimated at 4 kg (Michel et al., 2015).

Since the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963, the level of bomb tritium measured in precipitation has decreasing trend due to its radioactive decay and dilution in the world oceans. Recently the concentration of tritium in precipitation and river waters has almost returned to the pre-nuclear test level (about 5–20 TU) (Guetat al., 2011). However, some studies suggest that even 55 years after the 1963 maximum of nuclear atmospheric tests the tritium did not yet reached the equilibrium value (Duliu et al., 2018).

In the north hemisphere activity concentrations of cosmogenic tritium in precipitation follow characteristic seasonal variations. The spring/summer maximum, referred to as “Spring Leak”, is explained by the exchange of tropospheric and stratospheric air masses occurring mainly during late winter and spring. At this time is the border layer between the stratosphere and troposphere lowered due to the heating of the continents (Zahn et al., 1998; Clark and Fritz, 1997; Gat et al., 2001) and this decline is followed by a release of tritium from the stratosphere into the troposphere and thus increases the flux of tritiated water to the ground by precipitation.

As tritium concentration in environment is 8.5 TU or lower and especially lower than 4.2 TU in seawater, it is difficult to measure this concentration even using a low background liquid scintillation counting system (Muranaka et al., 2011). To solve the problem, the tritium in water samples must be concentrated through a process of electrolytic enrichment (electrolysis) to attain a measurable level by liquid scintillation counting (Satake and Takeuchi, 1991; Saito, 2007; Plastino et al., 2007). Afterwards, the liquid scintillation counting system is used to count the released electrons by the beta-decay of 3H.

In the Water Research Institute in Bratislava was the tritium enrichment system coupled with LSC employed since the 60-ties of the 20th century. We present the results of the tritium concentration in precipitations during the period from May 2016 to May 2019. For this study we used a new electrolytic enrichment system with higher enrichment factor and also the new LCS counter QUANTULUS GCT 6220 obtained in 2018. Moreover, selected data from the extensive monitoring of river waters in Slovakia are presented.

Section snippets

Reagents and equipment

Used reagents were of analytical grade: sodium peroxide 96%, nitric acid 65%, purchased from Sigma; liquid scintillation cocktail Ultima Gold LLT from PerkinElmer.

Measurements of 3H activity concentrations were conducted on two different LS counters: Tricarb 2900TR and Quantulus GCT 6220 from PerkinElmer. The latter has active background suppression function (Guard Compensation Technology - GCT) and for the tritium measurement the background counts are approximately 1 cpm. For comparison, the

Selection of the dead water

For the purpose of dead water selection eight different water sources (all from Slovakia) were tested (Table 1.) using the described method. The water from the springs was sampled right in the outlet since the ground. The tap water was included into the study for comparison.

The counts C and Cel in the selected samples are in Table 2. The smallest differences between the counts are for the sample from the spring Medokýš and the bore ČH-1. We can conclude that these two sources containn almost no

Conclusions

In this work we presented the enrichment system in combination with LSC, which is well suited for the measurement of very low tritium concentrations in environmental samples. Using this system we investigated the temporal variations of tritium in precipitation at sampling station in Bratislava, Slovakia for period of three years (May 2016–May 2019). The concentration of tritium in precipitation varies between 15.3 TU and 2.3 TU, with the average value of 7.8 TU. This result corresponds to other

Acknowledgements

This work was done in the cooperation with the faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics of Comenius University in Bratislava. The samples from two Slovak rivers are the part of the extensive and long-term monitoring in the framework of the project Monitoring and water status assessment – III. phase, Cohesion Fund, ITMS Code: 310011A366.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Low-level tritium measurements in freshwater and seawater samples

    2024, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
View full text