Skip to main content
Log in

Natural Language Processing in Dutch Free Text Radiology Reports: Challenges in a Small Language Area Staging Pulmonary Oncology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reports are the standard way of communication between the radiologist and the referring clinician. Efforts are made to improve this communication by, for instance, introducing standardization and structured reporting. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is another promising tool which can improve and enhance the radiological report by processing free text. NLP as such adds structure to the report and exposes the information, which in turn can be used for further analysis. This paper describes pre-processing and processing steps and highlights important challenges to overcome in order to successfully implement a free text mining algorithm using NLP tools and machine learning in a small language area, like Dutch. A rule-based algorithm was constructed to classify T-stage of pulmonary oncology from the original free text radiological report, based on the items tumor size, presence and involvement according to the 8th TNM classification system. PyContextNLP, spaCy and regular expressions were used as tools to extract the correct information and process the free text. Overall accuracy of the algorithm for evaluating T-stage was 0,83 in the training set and 0,87 in the validation set, which shows that the approach in this pilot study is promising. Future research with larger datasets and external validation is needed to be able to introduce more machine learning approaches and perhaps to reduce required input efforts of domain-specific knowledge. However, a hybrid NLP approach will probably achieve the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGinty GB, Allen B, Geis JR, Wald C: IT infrastructure in the era of imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1197–1204, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C Eds: TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Puts S, Nobel JM: Medical narrative to structure: maastroclinic/medstruct. maastroclinic, 2019

  4. Krupinski EA, Hall ET, Jaw S, Reiner B, Siegel E: Influence of radiology report format on reading time and comprehension. J Digit Imaging 25:63–69, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pons E, Braun LMM, Hunink MGM, Kors JA: Natural language processing in radiology: A systematic review. Radiology 279:329–343, 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Zheng J, Sohn S, Kipper-Schuler KC, Chute CG: Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): Architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:507–513, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornet R, van Eldik A, de Keizer N: Inventory of tools for Dutch clinical language processing. Stud Health Technol Inform 180:245–249, 2012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen AN, Lawley MJ, Hansen DP, Bowman RV, Clarke BE, Duhig EE, Colquist S: Symbolic rule-based classification of lung cancer stages from free-text pathology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:440–445, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro SM, Tseytlin E, Medvedeva O, Mitchell K, Visweswaran S, Bekhuis T, Jacobson RT: Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports. J Biomed Inform 69:177–187, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pathak S, van Rossen J, Vijlbrief O, Geerdink J, Seifert C, van Keulen M: Automatic Structuring of Breast Cancer Radiology Reports for Quality Assurance. IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW), Singapore, IEEE 2018(732–739):2018, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Honnibal M, Montani I: Spacy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing. To appear: 7, 2017

  12. Soldaini L, Goharian N: QuickUMLS: a fast, unsupervised approach for medical concept extraction. MedIR workshop, sigir, 2016. Available at http://ir.cs.georgetown.edu/downloads/quickumls.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2019.

  13. Côté RA, Robboy S: Progress in medical information management. Systematized nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED). JAMA 243:756–762, 1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman BE, Lee S, Kang HP, Chapman WW: Document-level classification of CT pulmonary angiography reports based on an extension of the ConText algorithm. J Biomed Inform 44:728–737, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapman WW, Hillert D, Velupillai S, Kvist M, Skeppstedt M, Chapman BE, Conway M, Tharp M, Mowery DL, Deleger L: Extending the NegEx lexicon for multiple languages. Stud Health Technol Inform 192:677–681, 2013

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Afzal Z, Pons E, Kang N, Sturkenboom MC, Schuemie MJ, Kors JA: ContextD: An algorithm to identify contextual properties of medical terms in a Dutch clinical corpus. BMC Bioinformatics 15:373, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman WW: Extract context modifiers targeting clinical terms: Maastroclinic/pyConTextNLP 2019. Available at https://github.com/maastroclinic/pyConTextNLP. Accessed 19 June 2019.

  18. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes AJ, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo CT, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Groth P, Goble C, Grethe JS, Heringa J, ’t Hoen PA, Hooft R, Kuhn T, Kok R, Kok J, Lusher SJ, Martone ME, Mons A, Packer AL, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, van Schaik R, Sansone SA, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz MA, Thompson M, van der Lei J, van Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg P, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:160018, 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Martijn Nobel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nobel, J.M., Puts, S., Bakers, F.C.H. et al. Natural Language Processing in Dutch Free Text Radiology Reports: Challenges in a Small Language Area Staging Pulmonary Oncology. J Digit Imaging 33, 1002–1008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00327-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00327-z

Keywords

Navigation