Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic mechanisms of formation of radiation-induced instability of the genome and its transgenerational effects in the descendants of chronically irradiated individuals of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the role of intracellular mechanisms in the formation of radiation-induced genetic instability and its transgenerational effect in cells of different tissues of the descendants of Drosophila melanogaster mutant strains whose parents were exposed to chronic radiation (0.42 and 3.5 mGy/h). The level of DNA damage (alkali-labile sites (ALS), single-strand (SSB) and double-strand (DSB) breaks) in cells of somatic (nerve ganglia, imaginal discs) and generative (testis) tissues from directly irradiated animals and their unirradiated offspring was evaluated. Confident transgenerational instability (on the level of ALSs and SSBs), observed only in somatic tissues and only at the higher dose rate, is characteristic for mus209 mutant strains defective in excision repair and, less often, for mus205 and mus210 mutant strains. The greatest manifestation of radiation-induced genetic instability was found in evaluating the DSBs. Dysfunction of the genes mus205, mus304, mei-9 and mei-41, which are responsible for postreplicative repair, excision repair, recombination and control of the cell cycle, affects transgenerational changes in the somatic tissues of the offspring of parents irradiated in both low and high dose rates. In germ cells, the key role in maintaining genetic stability under chronic irradiation is played by the non-recombination postreplication repair mus101 gene. We revealed the tissue specificity of the radiation-induced effects, transgenerational transmission and accumulation of DNA damage to descendants of chronically irradiated animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashburner M (1989) Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, p 1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch JE, Aypar U, Waters KM, Yang AJ, Morgan WF (2014) Genetic and epigenetic changes in chromosomally stable and unstable progeny of irradiated cells. PloS ONE 9:e107722

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Beall EL, Rio DC (1997) DrosophilaP-element transposase is a novel site-specific endonuclease. Genes Dev 11:2137–2151

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat A, Andersen PL, Qin Z, Xiao W (2013) Rev3, the catalytic subunit of Polzeta, is required for maintaining fragile site stability in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 41:2328–2339

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao C, Ferreiro JA, Comendador MA, Sierra LM (2002) Influence of mus201 and mus308 mutations of Drosophila melanogaster on the genotoxicity of model chemicals in somatic cells in vivo measured with the Comet assay. Mutat Res 503:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonisoli-Alquati A, Beasley Ostermiller S, De AE, Welch SM, Møller AP, Mousseau TA (2018) Faster development covaries with higher DNA damage in grasshoppers (Chorthippus albomarginatus) from Chernobyl. Physiol Biochem Zool 91:776–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd JB, Golino MD, Setlow RB (1976) The mei-9a mutant of Drosophila melanogaster increases mutagen sensitivity and decreases excision repair. Genetics 84:527–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Breger KS, Smith L, Turker MS, Thayer MJ (2004) Ionizing radiation induces frequent translocations with delayed replication and rondensation. Cancer Res 64:8231–8238

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky MH, Sekelsky JJ, Tsang G, Hawley RS, Rubin GM (2000) Mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development. Genes Dev 14:666–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan SH, Yu AM, McVey M (2010) Dual roles for DNA polymerase theta in alternative end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 6:e1001005

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmuzh EV, Shestakova LA, Volkova VS, Zakharov IK (2007) Highly sensitive systems for experimental insertional mutagenesis in repair-deficient genetic environment in Drosophila melanogaster: new opportunities for studying postreplication repair of double-stranded DNA breaks and mechanisms of transposable element migration. Genetica 43:41–47 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi SH, Park J-H, Nguyen TTN, Shim HJ, Song Y-H (2017) Initiation of Drosophila chorion gene amplification requires Claspin and mus101, whereas Claspin, but not mus101, plays a major role during elongation. Dev Dyn 246:466–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins AR, Dusinska M (2002) Oxidation of cellular DNA measured with the comet assay. Methods Mol Biol 186:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • de Buendίa PG (1998) Search for DNA repair pathways in Drosophila melanogaster. Mut Res 407:67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekanty A, Barrio L, Milán M (2015) Contributions of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints and cell death to suppressing the DNA damage-induced tumorigenic behavior of Drosophila epithelial cells. Oncogene 34:978–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Valdés N, Comendador MA, Sierra LM (2010) Mus308 processes oxygen and nitrogen ethylation DNA damage in germ cells of Drosophila. J Nucleic Acids. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/416364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrova YE (2003) Radiation-induced transgenerational instability. Oncogene 22:7087–7093

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubrova YE, Plumb MA (2002) Ionising radiation and mutation induction at mouse minisatellite loci. The story of the two generations. Mutat Res 499:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Finette BA, Homans AC, Albertini RJ (2000) Emergence of genetic instability in children treated for leukemia. Science 288:514–517

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fullilove LS, Jacobson AG, Turner FR (1978) Embryonic development: descriptive. The genetics and biology of Drosophila, 2C edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 103–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatti M (1979) Genetic control of chromosome breakage and rejoining in Drosophila melanogaster: spontaneous chromosome aberrations in X-linked mutants defective in DNA metabolism (recombination-defective meiotic mutants/mutagen-sensitive mutants/chromosome aberrations in neuroblast cells). Genetics 76:1377–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock S, Vo NTK, Omar-Nazir L, Batlle JVI, Otaki JM, Hiyama A, Byun SH, Seymour CB, Mothersill C (2019a) Transgenerational effects of historic radiation dose in pale grass blue butterflies around Fukushima following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant meltdown accident. Environ Res 168:230–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock S, Vo NTK, Byun SH, Zainullin VG, Seymour CB, Mothersill C (2019b) Effects of historic radiation dose on the frequency of sex-linked recessive lethals in Drosophila populations following the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Environ Res 172:333–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari KL, Santerre A, Sekelsky JJ, McKim KS, Boyd JB, Hawley RS (1995) The mei-41 gene of Drosophila melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:815–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris PV, Boyd JB (1993) Re-evaluation of excision repair in the mus304, mus306 and mus308 mutants of Drosophila. Mutat Res 301:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrouk W, Codrington A, Vinson R, Robaire B, Hales BF (2000) Paternal exposure to cyclophosphamide induces DNA damage and alters the expression of DNA repair genes in the rat preimplantation embryo. Mutat Res 461:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenstein V, Spindler S, Pereanu W, Fung S (2008) The development of the Drosophila larval brain. Adv Exp Med Biol 628:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DS, Banga SS, Grigliatti TA, Boyd JB (1994) Mutagen sensitivity and suppression of position-effect variegation result from mutations in mus209, the Drosophila gene encoding PCNA. EMBO J 13:1450–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiyama A, Nohara C, Kinjo S, Taira W, Gima S, Tanahara A, Otaki JM (2012) The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the pale grass blue butterfly. Sci Reports 570:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Homem CC, Knoblich JA (2012) Drosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology. Development 139:4297–4310

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh M, Kajihara R, Kato Y, Takano-Shimizu T, Inoue Y (2018) Frequencies of chromosomal inversions in Drosophila melanogaster in Fukushima after the nuclear power plant accident. PLoS ONE 13:e0192096

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha AN (2008) Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. Mutagenesis 23:207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane DP, Shusterman M, Rong Y, McVey M (2012) Competition between replicative and translesion polymerases during homologous recombination repair in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 8:e1002659

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmins S, Sassone-Corsi P (2005) Chromatin remodelling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature 434:583–589

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M, Gerhart J (2006) The plausibility of life: resolving Darwin’s dilemma. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 314

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopper LD (2005) Use of the comet assay to asses genotoxicity in mammalian, avian and amphibian species. Techn Rep Ser 429:10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Koana T, Tsujimura H (2010) A U-shaped dose–response relationship between X radiation and sex-linked recessive lethal mutation in male germ cells of Drosophila. Radiat Res 174:46–51

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Koana T, Takashima Y, Okada MO, Ikehata M, Miyakoshi J, Sakai KA (2004) Threshold exists in the dose-response relationship for somatic mutation frequency induced by X irradiation of Drosophila. Radiat Res 161:391–396

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kooistra R, Pastink A, Zonneveld JB, Lohman PH, Eeken JC (1999) The Drosophila melanogaster DmRAD54 gene plays a crucial role in double-strand break repair after P-element excision and acts synergistically with Ku70 in the repair of X-Ray damage. Mol Cell Biol 19:6269–6275

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurencon A, Purdy A, Sekelsky J, Hawley RS, Su TT (2003) Phenotypic analysis of separation-of-function alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR. Genetics 164:589–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Gonon G, Buonanno M, Autsavapromporn N, de Toledo SM, Pain D, Azzam E (2014) Health risks of space exploration: targeted and nontargeted oxidative injury by high-charge and high-energy particles. Antioxid Redox Signal 20:1501–1523

    Google Scholar 

  • Little JB, Nagasawa H, Pfenning T, Vetrovs H (1997) Radiation-induced genomic instability: delayed mutagenic and cytogenetic effects of X rays and alpha partic-les. Radiat Res 148:299–307

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • López A, Xamena N, Marcos R, Velázquez A (2005) Germline genomic instability in PCNA mutants of Drosophila: DNA fingerprinting and microsatellite analysis. Mutat Res 570:253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Matulis S, Handel MA (2006) Spermatocyte responses in vitro to induced DNA damage. Mol Reprod Dev 73:1061–1072

    Google Scholar 

  • McVey M (2010) In vivo analysis of Drosophila BLM helicase function during DNA double-strand gap repair. Methods Mol Biol 587:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Mousseau TA (2013) High frequency of albinism and tumours in free-living birds around Chernobyl. Mutat Res 757:52–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay I, Chowdhuri DK, Bajpayee M, Dhawan A (2004) Evaluation of in vivo genotoxicity of cypermethrin in Drosophila melanogaster using the alkaline comet assay. Mutagenesis 19:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Muruganujan A, Mi H, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD (2013) Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc 8:1551–1566

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M, Tanaka K, Takahashi T, Kyo T, Dohy H, Fujiwara M, Kamada N (2001) Microsatellite instability in acute myelocytic leukaemia developed from A-bomb survivors. Int J Radiat Biol 77:687–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura K, Magae J, Kawakami Y, Koana T (2009) Reduction in mutation frequency by very low-dose gamma irradiation of Drosophila melanogaster. Radiat Res 171:1–8

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Oikemus SR, Queiroz-Machado J, Lai KJ, McGinnis N, Sunkel C, Brodsky MH (2006) Epigenetic telomere protection by Drosophila DNA damage response pathways. PLoS Genet 2:e71

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive PL, Wlodek D, Durand RE, Banath JP (1992) Factors influence DNA migration from individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis. Exp Cell Res 198:259–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar-Nazir L, Shi X, Moller A, Mousseau T, Byun S, Hancock S, Seymour C, Mothersill C (2018) Long-term effects of ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident: possible contribution of historic dose. Environ Res 165:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Portin P (2010) Evidence based on studies of the mus309 mutant, deficient in DNA double-strand break repair, that meiotic crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster is a two-phase process. Genetica 138:1033–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford SJ, Goley E, Baxter K, McMahan S, Sekelsky J (2005) Drosophila ERCC1 is required for a subset of MEI-9-dependent meiotic crossovers. Genetics 170:1737–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakyan VK, Preis J, Morgan HD, Whitelaw E (2001) The marks, mechanisms and memory of epigenetic states in mammals. Biochem J 356:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rocha H, Garcia-Garcia A, Panayiotidis M, Franco R (2011) DNA damage and autophagy. Mutat Res 711:158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkamm K, Lobrich M (2003) Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low X-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5057–5062

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sekelsky JJ, Burtis KC, Hawley RS (1998) Damage control: the pleiotropy of DNA repair genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148:1587–1598

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharief FS, Vojta PJ, Ropp PA, Copeland WC (1999) Cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), the eighth human DNA polymerase. Genomics 59:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Shima N, Munroe RJ, Schimenti JC (2004) The mouse genomic instability mutation chaos1 is an allele of Polq that exhibits genetic interaction with Atm. Mol Cell Biol 24:10381–10389

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimura T, Inoue M, Taga M, Shiraishi K, Uematsu N, Takei N, Yuan Z-M, Shinohara T, Niwa O (2002) p53-Dependent S-phase damage checkpoint and pronuclear cross talk in mouse zygotes with X-irradiated sperm. Mol Cell Biol 22:2220–2228

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh NP, Danner DB, Tice RR, McCoy MT, Collins GD, Schneider EL (1989) Abundant alkali-sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm. Exp Cell Res 184:461–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawn EJ, Whitehouse CA, Martin FA (2000) Sequential chromosome aberration analysis following radiotherapy - no evidence for enhanced genomic instability. Mutat Res 465:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (2001) Hereditary effects of radiation. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo NTK, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE (2019) Radiobiological characteristics of descendant progeny of fish and amphibian cells that survive the initial ionizing radiation dose. Environ Res 169:494–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel EW, Natarajan AT (1995) DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo. Mut Res 330:183–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace SS (1994) DNA damages processed by base excision repair: biological consequences. Int J Radiat Biol 66:579–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz O, Majumder S, Kramer B, Sekelsky JJ (2002) Drosophila MUS312 interacts with the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease MEI-9 to generate meiotic crossovers. Mol Cell 10:1503–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz O, Kearney H, Kramer BC, Sekelsky JJ (2004) Mutational analysis of the Drosophila DNA repair ana recombination gene mei-9. Genetics 167:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Yushkova EA, Zainullin VG (2015) Radiation induced DNA fragmentation in cells of somatic and generative tissues of Drosophila melanogaster. Radiat Biol Radioecol 55:97–103 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainullin VG, Shevchenko VA, Mjasnjankina EN, Generalova MV, Rakin AO (1992) The mutation frequency of Drosophila melanogaster populations living under conditions of increased background radiation due to the Chernobyl accident. Sci Total Environ 112:37–44

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Vijg J (2018) Somatic mutagenesis in mammals and its implications for human disease and aging. Annu Rev Genet 52:397–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhestyanikov VD (1968) Restoration and radioresistance of the cell. Leningrad State University, Leningrad, p 345 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was carried out on the theme of research “Mechanisms of biogenic migration of radionuclides and patterns of the appearance of long-term effects induced in plants and animals under conditions of chronic radiation and chemical effects” (Nos. 0414-2018-0002, AAAA-A18-118011190102-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Yushkova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving animals

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yushkova, E. Genetic mechanisms of formation of radiation-induced instability of the genome and its transgenerational effects in the descendants of chronically irradiated individuals of Drosophila melanogaster. Radiat Environ Biophys 59, 221–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00833-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00833-2

Keywords

Navigation