Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acetabular cup migration after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis and its influencing factors: a comparative study with osteoarthritic hip

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the radiographic migration profiles of primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and those with osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A total of 197 patients (215 hips) who underwent cementless THA for RA or OA between January 2001 and January 2013 and followed up for a minimum of 5.5 years were included. Ninety-four RA patients (109 hips) were compared with 103 OA patients (106 hips). Radiological evaluation was performed for acetabular cup loosening, and cup migration was measured using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. Multiple variables were assessed to identify influencing factors for cup migration.

Results

Early cup migration was observed in 13 hips (11.9%) in the RA group and four hips (3.8%) in the OA group, showing a significant difference (p = 0.041). Acetabular cup loosening occurred in three cups (2.8%) in the RA group and in one cup (0.9%) in the OA group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.321). Total cup migration was higher in the RA group (2.62 mm) than in the OA group (1.44 mm, p = 0.005). Total cup migration was significantly higher in patients aged < 50 years than in those aged > 50 years (p = 0.005). Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody influenced total cup migration. Patients with seropositive RA showed significantly higher total cup migration and early cup migration incidence than those with seronegative RA (p = 0.005, p = 0.038, respectively).

Conclusions

Acetabular cups in primary cementless THAs of RA patients were less stable in terms of cup migration compared with that of OA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mosleh-Shirazi MS, Ibrahim M, Pastides P, Khan W, Rahman H (2015) An insight into methods and practices in hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheumatol 2015:140143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi K, Setoguchi T, Twaratsumida H et al (2015) Risk of low bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordtz RL, Zobbe K, Højgaard P et al (2018) Predictors of revision, prosthetic joint infection and mortality following total hip or total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cohort study using Danish healthcare registers. Ann Rheum Dis 77:281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Creighton MG, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC (1998) Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A minimum ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1439–1446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ravi B, Escott B, Shah PS et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing complications following total joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 64:3839–3849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rud-Sorensen C, Pedersen AB, Johnsen SP, Riis AH, Overgaard S (2010) Survival of primary total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Acta Orthop 81:60–65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Onsten I, Bengner U, Besjakov J (1993) Socket migration after Charnley arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:677–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Makela KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Virolainen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V (2011) Cemented versus cementless total hip replacements in patients fifty-five years of age or older with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:178–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik JP, Mayrhofer P (1995) EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 28:1225–1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krismer M, Stöckl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Mayrhofer P, Ogon M (1996) Early migration predicts late aseptic failure of hip sockets. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78:422–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YS, Abraham JM, Callary SA et al (2017) Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80% of cases: a case-control study with confirmed intra-operative outcomes. Bone Joint J 99-B:465–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ et al (2010) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Udomkiat P, Wan Z, Dorr LD (2001) Comparison of preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings of fixation of hemispheric porous-coated sockets. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1865–1870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2013) Patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis have better functional outcomes and those with avascular necrosis worse pain outcomes compared to rheumatoid arthritis after primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study. BMC Med 11:210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sung YK, Cho SK, Choi CB, Bae SC (2013) Prevalence and incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea. Rheumatol Int 33:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2006) Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0-24 years. Acta Orthop 77:853–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ejnisman L, Leonhardt NZ, Fernades LF, Leonhardt Mde C, Vicente JR, Croci AT (2014) Comparison of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of mechanical and rheumatologic causes. Acta Ortop Bras 22:38–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardy R, Cooper MS (2009) Bone loss in inflammatory disorders. J Endocrinol 201:309–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijslma J et al (2017) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 76:960–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hetland ML, Østergaard M, Stengaard-Pedersen K et al (2019) Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and magnetic resonance imaging bone oedema at baseline predict 11 years’ functional and radiographic outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 48:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B, BARFOT Study Group (2004) Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP). Ann Rheum Dis 63:1090–1095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hecht C, Englbrecht M, Rech J et al (2015) Additive effect of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor on bone erosions in patients with RA. Ann Rheum Dis 74:2151–2156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deal CL, Meenan RF, Goldenberg DL et al (1985) The clinical features of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison with younger-onset disease of similar duration. Arthritis Rheum 28:987–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Labban AS, Abo Omar HAS, EL-Sherief RR, Ali F, El-Mansoury TM (2010) Pattern of young and old onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA and EORA) among a group of Egyptian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 3:25–31

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Ho Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Review Board of the university hospital prior to conducting this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moon, JK., Jung, JW., Kim, Y. et al. Acetabular cup migration after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis and its influencing factors: a comparative study with osteoarthritic hip. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1047–1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04502-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04502-3

Keywords

Navigation