The Effect of Retrieval Practice on Transitive Inference
Abstract
Abstract. Compared to restudying, retrieval practice has often been found to enhance memory (the testing effect). However, it has been proposed that materials with high element interactivity may not benefit from retrieval practice. Transitive inference (TI) requires just such interactivity, in which information must be combined across multiple learning elements or premises. The current study employed a 7-element TI paradigm in which participants initially learned a set of premises (e.g., A > B, B > C, C > D, etc.), then engaged in either restudy or retrieval practice with the premises, and then were given a final test that assessed memory for the original premises and one’s ability to make transitive inferences about them (e.g., to infer that B > D). Three experiments examined TI on final tests with retention intervals of a few minutes (Experiment 1), 2 days (Experiment 2), or up to a week (Experiment 3). Retrieval practice consistently failed to enhance transitive inference. Furthermore, retrieval practice significantly reduced TI in Experiment 1. Across experiments, TI was numerically worse in the retrieval-practice than restudy condition in 4 of 5 comparisons, and a small-scale meta-analysis revealed a significant negative effect of retrieval practice on TI.
References
2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 1563–1569.
(2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268–276.
(2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448.
(1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642.
(2012). The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: The roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization. Memory & Cognition, 40, 528–539.
(1990). The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 133–140.
(1997). The hippocampus and memory for orderly stimulus relations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7109–7114.
(2018). Retrieval practice benefits deductive inference. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 215–228.
(2007). Human relational memory requires time and sleep. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7723–7728.
(2005). When logic fails: Implicit transitive inference in humans. Memory & Cognition, 33, 742–750.
(1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399.
(2001). Relational learning with and without awareness: Transitive inference using non-verbal stimuli in humans. Memory & Cognition, 29, 893–902.
(2017). Cognitive load theory, element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 265–280.
(2014). Retrieval (sometimes) enhances learning: Performance pressure reduces the benefits of retrieval practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 597–606.
(2017). Transitive inference in humans and rhesus macaques after massed training of the last two list items. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 131, 231
(2016). Rethinking the boundaries of cognitive load theory in complex learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 831–852.
(2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 317–326.
(2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 62, 227–239.
(2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585–592.
(2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 989–998.
(1996). Investigations of the testing effect. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 451–464.
(2010). Nonverbal transitive inference: Effects of task awareness and human performance. Behavioral Processes, 83, 99–112.
(2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 291–304.
(2019).
(The centrality of element interactivity to cognitive load theory . In S. Tindall-FordS. AgostinhoJ. SwellerEds., Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 221–232). London, UK: Routledge.2015). Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 61–68.
(2008). The role of awareness and working memory in human transitive inference. Behavioral Processes, 77, 43–54.
(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2015). Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 859–871.
(2014). Relational memory generalization and integration in a transitive inference task with and without instructed awareness. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 109, 169–177.
(2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 710
(2013). The negative testing effect and multifactor account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1287–1293.
(2015). The status of the testing effect for complex materials: Still a winner. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 327–331.
(2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.
(2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
(2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463.
(2016). Relational learning and transitive expression in aging and amnesia. Hippocampus, 26, 170–184.
(1985). Ebbinghaus: Some associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 414–435.
(2005). Declarative memory, awareness, and transitive inference. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10138–10146.
(2015). Retrieval practice: The lack of transfer to deductive inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 135–140.
(2003). Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus: I. An empirical analysis. Hippocampus, 13, 334–340.
(2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 265–289.
(2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten: The testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 247–264.
(1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334
(2013). Generalizing memories over time: Sleep and reinforcement facilitate transitive inference. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 100, 70–76.
(2018). Investigating the replicability and generalizability of the negative testing effect. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.002
(2018). When does practice testing promote transfer on deductive reasoning tasks? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 398–411.
(2001). Simulating symbolic distance effects in the transitive inference problem. Neurocomputing, 38, 1603–1610.
(2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995–1008.
(