Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 103, 16 April 2020, 109670
Journal of Biomechanics

Effects of static stretching programs performed at different volume-equated weekly frequencies on passive properties of muscle–tendon unit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109670Get rights and content

Abstract

Whether static stretching (SS) frequency has an effect on increasing the range of motion (ROM) and decreasing muscle stiffness remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of two 6-week SS programs performed with different frequencies but generally the same duration of stretching on the passive properties of the medial gastrocnemius muscle–tendon unit. The study participants comprised 24 male volunteers randomly assigned to either the one-time/week group or the three-times/week group, performing 6 min of SS once per week and 2 min of SS thrice per week, respectively. The dorsiflexion ROM (DF ROM) and muscle stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius during passive ankle dorsiflexion were assessed using a dynamometer and ultrasonography before and after 6 weeks of SS programs. The results show that the DF ROM was increased and muscle stiffness was decreased significantly in the three-times/week group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), whereas no significant changes were observed in DF ROM and muscle stiffness in the one-time per week group (P = 0.25 and P = 0.32, respectively). These results suggest that a high-frequency SS program is more effective than a low-frequency SS program in increasing ROM and decreasing muscle stiffness.

Introduction

Static stretching (SS) is widely used to increase the range of motion (ROM) and/or decrease muscle stiffness in both clinical and athletic settings. Previous studies have reported that a long-term SS program increased ROM (Medeiros and Martini, 2018, Thomas et al., 2018) and decreased muscle stiffness (Ichihashi et al., 2016, Nakamura et al., 2012, Nakamura et al., 2017), although some studies have reported no changes in muscle stiffness after a long-term SS program (Freitas et al., 2018, Konrad and Tilp, 2014). Furthermore, other studies have pointed out that a poor ROM (Backman and Danielson, 2011, Witvrouw et al., 2001) and increased muscle stiffness (Pickering Rodriguez et al., 2017, Watsford et al., 2010) may lead to sports injuries. Moreover, an SS program was effective in preventing muscle strain (McHugh and Cosgrave, 2010). Therefore, a regular SS training program is considered as an effective method for the prevention of sports injuries and their recurrence.

Factors determining the effects of an SS program on ROM are the duration, intensity, and frequency of SS. For example, one study has reported that SS three to five times per week is more effective in improving ROM than that once per week among participants with limited hamstring extensibility (Marques et al., 2009). Moreover, a recent review article on the effects of an SS program on ROM has concluded that a weekly frequency is positively associated with ROM (Thomas et al., 2018). However, interestingly, this review article focused on the total stretching duration per week (i.e., stretching duration * set * frequency) and concluded that the total stretching duration per week is an important factor for increasing ROM (Thomas et al., 2018). Therefore, we assumed that an increase in ROM by an SS program is affected by increasing the frequency of stretching because the total stretching duration per week is increased due to an increased frequency. Whether stretching frequency is an important factor for increase in ROM should be clarified by comparing the effects of SS at different frequencies under an equivalent total stretching duration.

The effects of an SS program on muscle stiffness have been previously investigated, and it has been reported that the stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and hamstring muscles was decreased after a 4-week SS program (Ichihashi et al., 2016, Nakamura et al., 2012). The effects of an SS program comprising 2 min of stretching thrice per week on the stiffness of MG have been investigated, demonstrating that an SS program duration of more than 3 weeks is needed to decrease muscle stiffness (Nakamura et al., 2017). Considering the findings reported by Nakamura et al. (2017), an SS of at least 6 min per week could decrease muscle stiffness. Based on the previous results, we assumed that the importance of stretching frequency could be clarified by comparing the effects of SS programs at different frequencies under the 6-min duration per week to investigate the effects of frequency in decreasing muscle stiffness.

As described above, increased stretching frequency is an important factor for increasing the ROM and decreasing muscle stiffness. However, because the total stretching duration has been increased due to increased stretching frequency, increased ROM and decreased muscle stiffness could be involved with not only increased stretching frequency but also increased total stretching duration. Although some studies have investigated the effect of SS programs using different stretching frequencies and total stretching duration (Marques et al., 2009, Thomas et al., 2018), no study has investigated the effects of SS programs at different frequencies under an equivalent total stretching duration on ROM and muscle stiffness. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two 6-week SS programs with different frequencies but the same total stretching duration on the passive properties of MG (i.e., ROM and muscle stiffness). In this study, we hypothesized that stretching performed with a high frequency is more effective in improving the DF ROM and decreasing gastrocnemius muscle stiffness than stretching performed with a lower frequency. The knowledge about whether stretching frequency can affect an increase in ROM or decrease in muscle stiffness would provide important information for a coach or rehabilitation staff when prescribing SS programs.

Section snippets

Study design

A quasi-randomized controlled trial design was used to investigate changes in ankle dorsiflexion (DF) ROM and muscle stiffness during two routine SS programs that differed in the frequency of stretching (6-min SS once per week [one-time/week group] vs. 2-min SS thrice per week [three-times/week group]) but resulted in the same total stretching duration per week and were performed for 6 weeks. The ankle DF ROM and stiffness of the MG muscle were measured at the initial evaluation (PRE) and after

Results

No participants dropped out; therefore, all participants completed the full SS program. Accordingly, data of all participants in both groups were used in the analysis. The characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. No significant between-group differences were observed in age, height, or body mass index. The results of reliability assessments are summarized in Table 2 and high reliabilities were confirmed in this study.

The effects of SS program on DF ROM and muscle stiffness in

Discussion

In this study, the effects of a 6-week SS program on the DF ROM and muscle stiffness of MG were investigated by comparing two different stretching frequencies but with the same total duration. The results show that DF ROM was significantly increased and muscle stiffness decreased in the group that stretched thrice per week, but not in the group that stretched only once. These results suggest that a high stretching frequency (at least thrice per week) is essential to increase ROM and decrease

Conclusion

Previous studies have demonstrated that poor ROM (Backman and Danielson, 2011, Witvrouw et al., 2001) and increased muscle stiffness (Pickering Rodriguez et al., 2017, Watsford et al., 2010) may lead to sports injuries. Moreover, an SS program can effectively prevent muscle strain (McHugh and Cosgrave, 2010). Our results suggest that a high-frequency (at least thrice per week) SS program could be more effective than a low-frequency SS program in increasing the ROM and decreasing the muscle

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Early-Career Scientists (19K19890) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. In addition, the authors would like to thank Enago (http://www.enago.jp/) for editorial assistance with the manuscript.

References (24)

  • A. Konrad et al.

    Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures

    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

    (2014)
  • D.M. Medeiros et al.

    Chronic effect of different types of stretching on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Foot (Edinb)

    (2018)
  • R. Akagi et al.

    Acute effect of static stretching on hardness of the gastrocnemius muscle

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2013)
  • R. Akagi et al.

    Effect of a 5-week static stretching program on hardness of the gastrocnemius muscle

    Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports

    (2014)
  • R.J. Andrade et al.

    The potential role of sciatic nerve stiffness in the limitation of maximal ankle range of motion

    Sci. Rep.

    (2018)
  • R.J. Andrade et al.

    Effects of hip and head position on ankle range of motion, ankle passive torque, and passive gastrocnemius tension

    Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports

    (2016)
  • L.J. Backman et al.

    Low range of ankle dorsiflexion predisposes for patellar tendinopathy in junior elite basketball players: a 1-year prospective study

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (2011)
  • D.J. Cipriani et al.

    Effect of stretch frequency and sex on the rate of gain and rate of loss in muscle flexibility during a hamstring-stretching program: a randomized single-blind longitudinal study

    J. Strength Cond. Res.

    (2012)
  • S.R. Freitas et al.

    Can chronic stretching change the muscle-tendon mechanical properties? A review

    Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports

    (2018)
  • N. Ichihashi et al.

    The effects of a 4-week static stretching programme on the individual muscles comprising the hamstrings

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2016)
  • A.P. Marques et al.

    Effect of frequency of static stretching on flexibility, hamstring tightness and electromyographic activity

    Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Effects of stretching intensity on range of motion and muscle stiffness: A narrative review

      2022, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we suggest that the change in ROM after SS at different intensities more likely differed in chronic than acute effects, and there were no differences among different intensities. However, Nakamura et al. reported that a high-frequency SS program was more effective than a low-frequency SS program in increasing ROM in the same stretching duration (Nakamura et al., 2020a). In the future, we should investigate the effect of different stretching intensities at various frequencies and durations on ROM.

    • Cross-education effect of 4-week high- or low-intensity static stretching intervention programs on passive properties of plantar flexors

      2022, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The participants were reclined (70° hip angle; 0° full extension) to prevent tension at the back of the knee. The footplate of the dynamometer was passively and isokinetically dorsiflexed at a speed of 5° per second from the neutral anatomical position to the dorsiflexion angle, just before participants started to feel discomfort or pain (Akagi and Takahashi, 2013; Nakamura et al., 2020a; Sato et al., 2020b). Before the passive dorsiflexion assessment, two cycles of passive dorsiflexion were performed to familiarize the participants and to prevent a conditioning effect of passive stretching on muscle-tendon stiffness (Hirata et al., 2017; Konrad and Tilp, 2014; Nakamura et al., 2021a).

    • Relationship between changes in passive properties and muscle strength after static stretching

      2021, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SS intervention was performed using the dynamometer in the sitting position with the knee extended, similar to that during the shear elastic modulus measurement. In this study, the footplate of the dynamometer was passively dorsiflexed at a speed of 5°/s from the neutral anatomical position to the dorsiflexion angle just before the participants started to feel discomfort or pain (Akagi and Takahashi, 2013; Nakamura et al., 2020; Sato et al., 2020). The participants stopped the dynamometer by activating a safety trigger when they started to feel discomfort or pain, and the ankle joint was held at this ankle angle for 300 s (Hirata et al., 2016, 2017; Nakamura et al., 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text