Reveal the interaction mechanism of five old drugs targeting VEGFR2 through computational simulations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107538Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We explore the mechanism of five FDA-approved drugs inhibiting VEGFR2.

  • Five drugs exhibit more stable interactions than sorafenib with VEGFR2.

  • Zafirlukast presentes the most stable binding affinity with VEGFR2.

  • Five old drugs inhibit VEGFR2 by interacting with Cys919, Glu885 and Asp1046.

Abstract

VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, plays an important role in anti-angiogenesis and is an effective target for inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Many small molecule inhibitors have so far exhibited fine therapeutic effects but do not rule out some adverse reactions. From the perspective of the new use of old drugs, we use a combination of two different docking methods, molecular dynamics simulations and quantum-chemical calculations to acquire potential anti-angiogenesis inhibitors from the library of FDA-approved drugs. We attain five FDA-approved old drugs from Drugbank as potential inhibitors against VEGFR2. Therein, the anti-tumor effects of three compounds, including vilazodone (psychiatric drug), pranlukast and zafirlukast (asthma drugs), have been reported by previous experiments but no anti-tumor data is available for the other two compounds, including antrafenine (analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug) and iloperidone (psychiatric drug). These five compounds exhibit more stable interaction than sorafenib as a market-oriented drug targeting VEGFR2. In parallel, there is a most stable interaction for zafirlukast while a weakest interaction for iloperidone with VEGFR2. We show that these five compounds bind with the hydrophobic cavity of VEGFR2, then forming hydrogen bond interactions with three key residues, Glu-885, Cys-919 and Asp-1046. Lys-868 and Phe-1047 play an important role in stabilizing the interaction conformation. The binding poses of pranlukast and vilazodone are similar to that of sorafenib, whereas antrafenine and zafirlukast act differently from sorafenib, focusing on the direction difference of the respective ring structure. This work may help to develop new and effective anti-angiogenic inhibitors.

Graphical abstract

We investigated interactions between five old drugs and VEGFR2 by two molecular docking methods, molecular dynamics simulation and ONIOM-based simulation.

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (235KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Cancer-related deaths are on the rise globally, with an estimated annual increase of 19.3 million cancer cases by 2025 [1]. The variety of cancers and the complex pathogenesis require continuous development of effective and precise drugs. Pharmacologist and Nobel laureate James Black once said, ‘the most fruitful basis for the discovery of a new drug is to start with an old drug’ [2]. The pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the existing old drugs are known, which can greatly reduce the time and money-cost of drug development [3]. According to this superb and attractive strategy, some old drugs have been approved and in clinical test for cancer treatment, including aspirin in colorectal cancer [4], ribavirin in acute myeloid leukemia and breast cancer [5], and nelfinavir in recurrent adenoid cystic cancer of the head and neck (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/) and so on. How do we find new indications for these old drugs? Signature matching, molecular docking, genome-wide association studies, pathway or network mapping and the other data-driven computational approaches are common but effective methods [6].

VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, is a kind of tyrosine kinase. It mediates the signal transduction pathway regulated by vascular endothelial cells, then stimulates the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells, leading to vascular growth. Studies have shown that it is highly expressed in ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, melanoma and other malignant tumors [7]. The extracellular ligand VEGF binds to VEGFR2, thereby to induce the formation of a homologous dimer complex of VEGFR2, and to change its intracellular domain conformation. These conformational changes cause auto phosphorylation of the tyrosine residue of VEGFR2 and signal downstream, such as Ras, Raf, MAPK, PI3K and Akt [8]. Thus, it is a promising way to find new anticancer drugs targeting VEGFR2.

So far, a variety of small molecule inhibitors targeting VEGFR2 has been developed. According to whether the inhibitors target the ATP-binding site, they are divided into two or three kinds [9]. Small molecules that target the DFG-in conformation of VEGFR2 are called type-І inhibitors, while ligands targeting the DFG-out conformation of VEGFR2 are termed type-II inhibitors or allosteric kinase inhibitors [10,11]. Sorafenib (Bay 43–9006, Bayer), tivozanib (KRN-951, Kirin) and vatalanib (PTK 787, Novartis) are classical type-II VEGFR2 inhibitors [12]. Nowadays, the small molecule inhibitors against VEGFR2 are more or less toxic, which causes fatigue, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, hand-foot skin reaction and weight loss [13], for instance, sorafenib can cause skin toxicity, digestive tract reaction, liver function damage, vascular system toxicity and systemic reaction [14]. Therefore, it is imperative to find new anti-angiogenesis inhibitors with more effectiveness but less side effects.

In this work, our attempt was to elucidate the detailed mechanism of new potential VEGFR2 inhibitors obtained from FDA-approved drugs using computational approaches. We used two different docking methods to obtain potential anti-angiogenic drugs from Drugbank [15], then utilized molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum-chemical calculations to explore the interaction mechanism of these old drugs targeting VEGFR2.

Section snippets

Ligand preparation

The ligands were downloaded from Drugbank [15], which contains the 3D structures of FDA-approved drugs. There were 2337 approved small molecule drugs in it until July 2018 (https://www.drugbank.ca/stats). We removed the drugs that are too flexible to display the certain 3D structures, and that involve a mixture of structures as well. We then obtained 1964 FDA-approved drugs. Finally, these candidate molecules were converted to PDBQT files by software OpenBabel [16] and Raccoon [17].

Molecular docking

AutoDock

Results

Five Old Drugs Exhibited Stable Binding Affinities with VEGFR2 through Two Different Molecular Docking Methods. We first performed re-dock for sorafenib with VEGFR2 to ensure if the present two docking methods are effective for the studied system or not. We showed that similarity was 0.92, Vina score was −11.00 kcal∙mol−1, and total score of Sybyl was 9.03 (Table 1), along with its docking conformation and crystal conformation (Fig. S1), proving that Vina and Sybyl were able to properly

Discussion

In this work, the five obtained compounds (antrafenine No.96, iloperidone No.856, pranlukast No.1401, vilazodone No.1778 and zafirlukast No.1795) were potential VEGFR2 inhibitors. Therein, three compounds have been reported to exhibit potential anti-tumor effects. Our work provided a theoretical methodology for exploring the possible anti-tumor targets of the compounds, then further evidence for their interaction mechanism with VEGFR2.

The binding abilities of five old drugs with VEGFR2 were

Conclusions

We explore the interaction mechanism of five old drugs, iloperidone, vilazodone, pranlukast, zafirlukast, and antrafenine, targeting VEGFR2 from the library of FDA-approved drugs by molecular dockings, MD simulations and ONIOM-based calculations. The receptor-ligand complexes are stable during the interaction process mainly due to the important contribution of Glu-885, Cys-919 and Asp-1046; meanwhile, the changes of hydrogen bond occupancy points out that Lys-868 and Phe-1047 may be a key

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31571782 and 31771975) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing CSTC (No. cstc2018jcyjAX0765).

References (53)

  • I.M. Bennani-Baiti et al.

    Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A/AOF2/BHC110) is expressed and is an epigenetic drug target in chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma ☆ ☆☆

    Hum. Pathol.

    (2012)
  • G. Fond et al.

    Antipsychotic drugs: pro-cancer or anti-cancer? A systematic review

    Med. Hypotheses

    (2012)
  • E. Sachlos et al.

    Identification of drugs including a dopamine receptor antagonist that selectively target cancer stem cells

    Cell

    (2012)
  • S.O. Dalton et al.

    Risk for cancer in a cohort of patients hospitalized for schizophrenia in Denmark, 1969-1993

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Grinshpoon et al.

    Cancer in schizophrenia: is the risk higher or lower?

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2005)
  • J. Ferlay et al.

    GLOBOCAN 2012 V1. 0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11

    (2013)
  • C.R. Chong et al.

    New uses for old drugs

    Nature

    (2007)
  • T.T. Ashburn et al.

    Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2004)
  • S. Pushpakom et al.

    Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2019)
  • C. Rodriguez-Antona et al.

    Overexpression and activation of EGFR and VEGFR2 in medullary thyroid carcinomas is related to metastasis

    Endocr. Relat. Cancer

    (2010)
  • R.R. Jr

    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor inhibitors in the treatment of renal cell carcinomas

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2017)
  • C. Pargellis et al.

    Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site

    Nat. Struct. Biol.

    (2002)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Development of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinases inhibitors: molecular structures and binding modes

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (2016)
  • J.W. Yao et al.

    Advances in the study of structural modifications of multi-target anticancer drug sorafenib

    Acta Pharm. Sin.

    (2012)
  • D.S. Wishart et al.

    DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2008)
  • N.M. O’Boyle et al.

    Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox

    J. Cheminf.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (6)

    • New quinoline-based BODIPYs as EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Molecular docking, DFT and in vitro cytotoxicity on HeLa cells

      2022, Journal of Molecular Structure
      Citation Excerpt :

      The binding energies of compounds 2 and 3 with EGFR were calculated to be -7.31 and -8.64 kcal/mol, respectively. Docking studies with VEGFR-2 revealed that all three compounds 1–3 may interact with the three key amino acids- Asp1046, Cys919 and Glu885 of VEGFR-2 [75]. In addition to these three amino acids, the compounds fitted within the active residues in the VEGFR2 kinase domain- Ala881, His1026, Phe1047 (1); Leu1049, Phe1047 (2) and Arg1027, Arg1028, Leu1049, Leu1067, Phe1047 (3) (Supplementary material Fig. S11).

    View full text