Elsevier

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volume 60, February 2020, Pages 176-183
Current Opinion in Neurobiology

The evolution of brain structure captured in stereotyped cell count and cell type distributions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2019.12.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Maps of cell count and cell type distributions reveal evolution of brain complexity.

  • Number and distribution of neurons and glial cells is species-specific and clade-specific.

  • Number of neurons in pallial telencephalon correlates with cognitive abilities.

  • Isotropic fractionator can be used to estimate cell numbers in hundreds of species.

  • Whole-brain immunolabeling and FISH are tools for cell type distribution mapping.

The stereotyped features of brain structure, such as the distribution, morphology and connectivity of neuronal cell types across brain areas, are those most likely to explain the remarkable capacity of the brain to process information and govern behaviors. Recent advances in anatomical methods, including the simple but versatile isotropic fractionator and several whole-brain labeling, clearing and microscopy methods, have opened the door to an exciting new era in comparative brain anatomy, one that has the potential to transform our understanding of the brain structure-function relationship by representing the evolution of brain complexity in quantitative anatomical features shared across species and species-specific or clade-specific. Here we discuss these methods and their application to mapping brain cell count and cell type distributions—two particularly powerful neural correlates of vertebrate cognitive and behavioral capabilities.

Introduction

The ultimate goal of neuroscience is to understand the structure and function of the human brain. However, much of neuroscience research is done on nonhuman model species that are amenable to experiments and genetic manipulations, with an increasing focus on the laboratory mouse in addition to a few other traditional animal models, such as the rat, prairie vole, rhesus macaque, marmoset, and zebra finch. Here we make a case for the importance of comparative studies across a much broader range of mammalian and vertebrate species, applying modern but versatile anatomical methods to disentangle which neural features are shared across distantly related species and which are species-specific or clade-specific. We review how recently acquired estimates of neuron numbers advanced our understanding of the evolution of vertebrate intelligence and highlight the potential of newly developed microscopy and brain clearing and labeling techniques for quantitative assessment of neural cell type-based correlates of cognitive and behavioral capabilities. Finally, we postulate that while the primary focus of contemporary evolutionary neuroscience has been on the identification of homologies at various levels of nervous system organization [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], detailed analyses of both shared and divergent features of brain anatomy can bring new information on the evolution of brain complexity and information-processing capacity.

Section snippets

From brain size to neuron numbers

Brain size is the predominant surrogate measure of brain functional capacity in comparative and cognitive neuroscience. However, it is neurons and their connections that provide the substrate for cognition and behavior. The total number of neurons, the basic computational units of the brain, is therefore a much better approximation of the brain's computational capacity than brain size alone.

Historically, unbiased stereological techniques such as the optical fractionator have been the methods of

From neuron numbers to neural circuits

The simple IF method described above has enabled the use of neuron cell counts in place of brain size in comparative studies, demonstrating, for example, the cognitive relevance of neuronal numbers in the vertebrate pallial telencephalon. Yet the separation between neuronal and non-neuronal cells does not capture the astounding diversity of neuronal cell types known to neuroscientists since the first visualization of brain cytoarchitecture by Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal more than

Conclusion

We propose that a broad utilization of the IF in synergy with a more selective use of the newly available methods for quantitative whole-brain atlasing of cell type distributions can revolutionize comparative and cognitive neuroscience. The IF is a highly versatile tool that can be employed to estimate neuronal numbers across hundreds of species, generating an unprecedented wealth of comparative data on the evolution of brain complexity in vertebrates, ultimately identifying independent

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Kristina Kverková for reading of the manuscript and discussions and Martin Kocourek for his assistance with preparation of Figure 1. This study was supported by Czech Science Foundation (18-15020S to PN and by N.I.H. (U01 MH105971 and U01 MH114824 to PO).

References (70)

  • C.E. Collins et al.

    Cortical cell and neuron density estimates in one chimpanzee hemisphere

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2016)
  • T. Ragan et al.

    Serial two-photon tomography for automated ex vivo mouse brain imaging

    Nat Methods

    (2012)
  • N. Renier et al.

    Mapping of brain activity by automated volume analysis of immediate early genes

    Cell

    (2016)
  • H.J. Karten et al.

    Digital atlas of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) brain: a high‐resolution photo atlas

    J Comp Neurol

    (2013)
  • S. Shah et al.

    seqFISH accurately detects transcripts in single cells and reveals robust spatial organization in the hippocampus

    Neuron

    (2017)
  • J.M. Martin-Duran et al.

    Convergent evolution of bilaterian nerve cords

    Nature

    (2018)
  • G.F. Striedter et al.

    Brains Through Time: A Natural History of Vertebrates

    (2019)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel et al.

    Isotropic fractionator: a simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • N.A. Young et al.

    Use of flow cytometry for high-throughput cell population estimates in brain tissue

    Front Neuroanat

    (2012)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel et al.

    How to count cells: the advantages and disadvantages of the isotropic fractionator compared with stereology

    Cell Tissue Res

    (2015)
  • D.J. Miller et al.

    Three counting methods agree on cell and neuron number in chimpanzee primary visual cortex

    Front Neuroanat

    (2014)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel et al.

    Mammalian brains are made of these: a dataset of the numbers and densities of neuronal and nonneuronal cells in the brain of glires, primates, scandentia, eulipotyphlans, afrotherians and artiodactyls, and their relationship with body mass

    Brain Behav Evol

    (2015)
  • D. Jardim-Messeder et al.

    Dogs have the most neurons, though not the largest brain: trade-off between body mass and number of neurons in the cerebral cortex of large carnivoran species

    Front Neuroanat

    (2017)
  • S.E. Dos Santos et al.

    Cellular scaling rules for the brains of marsupials: not as "primitive" as expected

    Brain Behav Evol

    (2017)
  • K. Kverková et al.

    Sociality does not drive the evolution of large brains in eusocial African mole-rats

    Sci Rep

    (2018)
  • S. Olkowicz et al.

    Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2016)
  • A. Ngwenya et al.

    Continued growth of the central nervous system without mandatory addition of neurons in the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus)

    Brain Behav Evol

    (2016)
  • L. Marhounová et al.

    Artificial selection on brain size leads to matching changes in overall number of neurons

    Evolution

    (2019)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel et al.

    Cellular scaling rules for primate brains

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2007)
  • F.A. Azevedo et al.

    Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain

    J Comp Neurol

    (2009)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel

    The remarkable, yet not extraordinary, human brain as a scaled-up primate brain and its associated cost

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2012)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel

    Coordinated scaling of cortical and cerebellar numbers of neurons

    Front Neuroanat

    (2010)
  • S. Herculano-Houzel et al.

    The elephant brain in numbers

    Front Neuroanat

    (2014)
  • R.O. Deaner et al.

    Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates

    Brain Behav Evol

    (2007)
  • E.L. MacLean et al.

    The evolution of self-control

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text