Abstract
Recently, the microwell has been widely used for cell trapping due to its simple design and enclosed microenvironment for on-chip cell culture and stimulation. In this paper, we investigated the effect of various geometrical factors on microwells for efficient particle analysis. We used the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method to calculate the trajectory of particles entering circular and triangular microwells under various geometrical factors, particle size, and flow conditions. Our simulation results show that the W/L = 2 triangular microwell provides the best trapping efficiency due to a stronger recirculation vortex. A smaller particle size or slower flow rate also enhances particle trapping efficiency. To validate simulation results, we flowed 4.5, 6, and 10 µm diameter polystyrene beads into W/L = 1 circular, W/L = 1 and W/L = 2 triangular microwells under various flow rates. The experimental results agreed well with simulation results, showing that the occupancy of W/L = 2 triangular microwell was sevenfold and twofold higher than W/L = 1 circular and W/L = 1 triangular microwells, respectively. Overall, the above results can provide a useful guideline to design the microwell device for efficient hydrodynamic particle trapping, which can be applied to single cell analysis or rare cell capture.
References
Carlo DD, Wu LY, Lee LP (2006) Dynamic single cell culture array. Lab Chip 6(11):1445–1449. https://doi.org/10.1039/B605937F
Chen W, Huang N-T, Li X, Yu Z, Kurabayashi K, Fu J (2013) Emerging microfluidic tools for functional cellular immunophenotyping: a new potential paradigm for immune status characterization. Front Oncol 3:98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00098
Chen H, Sun J, Wolvetang E, Cooper-White J (2015) High-throughput, deterministic single cell trapping and long-term clonal cell culture in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 15(4):1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc01176g
Guz N, Dokukin M, Kalaparthi V, Sokolov I (2014) If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. Biophys J 107(3):564–575
Hirt CW, Amsden AA, Cook J (1974) An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J Comput Phys 14(3):227–253
Huang N-T, Chen W, Oh B-R, Cornell TT, Shanley TP, Fu J et al (2012) An integrated microfluidic platform for in situ cellular cytokine secretion immunophenotyping. Lab Chip 12(20):4093–4101. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2LC40619E
Huang N-T, Zhang H-L, Chung M-T, Seo JH, Kurabayashi K (2014) Recent advancements in optofluidics-based single-cell analysis: optical on-chip cellular manipulation, treatment, and property detection. Lab Chip 14(7):1230–1245. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc51211h
Huang N-T, Hwong Y-J, Lai RL (2018) A microfluidic microwell device for immunomagnetic single-cell trapping. Microfluid Nanofluid 22(2):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2040-x
Kim M-C, Wang Z, Lam RH, Thorsen T (2008) Building a better cell trap: applying Lagrangian modeling to the design of microfluidic devices for cell biology. J Appl Phys 103(4):044701
Lee PJ, Hung PJ, Rao VM, Lee LP (2006) Nanoliter scale microbioreactor array for quantitative cell biology. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20745
Lieu VH, House TA, Schwartz DT (2012) Hydrodynamic Tweezers: impact of design geometry on flow and microparticle trapping. Anal Chem 84(4):1963–1968. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac203002z
Lin C-H, Hsiao Y-H, Chang H-C, Yeh C-F, He C-K, Salm EM et al (2015) A microfluidic dual-well device for high-throughput single-cell capture and culture. Lab Chip 15(14):2928–2938. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00541H
Manbachi A, Shrivastava S, Cioffi M, Chung BG, Moretti M, Demirci U et al (2008) Microcirculation within grooved substrates regulates cell positioning and cell docking inside microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 8(5):747–754. https://doi.org/10.1039/B718212K
Mohr JC, de Pablo JJ, Palecek SP (2006) 3-D microwell culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 27(36):6032–6042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.012
Munson BR, Okiishi TH, Huebsch WW, Rothmayer AP (2013) Fluid mechanics. Wiley, Singapore
Mustin B, Stoeber B (2012) Low cost integration of 3D-electrode structures into microfluidic devices by replica molding. Lab Chip 12(22):4702–4708. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc40728k
Narayanamurthy V, Nagarajan S, Firus Khan AAY, Samsuri F, Sridhar TM (2017) Microfluidic hydrodynamic trapping for single cell analysis: mechanisms, methods and applications. Anal Methods 9(25):3751–3772. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ay00656j
Osman O, Toru S, Dumas-Bouchiat F, Dempsey NM, Haddour N, Zanini LF et al (2013) Microfluidic immunomagnetic cell separation using integrated permanent micromagnets. Biomicrofluidics 7(5):54115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4825395
Park JY, Morgan M, Sachs AN, Samorezov J, Teller R, Shen Y et al (2010) Single cell trapping in larger microwells capable of supporting cell spreading and proliferation. Microfluid Nanofluid 8(2):263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0503-9
Rothbauer M, Zirath H, Ertl P (2018) Recent advances in microfluidic technologies for cell-to-cell interaction studies. Lab Chip 18(2):249–270. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC00815E
Shen F, Li X, Li PCH (2014) Study of flow behaviors on single-cell manipulation and shear stress reduction in microfluidic chips using computational fluid dynamics simulations. Biomicrofluidics 8(1):014109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866358
Shen Z, Wu A, Chen X (2017) Current detection technologies for circulating tumor cells. Chem Soc Rev 46(8):2038–2056. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00803H
Tan W-H, Takeuchi S (2007) A trap-and-release integrated microfluidic system for dynamic microarray applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(4):1146. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606625104
Wörner M (2012) Numerical modeling of multiphase flows in microfluidics and micro process engineering: a review of methods and applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 12(6):841–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-012-0940-8
Yang H, Gijs MAM (2018) Micro-optics for microfluidic analytical applications. Chem Soc Rev 47(4):1391–1458. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00649J
Zhang Y, Luo C, Zou K, Xie Z, Brandman O, Ouyang Q et al (2012) Single cell analysis of yeast replicative aging using a new generation of microfluidic device. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048275
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Zheng-Jie Liao and Mr. Ping-Fan Chen regarding wafer fabrication. This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant “MOST 106-2221-E-002-058-MY3” and the “Center for electronics technology integration (NTU-108L900502)’’ from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
In this work, Mr. RLL designed the experiments, fabricated the microfluidic device, performed the experiment, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Prof. N-TH designed the experiments, performed data analysis, and wrote/reviewed/edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Also, the funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analyses or interpretation of data, nor in the writing of the manuscript and in the decision to publish the results.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, R.L., Huang, NT. Dimensional analysis and parametric studies of the microwell for particle trapping. Microfluid Nanofluid 23, 121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2289-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2289-8