Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

SEXUAL MEDICINE

Latest addition to a long LIST of negative penile rehabilitation trials does not come as a shock

A randomized controlled trial has shown no statistically significant effect of low-intensity shockwave therapy when added to standard postprostatectomy pharmaceutical penile rehabilitation. Although this trial had a number of limitations, it adds to a body of literature that shows little effect of this therapy and emphasizes the need for development of effective therapeutic options for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Baccaglini, W. et al. The role of the low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy on penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. J. Sex. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.024 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Montorsi, F. et al. Effects of tadalafil treatment on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a randomised placebo-controlled study (REACTT). Eur. Urol. 65, 587–596 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Montorsi, F. et al. Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 54, 924–931 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weyne, E., Castiglione, F., Van der Aa, F., Bivalacqua, T. J. & Albersen, M. Landmarks in erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 12, 289–297 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Padma-Nathan, H. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Impot. Res. 20, 479–486 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jo, J. K. et al. Effect of starting penile rehabilitation with sildenafil immediately after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on erectile function recovery: a prospective randomized trial. J. Urol. 199, 1600–1606 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Briganti, A. et al. Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification. J. Sex. Med. 7, 2521–2531 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, C. J., Scardino, P. T., Eastham, J. A. & Mulhall, J. P. Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients’ perspective. J. Sex. Med. 10, 1636–1643 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho De Araujo, A. et al. The management of erectile dysfunction with placebo only: does it work? J. Sex. Med. 6, 3440–3448 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Capogrosso, P. et al. Low-intensity shock wave therapy in sexual medicine-clinical recommendations from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM). J. Sex. Med. 16, 1490–1505 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Albersen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

Ensaios Clínicos RBR-85hgcg: http://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-85hgcg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albersen, M. Latest addition to a long LIST of negative penile rehabilitation trials does not come as a shock. Nat Rev Urol 17, 199–200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0299-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0299-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing