Numerical modeling for drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments and effects of permeability
Introduction
Clathrate hydrate typically forms when small ‘guest’ molecules, such as methane molecules or carbon dioxide molecules, contact water molecules under a suitable temperature and pressure condition (Sloan, 2003). In nature, the ‘guest’ molecules trapped by water cavities are mainly methane molecules, which are the main component of natural gas. Natural gas hydrate (NGH) has been discovered both in onshore and offshore environments all over the world (Sloan and Koh, 2007). Although estimates of the amount of natural gas contained in NGH are considerably different, many studies estimated that carbon mass contained in NGH is approximately 1016 kg (Pooladi-Darvish, 2004). Therefore, NGH has been considered as a potential source of natural gas for energy supply (Collett, 2002). Moreover, it has become a research focus to find effective technologies for extracting natural gas from NGH economically (Boswell, 2007).
The drilling technology is a necessary and useful method to identify target regions of NGH and exploit its hydrocarbon content (Jiang et al., 2011). However, because NGH is a kind of metastable minerals, a series of risks, including drilling operation disasters, marine geological disasters, and environmental disasters, may occur during the drilling process. Formation and dissociation of hydrate depend on pressure and temperature, salinity of reservoir water, and characteristics of porous medium in which hydrate is formed (Makogon, 2010). Increasing temperature or decreasing pressure can both induce hydrate dissociation. Besides, salt, as a thermodynamic inhibitor, can cause the phase equilibrium curve to shift toward destabilization, which enhances dissociation (Ning et al., 2013a). Dissociation of NGH in hydrate-bearing sediments could cause gas volume expansion, changes in pore pressure and formation strength, etc. (Kwon et al., 2013). Meanwhile, a large amount of natural gas generated from NGH dissociation inrushes into drilling fluid and then may form hydrate again under an appropriate temperature and pressure condition (McConnell et al., 2012). Formation of hydrate inside pipes and valves could impact the flow of drilling fluid and block pipes and blowout preventer stacks (Zhang et al., 2017a,). In order to avoid sharp hydrate dissociation during the drilling process, a practical way is to maintain wellbore pressure at a higher level than pore pressure (Ning et al., 2008), which would cause drilling fluid invasion into sediments. If drilling fluid temperature is higher than the hydrate equilibrium temperature under given salinity and pressure conditions of hydrate-bearing sediments, the temperature of sediments around wellbore will increase with drilling fluid invasion. Besides, in order to prevent hydrate formation in drilling fluid, water-based drilling fluid systems containing a specified concentration of salts are commonly used when drilling in NGH-bearing sediments (Jiang et al., 2011). Thus, drilling fluid with high temperature, heat generated from the friction, and thermodynamic inhibitors in drilling fluid jointly lead to hydrate dissociation around wellbore during the drilling fluid invasion process.
Sediment properties, such as permeability, pore pressure, and mechanical strength, will significantly change during the drilling fluid invasion process because drilling fluid invasion can lead to hydrate dissociation and formation. Hydrate dissociation and formation, coupled with high salinity drilling fluid invasion, will change the hydrate distribution patterns and the salinity of pore water in hydrate-bearing sediments, which could further affect the resistivity of hydrate-bearing sediments. The significant resistivity change caused by the drilling fluid invasion increases difficulties in the identification of hydrate zones, and even leads to erroneous results (Tian et al., 2010). Therefore, it is crucial to understand the dynamic process of drilling fluid invasion and evaluate its influence on NGH-bearing sediments, which is of great significance for predicting wellbore stability and improving the accurateness of well logging identification and evaluation.
The research of drilling fluid invasion mainly relies on mathematical models. Many scholars have developed mathematical models to investigate the drilling fluid invasion problems in conventional oil/gas formations (Bilardo et al., 1996; Chi et al., 2004; Windarto et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2019). The changes in some parameters, such as drilling fluid invasion depth, salinity of pore water, and water saturation in sediments during the drilling fluid invasion process, were evaluated. These models mainly consist of the Darcy law and the law of mass conservation of oil-water two-phases or gas-oil two-phases flow. Some factors also were taken into account as well, such as mud cake thickness, flow rates of drilling fluid, and solid particle invasion. However, although the research on the mechanism of multiphase flow in sediments is relatively mature in these works, temperature change during the drilling fluid invasion process is not taken into account. Compared to the drilling fluid invasion process in conventional oil/gas formations, the drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments could cause more complicated heat and mass transfer accompanied by hydrate dissociation or formation.
At present, the effects of drilling fluid properties, such as drilling fluid temperature and pressure, on hydrate dissociation around wellbore have been researched through numerical models. Freij-Ayoub et al. (2007) investigated—by modeling five cases—the effects of drilling a wellbore in hydrate-bearing sediments and the impact of the drilling fluid temperature and density on changes in stresses and pore pressure within the surrounding sediments. Khabibullin et al. (2011) found the main parameters affecting hydrate dissociation are drilling fluid temperature and bottom hole pressure. Golmohammadi and Nakhaee (2015) built a cylindrical model to simulate hydrate dissociation during drilling through hydrate-bearing sediments. The effects of wellbore pressure and temperature on the moving velocity and location of dissociation front and rates of produced released gas were studied. Gao et al. (2017) simulated the temperature distributions of the wellbore and sediments when circulating the drilling fluid at different temperatures, flow rates, and so forth. The results show that the risks of hydrate dissociation increases as the drilling fluid temperature and flow rate increase. Yu et al. (2017) also found—by using a two-dimensional numerical model that considers the temperature distribution in the wellbore, the heat transfers from drilling fluid to hydrate-bearing sediments, the dynamics of hydrate dissociation, and gas-water two phases flow in hydrate-bearing sediments—that reducing the inlet temperature of drilling fluid could make the dissociated gas flow under control. Sun et al. (2018) analyzed the wellbore stability problem during the drilling process by coupling FLAC3D and TOUGH + HYDRATE. The results show that increasing the temperature and salinity of drilling fluid implies that more free gas will be generated near the wellbore. Zhang et al. (2018) considered the coupling effect of seepage of drilling fluid into hydrate-bearing sediments, heat conduction between drilling fluid and the sediments, hydrate dissociation, and transformation of the sediment framework. The influences of drilling fluid temperature, densities, and soaking time on the instability of hydrate-bearing sediments were calculated and analyzed via the numerical model. Recent research (Wei et al., 2019) provides some prevention strategies for drilling risks, based on sensitivity analyses of drilling parameters, including increasing the drilling fluid circulation rate, reducing the drilling fluid temperature, and increasing the drilling fluid density lower limit.
To our knowledge, only Ning et al., 2013a, Ning et al., 2013b researched the dynamic behaviors of the drilling fluid invasion into oceanic gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Effects of drilling fluid properties (including drilling fluid densities, drilling temperatures, drilling salinities) and geophysical properties of sediments (including intrinsic permeability, porosity, initial hydrate saturation) on the invasion of drilling fluid into hydrate-bearing sediments have been investigated with the aid of numerical simulator TOUGH + HYDRATE. Besides, Chen et al. (2019) experimentally simulated the hydrate-bearing sediments with drilling fluid invasion under different wellbore pressures. The results show that a higher wellbore pressure can promote the drilling fluid invasion, but its effect is limited by the distance from the wellbore.
Although several researchers have studied the interactions between the wellbore and hydrate-bearing sediments, most of these works relate to the research of hydrate exploitation and hydrate drilling risks. The drilling fluid invasion process in hydrate-bearing sediments is affected by not only heat and mass transfer mechanism in porous medium, but also hydrate phase transition, which can change the structures and permeability of sediments, making the drilling fluid invasion problem becomes more complex to predict (Ning et al., 2012). Compared with existing numerical models of hydrate exploitation, numerical models of drilling fluid invasion have some specific features, including that the influence range is small, that the duration is short, and that the fluid flow has an opposite direction to fluid flow directions of natural gas production. Processes and mechanisms of phase change, multiphase flow, and heat transfer in hydrate-bearing sediments during the drilling fluid invasion process are still unclear. According to previous results, geophysical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments significantly affect the drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments, especially permeability (Ning et al., 2013a). The permeability of sediments could significantly influence the dynamic processes of drilling fluid invasion into conventional oil/gas formations (Chi et al., 2004; Salazar and Torres-Verdín, 2008). However, at present, there is limited research that focuses on the effects of permeability on the drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments. Permeability is one of the fundamental geophysical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments and is also one of the critical parameters of multiphase flow in porous media (Moridis, 2002). Particle sizes, pore distributions, and particle specific surface all have a significant influence on the permeability of hydrate-bearing sediments (Li et al., 2017). Therefore, the permeability varies significantly in different hydrate-bearing sediments. For example, it is estimated that the permeability of the Messoyakha gas field located in Siberian permafrost ranges from 10 to 1000 mD (Graver et al., 2008). While in ocean areas, many hydrate-bearing sediments have relatively low intrinsic permeability. For example, the permeability of hydrate-bearing sediments in the Shenhu area in the South China Sea is usually lower than 10 mD (Li et al., 2018). On the other hand, research on permeability models (the absolute permeability model and relative permeability model) of hydrate-bearing sediments is still immature. Therefore, there are several uncertain parameters of permeability models involved in numerical models. In this study, a numerical model in cylindrical coordinates was established to investigate the dynamic behaviors of the drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments, and effects of permeability and its models on the drilling fluid invasion process were also analyzed. The results of this study can help in guiding drilling and have great significance for understanding the problem of drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments.
Section snippets
Model description and assumptions
An axisymmetric hydrate-bearing sediment layer with a single vertical well located at its center is assumed. The model considers various processes, including heat transfer from drilling fluid to the hydrate-bearing sediment, gas-water two phases flow in the hydrate-bearing sediment, and the dynamic of hydrate dissociation. What is more, the effects of salinity on phase equilibrium conditions of in-situ hydrate and thermophysical properties of pore water are taken into account as well. The
Characteristics of drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments
Fig. 3a and b shows the simulated distributions of pressure and temperature around the wellbore during the drilling fluid invasion process of the real case. As shown in Fig. 3a and b, since the drilling fluid pressure is higher than the initial pore pressure of the hydrate-bearing sediments, the drilling fluid with the higher temperature gradually invades the hydrate-bearing sediments, and displaces the original pore water, causing rapid increases in the pressure and temperature of the
Conclusions
In this study, a cylindrical model was developed to investigate the drilling fluid invasion process in hydrate-bearing sediments. The model couples major mechanisms that influence the drilling fluid invasion into hydrate-bearing sediments. The drilling fluid invasion process and the effects of permeability (intrinsic permeability and permeability models) on this process were investigated using the model. The following conclusions are drawn:
- (1)
The drilling fluid invasion has a significant influence
Declarations of interest
None.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Tianjia Huang: Software, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Yu Zhang: Conceptualization, Software, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Gang Li: Resources, Validation, Formal analysis. Xiaosen Li: Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Zhaoyang Chen: Resources, Validation.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51736009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676190), the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (No. 2016YFC0304002, 2017YFC0307306), the Special project for marine economy development of Guangdong Province (GDME-2018D002), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (2017A030313301), which are gratefully acknowledged.
References (61)
Resource potential of methane hydrate coming into focus
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
(2007)- et al.
Formation water saturation from drilling fluid filtrate invasion: comparison of displacement modelling and induction well log response
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
(1996) Thermal conductivity of sea water
Deep-Sea Res.
(1974)- et al.
Yang, J.H. A wellbore stability model for hydrate bearing sediments
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
(2007) - et al.
A cylindrical model for hydrate dissociation near wellbore during drilling operations
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
(2015) - et al.
Identification of influential parameters through sensitivity analysis of the TOUGH+Hydrate model using LH-OAT sampling
Mar. Petrol. Geol.
(2015) - et al.
Physical properties of sea water solutions: viscosity
Desalination
(1972) - et al.
Physical properties of sea water solutions: heat capacity
Desalination
(1969) - et al.
Experimental investigation of gas-water relative permeability for gas-hydrate-bearing sediments from the mount elbert gas hydrate stratigraphic test well, Alaska north slope
Mar. Petrol. Geol.
(2011) - et al.
Kinetics of methane hydrate decomposition
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1987)
Experimental determination of permeability in the presence of hydrates and its effect on the dissociation characteristics of gas hydrates in porous media
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea, China
Geol.
Natural gas hydrates – a promising source of energy
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
Review of progress in evaluating gas hydrate drilling hazards
Mar. Petrol. Geol.
Production potential and stability of hydrate-bearing sediments at the site GMGS3-W19 in the South China Sea: a preliminary feasibility study
Mar. Petrol. Geol.
Wellbore stability analysis during drilling through marine gas hydrate-bearing sediments in Shenhu area: a case study
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
Kinetic simulation of methane hydrate formation and dissociation in porous media
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Drilling parameter optimizing strategies to prevent hydrate decomposition risks
Appl. Therm. Eng.
Modelling of formation damage due to mud filtrate invasion in a radial flow system
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
Numerical studies of methane gas production from hydrate decomposition by depressurization in porous media, energy
Procedia
Numerical analysis of wellbore instability in gas hydrate formation during deep-water drilling
J. Ocean Univ. China
Experimental study of water-based drilling fluid disturbance on natural gas hydrate-bearing sediments
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
Numerical simulation and correction of electric logging under the condition of oil-based mud invasion
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
Experimental investigation of methane hydrate reformation under dissociation process
Int. J. Offshore Polar
Experimental characterization of production behaviour accompanying the hydrate reformation in methane-hydrate-bearing sediments
J.Can.Petrol.Technol
Pressure effects on heat transfer in hydrate-bearing deposit with drilling fluid invasion by lab simulation
Int. J. Green Energy
Fluid-solid coupling model for studying wellbore instability in drilling of gas hydrate bearing sediments
Appl. Math. Mech. Engl.
Assessment of mud-filtrate invasion effects on borehole acoustic logs and radial profiling of formation elastic parameters
Energy potential of natural gas hydrates
AAPG Bull.
Methane hydrate stability in pore water: a simple theoretical approach for geophysical applications
J. Geophys. Res. Sol. Ear.
Cited by (17)
A review of formation damage processes encountered during gas hydrate production
2023, Geoenergy Science and EngineeringPermeability damage and hydrate dissociation barrier caused by invaded fracturing fluid during hydrate reservoir stimulation
2023, Gas Science and Engineering3D numerical simulation on drilling fluid invasion into natural gas hydrate reservoirs
2022, EnergyCitation Excerpt :Fig. 12 demonstrates the physical responses of HBS with different intrinsic permeability after invasion for 12 h. To reflect the effect of the permeability on the invasion process, we simulate the formation intrinsic (hydrate-free) permeability of 1 mD, 5 mD, 10 mD, 20 mD, and 30 mD. The results indicate that high intrinsic permeability brings in an increase in pore pressure and temperature in the near-wellbore area, which is caused by high flow velocity and rapid heat transfer [34,56], as shown in Fig. 7(a) and (b). Besides, the hydrate saturation decreases rapidly with the intrinsic permeability rising, while the water saturation increases quickly.