Toward a methodology for explaining and theorizing about social-ecological phenomena
Introduction
As social-ecological systems (SES) research is maturing, calls for moving beyond describing toward explaining and theorizing social-ecological phenomena are becoming more frequent [1, 2, 3]. In the last few decades, SES research has accumulated a rich body of empirical knowledge about how the interplay between human agency, social networks, and ecological dynamics shapes social and ecological outcomes [4,5]. This in-depth, mostly place-based knowledge, together with the increasing availability of generalized knowledge from synthesis studies [6], provides a valuable source for the development of explanations and theory. Generalization and theorizing in SES, however, face many challenges because of complex causation, emergent processes, social-ecological intertwinedness, and context dependence that characterize SES [7•,8, 9, 10].
Recent advances in the use of agent-based modelling (ABM) for explanation and theory development in several natural and social sciences provide interesting opportunities for overcoming some of these challenges. ABM is grounded in complexity thinking, allows studying emergent processes and has proven to be a valuable tool for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration [11,12]. While ABM is becoming increasingly popular in SES research it is mainly used for exploring social-ecological dynamics and global change or policy implications in particular places, to support participatory processes or as a conceptual tool [11]. We argue that ABM could also be a valuable tool for facilitating a transdisciplinary process of theory development that builds on existing empirical knowledge, particularly recent attempts to develop generalized knowledge claims [6,13••]. Yet, combining generalization from case studies with ABM to develop and test explanations of social-ecological phenomena is not often done (but see Ref. [14] for an example and Ref. [15] for a discussion of how meta-studies can support the development of process-based land change models).
For this purpose, we introduce here a methodology that combines case-study research with ABM to facilitate developing generative explanations, that is, explanations that specify the causal mechanisms and processes that bring about a phenomenon of interest [16]. Contrary to deductive approaches of theory building and testing, this methodology builds theory from empirical understanding in an abductive manner. The resulting theories are so-called middle-range theories [17], or ‘contextual generalizations’ [18] that apply to a delimited set of cases specified by the conditions under which the proposed mechanisms are effective (see Box 1 for a glossary of terms).
We aim to advance the development of middle-range theories of social-ecological phenomena by proposing a transdisciplinary process of theorizing that iterates between empirical knowledge integration and modelling. The approach is inspired by the mechanism-based approach from Analytical Sociology [16], but extends beyond it by incorporating diverse knowledge sources and ways of knowing through a collaborative process of developing, testing, and refining explanations. This methodology requires empiricists, theorists, practitioners, and modellers to work together across disciplines and methods. ABM can be used as a tool to collect, contest, compare, and integrate these various types of knowledge and understanding. In this article, we first discuss current trends in generalizing from case studies in SES research and review the potential of ABM for developing explanations of phenomena recently put forward in several natural and social sciences. We then propose four steps to combine empirical synthesis with ABM and discuss their potential for supporting an abductive and iterative process of theorizing that moves from empirics to theory and back.
Section snippets
Case study methods for finding commonalities and generalizing across cases
Synthesizing empirical evidence across cases to identify common patterns, mechanisms or drivers of SES outcomes has recently received increased attention, particularly in the subfield of land system science (see Figure 4 in Ref. [13••] for a review of studies in land system science from 1995–2012). These studies have applied a variety of qualitative and quantitative case study and synthesis methods. A review of a subset of the most commonly found methods in SES research provides insights into
Developing explanations of complex system phenomena through agent-based modelling
ABM is a computational method that represents different types of agents, their attributes, interaction structures and behaviors and simulates their interactions with each other and their environment over time. Agent-based models are used to study emergent, meso-level and macro-level outcomes and perform experiments to test whether changes in the action logics of agents, their relational structures or the environment are likely to change the outcome [39,40]. ABM provides generative explanations;
Combining empirical synthesis with agent-based modelling in an iterative, transdisciplinary process
We propose a four-step, iterative methodology for combining empirical synthesis with ABM to advance explanation and theorization of social-ecological phenomena (Figure 1). The methodology builds on the insights presented above and our experiences with combining empirical synthesis and ABM in collaborative research processes that involved empirical scientists, theoreticians, and modellers [14,59,60]. The steps are as follows:
- •
Step 1: Developing possible explanations of the empirical phenomenon
Concluding reflections
Recent advances in generalizing from SES case studies and explaining complex phenomena through ABM provide novel opportunities for theorizing social-ecological phenomena. Combining generalized empirical knowledge with ABM in a transdisciplinary process allows building evidence and confidence of causal claims and provides an empirically grounded, complexity-based methodology for developing middle-range theory. The use of ABM is particularly interesting for SES research because it is one of the
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
We thank Rodrigo Martinez Peña for help with reviewing the literature on ABM for explanation and theory building. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 682472 — MUSES).
References (71)
- et al.
Explaining through causal mechanisms: resilience and governance of social–ecological systems
Curr Opin Environ Sustain
(2017) - et al.
Synthesizing theories of natural resource management and governance
Glob Environ Change
(2016) - et al.
Unifying research on social–ecological resilience and collapse
Trends Ecol Evol
(2017) - et al.
Closing global knowledge gaps: producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems
Glob Environ Change
(2018) Social Theory and Social Structure
(1949)- et al.
A portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change
Ecol Soc
(2006) - et al.
Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations
Ecol Soc
(2014) Is collaboration a good investment? Modeling the link between funds given to collaborative watershed councils and water quality
J Public Adm Res Theory
(2016)- et al.
Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs
Nat Commun
(2019) - et al.
Legitimacy in co-management: the impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies: legitimacy in co-management
Environ Policy Govern
(2014)
Process, mechanism, and modeling in macroecology
Trends Ecol Evol
Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up
Emergence of global adaptive governance for stewardship of regional marine resources
Ecol Soc
From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects
Sustain Sci
Causal inference in coupled human and natural systems
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications
Environ Dev Econ
The historical dynamics of social–ecological traps
AMBIO
Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
Ecol Soc
Agent-based modelling of social-ecological systems: achievements, challenges, and a way forward
J Artif Soc Soc Simul
Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development
Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
Reg Environ Change
Micro-level explanations for emergent patterns of self-governance arrangements in small-scale fisheries—a modeling approach
PLoS One
From meta-studies to modeling: using synthesis knowledge to build broadly applicable process-based land change models
Environ Model Softw
Causal mechanisms in the social sciences
Annu Rev Sociol
Middle-range theories of land system change
Glob Environ Change
Event ecology, causal historical analysis, and human–environment research
Ann Assoc Am Geogr
A basic guide for empirical environmental social science
Ecol Soc
Mechanism-based theorizing and generalization from case studies
Stud Hist Philos Sci A
Tracing a pathway to success: how competing interest groups influenced the 2013 EU common fisheries policy reform
Environ Sci Policy
Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
Integrating cross-case analyses and process tracing in set-theoretic research: strategies and parameters of debate
Sociol Methods Res
Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries
Nature
Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials
Glob Environ Change
Measuring squid fishery governance efficacy: a social-ecological system analysis
Int J Commons
Cited by (47)
Dynamical systems modeling for structural understanding of social-ecological systems: A primer
2023, Ecological ComplexityCollaboration and individual performance during disaster response
2023, Global Environmental ChangeA framework for conceptualizing and modeling social-ecological systems for conservation research
2022, Biological ConservationA quantitative application of diffusion of innovations for modeling the spread of conservation behaviors
2022, Ecological ModellingWhy care about theories? Innovative ways of theorizing in sustainability science
2022, Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityCitation Excerpt :Recent theorizing of social-ecological phenomena in this mode has been inspired by social science methodologies, such as the mechanism-based approach from analytical sociology [2,40], or model-centered meta-analysis [3••,41]. There is a focus on middle-range theories that are produced through abductive processes that iterate between empirical research and the emerging theory [e.g. 3••,4,8,13]. Methodologies developed to support such abductive theorizing include collaborative modelling [4] or the identification of archetypes, syndromes or pathways [29,42,43].