Abstract
The acceleration of the expansion of the Universe which has been identified in recent years has deep connections with some of the most central issues in fundamental physics. At present, the most plausible explanation is some form of vacuum energy. The puzzle of vacuum energy is a central question which lies at the interface between quantum theory and general relativity. Solving it will presumably require to construct a quantum theory of gravity and a correspondingly consistent picture of spacetime. To account for the acceleration of the expansion, one may also think of more dynamical forms of energy, what is known as dark energy, or modifications of gravity. In what follows, we review the vacuum energy problem as well as the basic models for dark energy or modification of gravity. We emphasize the conceptual aspects rather than the techniques involved. We also discuss the difficulties encountered in each approach. This review is intended for astrophysicists or physicists not specialized in particle physics, who are interested in apprehending the issues at stake in fundamental physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The metric signature we adopt throughout is Einstein’s choice: (+,−,−,−).
These equations can be obtained from the Einstein–Hilbert action:
$$ \mathcal{S} = {1 \over8 \pi G_{N}} \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \biggl[-{1 \over 2} R - \lambda \biggr] + \mathcal{S}_m(\psi, g_{\mu\nu}) , $$(1.1)where the generic fields ψ contribute to the energy-momentum: \(T_{\mu\nu} = (2/\sqrt{-g})(\delta\mathcal{S}_{m} /\delta g^{\mu\nu})\).
In case w X is not constant during the evolution, this term has the form:
$$ \varOmega_{X} e^{3 \int_a^{a_0} [1+w_{X}(a') ]\,da'/a'} . $$(1.23)In Fig. 3, there is a rotational symmetry around the axis OL; in the general case, the angles θ I , θ S are replaced by 2-dimensional vectors θ I , θ S representing the angular position in the sky, and similarly for α.
Beware that some authors use a different definition (e.g. Copeland et al. 2006).
We assume that the evolution of the scale factor is set by the background: H∼2/(n B t) does not depend on ϕ to a first approximation.
We will return below to the questions raised by the fact that the field has to reach a regime where ϕ becomes larger than the Planck scale (just as in standard chaotic inflation).
For example, the quantum electrodynamics Lagrangian reads, with our conventions, \(\mathcal{L} = -(1/4e^{2}) F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu\nu}\). The extra term would lead to an effective electromagnetic coupling \((1/4e_{{\rm eff}}^{2}) = (1/4e^{2}) + \beta(\phi/m_{P})\), hence a time-dependent fine structure constant \(\alpha= e_{{\rm eff}}^{2}/(\hbar c)\).
We use the following results: if \(\bar{g}_{\mu\nu} = F g_{\mu\nu}\), then \(\bar{g}^{\mu\nu} = F^{-1} g^{\mu\nu}\), \(\sqrt{-\bar{g}} = F^{2} \sqrt{-g}\) and \(F \bar{R} = R - 3 D^{\mu}(\partial_{\mu}\ln F ) -{3 \over2} ( \partial_{\mu}\ln F ) ( \partial^{\mu}\ln F )\).
Note that, as w ϕ →−1, the dependence of α with time vanishes.
Using \(\operatorname{det} ( \delta^{m}_{n} + A^{m} B_{n} ) = 1 + A^{m} B_{m}\).
In D dimensions, the corresponding behaviour is expected to be r −(D−2) for r≪R.
Branes are higher-dimensional objects, similar to higher-dimensional membranes, which play a dynamical role in string theory; in particular, the ends of open strings are attached to branes.
See Sect. 5.2.
We consider only positive values of ρ Λ .
References
Amendola L (2000) Coupled quintessence. Phys Rev D 62:043511. arXiv:astro-ph/9908023
Amendola L (2003) Mon Not R Astron Soc 342:221. arXiv:astro-ph/0209494
Amendola L, Gannouji R, Polarski D, Tsujikawa S (2007) Phys Rev D 75:083504
Amendola L, Tocchini-Valentini D (2001) Phys Rev D 64:043509. arXiv:astro-ph/0011243
Anderson GW, Carroll SM (1997). arXiv:astro-ph/9711288
Arkani-Hamed N, Antoniadis I, Dimopoulos S, Dvali G (1998) New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV. Phys Lett B 436:257–263. arXiv:hep-ph/9804398
Arkani-Hamed N, Dimopoulos S, Dvali G (1999) Phys Rev D 59:086004. arXiv:hep-ph/9807344
Arkani-Hamed N, Georgi H, Schwartz MD (2003) Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space. Ann Phys 305:96–118. arXiv:hep-th/0210184
Armendariz-Picon C, Mukhanov V, Steinhardt PJ (2000) A dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration. Phys Rev Lett 85:4438–4441
Bean R, Flanagan E, Trodden M (2008) Probing dark energy perturbations: the dark energy equation of state and speed of sound as measured by WMAP. Phys Rev D 78:023009. arXiv:0709.1128 [astro-ph]
Binétruy P (1999) Models of dynamical supersymmetry breaking and quintessence. Phys Rev D 60:063502. arXiv:hep-ph/9810553
Binétruy P (2012) Vacuum energy, holography and a quantum portrait of the visible universe. arXiv:1208.4645 [gr-qc]
Binétruy P, Deffayet C, Ellwanger U, Langlois D (2000a) Brane cosmological evolution in a bulk with cosmological constant. Phys Lett B 477:285–291. arXiv:hep-th/9910219
Binétruy P, Deffayet C, Langlois D (2000b) Nonconventional cosmology from a brane universe. Nucl Phys B 565:269–287. arXiv:hep-th/9905012
Bjaelde OE, Brookfield AW, van de Bruck C, Hannestad S, Mota DF, Schrempp L, Tocchini-Valentini D (2008) Neutrino dark energy: revisiting the stability issue. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 0801:026. arXiv:0705.2018 [astro-ph]
Bjaelde OE, Hannestad S (2010) Neutrino dark energy with more than one neutrino species. Phys Rev D 81:063001. arXiv:0806.2146 [astro-ph]
Boulware DG, Deser S (1972) Can gravitation have a finite range? Phys Rev D 6:3368–3382
Bousso R, Polchinski J (2000) Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. J High Energy Phys 0006:006. arXiv:hep-th/0004134
Brax P, van de Bruck C, Davis AC, Khoury J, Weltman A (2004) Detecting dark energy in orbit: the cosmological chameleon. Phys Rev D 70:123518. arXiv:astro-ph/0408415
Brown JD, Teitelboim JC (1987) Dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. Phys Lett B 195:177–182
Brown JD, Teitelboim JC (1988) Neutralization of the cosmological constant by membrane creation. Nucl Phys B 297:787–836
Caldwell RR, Dave R, Steinhardt PJ (1998) Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state. Phys Rev Lett 80:1582–1585. arXiv:astro-ph/9708069
Carroll SM (1998) Quintessence and the rest of the world. Phys Rev Lett 81:3067–3070. arXiv:astro-ph/9806099
Casas JA, García-Bellido J, Quirós M (1992) Scalar-tensor theories of gravity with phi dependent masses. Class Quantum Gravity 9:1371–1384. arXiv:hep-ph/9204213
Cline JM, Grojean C, Servant G (1999) Cosmological expansion in the presence of extra dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 83:4245. arXiv:hep-ph/9906523
Comelli D, Pietroni M, Riotto A (2003) Dark energy and dark matter. Phys Lett B 571:115. arXiv:hep-ph/0302080
Copeland E, Liddle AR, Wands D (1998) Exponential potentials and cosmic scaling solutions. Phys Rev D 57:4686–4690. arXiv:gr-qc/9711068
Copeland EJ, Sami M, Tsujikawa S (2006) Dynamics of dark energy. arXiv:hep-th/0603057
Supernova Cosmology Project (1999) Astrophys J 577:565
Csáki C, Graesser M, Kolda C, Terning J (1999) Cosmology of one extra dimension with localized gravity. Phys Lett B 462:34–40. arXiv:hep-ph/9906513
Damour T, Esposito-Farese G (1992) Tensor multi-scalar theories of gravitation. Class Quantum Gravity 9:2093–2176
Deffayet C (2001) Cosmology on a brane in a Minkowski bulk. Phys Lett B 502:199–208. arXiv:hep-th/0010186
Deffayet C, Dvali GR, Gabadadze G (2002a) Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions. Phys Rev D 65:044023. arXiv:astro-ph/0105068
Deffayet C, Dvali GR, Gabadadze G, Vainshtein A (2002b) Nonperturbative continuity in graviton mass versus perturbative discontinuity. Phys Rev D 65:044026. arXiv:astro-ph/0106001
Deffayet C, Gao X, Steer DA, Zahariade G (2011) From k-essence to generalized Galileons. Phys Rev D 84:064039. arXiv:1103.3260 [hep-th]
Dvali G, Gomez C (2010) Self-completeness of Einstein gravity. arXiv:1005.3497 [hep-th]
Dvali GR, Gabadadze G, Porrati M (2000) Phys Lett B 485:208. arXiv:hep-th/0005016
Riess AG et al. (1998) Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron J 116:1009–1038
Kapner D et al. (2007) Phys Rev Lett 98:021101. arXiv:hep-ph/0611184
Einsenstein DJ et al. (2005) Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies. Astrophys J 633:560–574
Sullivan M et al (2011) SNLS3: constraints on dark energy combining the Supernova Legacy Survey three-year data with other probes. arXiv:1104.1444 [astro-ph]
Lehnert MD et al. (2010) Spectroscopic confirmation of a galaxy at redshift z=8.6. Nature 467:940–942. arXiv:hep-th/0005025
Ade PAR et al (Planck collaboration) (2013) Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. arXiv:1303.5076 [astro-ph.CO]
Fardon R, Nelson AE, Weiner N (2004) J Cosmol Astropart Phys 0410:005. arXiv:astro-ph/0309800
Farrar GR, Peebles PJE (2004) Astrophys J 604:1. arXiv:astro-ph/0307316
Ferreira P, Joyce M (1998) Cosmology with a primordial scaling field. Phys Rev D 58:023503
Fierz M (1939) Force-free particles with any spin. Helv Phys Acta 12:3–37
Fierz M, Pauli W (1939) On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field. Proc R Soc Lond A 173:211–232
Friedman AS, Bloom JS (2005) Towards a more standardized candle using GRB energetics and spectra. Astrophys J 627:1–25. arXiv:astro-ph/0407497
Friedmann A (1922) Z Phys 10:377
Frieman J, Hill C, Stebbins A, Waga I (1995) Phys Rev Lett 75:2077
Garriga J, Mukhanov VF (1999) Perturbations in k-inflation. Phys Lett B 458:219–225. arXiv:hep-th/9904176
Gasser J, Leutwyler H (1982) Phys Rep 87:77
Ghirlanda G, Ghisellini G, Lazzati D (2004a) The collimation-corrected GRB energies correlate with the peak energy of their νf ν spectrum. Astrophys J 616:331–338. arXiv:astro-ph/0405602
Ghirlanda G, Ghisellini G, Lazzati D, Firmani C (2004b) Gamma ray bursts: new rulers to measure the universe. Astrophys J 613:L13–L16. arXiv:astro-ph/0408350
Gorbunov D, Koyama K, Sibiryakov S (2006) More on ghosts in DGP model. Phys Rev D 73:044016. arXiv:hep-th/0512097
Gu P, Wang X, Zhang X (2003) Phys Rev D 68:087301
Hogan C (2008) Phys Rev D 77:104031. arXiv:0712.3419 [gr-qc]
Holz DE, Hughes SA (2002) Gravitational wave standard candles. arXiv:astro-ph/0212218
Hubble E (1929) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 15:168
Hui L, Nicolis A, Stubbs C (2009) Equivalence principle implications of modified gravity models. Phys Rev D 80:104002. arXiv:0905.2966 [astro-ph.CO]
Hung PQ (2000) Sterile neutrino and accelerating universe. arXiv:hep-ph/0010126
Iwasaki Y (1970) Phys Rev D 2:2255
Khoury J, Weltman A (2004a) Chameleon fields: awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys Rev Lett 93:171104. arXiv:astro-ph/0309300
Khoury J, Weltman A (2004b) Chameleon cosmology. Phys Rev D 69:044026. arXiv:astro-ph/0309411
Kolda C, Lyth D (1999) Phys Lett B 458:197
Lemaître G (1927) Ann Soc Sci Brux Sér a : Sci Math 47:49
Linder EV (2005) Phys Rev D 72:043529. arXiv:astro-ph/0507263
Loeb A (2006) An observational test for the anthropic orgin of the cosmological constant. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 0605:009. arXiv:astro-ph/0604242
Luty M, Porrati M, Rattazzi R (2003) Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model. J High Energy Phys 0309:029. arXiv:hep-th/0303116
Martel H, Shapiro PH, Weinberg S (1998) Likely values of the cosmological constant. Astrophys J 492:29. arXiv:astro-ph/9701099
Mellier Y (1999) Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 37:127
Nicolis A, Rattazzi R (2004) Classical and quantum consistency of the DGP model. J High Energy Phys 0406:059. arXiv:hep-th/0404159
Nicolis A, Rattazzi R, Trincherini E (2009) The Galileon as a local modification of gravity. Phys Rev D 79:064036. arXiv:0811.2197 [hep-th]
Nordtvedt K (2002) Space-time variation of physical constants and the equivalence principle. Int J Mod Phys A 17:2711–2715. arXiv:gr-qc/0212044
Padmanabhan T (2008) Dark energy and gravity. Gen Relativ Gravit 40:529. arXiv:0705.2533 [gr-qc]
Pais A (1982) Subtle is the Lord… The science and life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Peebles PJE, Ratra B (1988) Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological constant. Astrophys J 325:L17–L20
Petiteau A, Babak S, Sesana A (2011) Constraining the dark energy equation of state using LISA observations of spinning massive black hole binaries. Astrophys J 732:82. arXiv:1102.0769 [astro-ph.CO]
Randall L, Sundrum R (1999) An alternative to compactification. Phys Rev Lett 83:4690–4693. arXiv:hep-th/9906064
Ratra B, Peebles PJE (1988) Phys Rev D 37:3406
Schutz BF (1985) A first course in general relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schutz BF (1986) Nature 323:310
Sen A (2002a) Rolling tachyon. J High Energy Phys 0204:048. arXiv:hep-th/0203211
Sen A (2002b) Tachyon matter. J High Energy Phys 0207:065. arXiv:hep-th/0203265
Starobinsky AA (1980) Phys Lett B 91:99
Tsujikawa S (2008) Phys Rev D 77:023507
Upadhye A, Hu W, Khoury J (2012) Quantum stability of chameleon field theories. Phys Rev Lett 109:041301. arXiv:1204.3906 [hep-ph]
Uzan J-P (2003) The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations. Rev Mod Phys 75:403. arXiv:hep-ph/0205340
Vainshtein AI (1972) To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass. Phys Lett B 39:393–394
van Dam H, Veltman MJG (1970) Massive and massless Yang–Mills and gravitational fields. Nucl Phys B 22:397–411
Wambsganss L, Cen R, Ostriker JP, Turner EL (1995) Science 268:274
Wang L, Steinhardt PJ (1998) Cluster abundance constraints on quintessence models. Astrophys J 508:483–490. arXiv:astro-ph/9804015
Weinberg S (1987) Anthropic bound on the cosmological constant. Phys Rev Lett 59:2607–2610
Weinberg S (1989) The cosmological constant. Rev Mod Phys 61:1
Wetterich C (1988) Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry. Nucl Phys B 302:668
Wetterich C (2003) Probing quintessence with time variation of couplings. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 0310:002. arXiv:hep-ph/0203266
Will CM (2006) The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev Relativ 9:3. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2006-3
Zakharov VI (1970) Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass. JETP Lett 12:312
Zel’dovich YaB (1968) Sov Phys Usp 11:381
Liang EW, Dai ZG, Xu D (2004) Constraining ω m and dark energy with gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys J 612:L101–L104. arXiv:astro-ph/0407497
Zlatev I, Wang L, Steinhardt PJ (1999) Phys Rev Lett 82:896
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Partially based on lectures given at the First TRR33 Winter School, Paso Tonale, 3–7 December, 2007 and at the UniverseNet School, Barcelona, 28 September–2 October, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binétruy, P. Dark energy and fundamental physics. Astron Astrophys Rev 21, 67 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0067-2
Received:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0067-2