A general framework for modelling association

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112544Get rights and content

Abstract

A general formulation of association theory is presented which, unlike Wertheim's association theory as proposed in the Statistical Associating Fluid Theory, allows association strengths to vary with different sizes of oligomer. It is shown that association theory is governed by a few simple relationships which apply in all cases. The formulation is compatible with any equation of state. Potential applications are suggested.

Introduction

The concept of association is not new; it is often said that the idea was first proposed in 1908 by Dolezalek [1]. According to kinetic theory, fluids consist of a large number of particles in random thermal motion, and the simplest interpretation is that the particles correspond to the fluid's molecules. However, molecules are known to associate, typically through hydrogen bonding, to form oligomers. Since the oligomers are relatively long lasting, association theory identifies the fluid particles with these oligomers rather than the molecules, leading to the prediction that the pressure exerted by an associating fluid will be lower than otherwise expected.

Over the years, association theory has been incorporated into many thermodynamic models in various ways. To cite a few examples: an early work was that of Kretschmer and Wiebe [2] who proposed a continuous linear association scheme to describe the thermodynamics of alcohol molecules in solution. Others have developed similar ideas [[3], [4], [5]]. It is well known that the vapour phase of carboxylic acids dimerise strongly, and that an adequate thermodynamic description of them must include some treatment of the monomer-dimer equilibrium; see for example [6]. Wenzel adopted the idea of computing the equilibrium of specific oligomers in solution to model a number of polar solutions [7]. Heidemann and Prausnitz demonstrated that it was possible to obtain a closed form of the association of a mixture containing an associating substance with a continuous linear association scheme using an equation of state [8]. Anderko [9] added an additional association term to the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation [10] to extend the SRK equation to model solutions containing an associating substance. Ikonomou and Donohue proposed the Associated Perturbed Anisotropic Chain Theory [11] as a general model for associating solutions. For an extensive review of the application of the concept of association in a variety of thermodynamic model, see Economou and Donohue [12].

The Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (SAFT) proposed in 1990 by Chapman et al. [13] has been particularly influential. SAFT is a complex equation of state designed to have realistic physical terms based on statistic knowledge. In common with most equations of state, however, it has difficulty representing associating mixtures, but SAFT overcomes the problem by having an additional association term based on Wertheim's association theory [14,15]. It has been shown that SAFT is able to represent the thermodynamics of strongly associating mixtures with considerable accuracy. Inspired by the success of SAFT, Kontogeorgis and co-workers proposed the Cubic Plus Association (CPA) equation [16,17], which is based on the SRK equation to which a Wertheim association term is added. The CPA equation is much simpler mathematically than SAFT, and reduces to the SRK equation when no association is present. Like SAFT it can model associating mixtures.

The Wertheim association term as defined in SAFT is a first order treatment of Wertheim's theory; it has an attractive simplicity which results from the assumption that association is always chain-like and bonds are pair-wise additive, i.e. the association strengths of any type of bond are constant (at a given temperature) and independent of the size of the oligomers in which they occur. Unfortunately, these approximations are probably not particularly good. Take water for example: traditionally it was assumed that water forms a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network in which tetragonal structures are common. However, a different concept was proposed by Benson [18] who used thermodynamic arguments to suggest that water must have around 1.75 hydrogen bonds per molecule, compared with 2 for ice, while at the same time water molecules must be mobile. Benson felt this could only occur if water molecules were largely present as closed oligomers; he proposed an equilibrium between cyclic tetramers and cubic-shaped octomers. The idea would only have been regarded as speculative were it not that Benson was able to predict the heat capacity of water between 0 and 100 °C to within ±2% using only thermodynamic data for ice and water vapour. There is no fundamental reason for water oligomers not to be cyclic, and some molecular simulation studies support the idea that cyclic structures will form; see for example [19].

Alcohols are another example of highly associated compounds which have also been studied by Benson [20]. Using thermodynamic data, he concluded that, as with water, they tend to form cyclic oligomers with the cyclic tetramer probably the predominant species. Others have come to the same conclusion: using molecular orbital simulation, Curtiss [21] concluded that the most stable structure of the trimer and tetramer of methanol is cyclic; from measurements of alcohol dipole moments in solutions of varying concentration, Brink et al. [22] concluded that the cyclic tetramer is one of the predominant species of liquid alcohols. More recent molecular simulation studies [23] have supported the idea of cyclic oligomers forming in liquid alcohols and also ‘lasso’ structures where further association occurs around a cyclic core.

The implication of the finding that oligomers may form cyclic or other closed structures is that the association strength cannot be constant; as an oligomer grows, the thermodynamics of the addition of an extra molecule will depend on how many new bonds will form, whether the bonds are strained, the degree of steric hindrance and the cooperative effect which occurs when two or more hydrogen bonds occur. The Wertheim association term is therefore a considerable approximation. The success of the CPA equation with its highly empirical physical terms makes the obvious point that, in an associating system, the association term is the dominant term and the formulation of the physical terms is of lesser importance. It implies that the key to improving the description of associating systems is to improve the association term.

Since the Wertheim association term in SAFT is a first order expression, there is clearly scope to explore other less restrictive formulations. In order to describe experimental data more accurately, many researchers have investigated the implications of not assuming pair-wise additivity of bonds using a variety of formalisms. (See Hendriks et al. [24] for a demonstration that lattice theory, chemical theory and perturbation theory are equivalent at least to first order.) A common idea is bond cooperativity which implies that, compared with the dimer, larger oligomers should show greater association strength. For example, Sear and Jackson [25] introduced a three-body term into a perturbation treatment and showed that it had a significant impact on predicted levels of dimerisation, on coexistence curves and critical points. Missopolinou and Panayiotou [26] presented a lattice-fluid model in which dimerisation strength was different from that of all larger oligomers. A similar idea was introduced into a modified form of the Wertheim association term by Marshall and Chapman [27] which gave excellent agreement with molecular simulations. The effect of intramolecular association and formation of cyclic oligomers was also considered by Missopolinou and Panayiotou. Modelling cyclic association was investigated by Sear and Jackson [28]. Ghonasgi et al. [29,30] have investigated the impact of intramolecular bonding on association. The works above show that it is possible to extend formulations of association to incorporate a wider range of phenomena at the expense of varying increases of complexity.

The approach presented in this paper is to show that, starting from simple concepts, association theory can be formulated in a very general way which does not make assumptions about the values of the association strength, and the model is always governed by the same compact relationships whatever association scheme is assumed. The theory is set out in a way that is compatible with any equation of state.

Section snippets

Basic equilibrium relations

Following the example of SAFT, it is envisaged that association can be modelled by adding an extra free energy term to the physical terms for the free energy given by some existing equation of state. We derive expressions for such an association contribution to the free energy making only minimal assumptions about the equation of state.

Consider a system with a mixture of N components: ni denotes the number moles present for component i; the total number of moles present n=ini, where all

Discussion

The derivation above shows that the expression for the free energy, eqn. (12), together with auxiliary eqn. (25) are always the same whatever association scheme is adopted. Eqn. (25) must be solved to find the value of yi for each component present in the system; interestingly, the number of unknowns is always the same as in the Wertheim association term although the complexity of the equations to be solved is dependent on the complexity of the association scheme.

Since the possible number of

Conclusion

It is possible to formulate a general association theory in a way that certain simple formal relationships always apply no matter what association scheme is adopted. The widely used association term of Wertheim is seen to be a particular special case of the general formulation. The general theory allows one greater flexibility to model different sizes and structures of oligomers with appropriately varied thermodynamic parameters, offering the possibility of representing the thermodynamic

Author contribution

Author Tony Moorwood was responsible for the entire work.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (41)

  • S.A. Chen et al.

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1978)
  • I. Nagata

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1985)
  • E. Bich et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1996)
  • H. Wenzel et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1982)
  • A. Anderko

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1989)
  • G. Soave

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1972)
  • G.D. Ikonomou et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1988)
  • G.M. Kontogeorgis et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (1999)
  • V. Crupi et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1996)
  • G.K. Folas et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (2005)
  • N. Haarmann et al.

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (2018)
  • F. Dolezalek

    Z. Phys. Chem.

    (1908)
  • C.B. Kretschmer et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1954)
  • H. Renon et al.

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1967)
  • R.A. Heidemann et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (1976)
  • I.G. Economou et al.

    AIChE J.

    (1991)
  • W.G. Chapman et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (1990)
  • M.S. Wertheim

    J. Stat. Phys.

    (1984)
  • M.S. Wertheim

    J. Stat. Phys.

    (1986)
  • G.M. Kontogeorgis et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (1)

    • A General Framework for Modelling Association Formulated in Terms of Bond Sites

      2022, Fluid Phase Equilibria
      Citation Excerpt :

      The chloroform-diethyl ether binary, for example, forms a negative azeotrope which is a strong indication of the formation of cross-association giving the mixture a lower volatility than either pure component; see for example [16]. The development of a general association framework in [1] was for simplicity based on molecular components. The previous paper discussed a range of possible applications for the theory whilst also pointing out the obvious drawback that it involves a very large number of parameters which need to be determined one way or another.

    View full text