Identifying organic compounds in exhaled breath aerosol: Non-invasive sampling from respirator surfaces and disposable hospital masks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105444Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A method for exhaled breath aerosol collection was developed using masks materials.

  • Surgical-style paper and hard-surface plastic masks were investigated.

  • Elevated cytokines showed that human compounds were extracted from masks.

  • Compounds were from industrial, medical, food, pesticide, and care product sources.

Abstract

Exhaled breath aerosol (EBA) is an important non-invasive biological medium for detecting exogenous environmental contaminants and endogenous metabolites present in the pulmonary tract. Currently, EBA is typically captured as a constituent of the mainstream clinical tool referred to as exhaled breath condensate (EBC). This article describes a simpler, completely non-invasive method for collecting EBA directly from different forms of hard-surface plastic respirator masks and disposable hospital paper breathing masks without first collecting EBC. The new EBA methodology bypasses the complex EBC procedures that require specialized collection gear, dry ice or other coolant, in-field sample processing, and refrigerated transport to the laboratory. Herein, mask samples collected from different types of plastic respirators and paper hospital masks worn by volunteers in the laboratory were analyzed using high resolution-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HR-LC-MS) and immunochemistry. The results of immunochemistry analysis revealed that cytokines were collected above background on both plastic respirator surfaces and paper hospital masks, confirming the presence of human biological constituents. Non-targeted HR-LC-MS analyses demonstrated that larger exogenous molecules such as plasticizers, pesticides, and consumer product chemicals as well as endogenous biochemicals, including cytokines and fatty acids were also detected on mask surfaces. These results suggest that mask sampling is a viable technique for EBA collection to assess potential inhalation exposures and endogenous indicators of health state.

Introduction

Breath-based testing has a long history focused on analyzing gas-phase compounds for environmental exposures or for indications of health-state via preclinical biomarkers (Pleil, 2016; Wallace & Pleil, 2018). More recently, the concept of condensed-phase breath collection, referred to as exhaled breath condensate (EBC), has extended the analyte range beyond organic gases to include water-soluble inorganic constituents, as well as a wide range of compounds that are otherwise difficult to collect due to polarity and/or low volatility (Ahmadzai et al., 2013; Kubáň & Foret, 2013; Zamuruyev et al., 2018). EBC has been collected to assess airway pH for tracking asthma status (Accordino et al., 2008; Morton, Henry, & Thomas, 2006; Ojoo, Mulrennan, Kastelik, Morice, & Redington, 2005). A wide variety of compounds are also part of the EBC fluid that could complement, or even replace some blood or urine assays (Stiegel, Pleil, Sobus, Morgan, & Madden, 2015; Wallace, Kormos, & Pleil, 2016). EBC became a robust biological medium used for a wide variety of environmental and clinical biomonitoring applications (Barbara et al., 2018; Marie-Desvergne et al., 2016; Peralbo-Molina, Calderón-Santiago, Priego-Capote, Jurado-Gámez, & Castro, 2016a; Sauvain, Hohl, Wild, Pralong, & Riediker, 2014).

Certainly, EBC has some logistical advantages over blood sampling in that there is little, if any, infectious waste generated, and that no specialized medical personnel are required. However, there are some challenges for collecting EBC in the field that revolve around infrastructure and subject/patient time. EBC sample collection requires specialized equipment, dry ice or other coolant, and a clinical/laboratory space to process frozen condensate into liquid samples (Wallace & Pleil, 2018; Zamuruyev et al., 2018). Subjects are required to perform breathing maneuvers generally for 10 min, each with previously sterilized sampling gear. Although the resulting EBC samples are of low-volume (1–2 mL of liquid), like blood, they need to be shipped to the laboratory at sub-ambient temperature to maintain integrity (Ahmadzai et al., 2013; Wallace & Pleil, 2018).

The proposed solution to streamlining EBC sampling is based on the observation that many of the analytes of interest are likely entrained in liquid aerosols formed during exhalation, and thus could be expected to form films on surfaces or become entrained within filters. Termed exhaled breath aerosol (EBA), it represents a small fraction (<0.1%) of the EBC containing larger organic constituents (Hayes et al., 2016). Aerosols have been classified as particles ≤5 μm, while respiratory droplets are those >5 μm (Duguid, 1946; Siegel, 2007; Zhang, Leung, Cowling, & Yang, 2018). So, even when dried, it was presumed that EBA films and deposits would retain the semi- and non-volatile fraction of EBC. Certainly, polar volatile organic compounds (PVOCS) and robust measures of pH would be lost in this method, but the strategic advantages could outweigh the loss. The philosophical aspects of EBC and EBA sampling have been described in the literature (Pleil & Wallace, 2018; Pleil, Wallace, & Madden, 2018; Wallace & Pleil, 2018). Traditional methods for EBC sampling typically involve breathing through a long, chilled tube to condense the aqueous fraction of exhaled breath (Ahmadzai et al., 2013; Davis, Fowler, & Montpetit, 2019; Kubáň & Foret, 2013; Mutlu, Garey, Robbins, Danziger, & Rubinstein, 2001; Wallace & Pleil, 2018; Winters et al., 2017). Methods for EBA sampling include collection on filters, use of commercial sampling devices, and particle impaction (Beck, Olin, & Mirgorodskaya, 2016; Kintz, Mathiaux, Villéger, & Gaulier, 2016; Mikheev & Morozov, 2018; Seferaj et al., 2018; Wallace & Pleil, 2018). Fig. 1 is a diagram of how all breath constituents relate.

Based on previous research using EBC, it is expected that certain groups of analytes would be preserved in EBA samples. These non-volatile particles are contained within the fraction of EBC, as shown in Fig. 1. The most likely compounds are the heavier (non-volatile) organic molecules representing exogenous exposures to pesticides, consumer products (fragrances, cosmetics), cooking, drugs/medications, combustion sources (fuel, cigarettes), and the various endogenous metabolic compounds representative of human biology, including fatty acids, proteins, surfactants, and cytokines in part derived from lung epithelial lining fluid (Beck, Stephanson, Sandqvist, & Franck, 2013; Davis, Fowler, & Montpetit, 2019; Ljungkvist et al., 2015, 2017; Oldham et al., 2017; Phares, Collier, Zheng, & Jung, 2017; Soares et al., 2018; Tinglev et al., 2016; Trefz et al., 2017; Ullah, Sandqvist, & Beck, 2018). In addition, EBA contains protein and DNA remnants of organisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses, fungal spores) that could be indicative of infection (Heo, Lim, Kim, & Lee, 2017; Morozov et al., 2018; Patrucco et al., 2019; Yao, 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Zheng, Chen, Yao, & Li, 2018). There is also the possibility that semi-volatile compounds may be collected on mask surfaces, such as aldehydes, alcohols, and other organic compounds that have been previously observed in EBC (Peralbo-Molina, Calderón-Santiago, Priego-Capote, Jurado-Gámez, & De Castro, 2016b; Peralbo-Molina et al., 2016a; Pleil, Hubbard, Sobus, Sawyer, & Madden, 2008).

In our laboratory, the original concept for exploiting EBA evolved from solving practical and logistical problems in biomonitoring. The initial work along these lines came from the observation that disposable filters from pulmonary function instruments (spirometers) might be a valuable resource for assessing infections. As these filters are routinely discarded in a clinical setting, they appeared to be a pragmatic source of interesting biological specimens. A second application was derived from the evaluation of exposures and health states from occupational settings wherein standard biomonitoring could not be done easily. For example, it is not practical to intrude on firefighters or military pilots during their activities, but one could easily sample the internal surfaces of their masks afterwards. Finally, we found that standard disposable paper masks worn in hospitals could be used as a non-invasive sampling method for the general public. The masks only need to be worn for 10 min to collect EBA and do not affect normal activities. An overview of these applications has been published recently (Pleil et al., 2018).

Section snippets

Sample collection

This exploratory analytical research is based on a series of biological samples collected from randomly selected hard-surface plastic respiratory masks and disposable paper hospital masks. The following plastic masks were included in mask sampling: half-face respirator (3M, North), full-face respirator (3M), supplied air (Navy), face shield (US Safety, Crews), and the following disposable hospital-style paper/polypropylene masks were included: Stanley Safe-T-fit N95 and 3M1818. Hard-surface

Method development for mask sampling and extraction

A basic procedure for sampling and extraction of disposable paper hospital mask materials/cellulose filter wipes was developed in this study to determine the feasibility of using masks to capture and analyze EBA. An advantage of this protocol is its simplicity and ease of use. Other than instrumentation, few specialized materials are needed for sampling, and no health professionals are required to collect samples, unlike with blood or urine sampling. This completely non-invasive sampling

Conclusions

In this initial study, we have reported a novel experimental protocol by which human endogenous and exogenous compounds were extracted from both disposable paper hospital masks and hard-surface plastic masks. This simple procedure can be used for non-targeted discovery analysis to evaluate compounds in EBA that are captured on the mask surfaces. A variety of endogenous and exogenous compounds were identified in the mask sample extracts, including compounds such as cytokines that confirmed the

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank colleagues at the U.S. EPA health and safety office for providing the anonymous mask samples, including hard-surface plastic respirators and disposable hospital paper masks. The authors acknowledge Lisa Dailey for assisting with immunochemistry analyses. This article was funded and reviewed by the U.S. EPA and approved for publication. The conclusions are those of the authors and do not reflect EPA policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute

Dr. M. Ariel Geer Wallace is a Chemist at U.S. EPA in the Office of Research and Development. Dr. Wallace's research at EPA focuses on analytical methods development and understanding the extent of human exposure to environmental contaminants through biomarkers research. Dr. Wallace specializes in techniques including gas- and liquid-chromatography/mass spectrometry and immunochemistry. She holds a B.S. in Biochemistry from Indiana Wesleyan University (Marion, IN) and a Ph.D. in Chemistry from

References (47)

  • K.O. Zamuruyev et al.

    Effect of temperature control on the metabolite content in exhaled breath condensate

    Analytica Chimica Acta

    (2018)
  • Y.-H. Zhang et al.

    Role of viral bioaerosols in nosocomial infections and measures for prevention and control

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (2018)
  • Y. Zheng et al.

    Bacterial pathogens were detected from human exhaled breath using a novel protocol

    Journal of Aerosol Science

    (2018)
  • H. Ahmadzai et al.

    Exhaled breath condensate: A comprehensive update

    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

    (2013)
  • R. Barbara et al.

    Exhaled breath condensate as a potential biomarker tool for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis—a pilot study

    Journal of Breath Research

    (2018)
  • O. Beck et al.

    Potential of mass spectrometry in developing clinical laboratory biomarkers of nonvolatiles in exhaled breath

    Clinical Chemistry

    (2016)
  • O. Beck et al.

    Detection of drugs of abuse in exhaled breath using a device for rapid collection: Comparison with plasma, urine and self-reporting in 47 drug users

    Journal of Breath Research

    (2013)
  • J. Duguid

    The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei

    Epidemiology and Infection

    (1946)
  • S.A. Hayes et al.

    Exhaled breath condensate for lung cancer protein analysis: A review of methods and biomarkers

    Journal of Breath Research

    (2016)
  • A.M. Hejl et al.

    Inflammatory effects of woodsmoke exposure among wildland firefighters working at prescribed burns at the Savannah River Site, SC

    Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

    (2013)
  • P. Kintz et al.

    Testing for drugs in exhaled breath collected with ExaBreath in a drug dependence population: Comparison with data obtained in urine after liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analyses

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

    (2016)
  • G. Ljungkvist et al.

    Study on the origin and collection of exogenous compounds in exhaled breath aerosol particles

    (2015)
  • G. Ljungkvist et al.

    Two techniques to sample non-volatiles in breath—exemplified by methadone

    Journal of Breath Research

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    Dr. M. Ariel Geer Wallace is a Chemist at U.S. EPA in the Office of Research and Development. Dr. Wallace's research at EPA focuses on analytical methods development and understanding the extent of human exposure to environmental contaminants through biomarkers research. Dr. Wallace specializes in techniques including gas- and liquid-chromatography/mass spectrometry and immunochemistry. She holds a B.S. in Biochemistry from Indiana Wesleyan University (Marion, IN) and a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Duke University (Durham, NC).

    Dr. Joachim Pleil is a Research Scientist at U.S. EPA in the Office of Research and Development. Dr. Pleil's research at EPA focuses on developing analytical methods for environmental pollutants, human systems biology, and biomarkers. He serves as Professor at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health and is assigned to NASA working on the Pilot Breathing Assessment project. He holds B.S. degrees in Mathematics and Physics, M.S. in Physics (SIU, Carbondale, IL), and Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Engineering (UNC, Chapel Hill, NC). He has served as Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Breath Research (JBR) since 2014.

    Dr. Michael Madden is a Research Biologist at U.S. EPA in Chapel Hill, NC. He examines biological responses and health effects in people exposed to air pollution, including ozone and diesel engine exhaust. His work involves validating biomarkers of exposure and identifying susceptible populations. His research strategies use an array of approaches from in vitro exposures of cells to controlled and field exposures of volunteers. Dr. Madden is adjunct faculty at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC; PhD 1987) in the Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering. He serves on the Editorial Board for Journal of Breath Research.

    View full text