Perspective
Ex situ conservation of threatened plant species in island biodiversity hotspots: A case study from Hawai‘i

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108435Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Hawaiian plant conservation can serve as a model for other biodiversity hotspots.

  • In this system, micropropagation (tissue culture) is a critical conservation tool.

  • Micropropagation is underutilized and it serves many important storage functions.

  • Interorganizational alliances are essential for effective conservation outcomes.

  • It is necessary to combine a diversity of approaches to meet zero-extinction goals.

Abstract

Global plant extinction rates have increased dramatically over the past 50 years. Conservation efforts are especially challenging across the Hawaiian archipelago, where habitat loss and competition with invasive species threaten the existence of native plant species. Currently, 238 endemic Hawaiian plant species have fewer than 50 individuals remaining in the wild. To counteract this daunting statistic, conservationists apply a suite of ex situ techniques to effectively safeguard the many threatened plant species from imminent extinction. This perspective piece highlights how an integrated conservation approach that utilizes a co-located seed bank, micropropagation laboratory, and greenhouse, has led to the successful rescue and conservation of many threatened Hawaiian plant species. We draw on specific examples from the long history of Hawaiian plant conservation to detail successes and ongoing challenges associated with the implementation of ex situ conservation techniques. In doing so we discuss how plant micropropagation has emerged as a critical ex situ conservation tool, and how this underutilized tool fits into plant conservation as a whole. We also emphasize the essential roles that partnerships with external organizations play in ensuring that effective conservation efforts are implemented. Last, using lessons learned from these examples we detail and discuss an ex situ plant conservation decision tree that is widely applicable to other plant diversity hotspots of conservation concern, in order to help ensure regional and global zero-extinction goals are met.

Introduction

Evidence indicates that rapid human alteration of global processes and the degradation of ecosystems worldwide are driving a sixth mass-extinction event (Ceballos et al., 2015). The loss of plant biodiversity has profound impacts on human livelihoods by negatively affecting ecosystem services (Balvanera et al., 2014; Cardinale et al., 2012) that play integral roles in the function of food production and natural systems (Tilman et al., 2014; Vitousek et al., 1997). By current estimates tropical plant species are generally twice as threatened as temperate species, due in part to high rates of anthropogenic habitat conversion (Brummitt et al., 2015). To counteract these effects, botanical gardens and arboreta around the world have led the charge in the conservation of threatened species (IUCN, 2019) through in situ (in natural habitat; Chen et al., 2009; Havens et al., 2014) and ex situ (outside natural habitat; Havens et al., 2006; Li and Pritchard, 2009; Mounce et al., 2017) programs that have successfully safeguarded thousands of plant species across the United States (Oldfield et al., 2019) and worldwide (Wyse Jackson and Kennedy, 2009). These programs have also pioneered the development of cutting-edge techniques that have led to insights on in and ex situ plant conservation (Donaldson, 2009; Smith, 2016), while also supporting plant reintroduction and restoration efforts (Kawelo et al., 2012; Miller et al., 2016). Nonetheless, there is still a critical need and great potential to expand the focus of these conservation efforts (Miller et al., 2016), and to conduct national (Havens et al., 2014) and global assessments (Pelletier et al., 2018) of the conservation status of plant species, to improve threatened plant conservation efforts worldwide (Corlett, 2016).

Although a diverse set of techniques are used to conserve threatened species, many ex situ plant conservation programs have traditionally focused on preserving these species in seed banks (Havens et al., 2004; O'Donnell and Sharrock, 2017). Conventional seed banking is used extensively as a conservation strategy because it is the simplest method for long-term germplasm storage. Seed storage is also relatively low maintenance and does not require specialized equipment when implemented on small scales. However, seed banking is not a viable option for some plant species (Fant et al., 2016), which are referred to in the literature as “exceptional species” (Pence, 2011). There is ongoing debate about how best to define exceptionality, so in this article we refer to plant species as “exceptional” if (a) they produce recalcitrant (desiccation-sensitive) or freeze-sensitive seeds that cannot be stored conventionally; or (b) existing populations produce few or no viable seeds (Pence, 2013). These factors make ex situ conservation very challenging and plant tissue culture, or micropropagation, has emerged as an important ex situ storage alternative for these species (Pence, 2011). Using these techniques, explants (i.e., small pieces of living plant tissue that have been removed for culturing), are placed in vitro and used to culture viable plantlets or clones (Fay, 1992). These clones are subsequently stored to maintain plant species' genetic lines. Over the past five decades these in vitro techniques have been developed and refined with the goal of putting exceptional species into a stable environment where they can be propagated and grown to complete full life cycles (Pence, 2013; Sugii and Lamoureux, 2004). Plant micropropagation has therefore become a key component of the “integrated plant conservation” approach (Falk, 1990), which uses a combination of in and ex situ approaches to ensure persistence of threatened plant species (Kramer et al., 2011).

Using this integrated approach to leverage all available conservation tools is especially important in island ecosystems, such as the Hawaiian archipelago, due to the fact that a majority of recorded plant extinctions occur on islands, where species tend to have small populations and are more vulnerable to disturbance events (Humphreys et al., 2019). For example, 45% of the species on the United States federal Threatened and Endangered species list are endemic to the state of Hawai‘i (424 out of 946 species; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2019). Some 238 Hawaiian endemic plant species (close to 25% of all native plants in the state) have fewer than 50 individuals (<100 for dioecious species) remaining in the wild (referred to as PEPP species throughout; Plant Extinction Prevention Program, 2019). These factors make plant conservation in Hawai‘i particularly pressing, but this has also promoted a surge of innovative developments for in and ex situ conservation techniques, and the creation of large collaborative organizational networks working towards common conservation goals (Keir and Weisenberger, 2014). These conservation networks focus a great deal of effort on the collection of propagules of threatened species for ex situ storage and propagation. Furthermore, seed banking (Weisenberger and Keir, 2014) and micropropagation (Sugii and Lamoureux, 2004) have been integrated seamlessly as critical components to ex situ plant conservation in this system.

The overall objective of this perspective piece is to detail the integrated and highly collaborative approach to threatened plant conservation that has been implemented in Hawai‘i. In doing so we highlight how micropropagation has emerged as a critical tool for plant conservation; the benefits and challenges associated with the application of these underutilized techniques; and future directions for their application. We draw on examples and historical perspectives from the Lyon Arboretum Hawaiian Rare Plant Program (HRPP) at the University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa and its partner organizations to underscore that combining multiple ex situ approaches has been essential to ensure the conservation of many threatened Hawaiian plant species. Last, we detail how micropropagation and other emerging approaches such as cryopreservation fit into an ex situ plant conservation decision tree that is widely applicable to other regions with high concentrations of threatened species. In this article we refer to plant species as threatened if they are experiencing rapid population decline and have ongoing threats to their existence; however, unless otherwise specified, not all these species have been assessed for the IUCN Red List or are currently listed on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered species list.

Section snippets

Threats to the Hawaiian flora

As the most isolated oceanic landmass in the world, the Hawaiian archipelago has some of the highest percentages of plant endemism. Overall, 89% of native Angiosperms and 71% of Pteridophytes are endemic, and these species face serious threats such as habitat loss and competition with invasive species (Sakai et al., 2002). Widespread ecosystem degradation due to human introduction of invasive plants (Loope and Mueller-Dombois, 1989), vertebrates (Nogueira-Filho et al., 2009; Shiels and Drake,

An ex situ plant conservation decision tree for threatened plant species

Creating tools to facilitate ex situ conservation decisions for threatened species can streamline the decision-making process. Using knowledge gleaned from the outcomes of many collaborative plant conservation efforts across Hawai‘i we have developed a decision tree for ex situ plant conservation, which is widely applicable to other ex situ conservation challenges around the world (Fig. 2). Given the type of material collected (seeds or cuttings/divisions), this decision tree can also assess

New and future ex situ plant conservation initiatives

Our proposed ex situ conservation decision tree (Fig. 2) includes approaches not currently integrated into the HRPP at Lyon Arboretum, such as the use of cryopreservation for germplasm storage and the integration of a pollen storage program. Cryopreservation, or the storage of living plant tissue in liquid nitrogen, offers the potential for long-term stable storage of plant material (Normah et al., 2019), extending the storage interval well beyond the time frame afforded by in vitro tissue

Conclusions

Applying the integrated plant conservation approach by involving many agency, non-profit, and individual conservation stakeholders has led to the effective conservation of many threatened Hawaiian plant species. Within this conservation matrix, micropropagation has emerged as a critical tool that not only supplements conventional seed banking methods, but also can be used to conserve the globally increasing number of threatened plant species considered exceptional due to their increased rarity.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

We thank the many organizational partners and hundreds of volunteers that are essential for conservation efforts at the HRPP. We also thank the Plant Extinction Prevention Program for their tireless effort collecting plant material for ex situ storage. This work was supported by funding to N.C.S. and the Lyon Arboretum from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (#MA-30-16-0020-16); the State of Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources-Department of Forestry and Wildlife (#EPRE-10

Glossary

HRPP
Hawaiian Rare Plant Program
PEPP
Plant Extinction Prevention Program
Exceptional species
Plant species than cannot be stored in seed banks using standard methods or easily propagated by seed

References (79)

  • M.A. Albrecht et al.

    Effects of life history and reproduction on recruitment time lags in reintroductions of rare plants

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2019)
  • P. Balvanera et al.

    Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps

    BioScience

    (2014)
  • W.G. Berendsohn

    A taxonomic information model for botanical databases: the IOPI model

    TAXON

    (1997)
  • S.S. Bhojwani et al.

    Plant Tissue Culture: An Introductory Text

    (2013)
  • J.M. Bonga et al.

    In Vitro Culture of Trees

    (1992)
  • M.M. Bruegmann et al.

    Cyanea pinnatifida. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2003

  • M. Bruegmann et al.

    Cyanea truncata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

    (2016)
  • N.A. Brummitt et al.

    Green plants in the red: a baseline global assessment for the IUCN sampled red list index for plants

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • B.J. Cardinale et al.

    Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

    Nature

    (2012)
  • G. Ceballos et al.

    Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction

    Sci. Adv.

    (2015)
  • M.M. Chau et al.

    Seed freeze sensitivity and ex situ longevity of 295 species in the native Hawaiian flora

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2019)
  • A. Cibrian-Jaramillo et al.

    What is the conservation value of a plant in a botanic garden? Using indicators to improve management of ex situ collections

    Bot. Rev.

    (2013)
  • M. Clark

    Hibiscadelphus Woodii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016

  • D.A. Falk

    Integrated strategies for conserving plant genetic diversity

    Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.

    (1990)
  • J.B. Fant et al.

    What to do when we can’t bank on seeds: what botanic gardens can learn from the zoo community about conserving plants in living collections

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2016)
  • E.J. Farnsworth

    Forging research partnerships across the academic-agency divide

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2004)
  • M.F. Fay

    Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods

    In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant

    (1992)
  • K. Havens et al.

    Guidelines for ex situ conservation collection management: minimizing risks

  • K. Havens et al.

    Ex situ plant conservation and beyond

    BioScience

    (2006)
  • K. Havens et al.

    Getting plant conservation right (or not): the case of the United States

    Int. J. Plant Sci.

    (2014)
  • A.M. Humphreys et al.

    Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery

    Nat. Ecol. Evol.

    (2019)
  • IUCN

    The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2019-2

  • S.M. Joe et al.

    Invasive slugs as under-appreciated obstacles to rare plant restoration: evidence from the Hawaiian islands

    Biol. Invasions

    (2008)
  • H.K. Kawelo et al.

    Unique reintroduction considerations in Hawai‘i: case studies from a decade of rare plant restoration at the Oahu Army Natural Resource Rare Plant Program

  • M.J. Keir et al.

    Hawai‘i Strategy for Plant Conservation—Phase 1: Increasing In Situ Collecting and Ex Situ Capacity

    (2014)
  • L. Knudson

    Nonsymbiotic germination of orchid seeds

    Bot. Gaz.

    (1922)
  • A. Kramer et al.

    Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants: Progress Report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation

    (2011)
  • L. Kyte et al.

    Plants from Test Tubes: An Introduction to Micropropogation

    (2013)
  • L.L. Loope et al.

    Characteristics of invaded islands, with special reference to Hawai‘i

  • Cited by (19)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text