Resolution quiver and cyclic homology criteria for Nakayama algebras
Introduction
A Nakayama algebra is an algebra whose quiver consists of a single oriented cycle with a finite number of monomial relations or a single path, with or without relations. These are called cyclic and linear Nakayama algebras respectively. There are many results about these algebras. In [14], Ringel introduced the “resolution quiver” of a Nakayama algebra Λ and used it to characterize when Λ is Gorenstein and to give a formula for its Gorenstein dimension. In [16], Shen showed that every component of the resolution quiver of a Nakayama algebra has the same weight and, in [17], Shen used this to obtain the following result.
Theorem A Shen [17] A Nakayama algebra has finite global dimension if and only if its resolution quiver has exactly one component and that component has weight 1.
It is important for the purpose of induction that this includes linear Nakayama algebras.
In [11], the second author and Zacharia showed that a monomial relation algebra has finite global dimension if and only if the relative cyclic homology of its radical is equal to zero. For the case of a cyclic Nakayama algebra, they constructed a finite simplicial complex , which we will call the “relation complex” of Λ, and show that the reduced homology of gives the lowest degree term in the relative cyclic homology of the radical of Λ. They further simplified their results to obtain the following.
Theorem B Igusa-Zacharia [11] A Nakayama algebra Λ has finite global dimension if and only if the Euler characteristic of the relation complex is equal to one.
In fact, only cyclic Nakayama algebras were considered in [11]. However, if Λ is a linear Nakayama algebra, it is easy to see that is still defined and is contractible. Thus it has Euler characteristic one.
In this paper we will review these definitions and statements and prove the following statement showing that the two results above are equivalent.
Theorem C For any cyclic Nakayama algebra Λ the Euler characteristic of the relation complex is equal to the number of components of its resolution quiver with weight 1.
We prove Theorem C using an idea that comes from [15]. In fact, our argument proves Theorem A, Theorem B, Theorem C simultaneously. (See Remark 3.4.) We also obtain a new version of Theorem B:
Theorem B' Corollary 3.14 A Nakayama algebra Λ has finite global dimension if and only if its relation complex is contractible.
These results arose in our study, joint with Gordana Todorov, of the concept of “amalgamation” [5] and the reverse process which we call “unamalgamation”. Amalgamation is used in [2] to construct plabic diagrams which are used in [1] to construct new invariants in contact topology.
Since the result of [11] holds for any monomial relation algebra, we also attempted to generalize the definition of the resolution quiver to such algebras. This lead us to consider examples which eventually led to a counterexample to the ϕ-dimension conjecture. See [8] for more details about this story.
Section snippets
Resolution quiver of a Nakayama algebra
By a Nakayama algebra of order n we mean a finite dimensional algebra Λ over a field K given by a quiver with relations where the quiver, which we denote , consists of a single oriented n-cycle: with monomial relations given by paths in this quiver written left to right. We write for where and . If the relations have length ≥2 they are called admissible and the algebra is called a cyclic Nakayama algebra.
We also allow relations of length one. If
Cyclic homology of a monomial relation algebra
When quoting results from [11], we note that a cyclic Nakayama algebra is called a “cycle algebra” in [11] and the relation complex is denoted K. We changed this to L to avoid confusion with the ground field K. We reserve the symbol “Λ” for Nakayama algebras.
For a monomial relation algebra A over any field K, the following result was obtained in [11].
Theorem 2.1 A has finite global dimension if and only if the cyclic homology of the radical of A is zero.
The statement uses the fact, proved in [11], that the
Comparison of characterizations
In this section we prove Theorem C: For any Nakayama algebra Λ, the Euler characteristic of its relation complex is equal to the number of components of its resolution quiver of weight one. In Example 1.2, Example 1.7, Example 1.8 this number is 1,0,2, respectively. The proof will be by induction on the number of vertices of which do not lie in any oriented cycle. If this number is zero then has no leaves. So, the number of relations is equal to n the size of the quiver .
Comments
The construction of from Λ is an example of “unamalgamation”, which is the construction described in Lemma 3.9. This is a partial inverse to the “amalgamation” construction of Fock-Goncharov [5] used in [2] to construct the Jacobian algebras of plabic diagrams [13]. These operations are partial inverses since we claim that and , where stand for amalgamation and unamalgamation, respectively.
The idea to consider removing the leaves comes from
Acknowledgements
Both authors thank Gordana Todorov who is working with them on the larger project of amalgamation and unamalgamation of Nakayama algebras. The first author thanks Job Rock for meaningful conversations. The second author thanks Emre Şen for many discussions about Nakayama algebras and especially the construction of from [15]. The second author thanks his other coauthor Daniel Álvarez-Gavela for working with him, in [1], to reduce the calculation of higher Reidemeister torsion in [10] to
References (17)
Global dimension in serial rings
J. Algebra
(1985)Cyclic homology and the determinant of the Cartan matrix
J. Pure Appl. Algebra
(1992)- et al.
On the cyclic homology of monomial relation algebras
J. Algebra
(1992) The Gorenstein projective modules for the Nakayama algebras I
J. Algebra
(2013)- et al.
Turaev torsion and ribbon Legendrians
- et al.
Scattering amplitudes and the positive Grassmannian
- et al.
Auslander-Reiten sequences with few middle terms and applications to string algebras
Commun. Algebra
(1987) - et al.
Retractions and Gorenstein homological properties
Cited by (4)
The magnitude for Nakayama algebras
2024, Journal of Pure and Applied AlgebraTHE MAGNITUDE FOR NAKAYAMA ALGEBRAS
2023, arXivA counterexample to the ϕ -dimension conjecture
2022, Mathematische Zeitschrift