Elsevier

Journal of Algebra

Volume 553, 1 July 2020, Pages 138-153
Journal of Algebra

Resolution quiver and cyclic homology criteria for Nakayama algebras

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2020.01.025Get rights and content

Abstract

If a Nakayama algebra is not cyclic, it has finite global dimension. For a cyclic Nakayama algebra, there are many characterizations of when it has finite global dimension. In [17], Shen gave such a characterization using Ringel's resolution quiver. In [11], the second author, with Zacharia, gave a cyclic homology characterization for when a monomial relation algebra has finite global dimension. We show directly that these criteria are equivalent for all Nakayama algebras. Our comparison result also reproves both characterizations. In a separate paper we discuss an interesting example that came up in our attempt to generalize this comparison result to arbitrary monomial relation algebras [8].

Introduction

A Nakayama algebra is an algebra whose quiver consists of a single oriented cycle with a finite number of monomial relations or a single path, with or without relations. These are called cyclic and linear Nakayama algebras respectively. There are many results about these algebras. In [14], Ringel introduced the “resolution quiver” R(Λ) of a Nakayama algebra Λ and used it to characterize when Λ is Gorenstein and to give a formula for its Gorenstein dimension. In [16], Shen showed that every component of the resolution quiver of a Nakayama algebra has the same weight and, in [17], Shen used this to obtain the following result.

Theorem A Shen [17]

A Nakayama algebra has finite global dimension if and only if its resolution quiver has exactly one component and that component has weight 1.

It is important for the purpose of induction that this includes linear Nakayama algebras.

In [11], the second author and Zacharia showed that a monomial relation algebra has finite global dimension if and only if the relative cyclic homology of its radical is equal to zero. For the case of a cyclic Nakayama algebra, they constructed a finite simplicial complex L(Λ), which we will call the “relation complex” of Λ, and show that the reduced homology of L(Λ) gives the lowest degree term in the relative cyclic homology of the radical of Λ. They further simplified their results to obtain the following.

Theorem B Igusa-Zacharia [11]

A Nakayama algebra Λ has finite global dimension if and only if the Euler characteristic of the relation complex L(Λ) is equal to one.

In fact, only cyclic Nakayama algebras were considered in [11]. However, if Λ is a linear Nakayama algebra, it is easy to see that L(Λ) is still defined and is contractible. Thus it has Euler characteristic one.

In this paper we will review these definitions and statements and prove the following statement showing that the two results above are equivalent.

Theorem C

For any cyclic Nakayama algebra Λ the Euler characteristic of the relation complex L(Λ) is equal to the number of components of its resolution quiver R(Λ) with weight 1.

We prove Theorem C using an idea that comes from [15]. In fact, our argument proves Theorem A, Theorem B, Theorem C simultaneously. (See Remark 3.4.) We also obtain a new version of Theorem B:

Theorem B' Corollary 3.14

A Nakayama algebra Λ has finite global dimension if and only if its relation complex L(Λ) is contractible.

These results arose in our study, joint with Gordana Todorov, of the concept of “amalgamation” [5] and the reverse process which we call “unamalgamation”. Amalgamation is used in [2] to construct plabic diagrams which are used in [1] to construct new invariants in contact topology.

Since the result of [11] holds for any monomial relation algebra, we also attempted to generalize the definition of the resolution quiver to such algebras. This lead us to consider examples which eventually led to a counterexample to the ϕ-dimension conjecture. See [8] for more details about this story.

Section snippets

Resolution quiver of a Nakayama algebra

By a Nakayama algebra of order n we mean a finite dimensional algebra Λ over a field K given by a quiver with relations where the quiver, which we denote Qn, consists of a single oriented n-cycle:

with monomial relations given by paths yi in this quiver written left to right. We write yi=xkixki+1xi for i=1,,r where 1k1<k2<<krn and r1. If the relations have length ≥2 they are called admissible and the algebra is called a cyclic Nakayama algebra.

We also allow relations of length one. If

Cyclic homology of a monomial relation algebra

When quoting results from [11], we note that a cyclic Nakayama algebra is called a “cycle algebra” in [11] and the relation complex is denoted K. We changed this to L to avoid confusion with the ground field K. We reserve the symbol “Λ” for Nakayama algebras.

For a monomial relation algebra A over any field K, the following result was obtained in [11].

Theorem 2.1

A has finite global dimension if and only if the cyclic homology of the radical of A is zero.

The statement uses the fact, proved in [11], that the

Comparison of characterizations

In this section we prove Theorem C: For any Nakayama algebra Λ, the Euler characteristic of its relation complex L(Λ) is equal to the number of components of its resolution quiver R(Λ) of weight one. In Example 1.2, Example 1.7, Example 1.8 this number is 1,0,2, respectively. The proof will be by induction on the number of vertices of R(Λ) which do not lie in any oriented cycle. If this number is zero then R(Λ) has no leaves. So, the number of relations is equal to n the size of the quiver Qn.

Comments

The construction of Λ from Λ is an example of “unamalgamation”, which is the construction described in Lemma 3.9. This is a partial inverse to the “amalgamation” construction of Fock-Goncharov [5] used in [2] to construct the Jacobian algebras of plabic diagrams [13]. These operations are partial inverses since we claim that UAU=U and AUA=A, where A,U stand for amalgamation and unamalgamation, respectively.

amalgamation  unamalgamation

The idea to consider removing the leaves R(Λ) comes from

Acknowledgements

Both authors thank Gordana Todorov who is working with them on the larger project of amalgamation and unamalgamation of Nakayama algebras. The first author thanks Job Rock for meaningful conversations. The second author thanks Emre Şen for many discussions about Nakayama algebras and especially the construction of ε(Λ) from [15]. The second author thanks his other coauthor Daniel Álvarez-Gavela for working with him, in [1], to reduce the calculation of higher Reidemeister torsion in [10] to

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

View full text