Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction to: Does this lung nodule need urgent review? A discrete choice experiment of Australian general practitioners

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 20, Article number: 53 (2020) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 30 January 2020

Correction to: BMC Pulmonary Med

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1053-x

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors flagged that the article had gone to publishing with errors in Tables 1, 2 and 3.

Table 1 Vignette variables and response options
Full size table
Table 2 Case vignettes
Full size table
Table 3 Participant demographic information, n = 152
Full size table

The content of Table 2 had erroneously been replaced by a duplication of the content of Table 3, while the content of Table 1 had been erroneously replaced by the (correct) content of Table 2.

Furthermore, in the (non-PDF) version of Table 3 the top two rows were erroneously formatted in bold.

These errors have now been corrected in the original article.

Please also find the corrected tables in this article for reference.

The publisher apologizes for this technical error.

Reference

  1. Brownell, et al. Does this lung nodule need urgent review? A discrete choice experiment of Australian general practitioners. 2020;20:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1053-x.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, St John of God Healthcare Midland Campus, Midland, Western Australia

    P. Brownell, F. Piccolo & D. Manners

  2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia

    F. Brims

  3. Curtin University Medical School, Bentley, Western Australia

    F. Brims & D. Manners

  4. Curtin University School of Public Health, Bentley, Western Australia

    R. Norman

Authors
  1. P. Brownell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Piccolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Brims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Norman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Manners
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Brownell.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brownell, P., Piccolo, F., Brims, F. et al. Correction to: Does this lung nodule need urgent review? A discrete choice experiment of Australian general practitioners. BMC Pulm Med 20, 53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1085-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1085-2

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us