Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer-Aided Dementia Diagnosis Based on Hierarchical Extreme Learning Machine

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The deep learning–based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) approaches of dementia often require a lot of manual intervention. Although deep learning has a good effect on feature extraction, the current deep learning methods usually need to set a large number of parameters manually, which is time consuming. Hierarchical extreme learning machine (H-ELM) needs only less manual intervention and can extract features by a multi-layer feature representation framework, which is much faster than the traditional deep learning methods. A CADx framework based on H-ELM, named DCADx, is proposed. As common spatial pattern (CSP) and brain functional network (BFN) have been proven to have better de-redundancy effects on brain data, the DCADx contains two different data redundancy reduction methods: (1) CSP-based DCADx (i.e., DCADx-CSP model) and (2) BFN-based DCADx (i.e., DCADx-BFN model). The experimental evaluation proved the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The DCADx-CSP model obtained 83.2% on Alzheimer’s disease and 82.5% on Parkinson’s disease. The DCADx-BFN obtained 89.3% on Alzheimer’s disease and 88.7% on Parkinson’s disease. DCADx can make full use of the feature expression ability of H-ELM to achieve better performance. CSP and BFN can reduce the redundancy to enhance the diagnostic accuracy further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://adni.loni.usc.edu/

  2. https://opdc.medsci.ox.ac.uk/opdc-literature

References

  1. Wimo A, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement 2017; 13:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Misiewicz S, Brickman AM, Tosto G. Prosodic impairment in dementia: review of the literature. Curr Alzheimer Res 2018;15:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi F, et al. Meta-KANSEI modeling with valence-arousal fMRI dataset of brain. Cogn Comput 2018;11:227–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Makaronidis JM, Batterham RL. Obesity, body weight regulation The brain Insights from fMRI. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erica NG, Lara AR. 2019. The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorders: a systematic review Alcoholism (NY). https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14167.

  6. Rathore S, Habes M, Aksam IM, Shacklett A, Davatzikos C. A review on neuroimaging-based classification sstudies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer’s disease and its prodromal stages. Neuroimage 2017;155:530–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shang J, Fisher P, Daamen M, Josef GB. 2019. A machine learning investigation of volumetric and functional MRI abnormalities in adults born preterm Hum Brain Mapp. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24698.

  8. Mcdonough IM, Letang SK, Stinson EA. 2019. Dementia risk elevates brain activity during memory retrieval: a functional MRI analysis of middle aged and older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190035.

  9. Li W, Zhao Y, Xiao Y, Chen X. 2018. Detecting Alzheimer’s disease on small dataset: a knowledge transfer perspective. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2839771.

  10. Zaharchuk G, Gong E, Wintermark M. Rubind, Langlotz P. Deep learning in neuroradiology. Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1776–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarraf S, Tofighi G. Deep learning-based pipeline to recognize Alzheimer’s disease using fMRI data. Proceedings of 2016 future technologties conference. San Francisco: IEEE Press; 2017, pp. 816–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang J, Deng C, Huang GB. Extreme learning machine for multilayer perceptron. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2017;4:809–21.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan L, et al. Motor Imagery EEG classification based on kernel hierarchical extreme learning machine. Cogn Comput 2017;9:758–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lotte F, Guan C. Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:355–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, et al. Multi-kernel e learning machine for EEG classification in brain-computer interfaces. Expert Syst Appl 2018;96:302–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atluri G, et al. The vrain-network paradigm: using functional imaging data to study how the brain works. Computer 2016;49:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee YB, Yoo K, Roh JH, Moon WJ, Jeong Y. Brain-state extraction algorithm based on the state transition (best): a dynamic functional brain network analysis in fmri study. Brain Topogr 2019;32:897–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Hu Z, Wang H. Combining non-negative matrix factorization and sparse coding for functional brain overlapping community detection. Cogn Comput 2018;10:991–05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Muldoon SF, et al. 2016. Small-world propensity and weighted brain networks. Sci Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22057.

  20. Li P, et al. Structural and functional brain network of human retrosplenial cortex. Neurosci Lett 2018;674: 24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Filippi M, et al. 2018. Changes in functional and structural brain connectome along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Mol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0067-8.

  22. Mostafavi S, et al. A molecular network of the aging human brain provides insights into the pathology and cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci 2018;21:811–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chong J, et al. Influence of cerebrovascular disease on brain networks in prodromal and clinical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2017;140:3012–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sulaimany S, et al. Predicting brain network changes in Alzheimer’s disease with link prediction algorithms. Mol Biosyst 2017;13:725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK. Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 2006; 70:489–01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang GB, Wang DH, Lan Y. Extreme learning machines: a survey. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2011;2: 107–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang GB, Chen L. Convex incremental extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 2007;70:3056–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang GB, Ding X, Zhou H. Optimization method based extreme learning machine for classification. Neurocomputing 2010;74:155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang GB, Zhou H, Ding X, Zhang R. Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2012;42:513–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasun LLC, Zhou H, Huang GB, Vong CM. Representational learning with extreme learning machine for big data. IEEE Intell Syst 2013;28:31–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan CG, Zane YF. DPARSF A Matlab toolbox for ‘pipeline’ data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Front in Sys Neurosci 2010;4:13.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eickhoff SB, et al. A new spm toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005;25:1325–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hess AS, Hess JR. 2018. Principal component analysis. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14639.

  34. Liu ZP. Linear discriminant analysis. Chicago 2013;3:27–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. He X, Niyogi P. Locality preserving projections. NIPS. 2004:153–160.

  36. Kong X, Yu PS. Brain network analysis:a data mining perspective. Acm Sigkdd Explor Newslett 2014;15: 30–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tzouriomazoyer N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Titova N, Qamar MA, Chaudhuri KR. The nonmotor features of Parkinson’s disease. Int Rev Neurobiol 2018;132:33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khazaee A, Ebrahimzadeh A, Babajaniferemi A. Classification of patients with MCI And AD from healthy controls using directed graph measures of resting-state fMRI. Behav Brain Res 2017;322:339–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hinton G, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 2006;313: 504–07.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Vincent P, Larochelle H, Bengio Y, Manzagol PA. Extractingand composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. ICML. 2008:1096–03.

  42. Hinton G, Osindero TY. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 2006;18:1527–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Salakhutdinov R, Hinton G. Deep boltzmann machines. AISTATS. 2009:448–55.

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61472069, 61402089, U1401256, 61672146), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N180101028, N180408019, N161602003, N160601001), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019T120216 and 2018M641705), and the fund of Acoustics Science and Technology Laboratory, and the Open Program of Neusoft Institute of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co. Ltd (NRIHTOP1802), the Recruitment Program of Global Experts under Grant (01270021814101/022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junchang Xin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Xin, J., Wang, Z. et al. Computer-Aided Dementia Diagnosis Based on Hierarchical Extreme Learning Machine. Cogn Comput 13, 34–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09708-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09708-1

Keywords

Navigation