Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synthesis of graphene oxide nanoribbons/chitosan composite membranes for the removal of uranium from aqueous solutions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a graphene oxide nanoribbons/chitosan (GONRs/CTS) composite membrane was successfully prepared by encapsulating CTS into GONRs, which were unzipped from multi-walled carbon nanotubes. The GONRs/CTS composite membrane so prepared was characterized using scanning electron microscopy, X-Ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The effects of the experimental conditions such as the pH (2‒7), adsorbent dosage (10‒50 mg), experimental time (5 min–32 h), uranium concentration (25‒300 mg∙L–1), experimental temperature (298 K‒328 K) on the adsorption properties of the composite membrane for the removal of U(VI) were investigated. The results showed that the U(VI) adsorption process of the GONRs/CTS composite membrane was pH-dependent, rapid, spontaneous and endothermic. The adsorption process followed the pseudosecondary kinetics and Langmuir models. The maximum U(VI) adsorption capacity of the GONRs/CTS composite membrane was calculated to be 320 mg∙g−1. Hence, the GONRs/CTS composite membrane prepared in this study was found to be suitable for separating and recovering uranium from wastewater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Selvakumar R, Ramadoss G, Menon M, Rajendran K, Thavamani P, Naidu R, Megharaj M. Challenges and complexities in remediation of uranium contaminated soils: A review. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2018, 192: 592–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lesher E, Ranville J, Honeyman B. Analysis of pH dependent uranium(VI) sorption to nanoparticulate hematite by flow field-elow fractionation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(14): 5403–5409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu J, Liu Q, Li Z, Liu J, Zhang H, Li R, Wang J. Efficient extraction of uranium from aqueous solution using an aminofunctionalized magnetic titanate nanotubes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 353: 9–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amphlett J, Ogden M, Foster R, Syna N, Soldenhoff K, Sharrad C. The effect of contaminants on the application of polyamine functionalised ion exchange resins for uranium extraction from sulfate based mining process waters. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 354: 633–640

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertoli A, Quintão M, De Abreu H, Ladeira A, Duarte H. Uranium separation from acid mine drainage using anionic resins—An experimental/theoretical investigation of its chemical speciation and the interaction mechanism. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 102790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng Y, He P, Dong F, Nie X, Ding C, Wang S, Zhang Y, Liu H, Zhou S. Polyamine and amidoxime groups modified bifunctional polyacrylonitrile-based ion exchange fibers for highly efficient extraction of U(VI) from real uranium mine water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 367: 198–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torkabad M, Keshtkar A, Safdari S. Comparison of polyethersulfone and polyamide nanofiltration membranes for uranium removal from aqueous solution. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2017, 94: 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lakaniemi A, Douglas G, Kaksonen A. Engineering and kinetic aspects of bacterial uranium reduction for the remediation of uranium contaminated environments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 198–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nariyan E, Sillanpää M, Wolkersdorfer C. Uranium removal from pyhäsalmi/finland mine water by batch electrocoagulation and optimization with the response surface methodology. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 193: 386–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Y, Chen D, Kong L, Tsang D, Su M. Rapid and effective removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solution by facile synthesized hierarchical hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 397–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan N, Li L, Ding J, Li S, Wang R, Jin Y, Wang X, Xia C. Preparation of graphene oxide-manganese dioxide for highly efficient adsorption and separation of Th(IV)/U(VI). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 309: 107–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun M, Li J. Graphene oxide membranes: Functional structures, preparation and environmental applications. Nano Today, 2018, 20: 121–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan L, Liu Q, Jing X, Liu J, Song D, Hu S, Liu L, Wang J. Removal of uranium(VI) ions from aqueous solution by magnetic cobalt ferrite/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 273: 307–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Y, Wang Z, Gu Z, Yang J, Liao J, Yang Y, Liu N, Tang J. Uranium(VI) sorption on graphene oxide nanoribbons derived from unzipping of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2015, 304(3): 1329–1337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan D, Chen L, Xiong X, Yuan L, Liao S, Wang Y. Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solution by amidoxime functionalized superparamagnetic polymer microspheres prepared by a controlled radical polymerization in the presence of DPE. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 358–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Titirici M, White R, Brun N, Budarin V, Su D, del Monte F, Clark J, MacLachlan M. Sustainable carbon materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(1): 250–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thakur K, Kandasubramanian B. Graphene and graphene oxidebased composites for removal of organic pollutants: A review. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2019, 64(3): 833–867

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Terrones M, Botello-Méndez A, Campos-Delgado J, López-Uríasd F, Vega-Cantúd Y, Rodriguez-Macíasd F, Elias A, Cano-Márquez A, Charlier J, Terrones H. Graphene and graphite nanoribbons: Morphology, properties, synthesis, defects and applications. Nano Today, 2010, 5(4): 351–372

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Z, Chen D, Chen B, Kong L, Su M. Enhanced uranium(VI) adsorption by chitosan modified phosphate rock. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2018, 547: 141–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vakili M, Rafatullah M, Salamatinia B, Abdullah A, Ibrahim M, Tan K, Gholami Z, Amouzgar P. Application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014, 113: 115–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aizat M, Aziz F. Chitosan Nanocomposite Application in Wastewater Treatments, Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019: 243–265

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang L, Zeng Y, Cheng Z. Removal of heavy metal ions using chitosan and modified chitosan: A review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 214: 175–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan D, Fan Q, Fan F, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Wu W. Removal of uranium contaminant from aqueous solution by chitosan@attapulgite composite. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 177: 86–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu C, Wang J, Yang T, Chen X, Liu X, Ding X. Adsorption of uranium by amidoximated chitosan-grafted polyacrylonitrile, using response surface methodology. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 121: 79–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang Z, Li Z, Zheng L, Zheng L, Zhou L, Chai Z,Wang X, Shi W. Interaction mechanism of uranium(VI) with three-dimensional graphene oxide-chitosan composite: Insights from batch experiments, IR, XPS and EXAFS spectroscopy. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 328: 1066–1074

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samuel M, Shah S, Bhattacharya J, Subramaniam K, Singh N. Adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution using a magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide composite and its toxicity studies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 115: 1142–1150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan L, Luo C, Sun M, Li X, Qiu H. Highly selective adsorption of lead ions by water-dispersible magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide composites. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2013, 103: 523–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elwakeel K, Atia A. Uptake of U (VI) from aqueous media by magnetic Schiff’s base chitosan composite. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 70: 292–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu P, Wang Y, Hu X W, Yuan D, Liu Y, Liu Z. Synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide nanoribbons composite for the removal of Th(IV) from aqueous solutions. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2019, 319(3): 1111–1118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Samuel M, Bhattacharya J, Raj S, Santhanam N, Singh H, Singh N. Efficient removal of Chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using chitosan grafted graphene oxide (CS-GO) nanocomposite. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 121: 285–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsan N, Dutta P, Kumar S, Bera R, Das N. Chitosan grafted graphene oxide aerogel: Synthesis, characterization and carbon dioxide capture study. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 125: 300–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anush S M, Chandan H, Vishalakshi B. Synthesis and metal ion adsorption characteristics of graphene oxide incorporated chitosan Schiff base. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 126: 908–916

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Samuel M, Shah S, Subramaniyan V, Qureshi T, Bhattacharya J, Singh N. Preparation of graphene oxide/chitosan/ferrite nanocomposite for chromium(VI) removal from aqueous solution. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 119: 540–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mende M, Schwarz D, Steinbach C, Boldt R, Schwarz S. Simultaneous adsorption of heavy metal ions and anions from aqueous solutions on chitosan—investigated by spectrophotometry and SEM-EDX analysis. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 510: 275–282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang A, Yang P, Huang C. Preparation of graphene oxide–chitosan composite and adsorption performance for uranium. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2017, 313(2): 371–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hosseinzadeh H, Ramin S. Effective removal of copper from aqueous solutions by modified magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 113: 859–868

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. El Rouby W, Farghali A, Sadek M, Khalil W. Fast removal of Sr(II) from water by graphene oxide and chitosan modified graphene oxide. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, 2018, 28(6): 2336–2349

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liao Y, Wang M, Chen D. Preparation of polydopamine-modified graphene oxide/chitosan aerogel for uranium(VI) adsorption. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(25): 8472–8483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hyun S P, Davis J, Sun K, Hayes K. Uranium(VI) reduction by iron (II) monosulfide mackinawite. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(6): 3369–3376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tripathi S, Roy A, Nair S, Durani S, Bose R. Removal of U (VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto synthesized silica and zinc silicate nanotubes: Equilibrium and kinetic aspects with application to real samples. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2018, 10: 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tavengwa N, Cukrowska E, Chimuka L. Modeling of adsorption isotherms and kinetics of uranium sorption by magnetic ion imprinted polymers. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 98(1): 1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kapnisti M, Noli F, Misaelides P, Vourliasc G, Karfaridisc D, Hatzidimitrioua A. Enhanced sorption capacities for lead and uranium using titanium phosphates; sorption, kinetics, equilibrium studies and mechanism implication. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 342: 184–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cai Y, Wu C, Liu Z, Zhang L, Chen L, Wang J, Wang X, Yang S, Wang S. Fabrication of a phosphorylated graphene oxide–chitosan composite for highly effective and selective capture of U(VI). Environmental Science. Nano, 2017, 4(9): 1876–1886

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu W, Dai X, Bai Z, Wang Y, Yang Z, Zhang L, Xu L, Chen L, Li Y, Gui D, et al. Highly sensitive and selective uranium detection in natural water systems using a luminescent mesoporous metal–organic framework equipped with abundant Lewis basic sites: A combined batch, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and first principles simulation investigation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(7): 3911–3921

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Li H, Zhai F, Gui D, Wang X, Wu C, Zhang D, Dai X, Deng H, Su X, Diwu J, et al. Powerful uranium extraction strategy with combined ligand complexation and photocatalytic reduction by postsynthetically modified photoactive metal-organic frameworks. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 254: 47–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21601033, 21866006, 11875105, 21661003 and 11705027), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20192BAB202007), Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Jiangxi Province (No. 20171BCB23067), Open Project Foundation of Nuclear Technology Application Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center (East China University of Technology) (No. HJSJYB2016-6), Open Project Foundation of Stake key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment (East China University of Technology) (No. NRE1509), and Fundamental Science on Nuclear Wastes and Environmental Safety Laboratory (No. 16kfhk02)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, China

    Yun Wang, Dingzhong Yuan, Yan Liu & Zhirong Liu

  2. School of Chemical Biology and Materials Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, China

    Jinbo Ou Yang, Dingzhong Yuan & Yan Liu

  3. School of Nuclear Science and engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, China

    Xuewen Hu, Yun Wang, Yang Li, Peng Wu & Hengju Zhang

  4. China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, 102413, China

    Zhenyu Wu

Authors
  1. Xuewen Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinbo Ou Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hengju Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dingzhong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhenyu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhirong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Wang, Y., Yang, J.O. et al. Synthesis of graphene oxide nanoribbons/chitosan composite membranes for the removal of uranium from aqueous solutions. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 14, 1029–1038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1898-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1898-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation