Elsevier

Solid State Ionics

Volume 347, April 2020, 115255
Solid State Ionics

Oxygen ion conductivity in ceria-based electrolytes co-doped with samarium and gadolinium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115255Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Thorough, systematic study of eleven Gd- and Sm-doped ceria electrolytes

  • Co-doping Gd and Sm improved conductivity over singly-doped parent compositions.

  • Total dopant concentration of 0.175 and Sm/Gd ratio of 50/50 was best.

  • Conductivity values favourably comparable with the state-of-the-art

  • Kinetic parameters and capacitance values give insights into conduction process.

Abstract

In a systematic study, two compositional series of ceria-based oxides, both co-doped with Sm and Gd, were synthesised using a low temperature method and evaluated as oxygen ion-conducting electrolytes for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (IT-SOFCs). Series one, Ce1-2xSmxGdxO2-x, had equal concentrations of Sm and Gd but varying total dopant concentration. Series two, Ce0.825SmxGd0.175-xO1.9125, had a fixed total dopant concentration but the Sm:Gd concentration ratio was varied. The materials were characterised using scanning and transmission electron microscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and X-ray diffraction. Impedance spectra were recorded on dense pellets of these materials. From these, total, bulk and grain boundary conductivities and capacitances along with activation energies, pre-exponential constants and enthalpies of ion migration and defect association were obtained. These gave a detailed insight into the fundamental conduction processes in the materials. Ce0.825Sm0.0875Gd0.0875O1.9125 had the highest total ionic conductivity at temperatures of 550 °C and above and also demonstrated an enhanced conductivity with respect to its singly-doped parent compounds, Ce0.825Sm0.175O1.9125 and Ce0.825Gd0.175O1.9125, at 400 °C and above. This compares favourably with previously-reported values and has promising implications for the development of IT-SOFCs.

Introduction

A promising technology to help address our global energy and environmental challenges are fuel cells, which convert chemical potential energy from a fuel and oxidant directly into electrical energy. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) in particular have high efficiencies, low emissions and fuel flexibility [1]. SOFCs are likely to have a large impact on energy conversion in the future, over a range of commercial applications from small domestic power units to large industrial facilities [[2], [3], [4]]. Currently, SOFCs typically operate at temperatures of 800 to 1000 °C [5]. By reducing this to intermediate temperatures (ITs) of between 500 and 750 °C, the auxiliary plant could be manufactured from low cost materials such as standard steels rather than expensive technical ceramics (e.g. precision-made alumina parts, lanthanum chromite-based interconnects). As well as allowing wider material choices, IT-SOFCs would reduce loss of performance and component degradation caused by electrode sintering, interfacial diffusion between electrolyte and electrodes and thermal stress [6,7].

For successful implementation of IT-SOFCs, electrolytes with higher ionic conductivity are necessary. A partially-occupied oxygen ion sub-lattice containing a large number of interconnected and equivalent sites is required for high conductivity. This is obtained by doping the material with acceptor cations and so creating oxygen vacancies through which oxide ions are transferred by a hopping mechanism [8]. Yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ) is the electrolyte material used in first generation SOFCs, but at intermediate temperatures, ceria-based electrolytes demonstrate higher oxide ion conductivity [9]. Reports have shown that ceria doped with trivalent rare earth ions – such as Gd as in Eq. (1) – gives higher ionic conductivity than those doped with other elements, and in certain cases using multiple rare earth dopants gives rise to higher conductivity than the use of a single dopant [4,10].Gd2O32GdCe+3OOx+VO··

One interesting recent approach for optimising ionic conductivity is to search for an average dopant ionic radius which causes least distortion to the host lattice. This is reported to minimise both strain and activation energy for oxygen vacancy diffusion, Ea, and occurs when the repulsive elastic (related to dopant radius) and attractive electronic parts of the interactions between vacancies and dopant ions balance [[11], [12], [13], [14]]. According to research by Andersson and co-workers using ab initio methods, this is the case for a hypothetical atomic number between 61 (Pm) and 62 (Sm) [15]. Following this computational work, Omar et al. experimentally studied the energies of interaction between the oxygen vacancy and the dopant cations as a function of dopant ionic size. They concluded that the ionic conductivity was not a function solely of elastic strain, and therefore, a structure–ionic conductivity relationship based on critical radius was not sufficient to explain ionic conductivity behaviour in doped ceria [16]. Indeed, the local structure around dopants in CeO2, such as the formation by electrostatic attraction of clusters of vacancies and dopant ions, has been reported to influence ionic mobility [17]. Connecting these concepts with experimental observations is valuable for electrolyte design.

Previous work by the authors on co-doped ceria electrolytes found that of the Ce0.8SmxGdyNdzO1.9 materials studied (where x, y and z = 0.2, 0.1, 0.0667 or 0 and x + y + z = 0.2), Ce0.8Sm0.1Gd0.1O1.9 exhibited the highest conductivity between 300 °C and 700 °C [4]. Wang and co-workers observed a higher conductivity for Ce0.85Gd0.15-ySmyO1.925 (0.05 ≤ y ≤ 0.1) than for Ce0.85Gd0.15O1.925 or Ce0.85Sm0.15O1.925 between 500 and 700 °C [18]. This was attributed to the suppression of the ordering of oxygen vacancies leading to a lower Ea for the co-doped than for singly doped ceria. Dikmen and co-workers also found a four-fold increase in conductivity for Ce0.8Gd0.2-xSmxO2-δ at 700 °C for x = 0.1 over x = 0. Greater increases were observed at the lower temperatures of 500 and 600 °C [19]. However, using La or Nd as co-dopants with Gd failed to surpass the conductivity of the material co-doped with Sm and Gd, at 700 °C. Zając and Molenda demonstrated that Ce0.85Sm0.075Gd0.075O2-x/2 had a higher bulk conductivity at 700 °C than the singly-doped parent compounds or the co-doped sample, Ce0.85Nd0.075Gd0.075O2-x/2 [20].

It is apparent from the prior work of the authors and the relevant literature that Sm and Gd as either single or co-dopants in ceria electrolytes enhance conductivity to a greater extent than other rare earth dopants. Therefore, it is worth conducting a detailed study of how the total dopant concentration and the ratio of these individual co-dopants affect ionic conductivity in ceria co-doped with Sm and Gd. In this work, two compositional series, Ce1-2xSmxGdxO2-x, where x = 0.125, 0.1, 0.0875, 0.075 or 0.05, and Ce0.825SmxGd0.175-xO1.9125, where x = 0, 0.035, 0.070, 0.0875, 0.105, 0.140 or 0.175, were synthesised using a low temperature citrate method known to give high purity nanopowders [3,4]. The composition, powder nanostructure and crystal phase of these products were studied as were the microstructure and ionic conductivity of the dense electrolyte bodies prepared from them. The results gave insight into how subtle changes in composition affect the parameters determining favourable performance for IT-SOFC electrolytes. It is hoped that they will also aid future computational work on these materials.

Section snippets

Experimental

Five compositions of Ce1-2xSmxGdxO2-x where x = 0.05, 0.075. 0.875, 0.1 or 0.125, (series one), named SG050, SG075, SG0875, SG100 and SG125, respectively, and seven compositions of Ce0.825SmxGd0.175-xO1.9125 where x = 0, 0.035, 0.070, 0.0875, 0.105, 0.140 or 0.175 (series two), named G000, G035, G070, SG0875 (common to both series), G105, G140 and G175, respectively, giving eleven samples in total, were prepared (see Table S1 for compositions and naming conventions). Powder and dense pellet

Powder characterisation

After calcination, the products consisted of voluminous fragile, papery structures which yielded pale yellow nanopowders after milling. XRD patterns of the eleven Ce1-2xSmxGdxO2-x and Ce0.825SmxGd0.175-xO1.9125 nanopowders are given in Fig. 1(a). All peaks were assigned to the cubic Fluorite crystal structure, Fm-3m. There is no evidence of any other phases, indicating that the dopants are fully soluble in the cerium oxide lattice. Fig. 1(b)–(d) present lattice parameter, crystallite size and

Conclusions

A citrate complexation process was used to prepare successfully two series of high purity electrolyte nanopowders: Ce1-2xSmxGdxO2-x where x = 0.125, 0.1, 0.0875, 0.075 or 0.05 (series one) and Ce0.825SmxGd0.175-xO1.9125 where x = 0.175, 0.14, 0.105, 0.0875, 0.07, 0.035 or 0 (series two). These nanopowders - and dense sintered pellets made from them- were used to study the effect of total dopant concentration and Sm:Gd ratio on microstructure and ionic conductivity in ceria co-doped with Sm and

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Alice V. Coles-Aldridge:Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft.Richard T. Baker:Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the University of St Andrews and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for the PhD studentship for AVC-A (grant code: EP/M506631/1). Electron microscopy was performed at the Electron Microscope Facility, University of St Andrews.

References (47)

  • A.B. Stambouli et al.

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2002)
  • J. Kilner

    Solid State Ionics

    (2000)
  • H. Inaba et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1996)
  • L. Minervini et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • M. Mogensen et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2004)
  • S. Omar et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2006)
  • S. Dikmen

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2010)
  • W. Zajac et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2008)
  • R.O. Fuentes et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2009)
  • M.R. Kosinski et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • A.V. Coles-Aldridge et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2018)
  • Z. Tianshu et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2002)
  • S. Omar et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2008)
  • K. Venkataramana et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2017)
  • S. Dikmen et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2010)
  • L.B. Winck et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2017)
  • B.C.H. Steele

    Solid State Ionics

    (2000)
  • R.M. Kasse et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2013)
  • N. Cioatera et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2012)
  • I. Stephens et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2006)
  • A.S. Nowick et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1988)
  • K. Ngai

    Solid State Ionics

    (1998)
  • K. Ngai

    Solid State Ionics

    (1998)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Influence of La<sup>3+</sup>, Sm<sup>3+</sup>and Dy<sup>3+</sup> dopants on ceria solid electrolytes for IT–SOFCs

      2022, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further researches approach the co-doping and reported that different rare-earth cations eases the electrical conductivity improvement in ceria to be suitable for intermediate operating temperature SOFC (IT-SOFC) (600 °C–800 °C). Up to now, enormous investigations were made on different co-doped ceria systems and reported the enhanced electrical/thermal properties in Ce0.85La0.075Sm0.075O2−δ [11], Ce0.8Sm0.12Pr0.08O2–ẟ [12], Ce0.8Er0.18La0.02O1.9 [13], Ce0.80Pr0.10La0.10O2–ẟ [14], Nd0.20Gd0.05Ce0.75O1.90–x/2 [15], Ce0.80Pr0.10Dy0.10O2–ẟ [16], Ce0.84Gd0.08Pr0.08O2 [17], Ce0.85Sm0.1Nd0.05O2-δ [18], Ce0.85La0.075Dy0.075O2−δ [19], Ce0.825Sm0.0875Gd0.0875O1.9125 [20], and Ce0.85Sm0.1Yb0.05O1.925 [21] etc. On the other hand, several studies on triple-doping in ceria have also made and succeeded in reporting novel triple-doped ceria materials with improved microstructural, electrical as well as thermal properties of Ce0.7Pr0.15Sm0.07Eu0.07O2–ẟ [22], Ce0.8Sm0.1Ca0.05Gd0.05O2–ẟ [23], Ce0.76Pr0.08Sm0.08Gd0.08O2–ẟ [24], Ce0.82La0.06Sm0.06Gd0.06O2–ẟ [25], and Ce0.76La0.08Pr0.08Sm0.08O2–ẟ [26] etc.

    • Sm(Nd) doped ceria materials for multifunctional application

      2021, Ceramics International
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is also seen that the conductivity of samarium systems is higher than that of containing neodymium. As shown earlier, the best dopants for ceria electrolytes are gadolinium, samarium, or a combination of them [55], due to the microdeformation of the lattice leads to local microstresses, which can be good for catalysis but have a bad effect on the conductivity. An approach for optimizing ionic conductivity is to search for an average dopant ionic radius which causes the least distortion to the host lattice.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text