Inactivation of the prelimbic cortex attenuates operant responding in both physical and behavioral contexts
Introduction
Operant behaviors are weakened when they are tested outside the physical context (e.g., the Skinner box) in which they are learned (e.g., Thrailkill & Bouton, 2015a). The role of context in behavioral control has generally been attributed to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Miller & Cohen, 2001). Notably, the prelimbic subregion of the PFC has been identified as being involved in context-appropriate responding in choice paradigms (Haddon and Killcross, 2006, Marquis et al., 2007) and context-based renewal of extinguished operant behaviors (Bossert et al., 2011, Eddy et al., 2016, Fuchs et al., 2007, Fuchs et al., 2005, Palombo et al., 2017, Trask et al., 2017, Willcocks and McNally, 2013). Our work has suggested that rather than having a general role in renewal of extinguished behaviors, the PL selectively promotes the performance of operant behaviors in the context in which they are learned (i.e., acquisition context) (Trask et al., 2017). In that research, we demonstrated that pharmacological inactivation of the PL with baclofen and muscimol (GABA receptor agonists) reduced the response rate of an operant response when it was tested in the context in which it had been trained but not when tested in a non-training context (Trask et al., 2017). Moreover, this inactivation could also block ABA renewal of extinguished behavior (acquisition in context A, extinction in context B, renewal test in context A) but had no effect on ABC renewal (acquisition in context A, extinction in context B, renewal test in context C).
Recent evidence suggests that when two responses must be made in sequence to obtain a reinforcer, only the first response is sensitive to the physical context; the second response is sensitive to the performance of the first response (Thrailkill et al., 2016), what can be termed the “behavioral context”. Briefly, in a heterogenous instrumental chain procedure, a discriminative stimulus (S1) signals the rat to perform the first response (R1), which terminates S1 and intitiates a second stimulus (S2) that signals the rat to perform the second response (R2), which terminates S2 and leads to a food pellet reward (Thrailkill & Bouton, 2015b). Each component of the chain can be tested separately, by presenting S1 or S2 and allowing the opportunity to make either R1 or R2. Using this procedure, we found that while R1 was sensitive to a change in the physical context (i.e., its rate decreased when tested in a non-trained physical context after acquisition), R2 was not (Thrailkill et al., 2016). In fact, R2 appeared to be sensitive to a change in the behavioral context (i.e., the response rate decreased when R2 was tested separately from R1). Further, after extinction of R2, R2 renewed when tested back in the behavioral context in which it had been trained (R1-R2) but not when it was tested in a non-trained behavioral context (R3-R2) (Steinfeld et al., 2019, Thrailkill et al., 2016).
Here, we test the hypothesis that the PL is a key brain structure for the processing of not only physical context but also behavioral context as defined above. To that end, we trained rats to perform a discriminated heterogenous instrumental chain and then tested both R1 and R2 in isolation from each other in the physical acquisition context (Context A), and then the entire chain and R2 in isolation in a non-trained physical context (Context B). In that way, R1 and R2 were tested both within their respective acquisition contexts (Context A for R1; after R1 for R2) and outside their respective acquisition contexts (Context B for R1; in the absence of R1 for R2). We hypothesized that PL inactivation would reduce R2 when tested with R1 (i.e., within its acquisition context) but not when R2 was tested without R1 (i.e., outside of its acquisition context). We also hypothesized that PL inactivation would reduce R1 when tested in context A but not when tested in context B, similar to our previous finding examining a single operant (Trask et al., 2017).
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects were 32 male Wistar rats purchased from Charles River Laboratories (St. Constance, Quebec, CAN). They were 59–63 days old upon arrival and were individually housed in a room maintained on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle. Experimentation took place during the light period of the cycle. After recovery from the surgical procedures, food restriction was introduced in order to reduce body weights to 90% of baseline. Food restriction was maintained for the duration of the experiment.
Surgery
Once
Results
A total of 12 rats were excluded from data analysis. One rat did not recover from anesthesia. Seven rats were excluded due to misplaced cannulae or excessive cannulae-related tissue damage. Four rats (Rats 7, 8, 25, 31) were excluded from the data set because in at least one test, their proportion baseline score was more than two standard deviations above the mean (z > 2) (Rat 7: Test B.1 z = 3.03, Rat 8: Test A.2 z = 2.97, Test B.1 z = 3.11, Rat 25: Test A.1 z = 2.05, Rat 31: Test A.2
Discussion
Here we investigated the involvement of the PL in behaviors which are dependent on contexts that are either physical or behavioral. The current results indicate that the inactivation of the PL produces the same effect on behaviors which are associated with behavioral contexts as those that are associated with physical contexts. Beyond adding to the list of PL functions, this finding significantly extends our understanding of the role of the PL in contextual processing because it suggests that
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the University of Vermont Department of Psychological Science and by NIH Grant R01 DA033123 to MEB. EAT was supported by NIH Grant K01 DA044456.
References (24)
- et al.
Medial prefrontal cortex involvement in the expression of extinction and ABA renewal of instrumental behavior for a food reinforcer
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
(2016) - et al.
Renewal in a heterogeneous behavior chain: Extinction of the first response prevents renewal of a second response when it is separately extinguished and returned to the chain
Learning and Motivation
(2019) - et al.
Phasic mesolimbic dopamine signaling precedes and predicts performance of a self-initiated action sequence task
Biological Psychiatry
(2012) - et al.
Ventral medial prefrontal cortex neuronal ensembles mediate context-induced relapse to heroin
Nature Neuroscience
(2011) Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning
Psychological Bulletin
(1993)Extinction of instrumental (operant) learning: Interference, varieties of context, and mechanisms of contextual control
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
(2019)- et al.
Interactions of the basolateral amygdala with the dorsal hippocampus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex regulate drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats
European Journal of Neuroscience
(2007) - et al.
The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats
Neuropsychopharmacology
(2005) - et al.
Prefrontal cortex lesions disrupt the contextual control of response conflict
Journal of Neuroscience
(2006) - et al.
Inactivation of the prelimbic, but not infralimbic, prefrontal cortex impairs the contextual control of response conflict in rats
European Journal of Neuroscience
(2007)
An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Evidence of action sequence chunking in goal-directed instrumental conditioning and its dependence on the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
The Journal of Neuroscience
Cited by (7)
Prelimbic cortex inactivation prevents ABA renewal based on satiety state
2023, Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryLearning to stop responding
2023, Behavioural ProcessesDetailed mapping of behavior reveals the formation of prelimbic neural ensembles across operant learning
2022, NeuronCitation Excerpt :Many PrL neurons display activity time locked to specific behaviors (Chang et al., 1997; Euston and McNaughton, 2006; Horst and Laubach, 2013), but similar actions in different circumstances may evoke different patterns of PrL activity (Chang et al., 1998; Woodward et al., 2000). Recent work has linked the PrL to action selection using the rat’s own behavior as the context (Thomas et al., 2020). This evidence suggests that PrL neurons encode relationships among behavioral states, but traditional experimental procedures provide little information about the laboratory animal’s behavioral state outside of a narrow temporal window around a certain discrete action (e.g., a lever press).
New functions of the rodent prelimbic and infralimbic cortex in instrumental behavior
2021, Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryCitation Excerpt :A second test showed that PL inactivation had no effect on R2 tested by itself (without R1) in context B (Fig. 2C); R2 was only reduced when tested as part of the original chain. Overall, the results of Thomas et al. (2020) suggest the possibility that PL may be involved in processing even non-physical contexts; PL may thus process “acquisition context” in something like a functional, rather than a physical, sense. An important future direction might be to assess a possible PL role in internal states that appear to function like contexts.
Chemogenetic inhibition of the ventral hippocampus but not its direct projection to the prelimbic cortex attenuates context-specific operant responding
2024, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience