Skip to main content
Log in

Joint trust: an approach for trust-aware routing in WSN

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The province of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is continuously increasing due to widespread applications, like, military, monitoring environmental conditions, and several other domains. However, trust management in the WSN is a major challenge as trust is used when cooperation between nodes becomes critical to attaining reliable communication. Therefore, a new trust-based routing algorithm is proposed for initiating secured routing. Additionally, the paper proposes Chicken-Dragonfly (CHicDra) optimization algorithm for assisting secure communication by finding the optimal cluster heads (CHs) in the network. Once the CHs are selected with Multi-Objective Taylor Crow Optimization, the trusted nodes are optimally finalized using the Joint Trust that depends on the trust parameters, like integrity factor, consistency factors, forwarding rate factor, and availability factors. The proposed CHicDra is the modification of the chicken swam optimization with dragonfly algorithm. Finally, the optimally chosen path is employed for further communications in the network, which is secure and trustworthy. The proposed CHicDra computes maximal packet delivery ratio (PDR) of 44%, throughput of 52.8%, and minimal delay of 0.344, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arjunan, S., & Sujatha, P. (2018). Lifetime maximization of wireless sensor network using fuzzy based unequal clustering and ACO based routing hybrid protocol. Applied Intelligence,48, 2229–2246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kong, L., Pan, J. S., Snášel, V., Tsai, P. W., & Sung, T. W. (2018). An energy-aware routing protocol for wireless sensor network based on genetic algorithm. Telecommunication Systems,67(3), 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarkar, A., & Murugan, T. S. (2019). Cluster head selection for energy efficient and delay-less routing in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks,25(1), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shankar, T., Shanmugavel, S., & Rajesh, A. (2016). Hybrid HSA and PSO algorithm for energy efficient cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation,30, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crosby, G. V., Pissinou, N., & Gadze, J. (2006). A framework for trust-based cluster head election in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of Second IEEE Workshop on Dependability and Security in Sensor Networks and Systems (p. 10).

  6. Khan, F., Gul, T., Ali, S., Rashid, A., Shah, D., & Khan, S.(2018). Energy aware cluster-head selection for improving network life time in wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of Science and Information Conference (pp. 581-593). Springer.

  7. Robinson, Y. H., Julie, E. G., & Kumar, R. (2019). Probability-based cluster head selection and fuzzy multipath routing for prolonging lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications,12, 1061–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ram Mohan, C., & Ananthula, V. R. (2019). Reputation-based secure routing protocol in mobile ad-hoc network using Jaya Cuckoo optimization. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing,10(3), 1950014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. RamMohan, C., & Reddy, A. V. (2018). T-Whale: Trust and Whale optimization model for secure routing in mobile ad-hoc network. International Journal of Artificial Life Research (IJALR),8(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, E. P. K., Baskaran, K., Rajsingh, E. B., Lydia, M., & Immanuel Selvakumar, A. (2019). Trust aware nature inspired optimised routing in clustered wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation,14(2), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications,11(6), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Draves, R., Padhye, J., & Zill, B. (2004). Comparison of routing metrics for multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM.

  13. Perkins, C. E., & Bhagwat, P. (1994). Highly dynamic destination sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM.

  14. Johnson, D. B., Maltz, D. A., & Broch, J. (2001). DSR: The dynamic source routing protocol for multihop wireless ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networking,5, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

  16. Zahariadis, T., Leligou, H., Karkazis, P., Trakadas, P., Papaefstathiou, I., Vangelatos, C., et al. (2011). Design and implementation of a trust-aware routing protocol for Largewsns. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications,2(3), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Babu, S. S., Raha, A., & Naskar, M. K. (2011). Trustworthy route formation algorithm for WSNs. International Journal of Computers and Applications,27(5), 0975–8887.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhan, G., Shi, W., & Deng, J. (2012). Design and implementation of TARF: A trust-aware routing framework for WSNs. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing,9(2), 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karthick, S. (2018). TDP: A novel secure and energy aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems,11(2), 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selvi, M., Thangaramya, K., Ganapathy, S., Kulothungan, K., Nehemiah, H. K., & Kannan, A. (2019). An energy aware trust based secure routing algorithm for effective communication in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications,105(4), 1475–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Veeraiah, N., & Krishna, B. T. (2018). Intrusion detection based on piecewise fuzzy C-means clustering and fuzzy Naïve Bayes rule. Multimedia Research,1(1), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dhand, G., & Tyagi, S. S. (2019). SMEER: Secure multi-tier energy efficient routing protocol for hierarchical wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications,105(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Udhayavani, M., & Chandrasekaran, M. (2018). Design of TAREEN (trust aware routing with energy efficient network) and enactment of TARF: A trust-aware routing framework for wireless sensor networks. Cluster Computing,22, 11919–11927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Asha, G., & Santhosh, R. (2019). Soft computing and trust-based self-organized hierarchical energy balance routing protocol (TSHEB) in wireless sensor networks. Soft Computing,23(8), 2537–2543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilbert, E. P. K., Kaliaperumal, B., Rajsingh, E. B., & Lydia, M. (2018). Trust based data prediction, aggregation and reconstruction using compressed sensing for clustered wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering,72, 894–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Desai, S. S., & Nene, M. J. (2019). Node-level trust evaluation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security,14(8), 2139–2152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kavidha, V., & Ananthakumaran, S. (2018). Novel energy-efficient secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications,12, 881–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meng, X., Liu, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, H. (2014). A new bio-inspired algorithm: chicken swarm optimization. In Proceedings of International Conference in Swarm Intelligence (pp. 86–94). Springer.

  29. Mirjalili, S. (2016). Dragonfly algorithm: A new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Computing and Applications,27(4), 1053–1073.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. John, J., & Rodrigues, P. (2019). MOTCO: Multi-objective Taylor Crow optimization algorithm for cluster head selection in energy aware wireless sensor network. Mobile Networks and Applications,24(5), 1509–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alamelu Mangai, S., Ravi Sankar, B., & Alagarsamy, K. (2014). Taylor series prediction of time series data with error propagated by artificial neural network. International Journal of Computer Applications,89(1), 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Askarzadeh, A. (2016). A novel meta heuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Computers & Structures,169, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar, R., & Kumar, D. (2016). Multi-objective fractional artificial bee colony algorithm to energy aware routing protocol in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks,22(5), 1461–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kang, J., Zhang, Y., & Nath, B. (2005). Accurate and energy-efficient congestion level measurement in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Vol. 4).

  35. Zhu, J. (2018). Wireless sensor network technology based on security trust evaluation model. International Journal of Online Engineering,14(4), 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Karaboga, D., Okdem, S., & Ozturk, C. (2012). Cluster based wireless sensor network routing using artificial bee colony algorithm. Wireless Networks,18(7), 847–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarangi, S., & Thankchan, B. (2012). A novel routing algorithm for wireless sensor network using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Computer Engineering,4(1), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Elshrkawey, M., Elsherif, S. M., & Wahed, M. E. (2018). An enhancement approach for reducing the energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences,30(2), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob John.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, P., John, J. Joint trust: an approach for trust-aware routing in WSN. Wireless Netw 26, 3553–3568 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02271-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02271-w

Keywords

Navigation