Correction to: World J Urol (2015) 33:973–979 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1510-y
The authors recognized an error regarding the content of Tables 2 and 3 in the original publication of the above article. The correct Tables 2 and 3 are given below.
As a result, the second paragraph of the Results section should read as given below:
In univariate analysis, multiple parameters such as perineural infiltration and Gleason at positive margin were significantly associated with BCR (Table 2).
Accordingly, the p value in the reference to Table 3 in the Results section has to be changed: (Table 3, p < 0.001) instead of (Table 3, p = 0.003). Therefore, the first sentence in the fourth paragraph of the Results section should read as given below:
In multivariate analysis, GS of the regular prostatectomy specimen was the only statistically significant parameter for pT2R1 prostate cancer (Table 3, p < 0.001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karl, A., Buchner, A., Tympner, C. et al. Correction to: The natural course of pT2 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin: predicting biochemical recurrence. World J Urol 38, 1587–1588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03136-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03136-9