Correction to: World J Urol (2015) 33:973–979 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1510-y

The authors recognized an error regarding the content of Tables 2 and 3 in the original publication of the above article. The correct Tables 2 and 3 are given below.

Table 2 Univariate Cox regression analysis of potential prognostic parameters for biochemical recurrence
Table 3 Multivariate Cox regression analysis of potential prognostic parameters for biochemical recurrence

As a result, the second paragraph of the Results section should read as given below:

In univariate analysis, multiple parameters such as perineural infiltration and Gleason at positive margin were significantly associated with BCR (Table 2).

Accordingly, the p value in the reference to Table 3 in the Results section has to be changed: (Table 3, p < 0.001) instead of (Table 3, p = 0.003). Therefore, the first sentence in the fourth paragraph of the Results section should read as given below:

In multivariate analysis, GS of the regular prostatectomy specimen was the only statistically significant parameter for pT2R1 prostate cancer (Table 3, p < 0.001).