Skip to main content
Download PDF

Frontal cortex chitinase and pentraxin neuroinflammatory alterations during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 17, Article number: 58 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1), chitinase 3-like 2 (CHI3L2), and neuronal pentraxin II (NPTX2) are inflammatory biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although studies have demonstrated that cerebrospinal fluid levels of these proteins are changed in AD, no studies have undertaken a detailed examination of alterations in protein levels, cellular expression, and interaction with amyloid in the brain during the progression of AD.

Methods

The study evaluated levels of both CHI3L1 and CHI3L2, NPTX2, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1), complement component 1q (C1q), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and CD44, in the frontal cortex of people who died with an antemortem clinical diagnosis of no cognitive impairment (NCI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mild/moderate AD (mAD), and severe AD (sAD) using immunoblot and immunohistochemical techniques.

Results

CHI3L1-immunoreactive (-ir) astrocyte numbers were increased in the frontal cortex and white matter in sAD compared to NCI. On the other hand, increases in GFAP and Iba1-ir cell numbers were observed in MCI compared to NCI but only in white matter. Western blot analyses revealed significantly lower frontal cortex CHI3L2 levels, whereas CD44 levels were increased in sAD. No significant differences for CHI3L1, GFAP, C1q, and NPTX2 protein levels were detected between clinical groups. Strong significant correlations were found between frontal cortex CHI3L1 and Iba1-ir cell numbers in white matter and CHI3L1 and C1q protein levels in the early stages of the disease. C1q and Iba1, CD44 with CHI3L2, and GFAP protein levels were associated during disease progression. CHI3L1 and Iba1 cell numbers in white matter showed a significant associations with episodic memory and perceptual speed.

Conclusions

White matter CHI3L1 inflammatory response is associated with cognitive impairment early in the onset of AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible, progressive neurodegenerative disorder resulting in cognitive decline leading to extreme societal costs [1, 2]. With a rapidly growing older population worldwide, defining the cellular mechanism(s) driving the onset of AD is of paramount importance. AD-related cognitive decline is manifested by deficits in working memory and executive function modalities associated, in part, with the frontal cortex (FC) [3]. The FC is a hub of the default mode network that displays extensive amyloid pathology associated with cognitive decline early in AD [4, 5]. However, the underlying cellular mechanism(s) driving FC dysfunction remains unknown.

AD is pathologically characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), synaptic and neuronal loss, glial activation, and neuroinflammation [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Aβ plaques and NFTs induce an immune response associated with astroglia and microglia activation and increased inflammatory mediators, tumor necrosis factor α [12], S100, interleukin 1 [13, 14], such as triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) [15, 16], and complement activation (C1q to C5b-9) [17] in AD [18,19,20]. Recently, the chitinase family of inflammatory proteins, particularly chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1, YKL-40, or HC gp-39), chitinase 3-like 2 (CHI3L2 or YKL-39), and pentraxin II (NPTX2 or Narp), a member of the pentraxin family, has been associated with AD pathogenesis [21, 22]. Although their functions are not well understood, it is hypothesized that chitinases are involved in pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic tissue remodeling in cancer [23, 24] as well as in several neurodegenerative diseases [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. CHI3L1 found in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) obtained from preclinical and prodromal cases of AD [33,34,35] has been suggested as a biomarker for discerning cognitively normal from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) individuals [25, 36, 37]. Human tissue-based studies revealed that CHI3L1 is expressed in astrocytes in close apposition to blood vessels, Aβ plaques and NFTs in AD [38]. However, the role that chitinases play in cognitive impairment during the progression of AD remains under-investigated.

The protein NPTX2, a member of the pentraxin family [39, 40], is involved in excitatory synapse formation [41, 42] and has been implicated in the regulation of neuroinflammatory responses associated with trauma and neurological disease. For example, the deletion of NPTX2 produces an alteration of microglial activation following sciatic nerve transection [43]. Interestingly, reduced CSF levels of NPTX2 were associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy and cognitive decline in AD [44].

Although CSF chitinase and NPTX2 neuroinflammatory proteins are putative biomarkers related to the pathogenesis and cognitive decline seen in AD [45, 46], there are virtually no detailed clinicopathological studies of these proteins in brain tissue during the clinical onset of AD. Therefore, we examined CHI3L1 and NPTX2 protein levels and cellular expression in the FC, a region affected early by plaque pathology during the progression of AD. These proteins were compared with other glial neuroinflammatory markers such as microglial ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1), complement component 1q (C1q), TREM2, astrocytic glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and glial surface adhesion glycoprotein CD44, which interacts directly with CHI3L1 [47] and drives immune responses in the central nervous system [48]. These proteins were quantified using immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence techniques. Changes in these markers were correlated with case demographics and cognitive and neuropathological variables.

Methods

Subjects

The individuals used in this study were selected based upon a premortem clinical diagnosis of no cognitive impairment (NCI, n = 15), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 15), and mild to moderate AD (mAD, n = 14) from the Rush Religious Orders Study (RROS) cohort (Table 1) and severe AD (sAD, n = 12) from the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center. Subject selection was not based upon NFT Braak, amyloid Thal, or ApoE criteria. Association of these variables with the present findings was evaluated after the study was completed to avoid pathological bias. The Human Research Committees of Rush University Medical Center approved this study, and informed consent for research and autopsy was obtained from RROS participants or family/guardians.

Table 1 Demographic, cognitive, and neuropathological characteristics
Full size table

Clinical and neuropathological characteristics

Table 1 shows the demographic, clinical and neuropathological characteristics of the RROS cases examined. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for NCI, MCI, and AD diagnosis were reported previously [49,50,51,52,53]. Briefly, after a review of the clinical data and examination of the participant, clinical diagnoses were made by a board-certified neurologist with expertise in gerontology. The neurologist reviewed medical history, medication use, neurologic examination information, results of cognitive performance testing, and the neuropsychologist’s opinion of cognitive impairment and the presence of dementia. Each participant was evaluated in his/her home, emphasizing clinically relevant findings. AD diagnosis of dementia followed the recommendations of the joint working group of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and the Stroke and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS/ADRDA) [54]. Although there are no consensus criteria for the clinical classification of mild cognitive impairment, the criteria used in the present study are compatible with those used by many others in the field to describe those persons who are not cognitively normal, but do not meet the accepted criteria for dementia [55,56,57,58,59,60]. Here, MCI was defined as persons rated as impaired on neuropsychological testing by the neuropsychologist but were not found to have dementia by the examining neurologist. Average time from the last clinical evaluation to death was ~ 8 months.

Clinical neuropsychological testing included Mini-Mental State Examination, global cognitive score, composite z-score compiled from 19 cognitive tests [61], and z-scores from episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, perceptual speed, and visuospatial tests. Postmortem neuropathology was performed as reported previously [15, 49,50,51, 53], which included Braak staging [62], NIA-Reagan criteria [63], and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) [64]. A board-certified neuropathologist excluded cases with other pathologies (e.g., cerebral amyloid angiopathy, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, hippocampal sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and large strokes) and those treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. The RROS neuropathology core includes the transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) [65] in their diagnosis. A similar detailed clinical and neuropathological evaluation were not available for the sAD cases.

Quantification of pathological lesions

Neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, and NFT counts were performed within a 1-mm2 area (×100 magnification) per neocortical region blinded to clinical data [66,67,68] using Bielschowsky silver stain and AT8 immunohistochemistry. Amyloid precursor protein (APP)/Aβ was used to analyze the Aβ load [69]. Standardized plaque and tangle counts from each area were converted to standard scores by dividing the standard deviation of mean raw counts per marker and region from the entire deceased cohort. Quantitation of amyloid load was performed by using images from Aβ labeled sections [69] to determine percent area occupied using Object-Image 1.62p15 [70].

Antibodies

Characteristics of primary and secondary antibodies used for immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence, and western blotting experiments are described in Table 2.

Table 2 Antibodies
Full size table

Western blotting

FC (Brodmann’s area 10) CHI3L1, CHI3L2, NPTX2, GFAP, C1q, Iba1, and CD44 protein levels were measured in 15 NCI, 15 MCI, 13 mAD, and 7 sAD samples [15]. Briefly, frozen samples were homogenized (150 mg/mL) in phosphate buffer containing protease inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and denatured in SDS loading buffer to a final concentration of 5 mg/ml. Proteins (50 μg/sample) were separated by SDS-PAGE (Lonza, Rockland, ME) and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore) [71]. Membranes were blocked in tris-buffered saline/0.05% Tween-20/5% milk (1 h) at room temperature (RT). Antibodies were added to blocking buffer and membranes incubated overnight (4 °C), washed, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody or goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody at room temperature (RT), visualized by chemiluminescence (Kodak Image Station 440CF; Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA), and quantified with Kodak 1. Protein signals were quantified and normalized to β-tubulin across groups in three independent experiments [71]. Controls consisted of either pre-absorption or deletion of the primary antibody.

Immunohistochemistry

Two 8-μm-thick paraffin-embedded FC sections were processed for immunocytochemistry to visualize inflammatory markers, NFTs, and plaques. We chose CHI3L1 as opposed to CHI3L2 for immunohistochemical staining since the commercial CHI3L2 antibodies failed to react with the human brain tissue. Briefly, sections were pretreated with either citric acid (pH = 6) for 20 min as antigen retrieval for the CHI3L1 antibody and 80% formic acid for the APP/Aβ (6E10) antibody. Afterward, sections were incubated with primary antibodies against rabbit anti-CHI3L1, rabbit anti-GFAP, rabbit anti-Iba1, and mouse anti-APP/Aβ or AT8 overnight at RT in a tris-buffered saline/0.25% Triton X-100/1% goat serum solution. After several washes in tris-buffered saline, tissue samples were incubated with a goat anti-rabbit/anti-mouse biotinylated secondary antibody, then incubated in Vectastain ABC kit (1 h) (Vector Labs) and developed in acetate-imidazole buffer containing 0.05% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Sigma, MO).

Dual immunostaining

After visualization of APP/Aβ (see above), the tissue was incubated with an avidin/biotin blocking kit (Vector Labs) and second primary antibody (rabbit anti-CHI3L1) overnight at RT [72]. The next day tissue was placed in the appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody for 1 h at RT, incubated in ABC kit solution, and developed in acetate-imidazole buffer containing 0.05% 3,3′-DAB and 1% of nickel ammonium sulfate (Sigma). Dual staining produced a two-colored profile: APP/Aβ (brown) and CHI3L1 (black). Immunohistochemical controls consisted of primary antibody omission resulting in the absence of immunoreactivity. Additional sections were stained with Gill’s hematoxylin (1 min) to identify cortical layers.

Immunofluorescence

Sections were double-labeled with a mouse anti-GFAP or anti-CD44 and a rabbit anti-CHI3L1 antibody overnight. The appropriate secondary antibody was applied [Cy3-donkey anti-rabbit IgG for CHI3L1 and Cy2-donkey anti-mouse IgM for GFAP] and incubated in a 0.1 thioflavin solution (10 min) to visualize aggregated amyloid. Auto-fluorescence was blocked with Auto-fluorescence Eliminator Reagent (Millipore) and sections cover-slipped with aqueous mounting media (Thermo Scientific). Dual immunofluorescence was visualized, and images were acquired using the Revolve Fluorescent Microscope (Echo Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA) with excitation filters 405, 489, and 555 nm for thioflavin, Cy2, and Cy3, respectively.

Quantitation of CHI3L1, GFAP, and Iba1 profiles

CHI3L1 and GFAP-immunoreactive (-ir) cell counts were performed in five random fields within an area of 0.14 mm2 per field in both gray matter and white matter (WM) in two sections from the same 15 NCI, and MCI, 14 mAD, and 5 sAD cases. APP/Aβ plaque loads and numbers and counts of AT8-positive cells within the gray matter were performed as above using tissue from the same cases. Counts of Iba1 profiles in gray matter and WM were evaluated in 6 cases/per clinical group. FC gray matter CHI3L1-ir cell counts were performed in the different cortical layers (I–II, III–IV, V–VI, and WM), while GFAP and Iba1 counts, were counted independent of cortical layer. All images and counts were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse 80i coupled with NIS-Elements Imaging software (Nikon Americas Inc., NY). Images were corrected for contrast and luminosity using Adobe Photoshop CS4 software (Adobe Systems Inc., CA).

Statistical analysis

Data evaluated across clinical groups used Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test followed by Conover-Inman, Holm-Šidák, Tukey, and Dunn’s post hoc tests for multiple comparisons and Spearman rank for correlations (Sigma Plot 12.5, Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). A false discovery rate was used to adjust for multiple comparisons between correlations. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed) and data graphically represented using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Demographic, cognitive, and neuropathological characteristics

RROS clinical groups did not differ by age, gender, education, postmortem interval, or brain weight. There were no significant differences in the number of cases carrying the ApoE ε4 allele. Mini-Mental State Examination score, global cognitive score, and perceptual speed were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in mAD compared to MCI and NCI cases. Episodic memory z-score was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in mAD compared t NCI, and the visuospatial z-score was significantly lower (p < 0.03) in mAD and MCI compared to that of NCI. Braak scores, CERAD, and NIA Reagan diagnosis did not differ among the clinical groups. Neuropathology revealed that 80% of NCI, 73.3% of MCI, and 50% of mAD cases were Braak stages III/IV. Using NIA-Reagan criteria, 100% of NCI, 86% of MCI, and 78.5% of mAD were classified as low to intermediate likelihood of AD. CERAD criteria revealed that 33.3% of NCI, 20% of MCI, and 50% of mAD cases were probable or definitive AD (Table 1).

The sAD cases averaged 78.33 ± 4.47 years of age at death (range 71–86 years), 5.55 ± 3.34 h for postmortem interval (range 2–12 h), 1122.72 ± 124 g (range 1320–980 g) brain weight, 58.3% were female and average MMSE was 2.2 (range 0–9).

FC amyloid plaque and NFT pathology

FC diffuse and neuritic plaques were observed in 69.2% of NCI, 53.3% of MCI, and 100% of mAD RROS cases, while only 23% of NCI, 35.71% of MCI, and 45.5% of mAD displayed NFTs. All severe AD cases displayed neuritic plaques and NFTs.

FC CHI3L1, GFAP, and Iba1 distribution and counts during AD progression

The topographic location of CHI3L1-ir cells was examined in FC white and gray matter across groups. In NCI (Fig. 1a, e, i, m), MCI (Fig. 1b, f, j, n) and mAD (Fig. 1c, g, k, o) numerous CHI3L1-ir astrocytes were observed in layers I and II and WM with lesser numbers in layers III–VI. Statistical analysis revealed that the number of CHI3L1-ir cells were significantly greater in all lamina and WM in sAD (Fig. 1d, h, l, p) compared to NCI (p < 0.01). In contrast, the numbers of Iba1-positive (Fig. 2a, b, e, p < 0.01) and GFAP-positive glial cells (Fig. 2c, d, f, p < 0.01) were significantly increased in MCI WM compared to that in NCI. In addition, WM Iba1-ir cells were significantly higher in mAD compared to NCI (Fig. 2e, p < 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a–h Photomicrographs showing immunolabeling for CHI3L1 in the frontal cortex (FC) layers I–II, III–IV, and V–VI as well as WM in NCI, MCI, mAD, and sAD cases. Note CHI3L-ir cells appear mainly in layer I–II and WM in NCI, MCI, and mAD, while in sAD cells were also observed in layers III–IV and V–VI. Insets show high-power images of CHI3L-ir cells (arrows) in panels a–d, h, and i–p. q Graphic representation displaying the average numbers of CHI3L1-ir cells in the FC layers and WM in NCI, MCI, mAD, and sAD. Note the significantly higher numbers of CHI3L1-ir-positive cells in all FC layers and WM in sAD compared to NCI (p = 0.003). The tissue in a, e, i, and m panels were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. Scale bar in panel p = 100 μm and inset = 10 μm, which applies to all other panels and insets in the figure. Abbreviations: NCI, no cognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; mAD, mild to moderate AD; sAD, severe AD

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Photomicrographs showing Iba1 immunoreactive (-ir) microglia (a, b) and GFAP-ir astrocytes (c, d) in FC WM in NCI (a, c) and MCI (b, d) cases. Note that many more Iba1-ir microglia and GFAP-ir astrocytes were observed in MCI than NCI. Insets show high-power images of Iba1-ir microglia (a, b) and GFAP-ir astrocytes (arrows) (c, d). e, f Graphic representations showing the average number of Iba1-ir microglia (e) and GFAP-ir astrocytes (f) in WM across clinical groups. The iba1-ir numbers were significantly higher in MCI and mAD compared to NCI (p < 0.01), whereas the GFAP-ir cell numbers were significantly higher in MCI compared to NCI (p = 0.003). Scale bars in panel d = 25 μm and 5 μm in inset d, which apply to all panels and insets in this figure. Abbreviations: NCI, non-cognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment

Full size image

Dual immunofluorescence revealed that not all GFAP-ir astrocytes associated with plaques were also CHI3L1-positive (Fig. 3a–f), indicating that CHI3L1 co-occurs within a subset of GFAP-ir astrocytes regardless of amyloid plaques. Although a similar cortical distribution of CHI3L1-ir cells and the adhesion surface astrocyte marker CD44 was seen, not all CHI3L1-ir astrocytes co-expressed CD44 across groups (Fig. 3g–i).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a–i Double immunofluorescent images show single CHI3L1 (a, d, g) (red), GFAP (b, e) (green), and CD44 (h) (green) labeling and merged (c, f, i) (orange) images in the FC in sAD. Plaques were stained with thioflavin (blue). Note that not all GFAP-positive astrocytes (white arrows) were CHI3L1-positive (g–i), and not all the CHI3L1-positive astrocytes (white arrow) were CD44-positive. Scale bar in c = 10 μm and applies to panels a and b, and 30μm scale bars in f and i also apply to d, e, g, and h

Full size image

Although not all CHI3L1-ir astrocytes were associated with amyloid plaques (Fig. 4a–c), CHI3L1-ir astrocytes in gray and WM were associated with blood vessels (Fig. 4d–f).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a–f Photomicrographs of astrocytes dual immunolabeled for CHI3L1 (blue/black) and APP/Aβ (brown) seen in plaques (a–c) as well as in areas without plaques (d–f) in sAD. Note that not all CHI3L1-positive astrocytes were associated with amyloid-positive plaques and blood vessels (arrows). Scale bar in e = 50 μm and applies to a, b, d. Scale bar in f = 100 μm and applies to c

Full size image

FC neuroinflammatory protein levels during the progression of AD

Although western blot analysis revealed no significant differences in FC CHI3L1 levels between groups, there was a trend towards an increase in AD (Fig. 5a). Conversely, CHI3L2 protein levels were significantly reduced between NCI and sAD (Fig. 5b, p < 0.01). GFAP levels were unchanged across groups (Fig. 5c), whereas CD44 protein levels were significantly increased in sAD than in NCI (Fig. 5d, p < 0.01). C1q and NPTX2 did not change across clinical groups (Fig. 5e, f). A subanalysis comparing protein levels between low (I–III) and high (IV–VI) Braak scores within each clinical group [73] found that NPTX2 levels were significantly higher in mAD cases with high rather than low Braak scores (p = 0.001).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Representative immunoblots and box plots showing FC levels of CHI3L1 (a), CHI3L2 (b), GFAP (c), CD44 (d), C1q (e), and NPTX2 (f) in NCI, MCI, mAD, and sAD. β-tubulin was used to normalize the immunoreactive signal obtained by densitometry. Statistical analysis revealed that CHI3L1, NPTX2, GFAP, and C1q protein levels were stable across clinical groups, whereas there was a significant decrease in CHI3L2 levels, and CD44 significantly increased in sAD compared to NCI (p = 0.001). Abbreviations: NCI, non-cognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; mAD, mild to moderate AD; sAD, severe AD

Full size image

Neuroinflammatory, clinical, and neuropathological associations

A significant correlation was found between CHI3L1 and C1q protein levels (Fig. 6a, r = 0.44, p = 0.004) and CHI3L1- and Iba1-ir cell numbers in WM (Fig. 6b, r = 0.61, p = 0.009) across NCI, MCI, and mAD. We found a significant correlation between NPTX2 and CHI3L1 protein levels across NCI and MCI (Fig. 6c, r = 0.54, p = 0.003), but not mAD. C1q and Iba1 (r = 0.57, p = 0.00005), CHI3L2 and CD44 (Fig. 6d, r = − 0.65, p = 0.00001), and GFAP and CD44 protein levels (r = − 0.49, p = 0.002) correlated across groups. Total numbers of amyloid plaque and NFTs did not correlate with CHI3L1, CHI3L2, GFAP, and C1q protein levels at any clinical stage. By contrast, we found a significant correlation between NPTX2 and total plaque load (r = − 0.46, p = 0.01) and diffuse plaque number (r = − 0.50, p = 0.007). In addition, a strong association was found between CHI3L2 and age (r = − 0.44, p = 0.0048) and CHI3L1- and Iba1-ir cell numbers were significantly correlated with episodic memory (CHI3L1, r = − 0.45, p = 0.003 and Iba1, r = − 0.66, p = 0.003) (Fig. 6e, f) and perceptual speed (CHI3L1, r = − 0.46, p = 0.002 and Iba1, r = − 0.69, p = 0.002) (Fig. 6g, h) across groups.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a, b Linear regression shows a significant correlation between CHI3L1 and C1q protein levels (a), Iba1-ir and CHI3L1-ir cell numbers (b) across NCI, MCI, and mAD. c A significant positive correlation was observed between CHI3L1 and NPTX2 (r = 0.054, p = 0.0003) protein levels across NCI and MCI, whereas a negative correlation was seen between CD44 and CHI3L2 (d, r = − 0.65, p < 0.0001) protein levels across the four clinical groups. In addition, positive correlations were observed between CHI3L1-ir (e, g) and Iba1-ir microglia cell numbers (f, h) with episodic memory (p = 0.003; e, f) and perceptual speed (p = 0.002; g, h) across NCI, MCI, and mAD. Abbreviations: NCI, noncognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; mAD, mild to moderate AD; sAD, severe AD

Full size image

Discussion

Although studies implicate chitinase proteins and NPTX2 in the pathogenesis of AD, their role in preclinical AD remains under-investigated. In the present study, we found that the numbers of FC CHI3L1-positive astrocytes, mainly in gray matter layers I and II and WM, were unchanged in MCI and mild AD, whereas in sAD, CHI3L1 cell numbers were significantly increased in all cortical layers and WM. Furthermore, FC CHI3L1 protein levels showed a positive trend to increase during disease progression, whereas CHI3L2 was significantly reduced in sAD compared to NCI. In contrast, others have shown that protein and RNA levels for these chitinases were increased in the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, superior frontal gyrus, primary visual cortex, middle temporal gyrus, and posterior cingulate cortex in advanced AD compared to age-matched controls [74]. These observations, when taken together, suggest that chitinase levels vary between cortical regions, perhaps related to the extent and type of AD pathology. Although several studies revealed an increase in CSF CHI3L1 levels, which correlated with CSF markers for tau and amyloid in AD [75, 76], we did not find a correlation between CHI3L1 levels/counts and neuritic and diffuse plaques or NFTs. Similar to that in other reports [77], we observed CHI3L1-positive astrocytes in close apposition to amyloid plaques in MCI and AD. However, many CHI3L1-ir astrocytes were independent of plaque pathology, suggesting that amyloid is not a necessary precondition for the onset of CHI3L1 expression in astrocytes. Moreover, we demonstrated that CHI3L1 was present in a subset of GFAP astrocytes, but neither CHI3L1 nor CHI3L2 protein levels were related to GFAP during the progression AD. In addition, GFAP levels correlated with the astrocytic surface glycoprotein adhesion molecule CD44 and the latter negatively correlated with CHI3L2. Both CHI3L2 and CD44 showed opposite effects that reached significant levels in later stages of AD.

Interestingly, cortical CD44 was reported in a subset of astrocytes in FC layers I–II and WM in humans without cognitive impairment [78], similar to the CHI3L1 distribution observed in the present NCI cases. Although the distributions of CD44-positive and CHI3L1-positive astrocytes were similar, these two astrocytic markers did not colocalize. A previous study reported that CD44-positive astrocytes were increased and associated with Aβ plaques in AD [79]. In the present study, although astrocytes surrounding plaques expressed GFAP, not all GFAP-positive astrocytes displayed CHI3L1 or CD44. Functionally, CD44 and chitinase-like proteins are implicated in nervous system development, homeostasis, repair, and response to injury [80, 81] and have the same natural ligand, hyaluronan, a component of the extracellular matrix [82]. Since we found a strong correlation between CHI3L2 and CD44 during disease progression, we speculate that the expression of these markers in astrocytes is linked to extracellular matrix disturbances. The exact mechanism that triggers the expression of these inflammatory markers and their relationship with amyloid in AD requires further investigation.

We found that NPTX2 correlated negatively with plaque load and was significantly higher in mAD cases with high Braak scores. Interestingly, toxic, soluble Aβ oligomers disrupt glutamatergic synaptic function that leads to cognitive deficits [83,84,85]. NPTX2 also occurs in cortical pyramidal neurons, which are severely affected by tau aggregation in AD [86, 87], suggesting a role for NPTX2 in NFT formation. These observations and the present findings of a negative correlation between NPTX2 levels and plaque load, suggests that Aβ deposition modifies NPTX2 production. The significant correlation between CHI3L1 and NPTX2 in MCI and NCI suggests an interaction between astrocytes and neurons during the early stage of cognitive decline. Interestingly, changes in CSF CHI3L1 and NPTX2 levels are potential biomarkers for AD [88, 89] and MCI [22].

Here, we report a correlation between CHI3L1 and C1q protein levels in early AD. C1q is the first component of the complement pathway [90], and microglia and astrocytes are sources of C1q in the AD brain [91, 92]. Complement-associated factors are implicated in pathogen presentation, neurodegeneration, and microglia resolution of tissue injury [93]. Here, we found a strong correlation between C1q and microglia Iba1 protein levels during AD progression. Microglia activation, associated with high Iba1 levels that modulate synapse loss [94] and microglia reactivity, maybe related to the induction of pro-inflammatory genes and the expression of complement-associated factors following neuronal death [95]. Perhaps, microglia activation together with C1q expression activates CHI3L1 in astrocytes, which in turn plays a role in neuronal repair during AD progression.

We found a significant increase in Iba1 and GFAP profile numbers in the WM in MCI compared to NCI. We also observed a strong negative correlation between CHI3L1-positive astrocytes and Iba1-positive microglia numbers and perceptual speed and episodic memory [96] in early AD, indicating an association between WM degeneration and early memory deficits in AD [97,98,99,100]. Since CHI3L1 is highly expressed in WM perivascular astrocytes [101] and is implicated in angiogenesis [102], it is possible that it plays a role in blood vessel conservation and remodeling during disease onset.

Furthermore, hypoperfusion induced by small-vessel disruption leads to degeneration of astrocytes and fibrosis of the extracellular matrix [103]. Since blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction is related to WM damage [104] and CHI3L1 is related to BBB disruption [105], we suggest that increased CHI3L1 expression in perivascular astrocytes is an attempt to remodel the blood vasculature. Perhaps a breakdown of the BBB increases CSF CHI3L1 levels, which in turn is related to cognitive dysfunction in preclinical AD [106].

The present study found a relationship between CHI3L1 and NPTX2 levels in the onset AD, further supporting CSF levels of these proteins as biomarkers for AD [88, 89] and MCI [22]. NPTX2 levels marked MCI conversion to AD [107], improved diagnostic classification of AD, and predicted cognitive performance in MCI and AD [108]. Together, these observations suggest that CHI3L1 and NPTX2 should be considered as novel biomarkers to improve the diagnosis and prediction of cognitive decline during the progression of AD.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated that both FC CHI3L1-ir astrocytic number and CHI3L2 and CD44 protein levels were altered in sAD. However, white matter Iba1- and GFAP-ir cell numbers were increased in MCI. Additionally, white matter CHI3L1- and Iba1-ir glial cell numbers were associated with cognitive performance during disease progression. These results suggest that WM inflammation occurs earlier than in gray matter and CHI3L1 plays a critical role in WM neuroinflammation associated with cognitive decline in AD.

Availability of data and materials

The conclusions in the manuscript are supported by the data presented in the text and figures.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

Aβ:

Amyloid beta

C1q:

Complement component 1q

CERAD:

Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease

CHI3L1 (or YKL-40 or HC gp-39):

Chitinase 3-like 1

CHI3L2 (or YKL-39):

Chitinase 3-like 2

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

FC:

Frontal cortex

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Iba1:

Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1

-ir:

-Immunoreactive

mAD:

Mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

NCI:

Nocognitive impairment

NFT:

Neurofibrillary tangle

NPTX2 (or Narp):

Pentraxin II

RT:

Room temperature

sAD:

Severe Alzheimer’s disease

TREM2:

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2

WM:

White matter

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2016 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2016;12:459–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, Prina AM, Winblad B, Jonsson L, Liu Z, Prince M. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017;13:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salat DH, Kaye JA, Janowsky JS. Selective preservation and degeneration within the prefrontal cortex in aging and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, Andrews-Hanna JR, Sperling RA, Johnson KA. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1860–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Shannon BJ, LaRossa G, Sachs R, Fotenos AF, Sheline YI, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Morris JC, Mintun MA. Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7709–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrade S, Ramalho MJ, Loureiro JA, Pereira MDC. Natural compounds for Alzheimer’s disease therapy: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naseri NN, Wang H, Guo J, Sharma M, Luo W. The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2019;705:183–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, Cole GM, Cooper NR, Eikelenboom P, Emmerling M, Fiebich BL, Finch CE, Frautschy S, Griffin WS, Hampel H, Hull M, Landreth G, Lue L, Mrak R, Mackenzie IR, McGeer PL, O'Banion MK, Pachter J, Pasinetti G, Plata-Salaman C, Rogers J, Rydel R, Shen Y, Streit W, Strohmeyer R, Tooyoma I, Van Muiswinkel FL, Veerhuis R, Walker D, Webster S, Wegrzyniak B, Wenk G, Wyss-Coray T. Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:383–421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheng JG, Mrak RE, Griffin WS. S100 beta protein expression in Alzheimer disease: potential role in the pathogenesis of neuritic plaques. J Neurosci Res. 1994;39:398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaur D, Sharma V, Deshmukh R. Activation of microglia and astrocytes: a roadway to neuroinflammation and Alzheimer's disease. Inflammopharmacology. 2019;27:663–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boublay N, Federico D, Pesce A, Verny M, Blanc F, Paccalin M, Desmidt T, Grosmaitre P, Moreaud O, Relland S, Bravant E, Bouet R, Krolak-Salmon P. Study protocol on Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: focus on clinical and imaging predictive markers in co-existing lesions. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tarkowski E, Liljeroth AM, Minthon L, Tarkowski A, Wallin A, Blennow K. Cerebral pattern of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in dementias. Brain Res Bull. 2003;61:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin MR, Daugherty J, Reed GW, Standaert SM, Hutchins SS, Hutcheson RH, Schaffner W. Immunization coverage among infants enrolled in the Tennessee Medicaid program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:559–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin WS, Stanley LC, Ling C, White L, MacLeod V, Perrot LJ, White CL, Araoz C. Brain interleukin 1 and S-100 immunoreactivity are elevated in Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:7611–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez SE, Nadeem M, He B, Miguel JC, Malek-Ahmadi MH, Chen K, Mufson EJ. Neocortical and hippocampal TREM2 protein levels during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;54:133–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Y, Liu W, Wang X. TREM2 variants and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2015;36:1881–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen Y, Yang L, Li R. What does complement do in Alzheimer’s disease? Old molecules with new insights. Transl Neurodegener. 2013;2:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Itagaki S, McGeer PL, Akiyama H, Zhu S, Selkoe D. Relationship of microglia and astrocytes to amyloid deposits of Alzheimer disease. J.Neuroimmunol. 1989;24:173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Fu Z, Meng L, He M, Zhang Z. The early events that initiate beta-amyloid aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Meraz-Rios MA, Toral-Rios D, Franco-Bocanegra D, Villeda-Hernandez J, Campos-Pena V. Inflammatory process in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013;7:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lomiguen C, Vidal L, Kozlowski P, Prancan A, Stern R. Possible role of chitin-like proteins in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66:439–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiao MF, Xu D, Craig MT, Pelkey KA, Chien CC, Shi Y, Zhang J, Resnick S, Pletnikova O, Salmon D, Brewer J, Edland S, Wegiel J, Tycko B, Savonenko A, Reeves RH, Troncoso JC, McBain CJ, Galasko D, Worley PF. NPTX2 and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Elife. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23798.

  23. Liu T, Larionova I, Litviakov N, Riabov V, Zavyalova M, Tsyganov M, Buldakov M, Song B, Moganti K, Kazantseva P, Slonimskaya E, Kremmer E, Flatley A, Kluter H, Cherdyntseva N, Kzhyshkowska J. Tumor-associated macrophages in human breast cancer produce new monocyte attracting and pro-angiogenic factor YKL-39 indicative for increased metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1436922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pouyafar A, Heydarabad MZ, Mahboob S, Mokhtarzadeh A, Rahbarghazi R. Angiogenic potential of YKL-40 in the dynamics of tumor niche. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;100:478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall S, Surova Y, Ohrfelt A, Swedish BioFINDER Study, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Hansson O. Longitudinal measurements of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31:898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonneh-Barkay D, Zagadailov P, Zou H, Niyonkuru C, Figley M, Starkey A, Wang G, Bissel SJ, Wiley CA, Wagner AK. YKL-40 expression in traumatic brain injury: an initial analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1215–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanfilippo C, Nunnari G, Calcagno A, Malaguarnera L, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Di Rosa M. The chitinases expression is related to simian immunodeficiency virus encephalitis (SIVE) and in HIV encephalitis (HIVE). Virus Res. 2017;227:220–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiley CA, Bonneh-Barkay D, Dixon CE, Lesniak A, Wang G, Bissel SJ, Kochanek PM. Role for mammalian chitinase 3-like protein 1 in traumatic brain injury. Neuropathology. 2015;35:95–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hakansson I, Tisell A, Cassel P, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Lundberg P, Dahle C, Vrethem M, Ernerudh J. Neurofilament levels, disease activity and brain volume during follow-up in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:209–018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonneh-Barkay D, Bissel SJ, Wang G, Fish KN, Nicholl GC, Darko SW, Medina-Flores R, Murphey-Corb M, Rajakumar PA, Nyaundi J, Mellors JW, Bowser R, Wiley CA. YKL-40, a marker of simian immunodeficiency virus encephalitis, modulates the biological activity of basic fibroblast growth factor. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:130–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mollgaard M, Degn M, Sellebjerg F, Frederiksen JL, Modvig S. Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase-3-like 2 and chitotriosidase are potential prognostic biomarkers in early multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boesen MS, Jensen PEH, Magyari M, Born AP, Uldall PV, Blinkenberg M, Sellebjerg F. Increased cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 and neurofilament light chain in pediatric acquired demyelinating syndromes. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;24:175–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Swanson A, Wolf T, Sitzmann A, Willette AA. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: pleiotropic roles for cytokines and neuronal pentraxins. Behav Brain Res. 2018;347:49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Park JE, Choi KY, Kim BC, Choi SM, Song MK, Lee JJ, Kim J, Song HC, Kim HW, Ha JM, Seo EH, Song WK, Park SG, Lee JS, Lee KH. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2019;9:100–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bjerke M, Engelborghs S. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for early and differential Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62:1199–209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang H, Ng KP, Therriault J, Kang MS, Pascoal TA, Rosa-Neto P, Gauthier S, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau, visinin-like protein-1, and chitinase-3-like protein 1 in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2018;7:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kester MI, Teunissen CE, Sutphen C, Herries EM, Ladenson JH, Xiong C, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Morris JC, Holtzman DM, Fagan AM. Cerebrospinal fluid VILIP-1 and YKL-40, candidate biomarkers to diagnose, predict and monitor Alzheimer’s disease in a memory clinic cohort. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonneh-Barkay D, Wang G, Starkey A, Hamilton RL, Wiley CA. In vivo CHI3L1 (YKL-40) expression in astrocytes in acute and chronic neurological diseases. J Neuroinflammation. 2010;7:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Garlanda C, Bottazzi B, Salvatori G, De Santis R, Cotena A, Deban L, Maina V, Moalli F, Doni A, Veliz-Rodriguez T, Mantovani A. Pentraxins in innate immunity and inflammation. Novartis Found Symp. 2006;279:80–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Garlanda C, Bottazzi B, Bastone A, Mantovani A. Pentraxins at the crossroads between innate immunity, inflammation, matrix deposition, and female fertility. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:337–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu D, Hopf C, Reddy R, Cho RW, Guo L, Lanahan A, Petralia RS, Wenthold RJ, O'Brien RJ, Worley P. Narp and NP1 form heterocomplexes that function in developmental and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2003;39:513–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. O'Brien RJ, Xu D, Petralia RS, Steward O, Huganir RL, Worley P. Synaptic clustering of AMPA receptors by the extracellular immediate-early gene product Narp. Neuron. 1999;23:309–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Miskimon M, Han S, Lee JJ, Ringkamp M, Wilson MA, Petralia RS, Dong X, Worley PF, Baraban JM, Reti IM. Selective expression of Narp in primary nociceptive neurons: role in microglia/macrophage activation following nerve injury. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;274:86–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Swanson A, Willette AA. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuronal pentraxin 2 predicts medial temporal atrophy and memory decline across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;58:201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Melah KE, Lu SY, Hoscheidt SM, Alexander AL, Adluru N, Destiche DJ, Carlsson CM, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Okonkwo OC, Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Bratzke LC, Rowley HA, Sager MA, Asthana S, Johnson SC, Bendlin BB. Cerebrospinal fluid markers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology and microglial activation are associated with altered white matter microstructure in asymptomatic adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50:873–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Calsolaro V, Edison P. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:719–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Geng B, Pan J, Zhao T, Ji J, Zhang C, Che Y, Yang J, Shi H, Li J, Zhou H, Mu X, Xu C, Wang C, Xu Y, Liu Z, Wen H, You Q. Chitinase 3-like 1-CD44 interaction promotes metastasis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through beta-catenin/Erk/Akt signaling in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:208–018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Uberti D, Cenini G, Bonini SA, Barcikowska M, Styczynska M, Szybinska A, Memo M. Increased CD44 gene expression in lymphocytes derived from Alzheimer disease patients. Neurodegener Dis. 2010;7:143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Perez SE, Getova DP, He B, Counts SE, Geula C, Desire L, Coutadeur S, Peillon H, Ginsberg SD, Mufson EJ. Rac1b increases with progressive tau pathology within cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:526–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Schmitt FA, Nelson PT, Abner E, Scheff S, Jicha GA, Smith C, Cooper G, Mendiondo M, Danner DD, Van Eldik LJ, Caban-Holt A, Lovell MA, Kryscio RJ. University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown healthy brain aging volunteers: donor characteristics, procedures and neuropathology. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:724–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Davis DG, Schmitt FA, Wekstein DR, Markesbery WR. Alzheimer neuropathologic alterations in aged cognitively normal subjects. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:376–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS. Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions. Neurology. 2005;64:834–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mufson EJ, Chen EY, Cochran EJ, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Kordower JH. Entorhinal cortex beta-amyloid load in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Exp Neurol. 1999;158:469–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rubin EH, Morris JC, Grant EA, Vendegna T. Very mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. I. Clinical assessment. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:379–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Schaid DJ, Thibodeau SN, Kokmen E, Waring SC, Kurland LT. Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer’s disease in memory-impaired individuals. JAMA. 1995;273:1274–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ebly EM, Hogan DB, Parhad IM. Cognitive impairment in the nondemented elderly. Results from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:612–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Devanand DP, Folz M, Gorlyn M, Moeller JR, Stern Y. Questionable dementia: clinical course and predictors of outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Albert M, Smith LA, Scherr PA, Taylor JO, Evans DA, Funkenstein HH. Use of brief cognitive tests to identify individuals in the community with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 1991;57:167–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Flicker C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B. Mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: predictors of dementia. Neurology. 1991;41:1006–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mufson EJ, He B, Nadeem M, Perez SE, Counts SE, Leurgans S, Fritz J, Lah J, Ginsberg SD, Wuu J, Scheff SW. Hippocampal proNGF signaling pathways and beta-amyloid levels in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. JNeuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;71:1018–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82:239–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Newell KL, Hyman BT, Growdon JH, Hedley-Whyte ET. Application of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-Reagan Institute criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:1147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mirra SS. The CERAD neuropathology protocol and consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a commentary. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S91–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Hyman BT, National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer’s Association. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mufson EJ, Binder L, Counts SE, DeKosky ST, de Toledo-Morrell L, Ginsberg SD, Ikonomovic MD, Perez SE, Scheff SW. Mild cognitive impairment: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:13–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Kelly JF, Aggarwal NT, Shah RC, Wilson RS. Neuropathology of older persons without cognitive impairment from two community-based studies. Neurology. 2006;66:1837–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:378–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mufson EJ, Malek-Ahmadi M, Snyder N, Ausdemore J, Chen K, Perez SE. Braak stage and trajectory of cognitive decline in noncognitively impaired elders. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;43:101–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Mitchell TW, Nissanov J, Han LY, Mufson EJ, Schneider JA, Cochran EJ, Bennett DA, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Arnold SE. Novel method to quantify neuropil threads in brains from elders with or without cognitive impairment. J Histochem Cytochem. 2000;48:1627–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Perez SE, He B, Nadeem M, Wuu J, Scheff SW, Abrahamson EE, Ikonomovic MD, Mufson EJ. Resilience of precuneus neurotrophic signaling pathways despite amyloid pathology in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:693–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Querol-Vilaseca M, Colom-Cadena M, Pegueroles J, San Martin-Paniello C, Clarimon J, Belbin O, Fortea J, Lleo A. YKL-40 (chitinase 3-like I) is expressed in a subset of astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:118–017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mufson EJ, Malek-Ahmadi M, Perez SE, Chen K. Braak staging, plaque pathology, and APOE status in elderly persons without cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;37:147–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sanfilippo C, Malaguarnera L, Di Rosa M. Chitinase expression in Alzheimer’s disease and non-demented brains regions. J Neurol Sci. 2016;369:242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Muszynski P, Groblewska M, Kulczynska-Przybik A, Kulakowska A, Mroczko B. YKL-40 as a potential biomarker and a possible target in therapeutic strategies of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;15:906–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Muszynski P, Kulczynska-Przybik A, Borawska R, Litman-Zawadzka A, Slowik A, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Pera J, Dziedzic T, Mroczko B. The relationship between markers of inflammation and degeneration in the central nervous system and the blood-brain barrier impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59:903–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Llorens F, Thune K, Tahir W, Kanata E, Diaz-Lucena D, Xanthopoulos K, Kovatsi E, Pleschka C, Garcia-Esparcia P, Schmitz M, Ozbay D, Correia S, Correia A, Milosevic I, Andreoletti O, Fernandez-Borges N, Vorberg IM, Glatzel M, Sklaviadis T, Torres JM, Krasemann S, Sanchez-Valle R, Ferrer I, Zerr I. YKL-40 in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of neurodegenerative dementias. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12:83–017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Sosunov AA, Wu X, Tsankova NM, Guilfoyle E, McKhann GM, Goldman JE. Phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of isocortical and hippocampal astrocytes in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2014;34:2285–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Akiyama H, Tooyama I, Kawamata T, Ikeda K, McGeer PL. Morphological diversities of CD44 positive astrocytes in the cerebral cortex of normal subjects and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 1993;632:249–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kognole AA, Payne CM. Inhibition of mammalian glycoprotein YKL-40: identification of the physiological ligand. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:2624–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Toole BP. Hyaluronan-CD44 interactions in cancer: paradoxes and possibilities. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7462–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Dauth S, Grevesse T, Pantazopoulos H, Campbell PH, Maoz BM, Berretta S, Parker KK. Extracellular matrix protein expression is brain region dependent. J Comp Neurol. 2016;524:1309–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Klein WL, Krafft GA, Finch CE. Targeting small Abeta oligomers: the solution to an Alzheimer’s disease conundrum? Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:219–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hsia AY, Masliah E, McConlogue L, Yu GQ, Tatsuno G, Hu K, Kholodenko D, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA, Mucke L. Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3228–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Lambert MP, Barlow AK, Chromy BA, Edwards C, Freed R, Liosatos M, Morgan TE, Rozovsky I, Trommer B, Viola KL, Wals P, Zhang C, Finch CE, Krafft GA, Klein WL. Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1-42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:6448–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Lee SJ, Wei M, Zhang C, Maxeiner S, Pak C, Calado Botelho S, Trotter J, Sterky FH, Sudhof TC. Presynaptic neuronal pentraxin receptor organizes excitatory and inhibitory synapses. J Neurosci. 2017;37:1062–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Khatoon S, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K. Levels of normal and abnormally phosphorylated tau in different cellular and regional compartments of Alzheimer disease and control brains. FEBS Lett. 1994;351:80–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Bos I, Vos S, Verhey F, Scheltens P, Teunissen C, Engelborghs S, Sleegers K, Frisoni G, Blin O, Richardson JC, Bordet R, Tsolaki M, Popp J, Peyratout G, Martinez-Lage P, Tainta M, Lleo A, Johannsen P, Freund-Levi Y, Frolich L, Vandenberghe R, Westwood S, Dobricic V, Barkhof F, Legido-Quigley C, Bertram L, Lovestone S, Streffer J, Andreasson U, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Visser PJ. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration, synaptic integrity, and astroglial activation across the clinical Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:644–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Zetterberg H, Skillback T, Mattsson N, Trojanowski JQ, Portelius E, Shaw LM, Weiner MW, Blennow K. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Association of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light concentration with Alzheimer disease progression. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Reid KBM. Complement component C1q: historical perspective of a functionally versatile, and structurally unusual, serum protein. Front Immunol. 2018;9:764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Goetzl EJ, Schwartz JB, Abner EL, Jicha GA, Kapogiannis D. High complement levels in astrocyte-derived exosomes of Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:544–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Luchena C, Zuazo-Ibarra J, Alberdi E, Matute C, Capetillo-Zarate E. Contribution of neurons and glial cells to complement-mediated synapse removal during development, aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2018;2018:2530414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Holers VM. Complement and its receptors: new insights into human disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:433–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S, Merry KM, Shi Q, Rosenthal A, Barres BA, Lemere CA, Selkoe DJ, Stevens B. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science. 2016;352:712–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Kraft AD, McPherson CA, Harry GJ. Association between microglia, inflammatory factors, and complement with loss of hippocampal mossy fiber synapses induced by Trimethyltin. Neurotox Res. 2016;30:53–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Gold CA, Budson AE. Memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for development of therapeutics. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8:1879–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Racine AM, Adluru N, Alexander AL, Christian BT, Okonkwo OC, Oh J, Cleary CA, Birdsill A, Hillmer AT, Murali D, Barnhart TE, Gallagher CL, Carlsson CM, Rowley HA, Dowling NM, Asthana S, Sager MA, Bendlin BB, Johnson SC. Associations between white matter microstructure and amyloid burden in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a multimodal imaging investigation. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;4:604–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Molinuevo JL, Ripolles P, Simo M, Llado A, Olives J, Balasa M, Antonell A, Rodriguez-Fornells A, Rami L. White matter changes in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion tensor imaging study on cognitively normal older people with positive amyloid beta protein 42 levels. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:2671–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Heise V, Filippini N, Ebmeier KP, Mackay CE. The APOE varepsilon4 allele modulates brain white matter integrity in healthy adults. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:908–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ji F, Pasternak O, Ng KK, Chong JSX, Liu S, Zhang L, Shim HY, Loke YM, Tan BY, Venketasubramanian N, Chen CL, Zhou JH. White matter microstructural abnormalities and default network degeneration are associated with early memory deficit in Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4749–019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Nishikawa KC, Millis AJ. gp38k (CHI3L1) is a novel adhesion and migration factor for vascular cells. Exp Cell Res. 2003;287:79–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Shi Y, Song Y, Liu P, Li P. YKL-40 can promote angiogenesis in sporadic cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM). J Clin Neurosci. 2019;64:220–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Rosenberg GA. Extracellular matrix inflammation in vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131:425–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Wallin A, Sjogren M, Edman A, Blennow K, Regland B. Symptoms, vascular risk factors and blood-brain barrier function in relation to CT white-matter changes in dementia. Eur Neurol. 2000;44:229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. da Fonseca AC, Matias D, Garcia C, Amaral R, Geraldo LH, Freitas C, Lima FR. The impact of microglial activation on blood-brain barrier in brain diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Lleo A, Alcolea D, Martinez-Lage P, Scheltens P, Parnetti L, Poirier J, Simonsen AH, Verbeek MM, Rosa-Neto P, Slot RER, Tainta M, Izaguirre A, Reijs BLR, Farotti L, Tsolaki M, Vandenbergue R, Freund-Levi Y, Verhey FRJ, Clarimon J, Fortea J, Frolich L, Santana I, Molinuevo JL, Lehmann S, Visser PJ, Teunissen CE, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid biomarker trajectories along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum in the BIOMARKAPD study. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:742–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Smirnov D, Salmon DP, Edland SD, Vanmechelen E, Vanderstichele HM, De Wit N, Vanbrabant J, Jacobs D, Xu D, Xiao M-F, Worley PF, Galasko DR. CSF Biomarkers of amyloid, tau and synaptic damage (Neurogranin, SNAP25) and interneuron-dependent synaptic homeostasis (NPTX2) in CSF As predictors of cognitive progression in MCI and AD. ISTAART Alzheimers Dement. 2019. AAIC Abstract ID 33762.

  108. Galasko DR, Smirnov D, Salmon DP, De Wit N, Jacobs D, Vanbrabant J, Vanmechelen E, Vanderstichele HM, Xu D, Xiao M-F, Worley PF. CSF Biomarkers of Synaptic Damage (Neurogranin, SNAP25) and interneuron-dependent synaptic homeostasis (NPTX2) improve diagnostic classification of MCI and AD and correlate with cognition. ISTAART Alzheimers Dement. 2019. AAIC Abstract ID 33463.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the nuns, priests, and brothers from across the country that participated in the Rush Religious Orders Study and the staff of the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center. The authors thank the staff of the Neuroscience Publications at Barrow Neurological Institute for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Role of funding body in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and writing of the manuscript

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers P01AG14449, R01AG043375, P30AG010161, P30AG019610], Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium at Barrow Neurological Institute, and Barrow Neurological Institute Barrow and Beyond and Fine Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology and Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W. Thomas Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA

    Marta Moreno-Rodriguez, Sylvia E. Perez, Muhammad Nadeem & Elliott J. Mufson

  2. Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Michael Malek-Ahmadi

Authors
  1. Marta Moreno-Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvia E. Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Nadeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Malek-Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elliott J. Mufson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MMR and SEP designed the study, MMR and MN performed the experiments, and MMR and MMA performed the statistical data analysis. MMR generated the figures and wrote the manuscript. SEP and EJM provided advice in the design of the study, interpretation of data, and edited the manuscript. EJM provided support for the project. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliott J. Mufson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Human Research Committees of Rush University Medical Center approved this study, and informed consent for research and autopsy was obtained from the Rush Religious Orders Study participants, families, or guardians.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno-Rodriguez, M., Perez, S.E., Nadeem, M. et al. Frontal cortex chitinase and pentraxin neuroinflammatory alterations during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 17, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1723-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1723-x

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094