Abstract
The glasses of the composition \(25\hbox {CaO}\)–\(10({\hbox {M}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3})\)–\(14{\hbox {P}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{5}\)–\( 50{\hbox {B}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}{:} \! 1{\hbox {Er}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) (where M = Bi/Sb/Y) are prepared. The prepared samples are characterized by XRD, thermoluminescence (TL), UV and photoluminescence (PL) techniques. TL reports suggest that the sample of 10 mol% \({\hbox {Y}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) concentration (\(\hbox {E}_{\mathrm{Y}}\)) exhibiting good shape symmetry factor (\({{u}} = 0.484\)) and low AEs (\(E_{\tau } = 1.189\), \(E_\delta = 1.218\) and \(E_{\omega } = 1.210\)) under \(\gamma \)-irradiation might be a good TL asset. The optical absorptions of present glasses are studied well through the Judd–Ofelt theory. The evaluations such as Judd–Ofelt parameters are additionally projected. They are found to be the best (\({\Omega }_{2} = 1.62 \times 10^{-21} \, {\hbox {cm}}^{2}\), \({\Omega }_{4} = 1.56 \times 10^{-21} \, {\hbox {cm}}^{2}\) and \({\Omega }_{6} = 0.59 \times 10^{-21} \, {\hbox {cm}}^{2}\)) for the sample of 10 mol% \({\hbox {Y}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) concentration (\(\hbox {E}_{\mathrm{Y}}\)), which may be a good optical asset to develop a novel class of laser resources. The radiative evolutions corresponding to the emissive transition \({}^{4}{\hbox {S}}_{3/2} \rightarrow {}^{4} {\hbox {I}}_{15/2}\) are assessed by PL technique. The evaluations are found to be the best (\(A_{\mathrm{t}} = 7089 \, {\hbox {s}}^{-1}\), \(\tau _{\mathrm{rad}} = 140 \, \upmu \hbox {s}\) and \(\beta = 96.1\%\)) for the sample of 10 mol% \({\hbox {Y}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) concentration (\(\hbox {E}_{\mathrm{Y}}\)), which may be a useful luminescent resource.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sanyal B, Natarajan V, Chawla S P and Sharma A 2010 Radiat. Meas. 45 899
Hashim S, Alajerami Y S M, Ramli A T, Ghoshal S K, Saleh M A, Abdul Kadir A B et al 2014 Appl. Rad. Isot. 91 126
Timar-Gabor A, Ivascu C, Vasiliniuc S, Daraban L, Ardelean I, Cosma C et al 2011 Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69 780
Clark R A, David Robertson J and Schwantes J M 2013 Radiat. Meas. 59 270
Osorio E, Gutierrez O D, Paucar C G and Hadad C Z 2009 J. Lumin. 129 657
Swamy B J R S, Sanyal B, Vijay R, Ramesh Babu P and Krishna Rao D 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 3707
Gu M, Gao Q C, Huang S M, Liu X L, Liu B and Ni C 2012 J. Lumin. 132 2531
Kir’yanov A V, Minkovich V P, Barmenkov Y O, Gamez M A M and Martinez-Rios A 2005 J. Lumin. 111 1
Ravi Kumar G, Srikumar T, Rao M C, Venkat Reddy P and Srinivasa Rao Ch 2018 Mater. Res. Exp. 5 035203
Ravi Kumar G, Srikumar T, Rao M C, Venkat Reddy P and Srinivasa Rao Ch 2018 Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 161 250
Amritphale S S, Anshul A, Chandra N and Ramakrishnan N 2007 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 4639
Venkateswara Rao G, Veeraiah N and Yadagiri Reddy P 2003 Opt. Mater. 22 295
Elkholy M M 2003 Mater. Chem. Phys. 77 321
Depci T, Ozbayoglu G and Yilmaz A 2011 J. Rare Earths 29 618
Huston A L, Justus B L and Johnson T L 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 3377
Bos A J J, Dorenbos P, Bessière A, Lecointre A, Bedu M, Bettinelli M et al 2011 Radiat. Meas. 46 1410
Raghava Rao P, Murali Krishna G, Brik M G, Gandhi Y and Veeraiah N 2011 J. Lumin. 131 212
ASTM Standard 51956 2005 (E) Standard practice for use of thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) systems for radiation processing
Moorthy L R, Rao T S, Jayasimhadri M, Radhapathy A and Murthy D V R 2004 Spectrochim. Acta A 60 2449
Srinivasa Rao A, Rupa B, Rao V, Prasad M V V K S, Shanmukha Kumar J V, Jayasimhadri M et al 2009 Physica B 404 3717
Walsh B M 2006 in: B Di Bartolo and O Forte (eds) Advances in spectroscopy for lasers and sensing (Amsterdam: Springer)
Al-Hilli M F, Kalid T and Al-Rasoul T 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 5855
Acknowledgements
The SNIST management is thanked for providing an internal research development project to carry out the present research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, G.R., Rao, C.S. Influence of \({\hbox {Bi}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\), \({\hbox {Sb}}_{2} \hbox {O}_{3}\) and \({\hbox {Y}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) on optical properties of \({\hbox {Er}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\)-doped \(\hbox {CaO}\)–\({\hbox {P}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{5} \)–\( {\hbox {B}}_{2} {\hbox {O}}_{3}\) glasses. Bull Mater Sci 43, 71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1996-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1996-9