Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies on the tibial posterior slope—a study of two hundred seventy-nine cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There are two established techniques for high tibial valgisation osteotomy (HTO): medial open wedge (MOW) and lateral closed wedge (LCW). The aim was to analyze the change of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) caused by HTOs dependent on the technique.

Methods

Four hundred fourteen cases of HTOs were analyzed retrospectively. Two hundred seventy-nine osteotomies in 247 patients matched the inclusion criteria and were divided into two treatment groups (MOW/LCW). The PTS was determined on pre- and post-surgical lateral knee X-rays by measuring the proximal posterior tibial angle (PPTA).

Results

One hundred ninety of the included 279 cases were assigned to the MOW and 89 to the LCW group. The mean PPTA in MOW HTOs was 79.9° ± 32° (68–88°) and in LCW HTOs 80.6° ± 2.6° (74–88°). There was no statistically significant change of the PPTA in the MOW group comparing the pre- and post-surgical values (delta PPTA 0.07° ±2.9° (− 12 to 11°)). In the LCW group, the surgery resulted in a statistically significant reduction (p< 0.001) of the PTS (delta PPTA − 3.09° ± 4.5° (− 12 to 5°)).

Conclusion

The important finding of this study is that the thesis of a slope increase in MOW osteotomies found in the literature could not be approved regarding our results as no statistically significant change of PTS in MOW HTOs was observed. The findings support the common thesis that LCW osteotomies cause a slope reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion ostoeotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-Donjoy Award 2004. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(9):575–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Black MS, d’Entremont AG, McCormack RG, Hansen G, Carr D, Wilson DR (2018) The effect of wedge an tibial slope angles on knee contact pressure and kinematics following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Biomech 51:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(3):195–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(9):1227–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ducat A, Sariali E, Lebel B, Mertl P, Hernigou P, Flecher X, Zayni R, Bonnin M, Jalil R, Amzallag J, Rosset P, Servien E, Gaudot F, Judet T, Catonné Y (2012) Posterior tibial slope changes after opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(1):68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Azab H, Halawa A, Anetzberger H, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2008) The effect of closed- and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:1193–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferner F, Lutter C, Dickschas J, Strecker W (2018) Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy-indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4155-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galla M, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Die öffnende valgisierende umstellungsosteotomie der proximalen tibia mit dem tomofix-plattenfixateur. Oper Orthop Traumatol 16:397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing the tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohmann E, Bryant A, Imhoff AB (2005) The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study. Knee Surg Sport Traumtol Arthrosc 14:454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaper Bp, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald SJ (2001) Patellar infera after high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplast 16:168–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LaPrade RF, Oro FP, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP (2010) Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:160–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Ikenoue T, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (1999) Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg 12(3):165–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nha K-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Lee D-H (2016) Change in posterior tibial slope after open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy-a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44(11):3006–3013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Ogawa T, Takeuchi K, Akiyama H (2016) Effect of wedge insertion angle on posterior tibial slope in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med 4(2):2325967116630748. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116630748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Portner O (2014) High tibial valgus osteotomy: closing, opening or combined? Patellar height as a determining factor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3432–3440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith TO, Sexton D, Mitchel P, Hing CB (2011) Opening- or closing-wedged high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee 18:361–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strecker W, Muller M, Urschel C (2014) High tibial closed wedge valgus osteotomy. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26:196–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turgut A, Kayali C, Agus H (2012) Radiological analysis of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 23(2):82–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum am Bruderwald Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bugerstraße 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany

    Ilona Schubert, Felix Ferner & Jörg Dickschas

  2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Jörg Dickschas

Authors
  1. Ilona Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felix Ferner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jörg Dickschas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilona Schubert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schubert, I., Ferner, F. & Dickschas, J. The effect of open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies on the tibial posterior slope—a study of two hundred seventy-nine cases. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1077–1082 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04499-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04499-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation