Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Resistance Training Movement Pattern and Velocity on Isometric Muscular Rate of Force Development: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Muscular rate of force development (RFD) is positively influenced by resistance training. However, the effects of movement patterns and velocities of training exercises are unknown.

Objectives

To determine the effects of velocity, the intent for fast force production, and movement pattern of training exercises on the improvement in isometric RFD from chronic resistance training.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to 18 September, 2018. Meta-regression and meta-analytic methods were used to compute standardized mean differences (SMD ± 95% confidence intervals) to examine effects of movement pattern similarity (between training and test exercises; specific vs. non-specific) and movement speed (fast vs. slow vs. slow with intent for fast force production) for RFD calculated within different time intervals.

Results

The search yielded 1443 articles, of which 54 met the inclusion criteria (59 intervention groups). Resistance training increased RFD measured to both early (e.g., 50 ms; standardized mean difference [95% CI] 0.58 [0.40, 0.75]) and later (e.g., 200 ms; 0.39 [0.25, 0.52]) times from contraction onset, as well as maximum RFD (RFDmax; 0.35 [0.21, 0.48]). However, sufficient data for sub-analyses were only available for RFDmax. Significant increases relative to control groups were observed after training with high-speed (0.54 [0.05, 1.03]), slow-speed with intent for fast force production (0.41 [0.20, 0.63), and movement pattern-specific (0.38 [0.17, 0.59]) exercises only. No clear effect was observed for slow-speed without intent for fast force production (0.21 [0.00, 0.42], p = 0.05) or non-movement-specific (0.27 [− 0.32, 0.85], p = 0.37) exercises. Meta-regression did not reveal a significant difference between sexes (p = 0.09); however, a negative trend was found in women (− 0.57 [− 1.51, 0.37], p = 0.23), while a favorable effect was found in men (0.40 [0.22, 0.58], p < 0.001). Study duration did not statistically influence the meta-analytic results, although the greatest RFD increases tended to occur within the first weeks of the commencement of training.

Conclusions

Resistance training can evoke significant increases in RFD. For maximum (peak) RFD, the use of faster movement speeds, the intention to produce rapid force irrespective of actual movement speed, and similarity between training and testing movement patterns evoke the greatest improvements. In contrast to expectation, current evidence indicates a between-sex difference in response to training; however, a lack of data in women prevents robust analysis, and this should be a target of future research. Of interest from a training program design perspective was that RFD improvements were greatest within the first weeks of training, with less ongoing improvement (or a reduction in RFD) with longer training, particularly when training velocity was slow or there was a lack of intent for fast force production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Ruiter C, Leeuwen D, Heijblom A, Bobbert M, Haan A. Fast unilateral isometric knee extension torque development and bilateral jump height. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(10):1843–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tillin N, Pain MTG, Folland J. Explosive force production during isometric squats correlates with athletic performance in rugby union players. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(1):66–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pijnappels M, Bobbert MF, van Dieën JH. Control of support limb muscles in recovery after tripping in young and older subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2005;160(3):326–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arampatzis A, Degens H, Baltzopoulos V, Rittweger J. Why do older sprinters reach the finish line later? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2011;39(1):18–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Behan F, Pain M, Folland J. Explosive voluntary torque is related to whole-body response to unexpected perturbations. J Biomech. 2018;81:86–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zebis MK, Andersen LL, Ellingsgaard H, Aagaard P. Rapid hamstring/quadriceps force capacity in male vs. female elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(7):1989–93.

  7. Angelozzi M, Madama M, Corsica C, Calvisi V, Properzi G, McCaw ST, et al. Rate of force development as an adjunctive outcome measure for return-to-sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(9):772–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan MJ, Aagaard P, Herzog W. Rapid hamstrings/quadriceps strength in ACL-reconstructed elite alpine ski racers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(1):109–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL III, Prior BM. Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81(5):2173–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gapeyeva H, Buht N, Peterson K, Ereline J, Haviko T, Pääsuke M. Quadriceps femoris muscle voluntary isometric force production and relaxation characteristics before and 6 months after unilateral total knee arthroplasty in women. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(2):202–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maffiuletti NA, Bizzini M, Widler K, Munzinger U. Asymmetry in quadriceps rate of force development as a functional outcome measure in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):191–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirkov DM, Knezevic OM, Maffiuletti NA, Kadija M, Nedeljkovic A, Jaric S. Contralateral limb deficit after ACL-reconstruction: an analysis of early and late phase of rate of force development. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;35(5):435–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suetta C, Aagaard P, Rosted A, Jakobsen AK, Duus B, Kjaer M, et al. Training-induced changes in muscle CSA, muscle strength, EMG, and rate of force development in elderly subjects after long-term unilateral disuse. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(5):1954–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgess KE, Connick MJ, Graham-Smith P, Pearson SJ. Plyometric vs. isometric training influences on tendon properties and muscle output. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):986.

  15. Matavulj D, Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, Tihanyi J, Jaric S. Effects of plyometric training on jumping performance in junior basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001;41(2):159–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson PS, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased contractile rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:1318–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersen LL, Andersen JL, Zebis MK, Aagaard P. Early and late rate of force development: differential adaptive responses to resistance training? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(1):162–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(1):359–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tillin NA, Folland JP. Maximal and explosive strength training elicit distinct neuromuscular adaptations, specific to the training stimulus. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(2):365–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maffiuletti NA, Aagaard P, Blazevich AJ, Folland J, Tillin NA, Duchateau J. Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(6):1091–116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kyröläinen H, Avela J, McBride JM, Koskinen S, Andersen JL, Sipilä S, et al. Effects of power training on muscle structure and neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005;15(1):58–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blazevich AJ, Horne S, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Aagaard P. Effect of contraction mode of slow-speed resistance training on the maximum rate of force development in the human quadriceps. Muscle Nerve. 2008;38(3):1133-046.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall PW, McEwen M, Robbins DW. Strength and neuromuscular adaptation following one, four, and eight sets of high intensity resistance exercise in trained males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(12):3007–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Häkkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV. Changes in isometric force-and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detraining. Acta Physiol Scand. 1985;125(4):573–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seger JY, Arvidsson B, Thorstensson A, Seger JY. Specific effects of eccentric and concentric training on muscle strength and morphology in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;79(1):49–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasch PJ, Morehouse LE. Effect of static and dynamic exercises on muscular strength and hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol. 1957;11(1):29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thepaut-Mathieu C, Van Hoecke J, Maton B. Myoelectrical and mechanical changes linked to length specificity during isometric training. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64(4):1500–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Horne S. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103(5):1565–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cadore E, González-Izal M, Pallarés J, Rodriguez-Falces J, Häkkinen K, Kraemer WJ, et al. Muscle conduction velocity, strength, neural activity, and morphological changes after eccentric and concentric training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(5):343–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van Hooren B, Bosch F, Meijer K. Can resistance training enhance the rapid force development in unloaded dynamic isoinertial multi-joint movements? A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(8):2324–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Branislav R, Milivoj D, Abella CP, Deval VC, Siniša K. Effects of combined and classic training on different isometric rate of force development parameters of leg extensors in female volleyball players: discriminative analysis approach. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(10):840.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. de Oliveira FB, Rizatto GF, Denadai BS. Are early and late rate of force development differently influenced by fast-velocity resistance training? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013;33(4):282–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bazyler CD, Beckham GK, Sato K. The use of the isometric squat as a measure of strength and explosiveness. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(5):1386–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Holtermann A, Roeleveld K, Vereijken B, Ettema G. The effect of rate of force development on maximal force production: acute and training-related aspects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;99(6):605–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lamont HS, Cramer JT, Bemben DA, Shehab RL, Anderson MA, Bemben MG. Effects of a 6-week periodized squat training program with or without whole-body vibration on jump height and power output following acute vibration exposure. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(8):2317–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Driggers AR, Sato K. The effects of vertically oriented resistance training on golf drive performance in collegiate golfers. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2018;13(4):598–606.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Behrens M, Mau-Moeller A, Bruhn S. Effect of plyometric training on neural and mechanical properties of the knee extensor muscles. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(02):101–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994;68(4):350–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ema R, Saito I, Akagi R. Neuromuscular adaptations induced by adjacent joint training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(3):947–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Farup J, Sørensen H, Kjølhede T. Similar changes in muscle fiber phenotype with differentiated consequences for rate of force development: endurance versus resistance training. Hum Movement Sci. 2014;34:109–19.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Geertsen SS, Lundbye-Jensen J, Nielsen JB. Increased central facilitation of antagonist reciprocal inhibition at the onset of dorsiflexion following explosive strength training. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(3):915–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gruber M, Gruber SB, Taube W, Schubert M, Beck SC, Gollhofer A. Differential effects of ballistic versus sensorimotor training on rate of force development and neural activation in humans. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):274–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jenkins N, Housh TJ, Buckner S, Bergstrom H, Smith C, Cochrane KC, et al. Four weeks of high-versus low-load resistance training to failure on the rate of torque development, electromechanical delay, and contractile twitch properties. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016;16(2):135–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Laroche DP, Roy SJ, Knight CA, Dickie JL. Elderly women have blunted response to resistance training despite reduced antagonist coactivation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(9):1660–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Peltonen H, Walker S, Lahitie A, Hakkinen K, Avela J. Isometric parameters in the monitoring of maximal strength, power, and hypertrophic resistance-training. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43(2):145–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zaras ND, Stasinaki A-nE, Krase AA, Methenitis SK, Karampatsos GP, Georgiadis GV, et al. Effects of tapering with light vs. heavy loads on track and field throwing performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3484–95.

  47. Vila-Chã C, Falla D, Farina D. Motor unit behavior during submaximal contractions following six weeks of either endurance or strength training. J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(5):1455–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Winchester JB, McBride JM, Maher MA, Mikat RP, Allen BK, Kline DE, et al. Eight weeks of ballistic exercise improves power independently of changes in strength and muscle fiber type expression. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(6):1728–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vangsgaard S, Taylor JL, Hansen EA, Madeleine P. Changes in H reflex and neuromechanical properties of the trapezius muscle after 5 weeks of eccentric training: a randomized controlled trial. J Appl Physiol. 2014;116(12):1623–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Oliveira AS, Corvino RB, Caputo F, Aagaard P, Denadai BS. Effects of fast-velocity eccentric resistance training on early and late rate of force development. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(2):199–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Manolopoulos K, Gissis I, Galazoulas C, Manolopoulos E, Patikas D, Gollhofer A, et al. Effect of combined sensorimotor-resistance training on strength, balance, and jumping performance of soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):53–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tsitkanou S, Spengos K, Stasinaki AN, Zaras N, Bogdanis G, Papadimas G, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval cycling performed after resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(11):1317–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol. 1998;513(1):295–305.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Moher D, Altman DG, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. PRISMA statement. Epidemiology. 2011;22(1):128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Del Vecchio A, Negro F, Holobar A, Casolo A, Folland JP, Felici F, et al. You are as fast as your motor neurons: speed of recruitment and maximal discharge of motor neurons determine the maximal rate of force development in humans. J Physiol. 2019;597(9):2445–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  59. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Alegre LM, Jiménez F, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Martín-Acero R, Aguado X. Effects of dynamic resistance training on fascicle lengthand isometric strength. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(05):501–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Barak Y, Ayalon M, Dvir Z. Transferability of strength gains from limited to full range of motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(8):1413–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Haff GG, Jackson JR, Kawamori N, Carlock JM, Hartman MJ, Kilgore JL, et al. Force-time curve characteristics and hormonal alterations during an eleven-week training period in elite women weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(2):433–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hartmann H, Bob A, Wirth K, Schmidtbleicher D. Effects of different periodization models on rate of force development and power ability of the upper extremity. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(7):1921–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hartmann H, Wirth K, Klusemann M, Dalic J, Matuschek C, Schmidtbleicher D. Influence of squatting depth on jumping performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3243–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Ito M, Fukunaga T. Effects of isometric training on the elasticity of human tendon structures in vivo. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91(1):26–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lamas L, Ugrinowitsch C, Rodacki A, Pereira G, Mattos EC, Kohn AF, et al. Effects of strength and power training on neuromuscular adaptations and jumping movement pattern and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3335–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Laird RH, Elmer DJ, Barberio MD, Salom LP, Lee KA, Pascoe DD. Evaluation of Performance Improvements After Either Resistance Training or Sprint Interval-Based Concurrent Training. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):3057–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mangine GT, Hoffman JR, Wang R, Gonzalez AM, Townsend JR, Wells AJ, et al. Resistance training intensity and volume affect changes in rate of force development in resistance-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(11–12):2367–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mikkola J, Rusko H, Izquierdo M, Gorostiaga E, Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training in untrained men. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(09):702–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Oliveira FB, Oliveira AS, Rizatto GF, Denadai BS. Resistance training for explosive and maximal strength: effects on early and late rate of force development. J Sports Sci. 2013;12(3):402.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Peltonen H, Walker S, Hackney AC, Avela J, Hakkinen K. Increased rate of force development during periodized maximum strength and power training is highly individual. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(5):1033–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rebutini VZ, Pereira G, Bohrer RC, Ugrinowitsch C, Rodacki AL. Plyometric long jump training with progressive loading improves kinetic and kinematic swimming start parameters. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(9):2392–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruas CV, Brown LE, Lima CD, Costa PB, Pinto RS. Effect of three different muscle action training protocols on knee strength ratios and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(8):2154–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Stone MH, Sanborn K, O’Bryant HS, Hartman M, Stone ME, Proulx C, et al. Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(4):739–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Thompson BJ, Stock MS, Shields JE, Luera MJ, Munayer IK, Mota JA, et al. Barbell deadlift training increases the rate of torque development and vertical jump performance in novices. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(1):1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wirth K, Keiner M, Szilvas E, Hartmann H, Sander A. Effects of eccentric strength training on different maximal strength and speed-strength parameters of the lower extremity. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(7):1837–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wirth K, Keiner M, Hartmann H, Sander A, Mickel C. Effect of 8 weeks of free-weight and machine-based strength training on strength and power performance. J Hum Kinet. 2016;53(1):201–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Mueller SM, Aguayo D, Zuercher M, Fleischmann O, Boutellier U, Auer M, et al. High-intensity interval training with vibration as rest intervals attenuates fiber atrophy and prevents decreases in anaerobic performance. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0116764.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Nie W, Zou L. Effects of pneumatic variable resistance strength training in less active men. M&D Forum. 2010;225–7.

  80. Balshaw TG, Massey GJ, Maden-Wilkinson TM, Tillin NA, Folland JP. Training-specific functional, neural, and hypertrophic adaptations to explosive-vs. sustained-contraction strength training. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(11):1364–73.

  81. Carroll KM, Bernards JR, Bazyler CD, Taber CB, Stuart CA, DeWeese BH, et al. Divergent performance outcomes following resistance training using repetition maximums or relative intensity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;2018:1–28.

  82. Doeringer JR, Johnson S, Norcorss MF, Hoffman MA. Plyometric exercises from a knee anterior cruciate ligament prevention program on the rate of isometric torque development and vertical jump height. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2018;16:1.

  83. Mosti MP, Carlsen T, Aas E, Hoff J, Stunes AK, Syversen U. Maximal strength training improves bone mineral density and neuromuscular performance in young adult women. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(10):2935–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Terzis G, Spengos K, Methenitis S, Aagaard P, Karandreas N, Bogdanis G. Early phase interference between low-intensity running and power training in moderately trained females. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(5):1063–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Vanderka M, Longová K, Olasz D, Krčmár M, Walker S. Improved maximum strength, vertical jump and sprint performance after 8 weeks of jump squat training with individualized loads. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;2016:15.

  86. Zaras ND, Stasinaki A-NE, Methenitis SK, Krase AA, Karampatsos GP, Georgiadis GV, et al. Rate of force development, muscle architecture, and performance in young competitive track and field throwers. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):81–92.

  87. Bogdanis GC, Tsoukos A, Methenitis SK, Selima E, Veligekas P, Terzis G. Effects of low volume isometric leg press complex training at two knee angles on force-angle relationship and rate of force development. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019;19(3):345–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gordon JP, Thompson BJ, Crane JS, Bressel E, Wagner DR. Effects of isokinetic eccentric versus traditional lower body resistance training on muscle function: examining a multiple-joint short-term training model. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;44(2):118–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hornsby WG, Gentles JA, MacDonald CJ, Mizuguchi S, Ramsey MW, Stone MH. Maximum strength, rate of force development, jump height, and peak power alterations in weightlifters across five months of training. Sports (Basel, Switzerl). 2017;5:4.

  90. Levernier G, Laffaye G. Four Weeks of finger grip training increases the rate of force development and the maximal force in elite and world-top ranking climbers. J Strength Cond Res. 2017.

  91. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1419–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Young WB, Bilby GE. The effect of voluntary effort to influence speed of contraction on strength, muscular power, and hypertrophy development. J Strength Cond Res. 1993;7(3):172–8.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Holviala JH, Häkkinen A, Alen M, Sallinen J, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Effects of prolonged and maintenance strength training on force production, walking, and balance in aging women and men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(1):224–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Gentil P, Arruda A, Souza D, Giessing J, Paoli A, Fisher J, et al. Is there any practical application of meta-analytical results in strength training? Front Physiol. 2017;8:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Field A. Dread returns to mega-silly one. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):15–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. De Ruiter C, Kooistra R, Paalman M, De Haan A. Initial phase of maximal voluntary and electrically stimulated knee extension torque development at different knee angles. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(5):1693–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Duchateau J, Baudry S. Maximal discharge rate of motor units determines the maximal rate of force development during ballistic contractions in human. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Adaptations in athletic performance after ballistic power versus strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(8):1582–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Blazevich A. Are training velocity and movement pattern important determinants of muscular rate of force development enhancement? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(10):3689–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ogasawara R, Yasuda T, Ishii N, Abe T. Comparison of muscle hypertrophy following 6-month of continuous and periodic strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(4):975–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard J-M, Cronin JB. Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):267–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN, Ball SD. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):456–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors contributed substantially to the conception and design of the review and meta-analysis; CW and JA were responsible for screening and data extraction, with disagreements resolved by AB; all authors contributed to interpretation of the data; AB drafted the article; all authors provided critical revisions, contributed to the intellectual content of the article, and approved the final version. We thank the reviewers of the paper for their excellent feedback, which improved the quality of the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Blazevich.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Anthony Blazevich, Cody Wilson, Pedro Alcaraz, and Jacobo Rubio-Arias declare no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Patient consent

None required.

Data availability statement

Data are available as supplementary files, as indicated within the manuscript text.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blazevich, A.J., Wilson, C.J., Alcaraz, P.E. et al. Effects of Resistance Training Movement Pattern and Velocity on Isometric Muscular Rate of Force Development: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Sports Med 50, 943–963 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01239-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01239-x

Navigation