Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Sequences of the 2017 Mainling Mw 6.5 Earthquake: Imaging the Seismogenic Fault by Aftershock Analysis

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the southeastern part of Tibet, an earthquake with a local magnitude of 6.9 occurred in the prefecture of Mainling on 18 November 2017. The mainshock and more than 900 aftershocks were recorded by a local seismic network comprising seven three-component seismic stations. In this study, both HypoDD location of aftershocks and focal mechanism inversion of moderate events were performed in order to accurately identify the pattern of active faults. The result reveals that the mainshock has a thrust source mechanism located at a depth of 14 km beneath the NE flank of the Namcha Barwa–Gyala Peri (NB-GP) massif. The aftershock sequences are caused mainly by two determined faults, one of which is the seismogenic fault stretching with a SE–NW trend parallel to the GP ridge and with a high NE-oriented dipping angle, and the other is activated by the mainshock and displays features of a SSE-NNW trend and SW-dipping, inferring the adjustment of stress in the focal area. The source parameters of the mainshock and the selected aftershocks show the reverse property of the seismogenic fault and its adjunct fault, thus inferring the backlash and uplift of the NB-GP massif, especially GP, for adjusting the uneven extrusion from the eastern Himalayan syntaxis to the adjacent Lhasa block. Furthermore, it is deduced that the rupture energy of the mainshock and aftershocks was limited by the surrounding rigid rock mass with high seismic velocity, such as the Lhasa block in the north and east, and Namcha Barwa complex in the south, and other aftershocks appearing at the NW top of GP and the SE side of Yarlung Tsangpo Big Bend reflect the strong squeezing effect of the NB-GP massif to its northeastern geological mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, L., Li, G., Khan, N. G., Zhao, J., & Ding, L. (2017). Focal depths and mechanisms of shallow earthquakes in the Himalayan–Tibetan region. Gondwana Research,41, 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., Zeitler, P. K., Kidd, W. S. F., Wooden, J., Liu, Y., Idleman, B., et al. (2004). U-Pb zircon constraints on the tectonic evolution of southeastern Tibet, Namche Barwa Area. American Journal of Science,304, 889–929. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.10.889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burg, J. P., Davy, P., Nievergelt, P., Oberli, F., Seward, D., Diao, Z., et al. (1997). Exhumation during crustal folding in the Namche-Barwa syntaxis. Terra Nova,9, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.1997.tb00001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. J., Wang, C. Y., & Ding, Z. F. (2015). Upper mantle anisotropy of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and surrounding regions from shear wave splitting analysis. Science China Earth Sciences,45, 577–588. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Bai, L., & Ding, L. (2017). Crustal structure of Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis revealed by receiver function method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,60, 2969–2979. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Q. D. (2007). Map of active tectonic in China. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, W. L., & Koyanagi, R. Y. (1977). Three-dimensional crust and mantle structure of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Journal of Geophysical Research,82, 5379–5394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. Q., & Yao, H. J. (2018). Crustal velocity structure around the eastern Himalayan syntaxis: Implications for the nucleation mechanism of the 2017 Ms 6.9 Mainling earthquake and regional tectonics. Tectonophysics,744, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, M., Peng, M., & Wang, Y. X. (2012). Geophysical evidence for deep subduction of Indian lithospheric plate beneath Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. Acta Petrologica Sinica,28, 1755–1764. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissling, E., Ellsworth, W. L., Eberhart-Phillips, D., & Kradolfer, U. (1994). Initial reference models in local earthquake tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,99, 19635–19646. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB03138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy M. (2004) Rapid erosion at the Tsangpo knickpoint and exhumation of southeastern Tibet, M.S. thesis, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Lehigh University, 84 p.

  • Peng, C., Yang, J., Wang, W., Zheng, Y., Jiang, X., Han, J., et al. (2018). The Namche Barwa Temporary Seismic Network (NBTSN) and its application in monitoring the 18 November 2017 M 6.9 Mainling, Tibet, China Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters,89(5), 1730–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao C.R. (2009). Seismicity of the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon Region, China. Master Dissertation. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.

  • Sol, S., Meltzer, A., & Bürgmann, R. (2007). Geodynamics of the southeastern Tibetan Plateau from seismic anisotropy and geodesy. Geology,35, 563–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldhauser F. (2001). HypoDD—A program to compute double-difference hypocenter locations (hypoDD version 1.0-03/2001). US Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 01,113.

  • Waldhauser, F., & Ellsworth, W. L. (2000). A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,90, 1353–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, W., Xie, C., Zhou, B. G., Guo, Z., Yin, X. Z., Li, B. H., et al. (2018). Location of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of the M6.9 Mainling earthquake, Tibet. Chin Sci Bull,63(15), 1493–1501. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B. F. (2017). Determination of the focal mechanism of Milin M 6.9 earthquake on Nov.18, 2017 in Tibet. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 38(6), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. Q., & Huang, W. H. (2010). Digital seismic network data processing system software JOPENS architecture design and implementation. Seismology and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,31(6), 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. Q., Huang, W. H., & Su, Z. J. (2013). Real-time data transmission and service of Chinese seismic network. South China Journal of Seismology,33(3), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Zhao, J., & Pei, S. (2013). Distinct lateral contrast of the crustal and upper mantle structure beneath northeast Tibetan plateau from receiver function analysis. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,217, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., Herman, F., Fellin, M. G., & Maden, C. (2018). Exhumation and topographic evolution of the Namche Barwa Syntaxis, eastern Himalaya. Tectonophysics,722, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, H., Van Der Hilst, R., & Montagner, J. (2010). Heterogeneity and anisotropy of the lithosphere of SE Tibet from surface wave array tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X. Z., Zhou, B. G., Chen, J. H., Wei, W., Xie, C., & Guo, Z. (2018). Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of early aftershocks following the M6.9 Mainling earthquake in Tibet, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,61(6), 2322–2331. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2018l0783. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitler, P.K., Malloy, M. A., Kutney, M.P., Idleman, B.D., Liu, Y., Kidd, W.S., Booth, A.L. (2006). Geochronological evidence for the tectonic and topographic evolution of SE Tibet. Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union) 87: Abstract T23B–0480.

  • Zeitler, P. K., Meltzer, A. S., Brown, L., Kidd, W. S., Lim, C., & Enkelmann, E. (2014). Tectonics and topographic evolution of Namche Barwa and the easternmost Lhasa block, Tibet. Toward an Improved Understanding of Uplift Mechanisms and the Elevation History of the Tibetan Plateau. Geological Society of America Special Paper,507, 23–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Du, G., Liu, J., Yang, Z., Zou, L., & Wu, X. (2018). An M6.9 earthquake at Mainling, Tibet on Nov.18, 2017. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2(1), 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L. P., & Ben-Zion, Y. (2013). Parametrization of general seismic potency and moment tensors for source inversion of seismic waveform data. Geophysical Journal,194, 839–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L. P., & Rivera, L. A. A. (2002). Note on the dynamic and static displacement from a point source in multilayered media. Geophysics,148, 619–627.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2018YFC1504001) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. 418740750). We acknowledge the contributions by Xue-Cheng Wang and Xiao-Long Wang in deploying the seismographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiping Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Yang, J. & Wang, Y. Seismic Sequences of the 2017 Mainling Mw 6.5 Earthquake: Imaging the Seismogenic Fault by Aftershock Analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3161–3174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02422-2

Keywords

Navigation