Abstract
Some geophysical or geodynamic applications require the use of true vertical gradient of gravity (VGG). This demand may be associated with reductions of or corrections to observed gravity or its spatiotemporal changes. In the absence of in situ measured VGG values, the constant value of the theoretical (normal) free air gradient (FAG) is commonly used. We propose an alternative to this practice which may significantly reduce systematic errors associated with the use of constant FAG. The true VGG appears to be better approximated, in areas with prominent and rugged topography, such as alpine or some volcanic regions, by a value based on the modelled contribution of the topographic masses to the gradient. Such prediction can be carried out with a digital elevation model (DEM) of sufficient resolution and accuracy. Here we present the VGG field computed for Mt. Etna (Italy), one of the most active and best monitored volcanoes worldwide, to illustrate how strongly the VGG deviates spatially from constant FAG. The predicted (modelled) VGG field is verified by in situ observations. We also take a look at the sensitivity of the VGG prediction to the resolution and quality of used DEMs. We conclude with discussing the applicability of the topo-predicted VGG field in near surface structural and volcanological micro-gravimetric studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baniamerian, J., Liu, S., & Abbas, M. A. (2018). Stable computation of the vertical gradient of potential field data based on incorporating the smoothing filters. Pure and Applied Geophysics,175, 2785–2806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1857-2.
Battaglia, M., Gottsmann, J., Carbone, D., & Fernández, J. (2008). 4D volcano gravimetry. Geophysics,73(6), WA3–WA18. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2977792.
Battaglia, M., Segall, P., & Roberts, C. (2003). The mechanics of unrest at Long Valley caldera, California: 2. Constraining the nature of the source using geodetic and micro-gravity data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,127, 219–245.
Battaglia, M., Troise, C., Obrizzo, F., Pingue, F., & DeNatale, G. (2006). Evidence for fluid migration as the source of deformation at Campi Flegrei caldera Italy. Geophysical Reseach Letters,33, L01307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024904.
Berrino, G. (1994). Gravity changes induced by height-mass variations at the Campi Flegrei caldera. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,61, 293–309.
Bisson, M., Spinetti, C., Neri, M., & Bonforte, A. (2016). Mt. Etna volcano high-resolution topography: airborne LiDAR modelling validated by GPS data. International Journal of Digital Earth. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2015.
Bonaccorso, A., Bonforte, A., Currenti, G., DelNegro, C., DiStefano, A., & Greco, F. (2011). Magma storage, eruptive activity and flank instability: Inferences from ground deformation and gravity changes during the 1993–2000 recharging of Mt. Etna volcano. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,200, 245–254.
Bonafede, M., & Mazzanti, M. (1998). Modelling gravity variations consistent with ground deformation in the Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,81, 137–157.
Bonforte, A., Carbone, D., Greco, F., & Palano, M. (2007). Intrusive mechanism of the 2002 NE-rift eruption at Mt Etna (Italy) modelled using GPS and gravity data. Geophysical Journal International,169, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03249.x.
Bonforte, A., Fanizza, G., Greco, F., Matera, A., & Sulpizio, R. (2017). Long-term dynamics across a volcanic rift: 21 years of microgravity and GPS observations on the southern flank of Mt. Etna volcano. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.06.005.
Branca, S., Coltelli, M., Groppelli, G., & Lentini, F. (2011). Geological map of Etna volcano, 1:50,000 scale. Italian Journal of Geosciences (Bollettino della Societa Geologica Italiana),130(3), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.3301/ijg.2011.15.
Carbone, D., & Greco, F. (2007). Review of microgravity observations at Mt. Etna: A powerful tool to monitor and study active volcanoes. Pure and Applied Geophysics,164, 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0194-7.
Carbone, D., Poland, M. P., Diament, M., & Greco, F. (2017). The added value of time-variable microgravimetry to the understanding of how volcanoes work. Earth-Science Reviews,169, 146–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.014.
EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. (2016). EMODnet digital bathymetry (DTM). Retrieved June 2018, from http://doi.org/10.12770/c7b53704-999d-4721-b1a3-04ec60c87238.
Fregoso, E., Palafox, A., & Moreles, M. A. (2019). Initializing cross-gradients joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data with a Bayesian surrogate gravity model. Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02334-w.
Greco, F., Currenti, G., D’Agostino, G., Germak, A., Napoli, R., Pistorio, A., et al. (2012). Combining relative and absolute gravity measurements to enhance volcano monitoring. Bulletin of Volcanology,74, 1745–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0630-0.
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., & Guevara, E. (2008). Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90 m Database. Retrieved June 2018, from http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.
Jousset, P. (1996). Gravimétrie et microgravimétrie en volcanologie: méthodologie et application au volcan Merapi, Java, Indonésie. Ph.D. Univ. Paris VII—IPGP (p. 325).
Jousset, P., & Okada, H. (1999). Post-eruptive volcanic dome evolution as revealed by deformation and microgravity observations at Usu volcano (Hokkaido, Japan). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,89, 255–273.
Lin, W., & Zhdanov, M. S. (2019). The Gramian method of joint inversion of the gravity gradiometry and seismic data. Pure and Applied Geophysics,176, 1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-02088-x.
Pamukçu, O., Gönenç, T., Çırmık, A., et al. (2019). The geothermal potential of Büyük Menderes Graben obtained by combined 2.5-D normalized full gradient results. Pure and Applied Geophysics,176, 5003–5026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02227-y.
Pistorio, A., Greco, F., Currenti, G., Napoli, R., Sicali, A., DelNegro, C., et al. (2011). High-precision gravity measurements using absolute and relative gravimeters at Mount Etna (Sicily, Italy). Annales Geophysicae,54(5), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5348.
Potent v.4.11.06. (2010). User guide. Manuscript, Geophysical Software Solutions Pty. Ltd., Gungahlin, Australia.
Schiavone, D., & Loddo, M. (2007). 3-D density model of Mt. Etna Volcano (Southern Italy). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,164, 161–175.
Tarquini, S., Vinci, S., Favalli, M., Doumaz, F., Fornaciai, A., & Nannipieri, L. (2012). Release of a 10-m-resolution DEM for the Italian territory: Comparison with global-coverage DEMs and anaglyph-mode exploration via the web. Computers and Geosciences,38, 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.018.
Tu, X., & Zhdanov, M. S. (2019). Enhancement and sharpening the migration images of the gravity field and its gradients. Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02397-9.
Vajda, P., Zahorec, P., Bilčík, D., & Papčo, J. (2019). Deformation-induced topographic effects in interpretation of spatiotemporal gravity changes: Review of approaches and new insights. Surveys in Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09547-7.
Vajda, P., Zahorec, P., Papčo, J., & Kubová, A. (2015). Deformation induced topographic effects in inversion of temporal gravity changes: First look at Free Air and Bouguer terms. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy,45(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/congeo-2015-0018.
Zahorec, P., Marušiak, I., Mikuška, J., Pašteka, R., & Papčo, J. (2017). Numerical calculation of terrain correction within the Bouguer anomaly evaluation. In R. Pašteka, J. Mikuška, & B. Meurers (Eds.), Understanding the Bouguer anomaly: A gravimetry puzzle (pp. 79–92). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-812913-5.
Zahorec, P., Mikuška, J., Papčo, J., Marušiak, I., Karcol, R., & Pašteka, R. (2015). Towards the measurement of zero vertical gradient of gravity on the Earth’s surface. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica,59(4), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0837-6.
Zahorec, P., Papčo, J., Mikolaj, M., Pašteka, R., & Szalaiová, V. (2014). The role of near topography and building effects in vertical gravity gradients approximation. First Break,32(1), 65–71.
Zahorec, P., Papčo, J., Vajda, P., Greco, F., Cantarero, M., & Carbone, D. (2018). Refined prediction of vertical gradient of gravity at Etna volcano gravity network (Italy). Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy,48(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.2478/congeo-2018-0014.
Zahorec, P., Vajda, P., Papčo, J., Aparicio, S. S., & De Pablo, J. P. (2016). Prediction of vertical gradient of gravity and its significance for volcano monitoring: Example from Teide volcano. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy,46(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/congeo-2016-0013.
Zhao, D., Li, S., Bao, H., & Wang, Q. (2015). Accurate approximation of vertical gravity gradient within the earth’s external gravity field. In: Jin, S., & Barzaghi, R. (eds) IGFS 2014. IAG Symposia, Vol. 144. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_113.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract (Project) No. APVV-16-0482 (acronym LITHORES), and by the Scientific Grant Agency VEGA under projects Nos. 2/0006/19 and 2/0100/20. We thank Gerald Gabriel for a thorough review and suggested improvements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vajda, P., Zahorec, P., Papčo, J. et al. Topographically Predicted Vertical Gravity Gradient Field and Its Applicability in 3D and 4D Microgravimetry: Etna (Italy) Case Study. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3315–3333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02435-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02435-x