Skip to main content
Log in

On the Identification of Industrial Components in the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) from Microtremors

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In seismic hazard studies, the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) is nowadays routinely considered as a quick way to assess possible amplification effects. However, because of several issues that can affect the data, the HVSR cannot be considered as valid per se, and a careful data evaluation is necessary. In this study, a series of HVSR curves are evaluated in order to highlight industrial components that can significantly alter the natural HVSR. First, a controlled-source experiment is carried out in order to define the characteristics of spurious industrial signals. Data analysis shows that the coherence functions and the mildly smoothed amplitude spectra plotted with linear scales can help significantly in identifying industrial components that can be otherwise difficult to highlight. Coherence functions appear particularly interesting because of their ability to reveal the presence of industrial components independently of their amplitude. Field data from three sites are then analyzed on the basis of the evidence obtained through the controlled-source experiment. For the third site, data recorded on two different days are considered. While in the first data set no significant industrial component is present, in the second and third data sets, a series of remarkable industrial signals that severely alter the natural HVSR are identified. The assessment of the coherence functions and mildly smoothed amplitude spectra is therefore suggested as a valuable support to avoid pitfalls in the interpretation of the experimental HVSR. Finally, two quick and dirty procedures aimed at reducing the effect of industrial components are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M. Y., Berteussen, K. A., Small, J., & Barkat, B. (2010). A low-frequency passive seismic array experiment over an onshore oil field in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Geophysics, 78, B159–B176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai, H., & Tokimatsu, K. (2004). S-wave velocity profiling by inversion of microtremor H/V spectrum. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai, H., & Tokimatsu, K. (2005). S-Wave velocity profiling by joint inversion of microtremor dispersion curve and horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectrum. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95, 1766–1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asten, M. W. (1978). Geological control on the three-component spectra of Rayleigh-wave microseisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68, 1623–1636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asten, M. W., & Henstridge, J. D. (1984). Array estimators and the use of microseisms for reconnaissance of sedimentary basins. Geophysics, 49, 1828–1837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauduin, R., Lognonné, P., Montagner, J. P., Cacho, S., Karczewski, J. F., & Morand, M. (1996). The effects of the atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or How to improve the quality of a station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(6), 1760–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Davis, P., & Ekström, G. (2004). Ambient Earth noise: A survey of the global seismographic network. Journal Geophysical Research, 109, B11307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berteussen, K., Ali, M. Y., Small, J., & Barkat, B. (2008). A low frequency, passive seismic experiment over a carbonate reservoir in Abu Dhabi—Wavefront and particle motion study. In 70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Rome. Extended Abstract, B046.

  • Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cornou, C., Bard, P., Cotton, F., Moczo, P., Kristek, J., et al. (2006a). H/V ratio: A tool for site effects evaluation. Results from 1-D noise simulations. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., & Bard, P.-Y. (2006b). The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: A literature review. Earth-Science Reviews, 79, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Kohler, A., Cornou, C., Wathelet, M., & Bard, P.-Y. (2008). Effects of love waves on microtremor H/V ratio. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98, 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, P. (Ed.). (2012). New manual of seismological observatory practice (NMSOP-2). Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungszentrum GFZ; IASPEI. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braddner, H., & Dodds, I. G. (1964). Comparative seismic noise on the ocean bottom and on land. Journal Geophysical Research, 69(20), 4339–4348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, J. N., & Oliver, J. (1959). The seismic noise of the Earth´s surface. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 49, 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cessaro, R. K. (1994). Sources of primary and secondary microseisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-García, F. J., & Kang, T. S. (2014). Lateral heterogeneities and microtremors: Limitations of HVSR and SPAC based studies for site response. Engineering Geology, 174, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Moro, G. (2010). Insights on surface-wave dispersion curves and HVSR: Joint analysis via pareto optimality. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 72, 29–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Moro, G. (2011). Some aspects about surface wave and HVSR analyses: A short overview and a case study. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata, 52, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Moro, G. (2014). Surface wave analysis for near surface applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 9780128007709.

  • Dal Moro, G. (2015). Joint inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion and HVSR of lunar seismic data from the Apollo 14 and 16 sites. Icarus, 254, 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Moro, G. (2019). Effective active and passive seismics for the characterization of urban and remote areas: Four channels for seven objective functions. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176, 1445–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2043-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giulio, G., Improta, L., Calderoni, G., & Rovelli, A. (2008). A study of the seismic response of the city of Benevento (Southern Italy) through a combined analysis of seismological and geological data. Engineering Geology, 97, 146–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriu, P., Kalogeras, I., & Theodulidis, N. (1999). Evidence of nonlinear site response in horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio from near-field earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 18, 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eker, A. M., Koçkar, M. K., & Akgün, H. (2015). Evaluation of site effect within the tectonic basin in the northern side of Ankara. Engineering Geology, 192, 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fäh, D., Kind, F., & Giardini, D. (2001). A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophysical Journal International, 145, 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasan, M., Magrin, A., Amadio, C., Romanelli, F., Vaccari, F., & Panza, G. F. (2016). A seismological and engineering perspective on the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering, 1, 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, E. H., Hough, S. E., & Jacob, K. H. (1990). Using microtremors to assess potential earthquake site response: A case study in flushing meadows, New York City. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 80, 1456–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fix, J. E. (1972). Ambient Earth motion in the period range from 0.1 to 2560 sec. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 62, 1753–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, A., Klinge, K., & Krüger, F. (1998). Ocean-generated microseismic noise located with the Gräfenberg array. Journal of Seismology, 2, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyen, J. (1990). Diurnal and seasonal variations in the microseismic noise observed at the NORESS array. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 63, 252–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, P., & Archuleta, R. J. (1987). Array analysis of seismic signals. Geophysical Research Letters, 14, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez González, A., Rodríguez, J., Sagartzazu, X., Schumacher, A., & Isasa. I. (2010). Multiple coherence method in time domain for the analysis of the transmission paths of noise and vibrations with non-stationary signals. In Proceedings of the 2010 international conference of noise and vibration engineering, ISMA2010-USD2010 (pp. 3927–3941).

  • Groos, J. C., & Ritter, J. R. R. (2009). Time domain classification and quantification of seismic noise in an urban environment. Geophysical Journal International, 179, 1213–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P., & Kar, S. P. (2015). MUSIC and improved MUSIC algorithm to estimate direction of arrival. In Proceedings 2015 International conference of the communications and signal processing (ICCSP). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsp.2015.7322593.

  • Gutenberg, B. (1958). Microseismic. Advances in Geophysics, 5, 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghshenas, E., Bard, P. Y., Theodulidis, N., et al. (2008). Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6, 75–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann, K. A. (1963). A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms. Reviews of Geophysics, 1, 177–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haubrich, R. A., & McCamy, K. (1969). Microseisms coastal and pelagic sources. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 7, 539–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, L. G. (1998). Spectral structure in the Earth’s microseismic background between 20 and 40 seconds. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 744–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedar, S., & Webb, F. (2005). The ocean’s seismic hum. Science, 307, 682–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno, K., & Ohmachi, T. (1998). Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuet-Higgins, M. (1950). A theory of the origin of microseisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 243, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, N., & Sutton, G. H. (1975). Lunar shear velocity structure at Apollo sites 12, 14, and 15. Journal Geophysical Research, 80, 4932–4938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzorati, Z., & Bindi, D. (2006). Ambient noise levels in north central Italy. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsushima, S., Kosaka, H., & Kawase, H. (2017). Directionally dependent horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors at Onahama, Fukushima, Japan. Earth Planets Space, 69, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A., Lindholm, C., & Cirgis, M. (2015). Site characterization and site response study of the Sahary area, South Egypt. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 12, 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. J., & Savino, J. R. (1975). A comprehensive study of long period (20–200 s) Earth noise at the high gain worldwide seismograph stations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65, 1827–1862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, 30, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. (1996). Realtime information systems for seismic hazard mitigation. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, 37, 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. (2000). Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its applications. In Proceedings of the XII world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand. Paper no 2656.

  • Oliver, J., & Ewing, M. (1957). Microseisms in the 11- to 18-second period range. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 47, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. B. (2000). Site amplification in the Los Angeles basin from three-dimensional modeling of ground motion. Bull Seism Soc Am, 90, S77–S94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzera, F., D’Amico, S., Lupi, M., Mauri, G., Karyono, K., & Mazzini, A. (2018). Lusi hydrothermal structure inferred through ambient vibration measurements. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 90, 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzera, F., Halldorsson, B., & Vogfjörð, K. (2017a). Directional effects of tectonic fractures on ground motion site amplification from earthquake and ambient noise data: A case study in South Iceland. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 97, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzera, F., Lombardo, G., Sicali, S., & D’Amico, S. (2017b). Surface geology and morphologic effects on seismic site response: The study case of Lampedusa, Italy. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 98, 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, V., Gélis, C., Froment, B., Hollender, F., Bard, P.-Y., Cultrera, G., et al. (2018). Can broad-band earthquake site responses be predicted by the ambient noise spectral ratio? Insight from observations at two sedimentary basins. Geophysical Journal International, 215, 1442–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (1993). Observations and modeling of seismic background noise (pp. 93–322). Open File Report: US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2009). Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1143–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picozzi, M., & Albarello, D. (2007). Combining genetic and linearized algorithms for a two-step joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and H/V spectral ratio curves. Geophysical Journal International, 169, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, V. H. S., & Midorikawa, S. (2002). Applicability of the H/V spectral ratio of microtremors in assessing site effects on seismic motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong, M., Fu, L. Y., Wang, Z., Li, X., Carpenter, N. S., Woolery, E. W., et al. (2017). On the amplitude discrepancy of HVSR and site amplification from strong-motion observations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, 2873–2884. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, S., & Thomas, C. (2002). Array seismology: Methods and applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 40, 1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J., McCamy, K., & Hade, G. (1972). Structures in Earth noise beyond twenty seconds—a window for earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 62, 141–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1971). Influence of soil conditions on building damage potential during earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 97, 639–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • SESAME. (2004). Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations measurements. In Processing and interpretation open file. ftp://ftp.geo.uib.no/pub/seismo/SOFTWARE/SESAME/USER-GUIDELINES/SESAME-HV-User-Guidelines.pdf. Retrieved on January 2020.

  • Stutzmann, E., Ardhuin, F., Schimmel, M., Mangeney, A., & Patau, G. (2012). Modelling long-term seismic noise in various environments. Geophysical Journal International, 191, 707–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto, T. (1999). Excitation of normal modes by atmospheric turbulence: Source of long-period seismic noise. Geophysical Journal International, 136, 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto, T., Ishimaru, S., & Alvizuri, C. (2006). Seasonality in particle motion of microseisms. Geophysical Journal International, 166, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Baan, M. (2009). The origin of SH-wave resonance frequencies in sedimentary layers. Geophysical Journal International, 178, 1587–1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. C. (1998). Broadband seismology and noise under the ocean. Reviews of Geophysics, 36, 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. C. (2007). The Earth’s ‘hum’ is driven by ocean waves over the continental shelves. Nature, 445, 754–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, W. S. D., Webb, S. C., & Bjarnason, I Th. (1999). The effect of local wind on seismic noise near 1 Hz at the MELT site and on Iceland. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89, 1543–1557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, M. M., Aster, R. C., Young, C. J., & Chael, E. P. (1996). High-frequency analysis of seismic background noise as a function of wind speed and shallow depth. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86, 1507–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Ritzwoller, M. H. (2008). The characteristics of ambient seismic noise as a source for surface wave tomography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, Q02008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Ch J, Chael, E. P., Withers, M. W., & Aster, R. C. (1996). A comparison of the high- frequency (> 1 Hz) surface and subsurface noise environment at three sites in the United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86, 1516–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, W., & Wielandt, E. (2007). On the minimum of vertical seismic noise near 3 mHz. Geophysical Journal International, 168, 647–658.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, CZ) in the framework of the long-term conceptual development project RVO 67985891 (Institute grant for the “Extreme Seismics” project). The author is also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their several helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarlo Dal Moro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix: Two Simple Ways to Attenuate Industrial Components in the HVSR Curve

Appendix: Two Simple Ways to Attenuate Industrial Components in the HVSR Curve

In this section, the site #2 data are used to briefly illustrate two possible simple (quick and dirty) ways of handling HVSR curves altered by significant industrial components.

Since in such a data set the effect of the 1.5-Hz industrial component is particularly clear and distinguishable from the natural background microtremor field (see Figs. 9, 10 and 11), it is possible to try to compute the HVSR after having manually interpolated (picked) the mean amplitude spectra of the three (UD, NS and EW) components. Figure 21 summarizes the results obtained when following this approach. The upper plot (Fig. 21a) shows the original amplitude spectra (5% smoothing, thin lines) and the manually interpolated (picked) spectra obtained by simply ignoring the large 1.5-Hz spurious peaks (thick lines). In the lower plot (Fig. 21b), the HVSR curves from the original raw data (thin line) and from the picked amplitude spectra (thick line) are presented.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Site #2: reconstruction of the HVSR through the picking of the mean amplitude spectra: a mean amplitude spectra obtained by applying a 5% smoothing (thin lines) and picked while bypassing the 1.5-Hz industrial peaks (tick lines) [red: UD; green: NS; blue: EW]; b HVSR obtained by considering the original (5% smoothed) amplitude spectra (thin line) and by computing the H/V ratio from the picked amplitude spectra shown in the upper plot (thick line)

Because of the small (5%) smoothing, the HVSR peak obtained from the raw data (thin line in Fig. 21b) is larger than that obtained when using a 15% smoothing (as usually applied for the computation of the HVSR; compare Fig. 21b with Fig. 9b).

Since the 1.5-Hz signal is so well-defined (quasi-monochromatic signal), while the rest of the spectra are quite smooth, in order to smooth the 1.5-Hz spurious peak, we might also try a different (and quite brutal) approach: increasing the spectral smoothing to a very high level. Figure 22 shows the amplitude spectra and HVSR curve when adopting 90% spectral smoothing.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Site #2: a mean amplitude spectra for the UD, NS and EW components when applying 90% smoothing; b mean HVSR curve and standard deviations

For this kind of data (spectra), the two approaches provide similar (but not identical) results. In both cases, the H/V peak decreases from the original value of 12.5 (Fig. 9b) to about 4–4.5 (Figs. 21b, 22b).

Clearly, both of these approaches (and particularly the second) are quite crude and are presented just to show how large the peaks produced by industrial components can be and how to possibly handle them in case the latter are well-characterized with respect to the background natural microtremor field (it must be considered that a notch filter cannot be applied, because it would also remove the part of the signal which is related to the natural microtremor field).

Note that the two approaches are applied to the final mean curves (so in the frequency domain) and can be considered simply as quick and dirty techniques aimed at obtaining a gross estimate of the HVSR due to the natural microtremors only.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dal Moro, G. On the Identification of Industrial Components in the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) from Microtremors. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3831–3849 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02424-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02424-0

Keywords

Navigation