Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning Methods to Detect and Quantify Adulterants in Minced Meats

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of hyperspectral imaging (400–1000 nm) was proved as a nondestructive method to detect, classify, and quantify plant- and animal-based adulterants in minced beef and pork. Machine learning techniques were implemented to build classification and prediction models. Samples were first classified into adulterated (1 class) or pure (5 classes). The type of adulterant (6 classes) was then evaluated. Finally, the level of each adulterant was estimated using partial least squares regression. The optimal classification models based on selected wavelengths of test set yielded classification rates of 75–100% and 100% for pure and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the rates were 83–100% depending on adulterant type. Prediction models for adulterant level yielded correlation coefficient, r, and ratio of performance to prediction, RPD, of 0.69(1.41) for beef adulterated with pork and textured vegetable protein (TVP), and 0.93(2.82) for beef adulterated with TVP. Improvement in results may be achieved with larger sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alamprese C, Casale M, Sinelli N, Lanteri S, Casiraghi E (2013) Detection of minced beef adulteration with Turkey meat by UV–vis, NIR and MIR spectroscopy. LWT- Food Sci Technol 53(1):225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American Meat Science Association (AMSA) (2012) Meat color measurement guidelines: AMSA. American Meat Science Association

  • Boyacı IH, Temiz HT, Uysal RS, Velioğlu HM, Yadegari RJ, Rishkan MM (2014) A novel method for discrimination of beef and horsemeat using Raman spectroscopy. Food Chem 148:37–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysworth MK, Booksh KS (2001) Aspects of multivariate calibration applied to near-infrared spectroscopy. Pract Spec Series 27:209–240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer H, Schleicher S, Borowski U (1999) Determination of soya protein, pea protein and gluten in frankfurter-type sausages by means of an enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (ELISA). Fleischwirtschaft (German)

  • Criado M, Castro-Rubio F, García-Ruiz C, García MC, Marina ML (2005) Detection and quantitation of additions of soybean proteins in cured-meat products by perfusion reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Sep Sci 28(9–10):987–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Q, Cheng JH, Sun DW, Pu H, Zeng XA, Xiong Z (2015) Potential of visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for rapid detection of freshness in unfrozen and frozen prawns. J Food Eng 149:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong SD (1993) PLS fits closer than PCR. J Chemom 7(6):551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding HB, Xu RJ (2000) Near-infrared spectroscopic technique for detection of beef hamburger adulteration. J Agric Food Chem 48(6):2193–2198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2012) Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons

  • Ellis DI, Broadhurst D, Clarke SJ, Goodacre R (2005) Rapid identification of closely related muscle foods by vibrational spectroscopy and machine learning. Analyst 130(12):1648–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher T (2009) Support vector machines explained. Tutorial paper. University College London, London

  • Heinz G, Hautzinger P (2007) Meat processing technology for small to medium scale producers. FAO. Pp 3

  • Johnson R (2014) Food fraud and economically motivated adulteration of food and food ingredients. Congressional Research Service

  • Kamruzzaman M, ElMasry G, Sun DW, Allen P (2012) Prediction of some quality attributes of lamb meat using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging and multivariate analysis. Anal Chim Acta 714:57–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman M, Makino Y, Oshita S, Liu S (2015) Assessment of visible near-infrared hyperspectral imaging as a tool for detection of horsemeat adulteration in minced beef. Food Bioprocess Technol 8(5):1054–1062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry JP, Kerry JF, Ledward D (Eds.) (2002) Meat processing: improving quality. Elsevier

  • Kerth CR (2013) The science of meat quality. John Wiley & Sons

  • López MCG, Alegre, MLM (2009) Detection of adulterations: addition of foreign proteins. In Handbook of processed meats and poultry analysis (pp. 155). CRC Press Boca Raton

  • Mancini RA, Hunt MC (2005) Current research in meat color. Meat Sci 71(1):100–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mao KZ (2004) Orthogonal forward selection and backward elimination algorithms for feature subset selection. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 34(1):629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar SJ, Moss BW, Stevenson MH (1996) Some observations on the absorption spectra of various myoglobin derivatives found in meat. Meat Sci 42(3):277–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morsy N, Sun DW (2013) Robust linear and non-linear models of NIR spectroscopy for detection and quantification of adulterants in fresh and frozen-thawed minced beef. Meat Sci 93(2):292–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • North American Meat Institute (NAMI) (2015) The amazing meat & poultry supply: a snapshot. Available at: http://www.themarketworks.org/sites/default/files/uploads/The-Amazing-Meat-and-Poultry-Supply.pdf/ Accessed at: August 16, 2018

  • Pegau WS, Gray D, Zaneveld JRV (1997) Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: dependence on temperature and salinity. Appl Opt 36(24):6035–6046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Premanandh J (2013) Horse meat scandal: a wake-up call for regulatory authorities. Food Control 34(2):568–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PWC, SSAFE (2015) Food fraud vulnerability assessment. Available at: https://www.pwc.nl/en/industries/agrifood/ssafe-food-fraud-tool.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2018

  • Rady A, Adedeji A (2018) Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy. Meat Sci 136:59–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rady A, Ekramirad N, Adedeji AA, Li M, Alimardani R (2017) Hyperspectral imaging for detection of codling moth infestation in GoldRush apples. Postharvest Biol Technol 129:37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ropodi AI, Pavlidis DE, Mohareb FE, Panagou Z, Nychas GJ (2015) Multispectral image analysis approach to detect adulteration of beef and pork in raw meats. Food Res Int 67:12–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somol P, Novovicová, J, Pudil P (2010) Efficient feature subset selection and subset size optimization. In Pattern recognition recent advances. InTech

  • Spink J, Moyer DC (2011) Defining the public health threat of food fraud. J Food Sci 76:157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-ERS (2016) United State Department of Agriculture – Economic Research Service. Beef Industry, 2016. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/statistics-information.aspx/ Accessed 16 Aug 2018

  • USDA-ERS (2018) United State Department of Agriculture – Economic Research Service. Food and Beverage Manufacturing, 2018. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-markets-prices/processing-marketing/manufacturing.aspx /Accessed 16 Aug 2018

  • Varmuza K, Filzmoser P (2016) Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis in chemometrics. CRC Press

  • Warriss PD (2000) Post-mortem changes in muscle and its conversion into meat. Meat Science: An Introductory Text, 93–105

  • Wise BM, Gallagher N, Bro R, Shaver J, Windig W, Koch RS (2007) PLS Toolbox 4.0. Eigenvector Research Incorporated 3905

  • Xiong Z, Sun DW, Dai Q, Han Z, Zeng XA, Wang L (2015) Application of visible hyperspectral imaging for prediction of springiness of fresh chicken meat. Food Anal Methods 8(2):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zongker D, Jain A (1996) Algorithms for feature selection: an evaluation. In proceedings of 13th international conference on pattern recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 18-22). IEEE

Download references

Acknowledgments

The information reported in this paper (18-05-081) is a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and it is published with the approval of the Director.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch-Multistate project no. 1007893.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinbode A. Adedeji.

Ethics declarations

This study was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch-Multistate project (no. 1007893).

Conflict of Interest

Akinbode Adedeji declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ahmed Rady declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rady, A., Adedeji, A.A. Application of Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning Methods to Detect and Quantify Adulterants in Minced Meats. Food Anal. Methods 13, 970–981 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01719-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01719-1

Keywords

Navigation